(3.227.249.234) 您好!臺灣時間:2019/10/18 12:05
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
本論文永久網址: 
line
研究生:涂譽鐘
研究生(外文):TU, YU-CHUNG
論文名稱:威權式領導對團隊績效之影響:以團隊氛圍、團隊信任為中介變項
論文名稱(外文):The effects of authoritarian leadership on team performance: The mediate roles of team climate and team trust
指導教授:董玉娟董玉娟引用關係
指導教授(外文):TUNG, YU-CHUAN
口試委員:李俊賢曹瓊文許淑寬董玉娟
口試委員(外文):LEE,CHUN-HSIENTSAO,CHIUNG-WENHSU,SHU-KUANTUNG, YU-CHUAN
口試日期:2019-06-13
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄科技大學
系所名稱:人力資源發展系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文出版年:2019
畢業學年度:107
語文別:中文
論文頁數:67
中文關鍵詞:家長式領導威權式領導團隊氛圍團隊信任團隊績效
外文關鍵詞:Patriarchal leadershipAuthoritarian leadershipTeam climateTeam trustTeam performance
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:24
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
在現今的工作環境,可看到許多企業單位或組織機構,普遍的建立團隊或是以團隊模式來執行組織目標,但是,不是每一個團隊都能產出高績效,在許多因素當中,團隊領導者主要是影響團隊績效的關鍵所在。而由於在現在工作型態的快速改變,使得領導者的角色、任務、及功能與過去的主管有很大的差異。而本研究將以團隊層次的概念來探討透過威權式領導模式下,以團隊氛圍及團隊信任為中介模式下,探究是否影響團隊績效之研究。
本研究先收集有關威權式領導、團隊氛圍、團隊信任及團隊績效之文獻,來作為研究的理論基礎並蒐集相關問卷,透過問卷調查法,以高屏地區之高科技產業、傳統產業中的專案、業績等部門團隊為主要發放樣本,共發出270份問卷(90組),最後回收239份問卷(71組),問卷回收率為89%。
經過SPSS分析軟體,透過描述性統計、信效度、相關及迴歸分析等方式檢定各項研究假設,結果發現:
(1) 威權領導會對團隊氛圍、團隊績效有顯著負向影響。
(2) 團隊氛圍及團隊信任會對團隊績效有顯著正向影響。
(3) 團隊氛圍在威權領導與團隊績效之間具有中介效果。

關鍵字:家長式領導、威權式領導、團隊氛圍、團隊信任、團隊績效
In today's work environment, many organizations generally build teams to perform organizational goals. However, not every team can produce high performance. Team leader are key to affect team performance. Furthermore, because of the rapid changes in the current work style, the role, tasks, and functions of the leader are very different from those of the past. This study explored whether authoritarian leadership affect team performance through team climate and team trust in team level.

This subject of study is the teams in high-tech industry and traditional industries. Through the questionnaire survey method, 270 samples in 90 teams were distributed and 239 questionnaires of 71 groups were collected. The rate of return was 89%.

Through SPSS analysis software, the research hypotheses were tested by descriptive statistics, reliability and validity, correlation and regression analysis. The results showed that:
(1)Authoritarian leadership has a significant negative relationship with team climate and team performance.
(2)Team climate and team trust have a significant positive relationship with team performance.
(3)Team climate has a mediating effect on the relationship between authoritarian leadership and team performance.

Keywords: Patriarchal leadership, Authoritarian leadership, Team climate, Team trust, Team performance

致謝詞…………………………………………………………………………………i
中文摘要…………………………………………………………………………… ii
英文摘要……………………………………………………………………………iii
目錄………………………………………………………………………………… iv
表目錄…………………………………………………………………………………v
圖目錄……………………………………………………………………………… ⅵ
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究問題與目的 4
第三節 研究流程與程序 5
第二章 文獻探討 6
第一節 威權領導 6
第二節 團隊氛圍 9
第三節 團隊信任 12
第四節 團隊績效 17
第五節 假設推導 21
第三章 研究方法 28
第一節 研究架構 28
第二節 研究假設 29
第三節 研究對象 30
第四節 研究變數之測量 33
第五節 資料處理分析 35
第四章 研究結果 37
第一節 因素分析與信度檢定 37
第二節 團隊資料內部一致性檢定 42
第三節 相關分析 43
第四節 迴歸分析 45
第五節 假設驗證 49
參考文獻 57
一、中文文獻 57
二、英文文獻 60

一、中文文獻
王楨綺(2013)。領導者與團隊成員異質性和團隊績效的關係-以團隊學習為中介
效果。國立高雄應用科技大學人力資源發展系碩士班。高雄市。
王毓源(2010)。交互記憶系統與團隊信任影響資訊系統團隊之效能研究:社會支
持意願之中界效果探索。國立東華大學數位知識管理碩士學位學程。花蓮縣。
田靜婷(2003)。影響高科技產業研發團隊學習績效相關因素之研究。國立彰化師
範大學工業教育學系。彰化市。
任金剛、樊景立、鄭伯壎、周麗芳(2003)。家長式領導與其效能:情境因素之調
節效果。教育部華人本土心理學研究追求卓越計畫研究報告(編號89-H-
FA01-2-4-4)。台北:教育部。
任金剛、樊景立、鄭伯壎、周麗芳(2003)。高階主管之家長式領導與組織效能:
一項個人與組織層次的分析。教育部華人本土心理學研究追求卓越計畫研究
報告(編號 89-H-FA01-2-4-4)。台北:教育部。
吳宗祐(2008)。主管威權領導與部屬的工作滿意度與組織承諾:信任的中介歷程
與情緒智力的調節效果。本土心理學研究,30,3-63。
吳宗祐、徐瑋玲、鄭伯壎(2002)。怒不可遏或忍氣吞聲:華人企業主管威權領導
與部屬憤怒反應。本土心理學研究,18,頁3-49。
吳宗祐、周麗芳、鄭伯壎(2008)。主管的權威取向及其對部屬順從與畏懼的知覺
對威權領導的預測效果。本土心理學研究,30,65-115。
吳宗祐、廖紘億(2013)。華人威權領導總是導致部屬負面結果嗎?由「不確定管
理理論」探討威權領導對分配不公平與程序不公平之交互作用與部屬工作滿
意度之關係的調節效果。中華心理學刊,55(1),1-22。
沈介文、陳月娥、周毓敏、陳銘嘉(2015)。以團隊歷程觀點探討團隊結構與績效
之關聯-以團隊信任為中介變項。人力資源管理學報,5(3)。75-90。
周婉茹、周麗芳、鄭伯壎、任金剛(2010)。專權與尚嚴之辨:再探威權領導的內
涵與恩威並濟的效果。本土心理學研究,34,223-284。
林晉寬(1999)。台灣購物網站銷售之產品分析。商業自動化研討會論文集。125-138。
姜定宇、丁捷、林伶瑾(2012)。家長式領導與部屬效能:信任主管與不信任主管
的中介效果。中華心理學刊,54(3),269-291。
徐瑋伶、鄭伯壎、黃敏萍 (2002)。華人企業領導人的員工歸類與管理行為。本
土心理學研究,18,51-94。
許道然(2001)。公部門組織信任與組織公民行為關係之研究。國立政治大學公共
行政學系。台北市。
陳介玄、高承恕(1991)。台灣企業運作的社會秩序:人情關係與法律。東海學報,
32,219-232。
陳姿纓(2011)。領導風格、團隊玩興氣氛、團隊衝突與團隊績效之研究。國立高
雄應用科技大學國際企業系。高雄市。
陳鈺芳(2004)。教練領導、領導信任及運動員效能:多元領導模式驗證(未出版
之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學體育學系,台北市。
陳德富(2013)。從威權領導、魅力領導到真誠領導探討華人企業組織之高科技產
業高階主管之領導對部屬工作態度之影響。中華管理評論國際學報,16(4),
1-24。
彭台光、高月慈、林鉦琴(2006)。管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報,23,77-98。
游宗憲(2006)。淺談組織信任對人力資源管理之影響。T&D飛訊,50。
周婉茹、鄭伯壎、連玉輝(2014)。威權領導:概念源起、現況檢討及未來方向。
中華心理學刊,56(2),165-189。
馮立誠(2005)。信任的定義與理論定位之命題研究。朝陽科技大學企業管理系碩
士班。台中市。
黃光國(1995)。儒家價值觀的現代轉化:理論分析與實徵研究。本土心理學研究,
3,276-338。
黃怡姿(1999)。員工之組織信任的形成與影響。國立台灣大學心理學研究所。台北市。
楊國樞(1993)。中國人的社會取向:社會互動的觀點。見楊國樞、余安邦(編):
中國人的心理與行為:理論與方法篇 (一九九二)。台北:桂冠圖書公司,
87-142。
樊景立、鄭伯壎(2000)。華人組織的家長式領導:一項文化觀點的分析,本土心
理學研究,13,127-180。
鄭伯壎(1990)。領導與情境-互動心理學研究途徑。台北:大洋出版社。
鄭伯壎(1991)。家族主義與領導行為。見楊中芳、高尚仁(主編)《中國人‧中國
心-人格與社會篇》。台北:遠流出版公司。
鄭伯壎(1993)。家長權威價值與領導行為之關係探討。台北:國科會專題研究報告。
鄭伯壎(1995a)。家長權威與領導行為之關係:一個台灣民營企業主持人的個案
研究。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,79,119-173。
鄭伯壎(1995b)。差序格局與華人組織行為。本土心理學研究,3,142-219。
鄭伯壎(1995c)。不同家長權威價值與領導作風的關係:台灣民營企業的實徵研
究。國科會專題研究計畫(編號83-0301-H-002-056)。
鄭伯壎(1999)。家長式領導的概念建構與工具發展。國科會專題計劃成果報告。
鄭伯壎(2001)。企業組織中上下屬的信任關係。載於楊中芳(主編):中國人的人
際關係、情感與信任(271-292頁)。臺北市:遠流。
鄭伯壎(2003)。台灣的組織行為研究:過去、現在、未來。應用心理研究,19,
35-87。
鄭伯壎、周麗芳、樊景立(2000)。家長式領導:三元模式的建構與測量。本土心
理學研究,14,3-64。
鄭伯壎、黃敏萍、周麗芳(2002)。家長式領導及其效能:華人企業團隊的證據。
香港華人心理學報(香港),3(1),85-112。
鄭伯壎、周麗芳、黃敏萍、樊景立、彭泗清(2003)。家長式領導的三元模式:中
國大陸企業組織的證據。本土心理學研究,19,209-250。
嚴奇峰(1997a)。台灣家族企業之文化與結構關係研究-雙元系統模型。台北:行
政院國家科學委員會專題研究。





二、英文文獻
Agrell, A., & Gustafson, R. (1994). The Team Climate Inventory (TCI) and group
innovation: A psychometric test on a Swedish sample of work groups. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67(2), 143-151.
Arrow K. J., (1974).Limited knowledge and economic analysis.The American Economic Review , 64, 1–10.
Bain, Paul G., Mann, Leon, & Pirola-Merlo, Andrew (2001) The innovation imperative: The relationships between team climate, innovation, and performance in research and development teams. Small Group Research, 32(1), 55-73.
Baron、R.、& Kenny、D. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in
social psychological research: Conceptual、strategic、and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6)、1173-1182.
Barber, B. (1983) .The Logic and Limits of Trust. New Brunswick: Rutgers University
Press.
Bass, B.M. Bass, R. (2008). The Bass Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research,
and Managerial Applications. New York: The Free Press.
Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability:
Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J.
Kozlowski(Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations:
Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349-381). San Francisco, CA,
US: Jossey-Bass.
Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G., dan Lee, J. N. (2005). Behavioral Intention
Formation in Knowledge sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators,
Social-Psychological Forces, and Organizational Climate. MIS Quarterly 29(1)
, 87-111.
Bradach, J. L., & Eccles, R. G.(1989). Price,Authority,and Trust:From Ideal Types
to Plural Forms. Annual Review of Sociology,15, 97-118.
Burke, C. S., Sims, D. E., Lazzara, E. H., & Salas, E. (2007). Trust in leadership: A
multi-level review and integration. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(6), 606-632.
Burningham, C., & West, M. A. (1995). Individual, climate, and group interaction
processes as predictors of work team innovation. Small Group Research, 26(1),
106-117.
Carron, A. V. (1982). Cohesiveness in sport groups: Interpretations and onsiderations.
Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 123-138.
Carron, A.V. and Hausenblas, H.A. (1998) .Group Dynamics in Sport (2nd edn).
Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
Carnevale, A. P.(1986) The learning enterprise. Training and Development Journal. v.
40 (1), 18-26.
Cartwright, D., & Zander, A. (1968). Group dynamics (3rd ed.). Oxford, England: Harper + Row.
Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA. et al
SPIRIT (2013).explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical
trials.BMJ
Chen, C.C., and Farh, J.L.(2008). Developments in understanding Chinese leadership:
Paternalism and its elaborations, moderations, and alternative.Paper presented
at the 2008 International Association for Chinese Management
Research(IACMR) Biannual Conference, Guang Chou, China.
Chen, X. P., & Farh, J. L. (1999). The effectiveness of transactional and
transformational leader behaviours in Chinese organizations: Evidence from
Taiwan. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management,
Chicago.
Cheng, B.S., Chou, L.F., Huang, M.P., Wu, T.Y., and Farh, J.L.(2004). “Paternalistic
leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in
Chinese organizations.”Asian Journal of Social Psychology,7(1),89-117.
Cheng, B.S., Jiang, D.Y., Cheng, C.Y., Riley, H.J., and Jen, K.K. (2004). Perceived
supervisor support as a moderator of the relationship between perceived
supervisor integrity and supervisory commitment: Tests of culture influences
between Taiwan and the United States. Paper Presented at the Inaugural
Conference on International Association for Chinese Management Research,
Beijing.
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness
research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23,
239-290.
Connell, J., Ferres, N., & Travaglione, A. (2003). Engendering trust in manager-
subordinate relationships: Predictors and outcomes. Personnel Review, 32(5),
569-587.
Cummings, L. L. and P. Bromiley (1996), The organizational trust inventory (OTI):
Development and validation, in Kramer, M. R. and R. T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in
Organizations, Frontiers of theory and research, 302-330. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
Dirks, K., & Ferrin, D. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science, 12, 450–467.
Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and
implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611-
628.
McAllister, D. (1995). Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal,38(1), 24-59.
De Jong, B. A., & Elfring, T. (2010). How Does Trust Affect the Performance of Ongoing Teams? The Mediating Role of Reflexivity, Monitoring and Effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 535-549.
Delarue, A., Van Hootegem, G., Procter, S., & Burridge, M. (2008). Teamworking and orga-nizational performance: A review of survey-based research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10, 127-148.
Drucker, Peter F.(1988), The coming of the new organization, Harvard Business Review,
66(1), 45-53
Dyer, J. H.; Chu, W. (2003): The Role of Trustworthiness in Reducing Transaction Costs and Improving Performance: Empirical Evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea, in: Organization Science, 14(1), 57-68.
Edmondson, A.(1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.
Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in
Chinese organizations. In Li, J. T., Tsui, A. S., & Weldon, E. (Eds.), Management
and organizations in the Chinese context, 84-127. London: Macmillan.
Fox, A. (1974) Beyond Contract: Work, Power and Trust Relations, Faber & Faber, London
Francisco Gil, Ramo´n Rico, Carlos M. Alcover, Angel Barrasa,(2005).hange-oriented
leadership, satisfaction and performance in workgroups Effects of team climate
and group potency, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20
Fulk, J.(1993). Social construction of communication technology. Academy of
Management Journal, 36(5), 921-950.
George, J. M. & Bettenhausen, K. (1990). Understanding prosocial behavior, sales performance, and turnover: A group-level analysis in a service context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 698-709
Gilmore, D. C., Ferris G. R. (1996). Organizational Politics and Employee Attendance, Group & Organization Management, 21(4): 481-494.
Gladstein, D. (1984), Groups in context: a model of task group effectiveness, Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 499-517.
Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of
organizational behavior, 315-342. New York: Prentice Hall.
Hogg, M. A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to
social identity. New York: New York University Press.
House, R. J. (1971). A path-goal theory of leadership effectiveness. Administrative
Science Quarterly, 16, 321-338.
Hofstede, G.(1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills; London: Sage Publications.
Jehn, K. A., & Bezrukova, K. (2004). A field study of group diversity, workgroup context, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 703–729.
Kang, H., Yang, H., & Rowley, C. (2006). Factors in team effectiveness: Cognitive and demographic similarities of software development team members. Human Relations, 59(12), 1681−1710.
Keyton, J., & Springston, J. (1990). Redefining cohesiveness in groups. Small Group Research, 21(2), 234-254.
Kline, T. J. B., & McGrath, J.-L. (1998). Development and validation of five criteria for evaluating team performance. Organization Development Journal, 16(3), 19-27.
Kozlowski, S.W.J., & Doherty, M. L.(1989). An integration of climate and leadership:Examination of a neglected issue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74,
546-553.
Kozlowski, S.W.J., & Farr, J. L. (1988). An integrative model of updating and
performance. Human Performance, 1, 5-29.
Kozlowski, S.W.J., Bell, B.S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In Borman, W.C., Ilgen, D.R., Klimoski, R.J. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 12. Industrial and organizational psychology , 333-375. London: Wiley.
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77–124.
Lapidot, Y., Kark, R., and Shamir, B. (2007), The impact of situational vulnerability
on the development and erosion of followers' trust in their leader, Leadership
Quarterly, 18(1), 16-34,
Larsen, R. J., & Diener, E. (1992). Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotion. In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology, No. 13. Emotion , 25-59. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc.
Lee, Y. D., Lain, J. W., & Chen, C. Y. (1999). A study on the measurement of productivity for white-collar employees — A case of electronic industry in Taiwan. The Chinese Military Academy Journal, 14, 345–361.
Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in
experimentally created "social climates. Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271- 299.
Lewis, J.D. and A. Weigert (1985).Trust as a Social Reality, Social Forces 63: 967–85.
Lewicki, R.J. and Bunker, B.B. (1996) Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work
Relationships. In: Kramer, R.M. and Tyler, T.R., Eds., Trust in Organizations:
Frontiers in Theory and Research, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, 114-139.
Lewicki R. J., McAllister D. J., Bies R. J. (1998) Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review 23 (3), 438–458.
Levi, D. and Slem, C. (1995).Team work in research and development organisations:
the characteristics of successful teams, International Journal of Industrial
Ergonomics, 16(1), 29-42.
María Isabel Delgado Piña, Ana María Romero Martínez, Luis Gómez Martínez, (2008) Teams in organizations: a review on team effectiveness, Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 14, 7-21,
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H. and Schoorman, F. D. (1995) .An integrative model of organizational trust, Academy of management review, 20(3), 709-734.
McAllister, D.J. (1995) Affect and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24-59
McEvily, B., Perrone, V. and Zaheer, A. (2003). Trust as an Organizing Principle. Organization Science, 14, 91-103.
McGrath, J. E. (1964). Social psychology: A brief introduction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., & Chervany, N. L. (1998). Initial trust formation
in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23(3),
473-490.
Michelle A. Marks.(2001). John E. Mathieu and Stephen J. Zaccaro The Academy of
Management Review, 26(3) 356-376
Mohrman, S. A., Cohen, S. G. & Mohrman, A. M.(1995).Designing team-based organization: New forms for knowledge work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Pub
Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., & Deshpande, R. (1992). Relationships between providers and users of market research: The dynamics of trust within and between organizations. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(3), 314-328.
Neil R. Anderson & Michael A(1998). West Source: Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(3), 235-258
Nyhan,R.C. (2000). Changing the Paradigm:Trust and Its Role in Public Sector
Organizations. American Review of Public Administration,30(1).87- 109.
Parker, G. M. (1990). Team players and teamwork: The new competitive business
strategy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.,
Publishers. Sherwood, A. L., & DePaolo, C. A. (2005). Task and relationship-oriented trust in leaders. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 12(2), 65-81.
Pellegrini, E. K. – Scandura, T. A. (2008): Paternalistic leadership: A review and
agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 34, 566–593.
Pye, L.W. (1981). Dynamics of Chinese Politics. Cambridge, MA: OG & H.
Quick, T. L.(1992). Successful Team Building. New York,American Management Association
Redding, S. G. (1990). The spirit of Chinese capitalism. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S. and Camerer, C. (1998) . Not So Different
After All: A Cross-discipline View of Trust’, Academy of Management Review
23(3): 393-404.
Robbins, S. P. (1990). Organization theory: Structure, design, and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Salas, E., Stagl, K., & Burke, C. S. (2004). 25 years of team effectiveness in organizations: Research themes and emerging needs. In C. L. Cooper, & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 19, 47 – 91. New York7 John Wiley & Sons
Shenhar, A., Levy, O., & Dvir, D. (1997). Mapping the dimensions of project success. Project Management Journal, 28(2), 5–13.
Shaw, J. B. and E. Barrett-Power(1998), The Effects of Diversity on Small Work Group Processes and Performance, Human Relations 51, 1307–1325.
Schneider, B. (Ed.) (1990). Organizational climate and culture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schaubroeck, J. M., Lam, S. S., and Peng, A. C.,(2016). Can peers’ ethical and transformational leadership improve coworkers’ service quality? A latent growth analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 133, 45-58
Silin, R. F. (1976). Leadership and values. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Simons, T. L., & Peterson, R. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trus Retrieved, from Cornell University, School of Hospitality Administration site.
Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Salas, E., & Brannick, M. T. (2001). To transfer or not to
transfer Investigating the combined effects of trainee characteristics, team leader
support and team climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 279-292
Smith, J. B. and D. W. Barclay (1997), The effects of organizational differences and trust on the effectiveness of selling partner relationships, Journal of Marketing, 61: 3-21.
Spinks, J.M. (2006). Resourcing Schools for the 21st Century 2: Models, London:
Specialist Schools and Academies Trust.
Stewart, G. L., & Barrick, M. R. (2000). Team structure and performance: Assessing
the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task
type. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 135-148
Tian, Q., and Sanchez, J. I. (2017). Does paternalistic leadership promote innovative behavior The interaction between authoritarianism and benevolence. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol.47, 235–246
Thomas, J. B., & Kenneth, P. D. M. (1996). Diagnosing whether an organization is truly
ready to empower work teams: A case study. Human Resource Planning, 19, 38-
47.
Wang Honglei, Guan Bichen. (2018). The positive effect of authoritarian leadership on employee performance: The moderating role of power distance. Frontiers in psychology.
Walker, L., Avant, K. (1995).Strategies for Theory Construction in Nursing. 3rd ed. Appleton-Century-Crofts, Norwalk.
Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective Events Theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews, 18, 1-74.
Wellins, R. S., Byham, W. C., & Dixon, G. R. (1994). Inside teams: How 20 world- class organizational are winning through teamwork. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
West, M. A. (1990). The social psychology of innovation in groups. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies , 309-333.
Westwood, R. I. (1997). Harmony and patriarchy: The cultural basis for paternalistic headship‖ among the overseas Chinese. Organization Studies, 18(3), 445−480.
Whitener, E. M., Brodt, S. E., Korsgaard, M. A., & Werner, J. M. (1998). Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 513-530.
Williams, M.(2001). In whom we trust: Group membership as an affective context
for trust development. Academy of management Review, 26(3), 377-396
Wren, J.T. (1995). The leader’s companion: Insights on leadership through the ages.
New York: The Free Press.
Yang, J., and Mossholder, K. W. (2010), Examining the effects of trust in leaders: A
basesand-foci approach, Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 50-63.
Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science, 9(2), 141-159.


QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔