臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究的目的是探討董監連結的社會網路對台灣電子業公司績效之間的關係。本研究分為兩個階段。首先，本文整合動態資料包絡分析法用於效率測度之相對重要性衡量電子業公司的營運績效。可視情境改善各投入產出變數，此舉更能貼切實務，對公司之績效能做更準確分析。第二階段，本文使用迴歸分析法探討董監連結的社會網路對公司績效的影響。本研究中樣本共187個，橫跨2013 年至2015 年，從本文實證結果得知董監事連結的中心性、董監事連結的結構洞、董監事連結數對公司績效是呈現顯著正相關。這意味著更多的董監連結網路可以提升公司績效。

The purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between networks of interlocking directorates and corporate performance in Taiwanese electronics companies. This research consisted of two stages. First, operational efficiency of electronics companies was measured using a dynamic SBM model for DEA. Second, this paper adopts ordinary least squares (OLS) regression analysis to explore the influence of networks of interlocking directorates on corporate performance. Our final sample included 187 samples. Sample period from 2013-2015. The empirical results show that centrality, structural holes and number of networks of interlocking directorates have significant positive influences on corporate performance. This means more networks of interlocking directorates enable better the corporate performance.

Title Page i
Abstract in Chinese ii
Abstract in English iii
Acknowledgements iv
Table of Contents v
List of Tables vi
List of Figures vii
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW AND HYPOTHESES 4
2.1 Social networks 4
2.2 Centrality and corporate performance 4
2.3 Structural holes and corporate performance 5
2.4 Interlocking directorates and corporate performance 6
CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH DESIGN 8
3.1 Research framework 8
3.2 Sample 8
3.3 Measures 9
3.4 Descriptive Statistics 13
CHAPTER 4 EMPIRICAL RESULTS 17
4.1 Network Structure Analysis for Taiwan’s electronics industry 17
4.2 Performance analysis for Taiwan’s electronics industry 20
4.3 The relationship between the network of interlocking directorates and corporate performance 21
CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSIONS 26
REFERENCE 27
Appendix I 32

Ahuja G, Katila R. (2004). Where do resources come from? The role of idiosyncratic situations. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8–9), 887–907.
Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and centrality: A family of measures. American journal of sociology, 92(5), 1170-1182.
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. University of Chicago press.
Bowlin, W. F. (1995). A Characterization of the Financial Condition of the United States’ Aerospace-defense Industrial Base. Omega, 23(5), 539–555.
Burt, R. S. (1993). The social structure of competition. Explorations in economic soci-ology, 65, 103.
Chiu, Y. H., Luo, Z., Chen, Y. C., Wang, Z., & Tsai, M. P. (2013). A comparison of op-erating performance management between Taiwan banks and foreign banks based on the Meta-Hybrid DEA model. Economic Modelling, 33, 433-439.
Cross, R. L., & Thomas, R. J. (2008). Driving results through social networks: How top organizations leverage networks for performance and growth. John Wiley & Sons.
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The journal of law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
Ferris, S. P., Jagannathan, M., & Pritchard, A. C. (2003). Too busy to mind the business? Monitoring by directors with multiple board appointments. The Journal of fi-nance, 58(3), 1087-1111.
Freeman, L. C., Roeder, D., & Mulholland, R. R. (1979). Centrality in social networks: II. Experimental results. Social networks, 2(2), 119-141.
Gnyawali, D. R., & Madhavan, R. (2001). Cooperative networks and competitive dy-namics: A structural embeddedness perspective. Academy of Management re-view, 26(3), 431-445.
Gulati, R., & Higgins, M. C. (2003). Which ties matter when? The contingent effects of interorganizational partnerships on IPO success. Strategic Management Jour-nal, 24(2), 127-144.
Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic management journal, 203-215.
Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Paetzold, R. L. (2000). The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management studies, 37(2), 235-256.
Horton, J., Millo, Y., & Serafeim, G. (2012). Resources or power? Implications of social networks on compensation and firm performance. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 39(3‐4), 399-426.
Hsu, E. and Chen, DM. (2012). Social network and firm performance. Journal of Ac-counting Review, 55, 119-145.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.
Koka, B. R., & Prescott, J. E. (2002). Strategic alliances as social capital: A multidi-mensional view. Strategic management journal, 23(9), 795-816.
Li, L., Tian, G., & Yan, W. (2013). The network of interlocking directorates and firm performance in transition economies: Evidence from China. Journal of Applied Business Research, 29(2), 607-620.
Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y., & Lu, W. M. (2016). Research fronts in data envelopment analy-sis. Omega, 58, 33-45.
Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y., Lu, W. M., & Lin, B. J. (2013). Data envelopment analysis 1978–2010: A citation-based literature survey. Omega, 41(1), 3-15.
Liu, Y., Lin, W. T., & Cheng, K. Y. (2011). Family Ownership and the International Involvement of Taiwan's High‐Technology Firms: The Moderating Effect of High‐Discretion Organizational Slack. Management and Organization Re-view, 7(2), 201-222.
Marsden, P. V. (2002). Egocentric and sociocentric measures of network centrali-ty. Social networks, 24(4), 407-422.
Martin, G., Gözübüyük, R., & Becerra, M. (2015). Interlocks and firm performance: The role of uncertainty in the directorate interlock‐performance relation-ship. Strategic Management Journal, 36(2), 235-253.
Maurer, I., & Ebers, M. (2006). Dynamics of social capital and their performance im-plications: Lessons from biotechnology start-ups. Administrative Science Quar-terly, 51(2), 262-292.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603-609.
Mizruchi, M. S. (1996). What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual review of sociology, 22(1), 271-298.
Nicholson, G. J., Alexander, M., & Kiel, G. C. (2004). Defining the social capital of the board of directors: An exploratory study. Journal of Management & Organization, 10(01), 54-72.
Peng, M. W., Mutlu, C. C., Sauerwald, S., Au, K. Y., & Wang, D. Y. (2015). Board interlocks and corporate performance among firms listed abroad. Journal of Man-agement History, 21(2), 257-282.
Pennings, J. M. (1980). Interlocking directorates. Jossey-Bass Inc Pub.
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collabora-tion and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnolo-gy. Administrative science quarterly, 116-145.
Sacks, M. A., Ventresca, M. J., & Uzzi, B. (2001). Global Institutions and Networks Contingent Change in the Structure of World Trade Advantage, 1965-1980. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(10), 1579-1601.
Shipilov, A. V., & Li, S. X. (2008). Can you have your cake and eat it too? Structural holes' influence on status accumulation and market performance in collaborative networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(1), 73-108.
Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Waddock, S. (2010). Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic management jour-nal, 31(5), 463-490.
Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2009). Network DEA: A slacks-based measure ap-proach. European Journal of Operational Research, 197(1), 243-252.
Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2010). Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure ap-proach. Omega, 38(3), 145-156.
Tseng, C. Y. (2008). Internal R&D effort, external imported technology and economic value added: empirical study of Taiwan's electronic industry. Applied Economics, 40(8), 1073-1082.
Tseng, C. Y., & James Goo, Y. J. (2005). Intellectual capital and corporate value in an emerging economy: empirical study of Taiwanese manufacturers. R&D Manage-ment, 35(2), 187-201.
Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative science quarterly, 35-67.
Wang, H., Zhao, J., Li, Y., & Li, C. (2015). Network centrality, organizational innova-tion, and performance: A meta‐analysis. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sci-ences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 32(3), 146-159.
Wang, W. K., Lu, W. M., Kweh, Q. L., & Lai, H. W. (2014). Does corporate social responsibility influence the corporate performance of the US telecommunications industry?. Telecommunications Policy, 38(7), 580-591.
Zaheer, A., & Bell, G. G. (2005). Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic management journal, 26(9), 809-825.
Zajac, E. J., & Westphal, J. D. (1996). DIRECTOR REPUTATION, CEO/BOARD POWER, AND THE DYNAMICS OF BOARD INTERLOCKS. In Academy of Management Proceedings,1996(1),254-258.