(54.226.58.177) 您好!臺灣時間:2019/01/18 15:13
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
本論文永久網址: 
line
研究生:曾明山
研究生(外文):Tseng, Ming-Shan
論文名稱:翻轉課堂教學對技術型高中專業科目學習成效之研究:以認知風格為調節變項
論文名稱(外文):A Study of Flipped Classroom Teaching on the Learning Performance of a Vocational Course in Technical Senior High School: Cognitive Style as a Moderator
指導教授:李懿芳李懿芳引用關係
指導教授(外文):Lee, Yi-Fang
學位類別:博士
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:工業教育學系
學門:教育學門
學類:專業科目教育學類
畢業學年度:106
語文別:中文
論文頁數:183
中文關鍵詞:翻轉課堂成功智能理論學習態度認知風格
外文關鍵詞:Flipped classroomSuccessful intelligence theoryLearning attitudeCognitive style
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:68
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
摘 要
本研究旨在探討翻轉課堂教學對技術型高中專業科目學習成效之研究,以建立技術型高中專業科目教學實踐的參考。本研究彙整與分析翻轉課堂在教學上的相關理論,繼之以準實驗研究法進行教學實驗,以瞭解學生在此教學下,認知、成功智能及學習態度等學習成效的表現,並進一步探究認知風格可能產生的調節效果。
本研究以技術型高中「機械製造」科目的教學課程為研究範疇,以機械科兩班學生各30名為研究對象,分別實施12週之翻轉課堂教學及傳統教學的準實驗研究法的教學實驗。本研究採用學習成就測驗、成功智能量表、學習態度量表及認知風格量表為測驗工具,藉以比較翻轉課堂教學與傳統教學,學生在學習成效差異。本研究在實驗研究中主要發現:一、翻轉課堂教學能有效提升學生學習成效。二、翻轉課堂教學對學生專業科目學習成效顯著優於傳統教學。三、認知風格在翻轉課堂對學習成效的影響上未具有調節效果。學生在翻轉課堂教學中之學習歷程,實踐技術型高中專業課程有效性教學發展,將複雜的學科理論與實務操作融合,值得做為推廣技術型高中專業課程的教學創新概念。
關鍵詞:翻轉課堂、成功智能理論、學習態度、認知風格
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to explore the research on the flipped classroom teaching on the learning performance of a vocational course in technical senior high school, and to establish a reference for the teaching practice. Relevant theoretical of flipped classroom teaching were integrated and analyzed. A quasi-experimental research methods was to conduct teaching experiments and to learn about students’ learning performance in cognitive, successful intelligence and learning attitudes, and to explore the possible moderator effect of cognitive style.
This study was to take the teaching course of the "Mechanical Manufacturing" as the research category. 30 students each of the two classes of mechanical department were the subjects of the study, and 12 weeks of quasi-experimental research were respectively conduct. The Learning achievement test, successful intelligence scale, learning attitude scale, and cognitive style scale was instruments. The main finding of this study was as follows: First, flipped classroom teaching could effectively improve learning performance. Second, flipped classroom teaching was significantly better than the traditional teaching . Third, cognitive style did not have a moderator effect in flipping classroom teaching on learning performance.Flipping classroom teaching was to practice the development of the effectiveness of technical senior high school vocational course, to integrate the complex subject theory with practical operations, and to worth as a teaching innovation concept for promoting vocational course.
Keywords: Flipped classroom, Successful intelligence theory, Learning attitude, Cognitive style
一、中文部分
王司沁(2008)。認知風格對學習者於互動多媒體輔助統計學習之影響-以圖像型與文字型為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學,桃園市。
王如哲(2010)。解析學生學習成效。評鑑雙月刊,27,62-64。
王思堯(2004)。學習教材與認知風格對於學習績效與教材評量的影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學,桃園市。
王曉玟(2013)。用免費教育改變世界。天下雜誌,524。
田美雲(2013)。「翻轉教室」(Flipped Classroom)介紹。國立臺灣大學教學發展中心,電子報,71。取自 http://ctld.ntu.edu.tw/_epaper/news_detail.php?nid=452。
呂玉瑞(2014)。翻轉教室結合問題導向學習對新北市某國小六年級學童學習成效與學習動機之研究—以製作電子書課程為例(未出版之碩士論文)。私立銘傳大學,臺北市。
余民寧(2005)。試題、分數和測驗理論。IRT測驗與教學,2,5-25。
余民寧(2006)。學習成就測驗編製。教師天地,145,24-29。
李新民、陳密桃(2003)。成功智能的理論建構及其對教育實務的啟示。高雄師範大學學報,15,245-259。
何依珊(2015)。國民小學翻轉課堂政策可行性之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立大學,臺北市。
洪蘭(譯)(1999)。活用智慧(原作者:Sternberg, R. J.)。臺北市:遠流。(原著出版年:1998)
汪慧玲、沈佳生(2013)。合作學習教學策略對大專學生之學習成效與 學習態度之影響:以兒童發展評量與輔導課程某單元為例。臺中教育大學學報,27(1),57-76。
汪曉東、張晨婧仔(2013)。「翻轉課堂」在大學教學中的應用研究-以教育技術學專業英語課程為例。現代教育技術,23(8),11-16。
邱貴發(1992)。電腦輔助教學成效探討。視聽教育,33(5),11-18。
邱慧芳(2013)。科技校院幼保系學生自我概念、學習態度與就業能力之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北科技大學,臺北市。
邱錦昌(2008)。教育視導與學校效能。高雄市:復文。
巫俊采(2012)。學習動機與學習策略對動態學習成效之影響(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
技術型高級中等學校群科課程資訊網(2017)。機械群-職校群科課程綱要。取自 http://vs.tchcvs.tc.edu.tw/course99/機械群-職校群科課程綱要.pdf。
林清山(1992)。心理與教育統計學。臺北市:東華。
周亞寬(2016)。創意教學數位平台建構及其學習成效之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北科技大學,臺北市。
吳武典(1990)。輔導原理。臺北市:心理出版社。
吳武典(1994)。資優教育的研究與課題。載於國立臺灣師範大學與中華民國特殊教育學會編印:開創資優教育的新世紀,1-19。
吳怡儒、蔡文榮、李林滄(2012)。彰化縣偏遠地區國中學生數學學習態度及其影響因素之研究。教育科學期刊,11(1),25-57。
吳宥葶(2013)。結合開放式課程之翻轉課堂對於學習者之自我調節與學習成效影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立交通大學,新竹市。
吳清山(2014)。翻轉課堂。教育研究月刊,238,135-136。
吳筱莉(2014)。翻轉教學對低成就學習者之英語自我導向學習與學習成效影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣科技大學,臺北市。
吳國宏(譯)(2003)。教授成功智力---增進學生的學習和成就水平(原作者:Sternberg, R. J.)。臺北市:五南。(原著出版年:2000)
紀佩妘(2014)。翻轉教室教學法對國中八年級學生英語學習表現與學習態度之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。
秦夢群(1992)。高中教師管理心態,學生內外控與學生學習習慣與態度之相關研究。教育與心理研究,15,129-172。
秦麗花、許靜雯(2005)。從語文到生活技能的學障兒童轉銜課程發展:一個行動研究。台東大學教育學報,16,111-138。
徐新逸、項志偉(2016)。翻轉教室融入國小六年級資訊課程對批判性思考能力之影響 。課程與教學季刊,19(4),23-60。
教育部(2015a)。中華民國師資培育白皮書。取自http://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/3/RelFile/6315/6921/中華民國師資培育白皮書.pdf。
教育部(2015b)。「數位學習推動計畫」。取自http://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED2700/News_Content.aspx?n=727087A8A1328DEE&sms=49589CE1E2730CC8&s=170E4E91A8C5E5A2。
教育部(2016)。職業學校群科課程綱要暨設備基準-機械群。取自http://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/userfiles/ _1_機械群-職校課程綱要.pdf。
梁育維、陳芳慶(2015)。資訊融入教學對學習態度影響之後設分析。中等教育,66(2),100-125。
莊玲瑜(2014)。結合磨課師的雲端學習-以小學三年級數學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。私立亞洲大學,臺中市。
陳元泰(2014)。結合翻轉學習與網路社群教學策略對中等學校生活科技課程學習成效影響之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
陳育捷(2015)。翻轉教育對於國中生數學學習成效與態度影響之行動研究─以一元一次方程式為例(未出版之碩士論文)。私立淡江大學,新北市。
陳旻萃(譯)(1997)。成功的智商(原作者:Sternberg, R. J.)。臺北市:平安。(原著出版年:1996)
郭璟瑜、周惠文(2006)。影音數位教材對學習之影響。資訊科學應用期刊,2(1),71-86。
張文哲譯(1974)。態度測量。測量與輔導,002(003),106-107。
張玉成(1998)。思考風格與教學效能。國民教育,38(3),36-41。
張其棟、楊晉民(2016)。翻轉學習在大學微積分課程之實現與初探。臺灣數學教育期刊,3(2),55-86。
張芳全(2010)。多層次模型在學習成就之研究。臺北市:心理出版社。
張春興(2002)。教育心理學。臺北市:東華。
張春興(2004)。認知心理學。臺北市:東華。
張春興(2007)。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北市:東華。
張春興、林清山(1994)。教育心理學。臺北市:東華。
張深淼(2014)。翻轉教室應用於高職基本電學對學生學習態度與學習成效之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北科技大學,臺北市。
張婷婷(2017)。SPOC結合翻轉教室對大學生旅遊日語學習成效、學習態度和學習滿意度之探究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。
曾明山、李懿芳(2017)。翻轉課堂對學習成效影響之後設分析。技術及職業教育學報,7(3),21-44。
曾郁庭(2017)。遊戲式學習對大學生資訊素養與倫理學習成效之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
黃政傑(2014)。翻轉教室的理念、問題與展望。臺灣教育評論月刊,3(12),161-186。
黃意雯、邱子華(2012)。數位教材導覽模式與認知風格對學習成效之影響。理工研究國際期刊,2(3),45-53。
臺中市立沙鹿工業高級中等學校(2017)。機械科教育目標。取自http://www.slvs.tc.edu.tw/releaseRedirect.do?unitID=183&pageID=3540。
廖怡慧(2012)。教學新思維-翻轉課堂。深耕教與學電子報,31。取自 http://www.teachers.fju.edu.tw/epapers/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=366&Itemid=369。
劉光夏、周宛瑜(2016)。翻轉教學融入國小高年級自然與生活科技領域課程學習成效之探討。教育傳播與科技研究,113,39-62。
劉伊霖(2012)。Flipped classroom徹底顛覆你的思維。數位學習品質服務中心。取自http://www.elq.org.tw/notes_detail.php?info3_id=55。
劉怡甫(2013)。翻轉課堂──落實學生為中心與提升就業力的教改良方案。評鑑雙月刊,41。
劉信雄(1992)。國小學生認知風格、學習策略、自我效能、與學業成就關係之研究。行政院國家科學委員會研究計畫成果報告(編號:NSC-80-0301-H-024-06),未出版。
潘玉龍(2017)。翻轉課堂融入體育教學對學習態度及學習成效之研究。臺灣教育評論月刊,6(10),103-109。
潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究理論與應用。臺北市:心理出版社。
鄭淑止(2015)。基於模糊理論探討翻轉教室進行校園古蹟學習之成效(未出版之碩士論文)。私立亞洲大學,臺中市。
鄭耀嬋、何華國(2004)。國小融合班學生學習態度及其相關因素之探討。國民教育研究學報,13,215-260。
蔡文榮、蔡佩君(2012)。互動式電子白板在英語教學過程中對學習成效與學習態度之影響。教育科學期刊,11(2),69-91。
蔡文豐、王玲玲(2012)。學習環境與學習態度相關之研究。建國科大社會人文期刊,31(2),53 -76。
蔡欣晏(2014)。翻轉教室應用於高職會計學對學生學習態度與學習成效之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北科技大學,臺北市。
蔡華華、張雅萍(2007)。學習動機對學習成效之影響-以領導行為為干擾變數。中華管理學報,8(4),1-18。
蔡瑞君(2014)。數位時代「翻轉教室」的意義與批判性議題。教育研究與發展期刊,10(2),115–138。
錢昭萍、梁麗珍(2017)。認知風格和多元智能對學習動機與學習成效之影響-以科技大學大一國文課數位化教學為例。人文社會學報,13(4),325-358。
譚克平(2000)。以三元智力理論為導向的國中幾何課程發展。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告(編號:NSC89-2511-S-003-033),未出版。
龔聰莉(2012)。學習風格在數位學習環境中對學習成效及學習態度之影響 -以餐管科中式點心教學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄應用科技大學,高雄市。

二、英文部分
Acedo, M. (2013). 10 pros and cons of a flipped classroom. Teachthought. Retrieved from http://www.teachthought.com/trends/10-pros-cons-flipped-classroom/.
Alice, T., Glenda, T. & Bob, S. (2003). Hot & successful intelligence. The cnnter for development & learning. Retrieved from http://www.cdl.org/resources/reading room/hot and successful.html/.
Baker, J. W. (2000). The “classroom flip”: Using web course management tools to become the guide by the side. Paper presented at the 11th International Conference on College Teaching and Learning. Jacksonville, FL.
Beesley, A. & Apthorp, H. (Eds.). (2010). Classroom instruction that works, second edition:Research report. Denver, CO: McRel.
Bergmann, J. (2013). Ten questions you should ask before you flip your classroom. Retrived from http://jonbergmann.com/new-to-the-flipped-classroom-10-things-to-consider-before-youstart/
Bergmann, J. & Sams, A. (2012). Why flipped classrooms are here to stay. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/tm/articles/2012/06/12/fp_bergmann_sams.html?tkn=WPCC1Rxu4%2FbCFsj3iEU3%2Bqk97aMS3xc0jkgq&cmp=clp-sb-edtech.
Bhagat, K. K., Chang, C. N., & Chang, C. Y. (2016). The Impact of the Flipped Classroom on Mathematics Concept Learning in High School. Educational Technology & Society, 19 (3), 134–142.
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives:The classification of educational goals. (HandbookⅠ:cognitive domain). New York: David Mckay.
Blumberg, P. (2008). Developing learner-centered teachers: A practical guide for faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Brame, C. J. (2013). Flipping the Classroom. Retrieved from http://cft.vanderbilt.edu/files/Flipping-the-classroom.pdf.
Bruff, D. O., Fisher, D. H., McEwen, K. E., & Smith, B. E. (2013). Wrapping a MOOC: Student perceptions of an experiment in blended learning. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9, 187.
Brunsell, E., & Horejsi, M. (2013). A flipped classroom in action. The Science Teacher, 80(2), 8-8.
Chan, D. W. (2007). Leadership competencies among Chinese gifted students in Hong Kong: The connection with emotional intelligence and successful intelligence. Roeper Review, 29(3), 183-189.
Chan, D. W. (2008). Giftedness of Chinese students in Hong Kong: Perspectives from different conceptions of intelligences. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(1), 40-54.
Childers, T. L., Houston, M. J. & Heckler, S. E. (1985). Visual versus verbal information processing. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 125-134.
Chuang, J. (2012). Flipped Classroom allows students to study independently. Classroom Aid. Retrieved from http://chinese.classroom-aid.com/2012/04/flipped-classroom.html.
Classroomwindow. (2012). Flipped classrooms: Improved test scores and teacher satisfaction. Retrieved from classroomwindow.com/flipped-classrooms-improved-test-scores-and-teacher-satisfaction.
Daniel, K. (1960). The Functional Approach to the Study of Attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24(2), 163-204. Retrieved from http://poq.oxfordjournals.org/content/24/2/163.abstract.
Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L. & Ball, N. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 563-580.
Di Vesta, F. J., Ingersoll, G. & Sunshine, P. (1977). A factor analysis of imagery tests. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 471-479.
Dunn, J. (2013). The 10 Best Web Tools For Flipped Classrooms. Retrieved from http://www.edudemic.com/2013/04/web-tools-for-flipped-classrooms/.
Eagly, A.H. & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt.
Educause. (2012). 7 things you should know about flipped classrooms. Retrieved from https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI7081.pdf.
Effken, J. A. & Doyle, M. (2001). Interface design and cognitive style in learning an instructional computer simulation. Computers in Nursing, 19, 164-171.
Fulton, K. (2012). The Flipped Classroom: Transforming Education at Byron High School. T H E Journal, 39(3), 18-20.
Gagne, Briggs & Wager. (1988). Principles of Instructional Design. Holt, Rinehart & Winston: New York.
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
Ghinea, G. & Chen, S. Y. (2003). The impact of cognitive styles on perceptual distributed multimedia quality. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 393-406.
Grigorenko, E. L., Jarvin, L, & Sternberg, R. J. (2002). School-based tests of the Triarchic Theory of Intelligence: Three settings, three samples, three syllabi. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 167-208.
Guilford, J.P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw Hill.
Haley, T. (2017). Flipped Learning Understanding the Flipped Classroom through the student experience (Unpublished Master dissertation). University of Oslo, Norway.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge, London.
Hayes, J. & Allinson, C. W. (1998). Cognitive style and the theory and practice of individual and collective learning in organizations. Human Relations, 31(7), 847-871.
He, Y., Swenson, S. & Lents, N. (2012). Online video tutorials increase learning of difficult concepts in an undergraduate analytical chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 89, 1128–1132.
Jamaludin, R. (2014) The use of a flipped classroom to enhance engagement and promote active learning. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(2), 124-131.
Jonassen, D. H. & Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of individual difference, learning, and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Keefe, J. W. (1987). Learning style : theory and practice. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
Kirby, J. R., Moore, P. & Schofield, N. (1988). Verbal and visual learning styles. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13, 169−184.
Koballa, T. R., Jr. (1988). Attitude and related concepts in science education. Science Education, 72(2), 115-126.
Kozhevnikov, M. (2007). Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology: Toward and integrated framework of cognitive style. Psychological Bulletin, 133(3), 464-481.
Kuchinskas, G. (1979). Whose cognitive style makes the difference?. Education Leadership, 36(4), 269-271.
Larson, S, & Yamamotom J. (2013). Flipping the College Spreadsheet Skills Classroom: Initial Empirical Results. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, 4, 10.
Maesumi, M. (2006). A Site Dedicated to College Level Mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.math.lamar.edu/faculty/maesumi/ mathexpo.pdf
Marzno, R. J. (1992). A different kind of classroom: Teaching with dimensions of learning. Alexandria,VA Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Mason, G., Shuman, T. R.,& Cook, K.E.(2013). Comparing the Effectiveness of an Inverted Classroom to a Traditional Classroom in an Upper-Division Engineering Course. Journal of IEEE Transactions on Education, 56 (4), 430-435.
Mayer, R. E. (1989). Systematic thinking fostered by illustrations in scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 240-246.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Learning and Instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/ Merrill/ Prentice Hall.
Mazur, E. (2009). Farewell, Lecture?. Science 323, 50-51.
McLaughlin, J. E. (2014). The Flipped Classroom: A Course Redesign to Foster Learning and Engagement in a Health Professions School. Journal of Academic Medicine, 89(2), 236-43.
McLaughlin, J. E., Griffin, L. M., Esserman, D. A., Davidson, C. A., Glatt, D. M., Roth, M. T., Gharkholonarehe, N,.& Mumper, R. J. (2013) Pharmacy Student Engagement, Performance, and Perception in a Flipped Satellite Classroom. Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(9), 196.
Messick, S. (Eds.). (1976). Personality consistencies in Cognition and Creativity. In S. Messick Individuality in learning (CA: Jossey-Bass, 4-33). San Francisco.
Messick, S. (1984). The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 19(1), 59-74.
Millard, E. (2012). 5 reasons flipped classrooms work. University Business, 26-29.
Missildine, K., Fountain, R., Summers, L., & Gosselin, K. (2013). Flipping the classroom to improve student performance and satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Education, 52, 10.
O’Dowd, D. K. & Aguilar-Roca, N. (2009). Garage demos: using physical models to illustrate dynamic aspects of microscopic biological processes. CBE Life Science Education, 8, 118–122.
Ozdamli, F. & Asiksoy, G. (2016). Flipped classroom approach. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues. 8(2), 98-105.
Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Pedro P. & Pilar R. (2006). The application of learning styles in both individual and collaborative learning. Advanced Learning Technologies.
Piccoli, G., R. Ahmad, and B. Ives (2001). “Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills traing”. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401-426.
Pierce, R., & Fox, J. (2012). Vodcasts and Active-Learning Exercises in a “Flipped Classroom” Model of a Renal Pharmacotherapy Module. Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76(10), 196.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5) Retrieved from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf.
Richardson, A. (1977). Verbalizer-visualizer: A cognitive style dimension. Journal of Mental Imagery, 1(1), 109-126.
Riding, R. J. & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles: An overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11, 193-215.
Riding, R., & Rayner, S. G. (1998). Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies. London: David Fulton.
Ruddick, K. W. (2012). Improving chemical education from high school to college using a more hands-on approach (unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Memphis.
Sams, A. & Bergmann, J. (2013). Flip Your Students’ Learning. Educational Leadership, 70 (6), 16-20.
Smith, S.M. & Woody, P.C. (2000). Interactive effect of multimedia instruction and learning styles. Teaching of Psychology, 27(3), 220-223.
Spencer, D., Wolf, Deb. & Sams, A. (2011). Are You Ready to Flip?. Retrieved from http://www.thedailyriff.com/articles/are-you-ready-to-flip-691.php.
Sternberg, R.J. (1985).Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (1988). The triarchic mind: A new theory of human intelligence. New York: Viking.
Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Successful intelligence: How practical and creative intelligence determine success in life. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Sternberg, R. J. (1997). The concept of intelligence and its role in lifelong learning and success. American Psychologist, 52(10), 1030-1037.
Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Cognitive psychology. New York: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). A broad view of intelligence: The theory of successful intelligence. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 55(3), 139-154.
Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The rainbow project: enhancing the STAT through assessments of analytical, practical, and creative. Intelligencd, 34, 321-350.
Sternberg, R. J. & Clinkenbeard, P. R. (1995). The triarchic model applied to identifying, teaching, and assessing gifted children. Roeper Review, 17(4), 255-260.
Sternberg, R J., Ferrari, M. & Clinkenbeard, P. (1996). Identification, instruction, and assessment of gifted children: A construct validation of a triarchic model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40(3), 129-137.
Sternberg, R.J. & Grigorenko, E.L. (2000). Teaching for successful intelligence: To increase student learning and achievement. Arlington Heights, IL: Skylight.
Sternberg, R.J. & Grigorenko, E.L (2002).The theory of successful intelligence as a basis for instruction and assessment in higher education. New Directions For Teaching and Learning, 89, 45-53.
Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., Ferrari, M. & Clinkenbeard, P. (1999). A triarchic analysis of an aptitude—treatment interaction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15(1), 1–11.
Sternberg, R. J., Torff, B. & Grigorenko, E. L. (1998).Teaching triarchically improves school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 374-384.
Strayer, J. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15, 171–193.
Talley, C. P., & Scherer, S. (2013). The Enhanced Flipped Classroom- Increasing Academic Performance with Student-recorded Lectures and Practice Testing in a Flipped STEM Course. The Journal of Negro Education, 82 (3), 339-347.
Tandichova, E.(1995). Coursebook evaluation in teacher training in Slovakia. MLT Journal, 4, 65-147.
Tennant, M. (1988). Psychology and adult learning. London: Routledge.
Tenneson, M. &; McGlasson, B. (2006). The Classroom Flip. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flip_teaching#cite_note-18.
Thames, D.G. & Reeves, C.K.(1994). Poor readers’ attitudes: effect of using interest and trade books in an integrated language arts approach. Reading Research and Instruction, 33, 293-308.
The Economist (2011). Flipping the classroom. The Economist. Electronic education. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/node/21529062#sthash.BB7RQwyY.dpbs.
Tune, J. D., Sturek, M.,& Basile, D. P.(2013). Flipped classroom model improves graduate student performance in cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal physiology. Physiology Education, 37(4), 316-320.
Wilson, S. G. (2013). A Method to Address the Challenges of an Undergraduate Statistics Course. Journal of Teaching of Psychology, 40(3), 193-199.
Witkin, H.A. & Goodenough, D.R. (1981). Cognitive styles: Essence and origins . New York: In ternational Universities Press .
Zappe, S., Leicht, R., Messner, J.,Litzinger, T. & Lee, H. (2009).“Flipping” the classroom to explore active learning in a large undergraduate course. Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exhibition.
電子全文 電子全文(網際網路公開日期:20220823)
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔