跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(18.97.14.90) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/12/04 21:54
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:陳靜儀
研究生(外文):Ching-I Chen
論文名稱:手機室內導航應用於地下空間避難之最適化設計—以台北車站為例
論文名稱(外文):Designing Optimized Smartphone Indoor Navigation Applied to Emergency Evacuation in Underground Spaces – Taipei Main Station, as a Case Study
指導教授:鄭孟淙鄭孟淙引用關係
指導教授(外文):Meng-Cong Zheng
口試委員:陳立杰彭瑞玟
口試日期:2017-06-07
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺北科技大學
系所名稱:工業設計系創新設計碩士班(碩士在職專班)
學門:設計學門
學類:綜合設計學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2017
畢業學年度:105
語文別:中文
論文頁數:130
中文關鍵詞:資訊處理手機介面室內導航緊急避難尋路
外文關鍵詞:Information ProcessingInterface DesignSmartphone NavigationEmergency Evacuationwayfinding
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:571
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:147
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
隨著都市化發展,交通運輸都積極拓展地下空間,來舒緩地面交通的壅塞。而人口密集的都會區,也日益仰賴地下公共交通運輸的便捷性。而運輸站所延伸出的地下商店街,若沒有系統化的避難措施與導引計畫,在緊急災難發生時,將會造成重大傷亡,因此在地下密閉空間能夠快速移動與避難,是公共設計的重要課題。
而物聯網日新月異的科技中,目前已有許多新技術,能夠彌補GPS在室內或地下空間無法順利進行接收的問題。室內導航系統可為地下空間避難時,提供避難者所在位置的機動性導引。本研究目的為設計出,最適用於避難者心理與空間環境因素交互作用下的手機介面,以達到在避難路徑上移動的最佳效率。
With the continuous progression of urban development, people increasingly rely on the convenience of underground public transportation. Lacking an advanced systematic program of safety measures and evacuation guidance provisions within such areas, such as the Taipei subway and its extensive underground mall, inevitably will result in significant casualties in an emergency disaster situation. In disaster emergency situations, it is vital to guarantee swift movement and evacuation routes, and as such, this is an important issue for public design.
The Internet of Things technology developments is ever-changing that there are some new technologies which can make up the problem that the GPS signal cannot be received smooth. The indoor navigation system provides evacuation guidance for the location of the evacuees when evacuating underground space.
The purpose of this study is to optimize the mobile navigation interface design for emergency evacuation situations under special consideration of psychological pressure and provide for a most efficient route of escape. 
摘 要 i
ABSTRACT ii
誌 謝 iii
目 錄 iv
表目錄 vi
圖目錄 viii
第一章 緒論 1
1.1研究背景與動機 1
1.2研究目的 2
1.3研究流程與架構 3
第二章 文獻探討 5
2.1避難相關研究 5
2.1.1 地下空間與車站之災難類型 5
2.1.2 災難心理與避難行為 7
2.2尋路與導航相關研究 10
2.2.1 尋路行為與空間認知 11
2.2.2 導航設計相關研究 13
2.3手機介面互動設計 14
2.3.1 視覺心理與認知心理 15
2.3.2 介面視覺元素和資訊設計 18
2.4室內定位與導航技術 23
2.4.1 地磁定位與應用 24
2.4.2 無線技術定位與應用 24
2.5小結 26
第三章 研究方法與步驟 27
3.1研究理論 27
3.1.1 量化問卷調查 27
3.1.2 行為觀察法 27
3.1.3 行為註記法(Behavioral Mapping) 28
3.1.4 發話分析法(Think-Aloud) 28
3.1.5 半結構性訪談法 28
3.1.6 使用後評估(Post-occupancy evaluation) 29
3.2研究架構與實驗設計 30
3.2.1前導性研究 30
3.2.2網路問卷:相關經驗調查與分析 30
3.2.3市面上的手機導航介面分析 33
3.2.4台北車站實驗環境調查 43
3.3研究範圍與對象 46
3.3.1 研究範圍 46
3.3.2 研究對象 49
3.4實驗設計架構 50
3.5實驗流程 51
第四章 實驗一實驗分析與討論 53
4.1實驗一:不同導航介面訊息設計與受測者訊息處理 53
4.2實驗步驟 56
4.3實驗分析與整理 59
4.4結果與討論 70
第五章 實驗二實驗分析與討論 88
5.1實驗二:不同行動導航模式之使用績效實驗 88
5.1.1 實驗介面樣本設計 90
5.1.2 實驗步驟 96
5.1.3 實驗設備與執行重點 98
5.2實驗分析與整理 100
5.2.1 模擬避難完成時間 100
5.2.2 觀看手機的次數與地點 101
5.2.3 受測者持手機快走姿勢與平均速度 106
5.2.4 受測者實驗發話分析 107
5.2.5 介面注意力 108
5.2.6 受測者半結構式訪談結果 110
第六章 結論與建議 111
6.1研究結果與討論 111
6.2後續研究建議 113
參考文獻 114
附錄 120
A. 網路問卷內容 120
B. 無導航自行尋路受測者訪談問卷內容 123
C. 實驗一實驗後問卷 124
D. 實驗二實驗後訪談問卷 127
E. 實驗一記錄表 129
F. 實驗二記錄表 130
書籍
[1]Alan Cooper, “About Face” 3th Edition, Wiley, 2007
[2]Arthur, P. & Passini, R. “Wayfinding: People, sign, and architecture.” Mcgraw-Hill (Tx); 1St Edition edition, 1992
[3]Brunswik, Egon, “Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments (second ed.)”. University of California Press, 1956
[4]Deniel Kahneman, “Thinking, Fast and Slow”, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1st edition, 2013
[5]Gennady Andrienko, Natalia Andrienko, Peter Back, Daniel Keim, Stefan Wrobel, “Visual Anlytics of Movement”, Springer, 2013, p156
[6]Greg Sterling, “Magnetic Positioning: The Arrival of Indoor GPS”, Opus Research INC report, 2014
[7]Ivan Chermayeff, Chris Calori,”Signage And Wayfinding Design: A Complete Guide to Creating Environmental Graphic Design Systems”, John Wiley & Sons Inc, 2007.3
[8]Jacob Nielsen, “Usability Engineering”, Academic Press, 1993
[9]Jenifer Tidwell, “Patterns for Effective Interaction Design”, O’REILLY, 2011
[10]Jenny Preece, Helen Sharp, Yvonne Rogers, “Interaction design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction”, Wiley, 2015
[11]Kevin Lynch, “The image of the City” Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1960
[12]Paul A. Bell, “Environmental Psychology”, Harcourt College Publishers, 2001
[13]Stephen Wendel, “Designing for Behavior Change: Applying Psychology and Behavioral Economics”, O’Reilly Media, 2013
[14]Steven Hoober, “Designing Mobile Interfaces”, O’Reilly Media, 2011
[15]Shneiderman & Plaisant, 「人機介面設計-有效的人機介面互動策略」, 曾志軒譯, 台北市東華出版社,2005
[16]Susan Weinschenk, “100 Things Every Designer Needs to Know About People”, New Riders, 2011
[17]William Lidwell, Kristina holden, Kill Butler, “Universal Principles of Design Revised and Updated”, Rockport Publishers, 2003, p118-119
[18]日本建築学会, 「環境心理調查手法入門」, 技報堂出版, 2000, p123
[19]エコロジーモビリティ財團,「ひと目でわかるシンボルサイン「標準案內用圖記號ガイドブック」」,2001, p12
[20]何明錦,「都市空間大量人群避難行為基礎研究」,內政部建築研究所專題研究計畫報告書,1999,p23-24
[21]伊場圭司,「防災性からみた地下街とピル地下階の接続部に関する研究 : 都市計画 : 近畿支部」,建築年報,1990
[22]南博文,「環境心理学の新しいかたち」, 誠信書房 , 2006.3, p152-183
[23]福田忠彦,「人間工学ガイド―感性を科学する方法」,福田忠彦研究室,2004, p177, P249
[24]陳一平,「視覺心理學」第一版,雙葉書廊,2011
[25]薛月琴、曾瑞嫻,「捷運系統標誌設計與管理」,台北市政府捷運工程局北區工程處,2000
[26]葉謹睿,「互動設計概論」,藝術家出版社,2010,p163-165。
[27]簡賢文,「臺北車站特定區災害分析與即時聯合防災應變作業機制之研究」,大景科技防災顧問公司,2008
[28]張邦立,「大規模地下空間避難弱者之情境模擬篤避難疏散策略」,內政部建築研究所,2012
[29]蕭秀玲、莊慧秋、黃漢耀譯,「環境心理學」, 1993,p35-37。
[30]観光地域づくり案内標識研究会,観光地のためのひと目でわかる案内標識―計画・設置・管理マニュアル, 2005
期刊論文
[31]Andrienko, N., Andrienko, G., Voss, H., Bernardo, F., Hipolito, J., &Kretchmer, U.(2002). “Testing the usability of interactive maps in common GIS.” Cartography and geograpfic Information science, 29(4), p325-342
[32]Arning, K., & Ziefle, M.(2009). “Effects of age, cognitive, and personal factors on PDA menu navigation performance.” Behavior & Information Technology, p1-18
[33]Beaumont, P. B., Gary, J., Moore, G. T. and Robinson, B., “Orientation and wayfinding in the Tauranga department building: a focused post-occupancy evaluation”, Environmental Design Research Association Proceedings, 1984.
[34]Bosco, Longoni et al., “Gender effects in spatial orientation: Cognitive profiles and mental strategies.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 18(5),2004, p519-532
[35]Cavuoto, L.A., Benson, K., Tonya Smith-Jackson, M.A.N., “A heuristic checklist for an accessible smartphone interface design.” Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 13. 2014, p351-365
[36]Carol A. Lawton, “Gender Differences in Way-finding Stragegies: Relationship to Spatial Ability and Spatial Anxiety”, Volume 30, Issue 11, 1994, p765-779
[37]Dabbs, J. M., L. Chang, et al., "Spatial ability, navigation strategy and geographic knowledge among men and women." Evolution and Human Behavior 19(2): 89-9,1998
[38]Daniel J Simons, Christopher F Chabris, “Gorillas in our misdst: Sustained Inattentional blindness for dynamic events”, SAGE Publications, Perception vol.28, 9, p1059-1074
[39]D.C.D Pocock, “Envinronmental Perception Process and product” Journal of Economic and Social Geography, Volume 64, Issue 4, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,1973, P251–257
[40]Endsley, M.R., “Toward a Theory of Situation Awreness in Dynamic Systems”, Human factors Journal 37(1), p32-64
[41]Evans G. W., Skorpanich M. A., Gärling T., Bryant K. J., Bresolin B. (1984). “The effects of pathway configuration, landmarks and stress on environmental cognition.” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4, p323-335. 
[42]Harrie C.M. Vorst, “Evacuation Models and Disaster Psychology”, Procedia Engineering, 2010
[43]Iaria, G., L. Palermo, et al., "Age differences in the formation and use of cognitive maps." Behavioral Brain Research 196(2), 2009, p187-191
[44]Karimi, H. A. (Ed.) “Big Data Techniques and Technologies in Geoinformatics”, Taylor & Francis, 2014.
[45]Karimi, H. A. (Ed.) “Advanced Location-Based Technologies and Services” Taylor & Francis (2013).
[46]Karimi, H. A. “Universal Navigation on Smartphones”, Springer (2011).
[47]K.E Claus and R.J Claus, “Visual Communication through Signage.” in vol.1 Perception of the message, Cincinnati, Ohio: Signs of the Times Publication, 1974
[48]Kozlowski, L. T., & Bryant, K. J. (1977). Sense of direction, spatial orientation, and cognitive maps. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, p590-598.
[49]Lipman PD, C. L., "Adult age differences in memory for routes: effects of instruction and spatial diagram." Psychol Aging 7(3): 435-42., 1992
[50]Meng-Cong Zheng, “Time Constraints in Emergencies Affecting the Use of Information Signs in Wayfinding Behavior”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012
[51]Mica R. Endsley, “Toward a Teory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic System” Human Factors, 1995
[52]Roger M. Downs & David Stea, “Cognitive Map and Spatial Behaviour: Process and Products”, The Map Reader: Theories of Mapping Practice and Cartographic Representation (First Edition), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2011
[53]Toru Ishikawa, “Wayfinding with a GPS-based mobile navigation system: A comparison with maps and direct-experience.” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 2008, p74-82.
[54]Xia, J., D. Packer and C. Dong, “Individual differences and tourist wayfinding behaviors”, 18th World IMACS / MODSIM Congress, Cairns, Australia 13-17 July 2009
[55]Kato, Y. (1987). Microgen, " Microgenesis of cognitive map and sense of direction”, Revue de Psychologie Appliquee, 37, 1987, p261–282.
[56]Yoshinobu Kato and Yoshiaki Takeuchi, “Individual differences in wayfinding strategies.” Journal of Environmental Psychology, Volume 23, Issue 2, June 2003, p171-188
[57]Yoon, S.Y., Laffey, J., & Oh H.(2008) “Understanding usability and user experience if web-based 3D graphic technology.” Journal of Human-computer Interaction, 24(3), p288-306
[58]土屋雅人,「防災カードのデザイン調査」,日本デザイン学会,第55回,2008
[59]安福健祐,「メッシュモデルによる避難シミュレーションシステムの開発と地下空間浸水時の避難に対する適用性」,2005
學術論文
[60]Mark A. Foltz, “Designing Navigable Information Spaces”, Master of Science at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, U.S., 1998
網路
[61]BEEKn.net,2013,http://beekn.net/guide-to-ibeacons/
[62]Geoinformatics Laboratory, “University of Pittsburgh: Location Thinkers.” http://gis.sis.pitt.edu/
[63]Inside硬塞的網路趨勢觀察,2014 http://www.inside.com.tw/2014/06/05/ibeacon-one-year,2014
[64]iThome,iBeacon裝置,http://www.ithome.com.tw/tech/86654,2014
[65]iThome,工研院與富士通合作研發自律型物聯網防災感測技術,http://www.ithome.com.tw/node/84675, 2014
[66]Mashable 2014, http://mashable.com/2014/12/14/internet-of-things-evolution/
[67]Micro-SoLoMo, http://microsolomo.weebly.com/information65295304562085136164357592099820139/category/beacon,2014
[68]University of Pittsburgh, “Geoinformatics Disciplines”, 2007, http://gis.sis.pitt.edu/diagrams.php?diagram=fields
[69]smartM,http://www.smartm.com.tw/Article/313835cea3,2014
[70]國家教育研究院,2012 http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1678793/
[71]智慧好程式,http://www.appshot.net/op/skill?pid=320,2014
[72]維基百科,http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBeacon,2014
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top