跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(44.212.99.208) 您好!臺灣時間:2024/04/23 16:51
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:蘇靖
研究生(外文):Ching Su
論文名稱:‘台農二號’與‘津香’番木瓜植株性狀及果實品質比較
論文名稱(外文):Comparative Studies on Plant Characteristic and Fruit Quality of ‘Tai-Noung NO.2’ and ‘Chin Hsiang’ Papaya (Carica papaya L.)
指導教授:謝慶昌謝慶昌引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ching-Chang Shiesh
口試委員:林慧玲李堂察
口試日期:2019-07-26
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中興大學
系所名稱:園藝學系所
學門:農業科學學門
學類:園藝學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2019
畢業學年度:107
語文別:中文
論文頁數:66
中文關鍵詞:番木瓜‘台農二號’‘津香’果實品質
外文關鍵詞:Carica papayaFruit quality
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:247
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:8
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
番木瓜(Carica papaya L.)是世界上重要的熱帶經濟果樹,根據世界農糧組織(FAO)統計,至2014年全球番木瓜產值已經超過4000百萬美元,顯示出番木瓜在世界的重要性以及其經濟價值。本試驗試以新品種‘津香’番木瓜及台灣常見栽培種‘台農二號’番木瓜進行營養比較,希望能藉由此次試驗成果來評估‘津香’番木瓜是否有成為栽培種之潛力,以及調查‘津香’番木瓜之品種性狀,以利品種資料之建立。本試驗結果顯示,兩品種番木瓜之糖度無顯著差異性。完熟‘津香’番木瓜果肉中的抗壞血酸約有59.46mg/100g含量,顯著高於‘台農二號’番木瓜果肉中的含量34.68mg/100g。果皮色彩,在綠熟果實階段L*、a*、b*、C*、H*皆有顯著差異,但在完熟階段只有L*值有顯著差異性。兩品種番木瓜果實呼吸率曲線呈現相似的趨勢,而乙烯釋放含量,‘津香’番木瓜相較於‘台農二號’番木瓜較為穩定。醣類比例,‘津香’番木瓜果肉中,擁有較高比例的葡萄糖含量,‘台農二號’番木瓜則是有較高比例的果糖含量。揮發性物質,‘津香’番木瓜果肉中擁有大量的芳樟醇類物質,相較於‘台農二號’番木瓜果肉高出約2~3倍的總體含量。醣類比例及揮發性物質之間的不同,可能影響消費者食用的感受。礦物元素含量結果顯示,葉片中的含量在兩品種間並無顯著差異,‘津香’番木瓜果肉中Mg低於‘台農二號’,而Cu、Zn則高於‘台農二號’。本試驗最終進行兩品種間的官能品評,分為放置5天、7天、12天、14天後,給不同食用者進行盲測,結果顯示,‘津香’番木瓜需要較久的時間才有較佳的風味呈現,而‘台農二號’番木瓜則是相反的情形,需要盡早食用,放置天數過多果實可能已經呈現軟爛的口感,而造成品評感受不佳。結合上述特性‘津香’番木瓜具有成為台灣新的栽培種之潛力。
Papaya (Carica papaya L.) is an important economic tropical fruit in the world. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the global papaya production value has exceeded US$4000 million in 2014 that indicates the world importance of papaya and its economic value. The objects of this experiment is to compare the nutrition value between the new variety ' Chin Hsiang ' papaya and Taiwan's common cultivar 'Tai Nong no.2' papaya and use these results to evaluate whether ' Chin Hsiang ' papaya has the potential to become a commercial cultivar in Taiwan, and to establish varietal characteristics for ' Chin Hsiang ' papaya fruit. Our results showed that there is no significant difference in the total soluble sugar between these two varieties of papaya. The ascorbic acid content in the ripe ' Chin Hsiang ' papaya pulp was 59.46mg/100g, which is significantly higher than that of the 'Tai Nong no.2' papaya pulp with a value of 34.68mg/100g. The color indexes of the peel in the green ripe fruit stage including L*, a*, b *, C*, H* were significant different between these two cultivars, however, only L* values was significantly different at the ripening stage. The respiration rate curves showed a similar trend in these two cultivars, and the ethylene production rate in 'Chin Hsiang' papaya was more stable than 'Tai Nong no.2' papaya at the ripening stage. The proportion of glucose was higher in 'Chin Hsiang' papaya pulp and the proportion of fructose was higher in 'Tai Nong no.2' papaya pulp. The amount of linalool in 'Chin Hsiang' papaya pulp was double or triple higher than that in 'Tai Nong no.2' papaya pulp. The difference in the proportion of sugar and volatile substances may affect the consumer's sensory evaluation. The analysis of mineral element content showed that there is no significant difference in the nutrient content of the leaves between these two varieties. Mg in the pulp of the 'Chin Hsiang' papaya was lower than that of 'Tai Nong no.2', while the Cu and Zn were higher than that of the 'Tai Nong no.2'. The food sensory evaluation was conducted in the two varieties at 5 days, 7 days, 12 days, and 14 days after harvest. Blind test was performed among different consumers. Our results showed that 'Chin Hsiang' papaya need a longer time to develop better flavor, while 'Tai Nong no.2' papaya is opposite. 'Tai Nong no.2' papaya needs to be eaten as soon as possible after harvest. The excessive number of days after 'Tai Nong no.2' was harvested may result in a soft and bad taste, which makes the sensory evaluation poor. Taken together, 'Chin Hsiang' papaya has the potential to become a new cultivar in Taiwan.
中文摘要 i
Summary ii
目次 iii
圖目次 v
表目次 vi

壹、前言 1

貳、前人研究 2
一、番木瓜概述 2
二、番木瓜採收後生理及成分變化 4
三、番木瓜營養元素 7
四、番木瓜之揮發性物質及官能品評 8

參、材料與方法 10
一、‘津香’番木瓜與‘台農二號’植株特性之比較 10
二、‘津香’番木瓜和‘台農二號’番木瓜果實品質、果實營養及呼吸速率之分析 11
三、‘津香’及‘台農二號’番木瓜果肉葡萄糖和果糖比例及揮發性物質之分析 17
四、‘津香’番木瓜及‘台農二號’番木瓜之官能品評 19

肆、結果 20
一、‘津香’番木瓜與‘台農二號’植株特性之比較 20
二、‘津香’及‘台農二號’後熟期間呼吸率及乙烯產生速率 35
三、‘津香’及‘台農二號’番木瓜果實品質和醣類比例之分析 39
四、 ‘津香’ 及‘台農二號’ 番木瓜果實和葉片內含礦物元素及成分 45
五、 ‘津香’ 及‘台農二號’ 番木瓜官能品評 52

伍、討論 54
一、植株品種以及性狀 54
二、番木瓜品種間呼吸率及乙烯產生速率之差異 54
三、兩品種間果實品質之差異 55
四、礦物元素 55
五、醣類比例 與揮發性物質 56
六、官能品評 58
陸、結論 59
柒、附錄 60
捌、參考文獻 63
王仁晃。2013。番木瓜高雄9號之育成。高雄區農業改良場研究彙報。Vol.24(2):pp1-8。
王自存。2014。園產品處理學。國立台灣大學園藝暨景觀學系。pp42, 91。
王彥熙、王乃巧。1999。臺北市大學女學生對外出服之色彩喜好分析研究。華岡紡織期刊 6:1 pp 39-47
林玉茹、林慧玲。2007。‘台農二號’番木瓜果實品質、礦物營養與生理性斑點之周年性調查。國立中興大學園藝學系碩士學位論文。
林穎正、吳達仁、歐弘毅。2014。果糖與代謝症候群。內科學誌。25, 410-416。
李皇照、謝慶昌、林宗賢、張龍生、洪挺軒、湯惟真、王仁晃。2008。赴夏威夷及墨西哥考察木瓜產業對手國核心技術競爭力。
孟祥春、凡超、張愛玉、竇同心。2010。不同品種番木瓜果實後熟及貯藏特性的比較研究。廣東省農業科學院果樹研究所。10(4): 21-24。
唐大崙 李天任 蔡政旻。2005。喜好與視線軌跡關係初探——以色彩喜好排序作業為例。Chinese J. of Psychol., Vol. 47(4), 339-351.
陳京城。2006。夏威夷之木瓜產業。台灣木瓜產業發展研討會專刊, pp21-29
陳國恩、吳俊達。2009。不同後熟特性番石榴品種ACC合成酶cDNA選殖與分析。臺灣大學園藝學研究所學位論文。
劉富文。1995。園產品採後處理及貯藏技術。台灣省青果運銷合作社。台灣、台北。pp. 1-38。
蔡雅惠、柯立祥。2005。不同發育階段番木瓜果實採後呼吸及乙烯產生行為之探討。
蔡宜峰、黃祥慶、賴文龍。1989。腐植酸及磷、鉀肥對枇杷果實品質及產量之影響。臺中區農業改良場研究彙報。24: 45-52。
趙 強。1997。自由基與抗氧化物質。美食天下.。64,3 P116
魏夢麗、呂秀英。2002。官能品評資料的統計分析方法之正確使用。農業試驗所技術服務。51, pp32-37。
Akamine, E. K. and T. Goo. 1979. Concentration of carbon dioxide and ethylene in the cavity of attached papaya fruit. Hort Science 14: 138-139.
Babushok, V. I., P. J. Linstrom and I. G. Zenkevich. 2011. Retention Indices for frequently reported compounds of plant essential oils. J. Phys. Chem. 40, no. 4.
Bari, L., P. Hassan, N. Absar, M. E. Haque, M. I. I. E. Khada, M. M. Pervin, S. Khatun, and M. I. Hossain. 2006. Nutritional analysis of two local varieties of papaya (Carica papaya L.) at different maturation stages. J. Bio. Sci. 9: 137-140.
Basulto, F. S., E. S. Duch, F. E. Gil, R. D. Plaza, A. L. Saavedra and J. M. Santamaría. 2009. Postharvest ripening and maturity indices for maradol papaya. Flavour Fragr. J. 2003; 18: 492–496.
Bickers, D., et al. 2003. "A toxicologic and dermatologic assessment of linalool and related esters when used as fragrance ingredients." Food and Chemical Toxicology 41(7): 919-942.
Chan, H. T. Jr. K. L. Hibbard, T. Goo, and E. K. Akamine. 1979. Sugar composition of papayas during fruit development. Hort Science 14: 140-141.
Chan R. A., F. R. R. Forrey, C. G. Cavaletto, M. Nakayama, J. E. Brekke. 1973. Development of off-odors and off-flavors in papaya puree. J. Agric. Food Chem. 21,4: 566-570.
Chandrika, U. G., E. R Jansz, SMD N. Wickramasinghe and N. D. Warnasuriya. 2003. Carotenoids in yellow- and red-fleshed papaya (Carica papaya L). J Sci Food Agric 83:1279–1282.
Cheng, L., S. Dong, S. Guak, and L.H. Fuchigami. 2001. Effects of nitrogen fertigationon reserve nitrogen and carbohydrate status and regrowth performance of pear nursery plants. Acta Hort. 564: 51-62.
Ferguson, I. B. and C. B. Watkins. 1993. Assessment and reduction of bitter pit risk in apple fruit. Acta Hort 326: 157-164.
Hartman, P. L., H. A. Mills, and J. B. Jones. Jr. 1986. The influence of nitrate: Ammonium ratios on growth, fruit development, and element concentration in‘Floradel’ tomato plants. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 111: 487-490.
Hofman, P. J., S. Vuthapanich, A. W. Whiley, A. Klieber, and D. H. Simons. 2002. Treeyield and influence fruit minerals concentrations ‘Hass’ avocado fruit quality. Sci. Hort. 92: 113-123.
Ikram, E. H. K., et al. 2015. "Phytochemicals of papaya and its traditional health and culinary uses – A review." J. of Food Composition and Analysis 41: 201-211.
Jirovetz L., G. Buchbauer, M. Shahabi, M. B. Ngassoum. 2003. Aroma Compounds of Mango and Papaya from Cameroon. Perfumer flavorist. 28:40-52.
Kelebek H., S. Selli, H. Gubbuk, E. Gunes. 2015. Comparative evaluation of volatiles, phenolics, sugars, organic acids and antioxidant properties of Sel-42 and Tainung papaya varieties Food Chem. 173: 912-919.
Kova´ts E., Helv. 1958. Gas-chromatographische charakterisierung organischer verbindungen. Chim. Acta. 206:1915-1932.
Marcelle, R. D. 1995. Mineral nutrition and fruit quality. Acta Hort. 383: 219-226.
Mahattanatawee, K., Manthey, J.A., Luzio, G., Talcott, S.T., Goodner, K., Baldwin, E.A., 2006. Total antioxidant activity and fiber content of select Florida-grown tropical fruits. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chem. 54 (19) pp7355–7363.
Paiva, E. A. S., R. A. Sampaio, and H. E. P. Martinez. 1998. Composition and quality of tomato fruit cultivated in nutrient solutions containing different calcium concentrations. J. Plant Nutr. 21: 2653-2661.
Paull, R. E., and N. J. Chen. 1983. Postharvest variation in cell wall-degrading enzymes of papaya (Carica papaya L.) during fruit ripening. Plant physiol. 72: 382-385.
Pereira, D.M., Valentao, P., Pereira, J.A., and Antrade, P.B. 2009. Phenolics : From chemistry to biology. Molecules, 14: 2202-2211.
Pino, J. A. K. Almora, R. Marbot. 2003. Volatile components of papaya (Carica papaya L., Maradol variety) fruit. Flavour Fragr J. 18(6),492-496.
Pino, J. A. 2014. Odour-active compounds in papaya fruit cv. Red Maradol. Food Chem. 146, 120-126.
Rogayah, M. H. Hamid, R. Razak, C. Y. Wee and J. O. Abdullah. 2018. Malaysian carica papaya L. var. Eksotika: current research strategies fronting challenges. Act. 1380 Vol 9. pp1-9.
Robert, F. R. R. Forrey. 1977. Volatile components of papaya (Carica papaya L., Solo variety). J. Agric. Food Chem. 251: 103-109
Saure, M. C. 2005. Calcium translocation to fleshy fruit: its mechanism and endogenous control. Sci. Hort. 105: 65- 89.
Sekeli, R., et al. (2018). "Malaysian Carica papaya L. var. Eksotika: Current Research Strategies Fronting Challenges." Front Plant Sci 9: 1380.
Selvaraj, Y., D. K. Pal, M. D. Subramanyam and C. P. A. Iyer. 1982. Changes in the chemical composition of four cultivars of papaya (Carica papaya L.) during growth and development. J. Hort. Sci. 57: 135-243.
Supriya V., K. Platel and K. Srinivasan. 2007 Varietal Differences in the Bioaccessibility of -Carotene from Mango (Mangifera indica) and Papaya (Carica papaya) Fruits. J. Agric. Food Chem., 55, 7931–7935.
Thomas S. N., T. Higaki. 2015 How to let go: pectin and plant cell adhesion. Frontiers in plant Sci. Vol.6 523.
Thorp, T. G., I. B. Ferguson, L. M. Boyd and A. M. Barnett. 2003. Fruiting position, mineral concentration and incidence of physiological pitting in ‘Hayward’ kiwifruit. J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol. 78: 505-511.
Veronika M. L., P. Esquivelb, E. C Castillo, R. Carlea. 2018. GC–MS profiling, descriptive sensory analysis, and consumer acceptance of Costa Rican papaya (Carica papaya L.) fruit purees. Food Chem. 248, 238–246.
Zhang, L. X. and R. E. Paull. 1990. Variation in the ripening characteristics of papaya.Acta Hort. 269: 119-125.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top