臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

【摘 要】

旅遊產業逐步發展出一種將歷史和文物資產商品化，作為地區性開發與經濟脈絡的模式，而黑暗觀光往往是此類旅遊的熱門類型。發生災難或傷痛等悲劇性事件的場域給遊客帶來更多觸動與生命反思，是非常具有教育意義的旅遊形式，然而亦存在觀光客與在地居民兩種視角下的矛盾。紀念性場域中空間元素的特質，是影響個體產生感受連結之關鍵，然而災難紀念場域的空間元素與一般美質環境存在很大區別，也因類型不同而以不同的樣態呈現。因此，本研究將以九二一紀念地為例，探討災難紀念性場域空間元素與情緒感受之關係。
本研究透過相關文獻及文本分析，了解九二一紀念地之空間元素與其景觀特徵，以及由此獲得的情緒感受，並進一步透過問卷調查，以學生及社會人士為受測者，探究九二一紀念地之空間元素與情緒感受之關係。研究結果顯示，空間元素之景觀特徵與大部分情緒感受皆呈顯著相關，景觀特徵越趨近於「自然的」與「完好的」，則產生之正面情緒越強烈；而景觀特徵越趨近於「人工的」與「破損的」，則產生之負面情緒越強烈。情緒感受於不同類型之空間元素間亦存在顯著差異。根據研究結果，建議規劃設計者可透過對空間元素之景觀特徵的掌控，以傳達符合場所定位的適當的情緒體驗，使用自然元素調節紀念性場域情緒氛圍，並通過人工元素創作，以輔助場所故事性與精神內涵的傳達，帶給參訪者更為豐富細膩的遊憩感受。

【Abstract】
In the tourism industry, a kind of form that commercializes historical and cultural assets has been gradually developed. As a mode of regional development and economic context, dark tourism is often a popular type of such tourism. Although those sites where tragic events such as disasters or injuries occur can bring visitors more touching and life reflection, which is an educational form of tourism, there are also contradictions from the perspective of tourists and local residents. The characteristics of spatial components in monumental site are the key to affecting the individual's ability to produce emotional connections. However, the disaster monumental site is presented in different forms because its spatial components are quite different from the general aesthetic environment, and the types are different. Therefore, in this study, the relationship between spatial components of the disaster monumental site and emotional feelings will be explored by taking the 921 Earthquake Memorial Sites as an example.
In this study, the spatial components and landscape features of 921 Earthquake Memorial Sites and the emotional feelings gained therefrom are understood by analyzing relevant literature and texts. Furthermore, the relationship between spatial components and emotional feelings of 921 Earthquake Memorial Sites is explored by questionnaires with students and social personages as subjects. The results show that the landscape characteristics of spatial components are significantly correlated with most emotional feelings. The closer the landscape characteristics approach to "natural" and "intact", the stronger the positive emotions generated; while the closer the landscape characteristics approach to "artificial" and " damaged", the stronger the negative emotions generated. Emotional feelings also have significant differences among different types of spatial components.
In view of the research results, it is suggested that planning designers can convey appropriate emotional experiences that are consistent with the site position by controlling the landscape characteristics of spatial components, adjust the emotional atmosphere of monumental sites by using natural spatial components, and convey the story and spiritual connotation of the site by creating artificial spatial components, so as to provide visitors with richer and more delicate recreational experience.

第一章 緒論
第一節 研究背景與動機
第二節 研究目的
第三節 名詞釋義
第四節 研究流程
第二章 文獻回顧
第一節 黑暗觀光
第二節 環境知覺
第三章 研究設計
第一節 研究場域說明
第二節 先期研究
第三節 研究架構與假設
第四節 測量工具
第五節 調查對象與調查方法
第六節 資料分析方法
第四章 研究分析結果
第一節 問卷樣本屬性描述性統計
第二節 研究變項測量結果
第三節 研究假設檢定
第五章 結論與建議
第一節 結論
第二節 建議
參考文獻
附錄 正式問卷

中文文獻：
1.王石番，(1999)，內容分析法，臺北: 幼獅文化事業股份有限公司。
2.王逸峰，(2006)，觀光行銷學，臺北: 偉華書局有限公司。 
3.何信華，(2014)，文化再生與工業遺產轉型之社會影響：荷蘭西瓦斯廠文化公園之個案研究，碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學歐洲文化與觀光研究所，臺北。
4.余民寧、李仁豪，(2006)，調查方式與問卷長短對回收率與調查內容影響之研究，當代教育研究，14(3)，127-168。
5.吳統雄，(1984)，電話調查理論與方法，臺北：聯經出版事業公司。
6.李卉，(2012)，探索旅客從事黑暗觀光之體驗效益－以小林村紀念公園為例，碩士論文，國立高雄餐旅大學旅遊管理研究所，高雄。
7.李佩璇，(2009)，自行車的休閒化: 休閒實作型式的象徵鬥爭，碩士論文，臺灣大學社會學研究所，臺北。
8.李佩璿，(2009)，自行車的休閒化：休閒實作形式的象徵鬥爭，碩士論文，國立臺灣大學社會學研究所，臺北。
9.李瓊玉，(1994)，遊客對農村景觀意象之研究，碩士論文，東海大學景觀學研究所，臺中。
10.周念潔，(2008)，以遊客動機探討黑暗觀光之市場區隔－921地震教育園區為例，碩士論文，中國文化大學觀光事業研究所，臺北。
11.林正士、吳英偉、李忠榮，(2015)，探索戰地觀光的旅遊動機與情緒體驗-以金門為例，休閒與遊憩研究，7(1)，93-140。
12.林淑慧，(2014)，旅人心境：臺灣日治時期漢文旅遊書寫，臺北：萬卷樓圖書股份有限公司。
13.林淑慧、王聖鐸，(2017)，形構美國都市意象：臺灣日治時期知識菁英的旅行文本分析，戶外遊憩研究，30(2)，1-22。
14.林惠玲、陳正倉，(2004)，統計學方法與應用，臺北：雙葉書廊有限公司。
15.林義男、陳淳文(譯)， (1989)，內容分析法導論 (原作者: Weber, R. P. )，臺北；巨流圖書有限公司。
16.林瓊華，(1995)，觀光遊憩發展對傳統聚落環境知覺及景觀意象之影響，碩士論文, 臺灣大學園藝研究所，臺北。
17.邱于平、楊美雪，(2011)，部落格口碑訊息訴求對購買決策之影響，電子商務學報，13(4)，919-937。
18.邱皓政，(2000)，社會與行為科學的量化研究與統計分析，臺北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
19.洪維勵、周念潔，(2011)，黑暗觀光動機之研究-以 921 地震教育園區為例，島嶼觀光研究，4(2)，1-17。
20.耿鳳英，(2011)，誰的故事？─ 論博物館展示詮釋，博物館學季刊，25(3)，99-111。
21.常智豪，(2014)，歷史感對重遊意願影響之研究，碩士論文，世新大學觀光學研究所，臺北。
22.張群，(2010)，從體驗角度看黑色旅遊及其發展探討，安徽農業科學，38(1)，437-439。
23.陳佳利，(2007)，創傷，博物館與集體記憶之建構，臺灣社會研究季刊，(66)，105-143。
24.陳映均、林晏州，(2014)，都市街道景觀封閉感之研究，都市與計劃，41(1)，99-115。
25.陳貞吟，(2008)，黑暗觀光：創傷再現之體驗與詮釋，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
26.陳貞吟、盧庭韻，(2008)，旅遊部落格之目的地行銷意涵-以淡水為例，觀光休閒學報，14(2)，135-159。
27.陳碧琳，(2011)，土銀古蹟遺構再現之空間歷史感浸潤與愉悅，臺灣博物季刊，30(1)，34-41。
28.陸建良，(2012)，探討遊客參與黑暗觀光的遊憩體驗之研究，碩士論文，逢甲大學景觀與遊憩系所，臺中。
29.曾慈慧、沈進成、陳麗如，(2011)，礦業遺產觀光中真實性對觀光意象、地方感與遊後行為意圖之影響，戶外遊憩研究，24(3)，79-111。
30.黃孝璋、李晶，(2018)，旅遊書寫中的歷史再現：紀念性場域空間元素與遊客之感受連結，觀光休閒學報，24(2)，177-205。
31.黃茂容，(1989)，溪頭森林遊樂區遊客對自然環境的情緒體驗，戶外遊憩研究，2(2)，31-50。
32.鄭宇軒，(2012)，墓園觀光：墓園環境與旅遊動機對於遊客懷舊情緒與重遊意願之影響，碩士論文，南華大學旅遊管理學系旅遊管理碩士班，嘉義。
33.盧碧純，(2009)，從環境復癒理論討黑暗觀光地對旅客之心理效益，碩士論文，南華大學旅遊事業管理研究所，嘉義。
34.賴韻文，(2012)，黑暗觀光遊客之情緒體驗與再訪意願:黑暗吸引力之中介效果-以臺灣「國民革命忠烈祠」為例，碩士論文，國立臺灣大學生物資源暨農學院生物產業傳播暨發展學系，臺北。
35.聶筱秋、胡中凡、唐筱雯、葉冠伶(譯)，(2003)，環境心理學 (原作者: Paul. A. Bell, Thomas. C. Green, Jeffery. D. Fisher & Andrew. Baum)。臺北：桂冠圖書股份有限公司。
英文文獻：
1.Best, M. (2007). Norfolk Island: thanatourism, history and visitor emotions. Shima: The International Journal of Research into Island Cultures, 1(2), 30-48.
2.Bigley, J. D., Lee, C. K., Chon, J., & Yoon, Y. (2010). Motivations for war-related tourism: A case of DMZ visitors in Korea. Tourism Geographies, 12(3), 371-394.
3.Blom, T. (2000). Morbid tourism-a postmodern market niche with an example from Althorp. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift, 54(1), 29-36.
4.Bollag, B. (1999). In the Shadow of Auschwitz: Teaching the Holocaust in Poland. American Educator, 23(1), 38.
5.Bosangit, C., McCabe, S., & Hibbert, S. (2009). What is told in travel blogs? Exploring travel blogs for consumer narrative analysis. In Information and communication technologies in tourism, 2009, 61-71, Springer, Vienna.
6.Braithwaite, D., & Lee, Y. L. (2006). Dark tourism, hate and reconciliation: The Sandakan experience. International Institute for Peace Through Tourism Occasional Paper, 8.
7.Carini, R. M., Hayek, J. C., Kuh, G. D., Kennedy, J. M., & Ouimet, J. A. (2003). College student responses to web and paper surveys: Does mode matter?. Research in Higher Education, 44(1), 1-19.
8.Cohen, E. (1988). Authenticity and commoditization in tourism. Annals of tourism research, 15(3), 371-386.
9.Cohen, E. H. (2011). Educational dark tourism at an in populo site: The Holocaust Museum in Jerusalem. Annals of tourism research, 38(1), 193-209.
10.Coomber, R. (1997). Using the Internet for survey research. Sociological research online, 2(2), 1-10.
11.Cresswell, T. (2010). Towards a politics of mobility. Environment and planning D: society and space, 28(1), 17-31.
12.Dann, G. M. S. (1998). The dark side of tourism (serie L, Vol. 14, pp. 1–31). Etudes et Rapports. Aix-en-Provence: Centre International de Recherches et d’Etudes Touristiques.
13.Dean, D. (1996). Museum exhibition: Theory and practice. London, UK: Routledge.
14.Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from museums. Oxford, UK: Altamira Press.
15.Foley, M., & Lennon, J. J. (1996). JFK and dark tourism: A fascination with assassination. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 2(4), 198-211.
16.Herzog, T. R. (1984). A cognitive analysis of preference for field‐and‐forest environments. Landscape research, 9(1), 10-16.
17.Herzog, T., & Smith, G. A. (1988). Danger, mystery, and environmental preference. Environment and Behavior, 20(3), 320-344.
18.Isaac, R. K., & Çakmak, E. (2014). Understanding visitor's motivation at sites of death and disaster: the case of former transit camp Westerbork, the Netherlands. Current Issues in Tourism, 17(2), 164-179.
19.Ittelson, W. H., Proshansky, H. M., Rivlin, L. G., & Winkel, G. H. (1974). An introduction to environmental psychology. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
20.Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.
21.Kang, E. J., Scott, N., Lee, T. J., & Ballantyne, R. (2012). Benefits of visiting a ‘dark tourism’site: The case of the Jeju April 3rd Peace Park, Korea. Tourism Management, 33(2), 257-265.
22.Kent, S. (Ed.). (1993). Domestic architecture and the use of space: an interdisciplinary cross-cultural study. Cambridge University Press.
23.Koch, N. S., & Emrey, J. A. (2001). The Internet and opinion measurement: Surveying marginalized populations. Social Science Quarterly, 82(1), 131-138.
24.Korpela, K. M., Hartig, T., Kaiser, F. G., & Fuhrer, U. (2001). Restorative experience and self-regulation in favorite places. Environment and behavior, 33(4), 572-589.
25.Krakover, S. (2005). Attitudes of Israeli visitors towards the Holocaust remembrance site of Yad Vashem. Horror and human tragedy revisited: the management of sites of atrocities for tourism, 108-117.
26.Krakover, S. (2005). Estimating the effect of atrocious events on the flow of tourists to Israel. Horror and human tragedy revisited: The management of sites of atrocities for tourism, 183-194.
27.Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28.Layne, B. H., Decristoforo, J. R., & McGinty, D. (1999). Electronic versus traditional student ratings of instruction. Research in Higher Education, 40(2), 221-232.
29.Lennon, J. J., & Foley, M. (2000). Dark tourism. Cengage Learning EMEA.
30.MacCannell, D. (2002). Empty meeting grounds: The tourist papers. Routledge.
31.Macdonald, S. (2002). A people’s story: Heritage, identity and authenticity. In Touring cultures (pp. 165-185). Routledge.
32.Magnini, V. P., Crotts, J. C., & Zehrer, A. (2011). Understanding customer delight: An application of travel blog analysis. Journal of Travel Research, 50(5), 535-545.
33.McCabe, S. E. (2004). Comparison of web and mail surveys in collecting illicit drug use data: A randomized experiment. Journal of drug education, 34(1), 61-72.
34.McCabe, S. E., Boyd, C. J., Couper, M. P., Crawford, S., & d'Arcy, H. (2002). Mode effects for collecting alcohol and other drug use data: Web and US mail. Journal of studies on alcohol, 63(6), 755-761.
35.McDougall, W. (1929). The chemical theory of temperament applied to introversion and extroversion. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 24(3), 293.
36.Miles, W. F. (2002). Auschwitz: Museum interpretation and darker tourism. Annals of tourism research, 29(4), 1175-1178.
37.Miles, W. F. (2015). Postcolonial Borderland Legacies of Anglo–French Partition in West Africa. African Studies Review, 58(3), 191-213.
38.Natori, Y., & Chenoweth, R. (2008). Differences in rural landscape perceptions and preferences between farmers and naturalists. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(3), 250-267.
39.Nuttin, J., Fraisse, P., Meili, R., & Piaget, J. (1963). Traité de psychologie expérimentale. Presses Universitaires de France.
40.Pan, B., MacLaurin, T., & Crotts, J. C. (2007). Travel blogs and the implications for destination marketing. Journal of Travel Research, 46(1), 35-45.
41.Parr, A. E. (1961). The problem of arrested movement in static exhibits. Curator: The Museum Journal, 4(4), 379-384.
42.Pealer, L. N., Weiler, R. M., Pigg Jr, R. M., Miller, D., & Dorman, S. M. (2001). The feasibility of a web-based surveillance system to collect health risk behavior data from college students. Health Education & Behavior, 28(5), 547-559.
43.Plutchik, R. (1980). A general psychoevolutionary theory of emotion. In Theories of emotion (pp. 3-33). Academic press.
44.Purcell, A. T., Lamb, R. J., Peron, E. M., & Falchero, S. (1994). Preference or preferences for landscape? . Journal of environmental psychology, 14(3), 195-209.
45.Robb, E. M. (2009). Violence and recreation: Vacationing in the realm of dark tourism. Anthropology and Humanism, 34(1), 51-60.
46.Rojek, C. (1993). Ways of escape: Modern transformations in leisure and travel. Springer.
47.Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of personality and social psychology, 39(6), 1161.
48.Seaton, A. V. (1996). Guided by the dark: From thanatopsis to thanatourism. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 2(4), 234-244.
49.Seaton, A. V. (1999). War and thanatourism: Waterloo 1815–1914. Annals of tourism Research, 26(1), 130-158.
50.Seaton, A. V. (2002). Thanatourism's final frontiers? Visits to cemeteries, churchyards and funerary sites as sacred and secular pilgrimage. Tourism Recreation Research, 27(2), 73-82.
51.Seaton, A. V., & Lennon, J. J. (2004). Thanatourism in the early 21st century: moral panics, ulterior motives and alterior desires. New horizons in tourism: Strange experiences and stranger practices, 63-82.
52.Sedmak, G., & Mihalič, T. (2008). Authenticity in mature seaside resorts. Annals of tourism research, 35(4), 1007-1031.
53.Sharpley, R. (2005) Travels to the Edge of Darkness: Towards a Typology of Dark Tourism, in C. Ryan, et al (eds), Taking Tourism to the Limits: Issues, Concepts and Managerial Perspectives, Oxford: Elsevier, 217-228.
54.Sharpley, R. (2009). Tourism development and the environment: Beyond sustainability?. Routledge.
55.Stone, P. (2005). Dark Tourism Consumption-A call for research. E-Review of Tourism Research, 3(5), 109-117.
56.Stone, P. R. (2006). A dark tourism spectrum: Towards a typology of death and macabre related tourist sites, attractions and exhibitions. Turizam: međunarodni znanstveno-stručni časopis, 54(2), 145-160.
57.Strange, C., & Kempa, M. (2003). Shades of dark tourism: Alcatraz and Robben Island. Annals of tourism research, 30(2), 386-405.
58.Tarlow, P. (2005). Dark Tourism: The Appealing -"Dark"Side of Tourism and More. In, M. Novelli, ed. Niche Tourism: Contemporary Issues, Trends and Cases pp. 47-57.
59.Taum, Y. Y., & Hum, M. (2005). Collective Cambodian memories of the Pol Pot Khmer Rouge regime. In Fifth Annual Conference of the Asian Scholarship Foundation. Bangkok (pp. 25-26).
60.Thurnell-Read, T. P. (2009). Engaging Auschwitz: an analysis of young travellers’experiences of Holocaust Tourism, 1(1), 26-52.
61.Tunbridge, J. E., & Ashworth, G. J. (1996). Dissonant heritage. The Management of the Past as a Resource in Conflict.
62.Tunbridge, J. E., & Ashworth, G. J. (1997). [BOOK REVIEW] Dissonant heritage, the management of the past as a resource in conflict. Journal of Historical Geography, 23, 383-384.
63.Ulrich, R. S. (1981). Natural versus urban scenes: Some psychophysiological effects. Environment and behavior, 13(5), 523-556.
64.Van den Berg, A. E., Koole, S. L., & Van der Wulp, N. Y. (2003). Environmental preference and restoration:(How) are they related?. Journal of environmental psychology, 23(2), 135-146.
65.Voase, R. (2008). Rediscovering the Imagination: Meeting the needs of the new visitor. In Managing visitor attractions, 148-164.
66.Waitt, G. (2000). Consuming heritage: Perceived historical authenticity. Annals of tourism research, 27(4), 835-862.
67.Walsh, K. (2002). The representation of the past: museums and heritage in the post-modern world. Routledge.
68.Wight, A. C., & Lennon, J. J. (2007). Selective interpretation and eclectic human heritage in Lithuania. Tourism management, 28(2), 519-529.
69.Williams, P. (2004). Witnessing genocide: vigilance and remembrance at Tuol Sleng and Choeung Ek. Holocaust and Genocide Studies, 18(2), 234-254.
70.Woodside, A. G., Cruickshank, B. F., & Dehuang, N. (2007). Stories visitors tell about Italian cities as destination icons. Tourism Management, 28(1), 162-174.
71.Wright, D., & Sharpley, R. (2018). Local community perceptions of disaster tourism: the case of L'Aquila, Italy. Current Issues in Tourism, 21(14), 1569-1585.
72.Yeoman, I., Lennon, J. J., & Black, L. (2005). Foot-and-mouth disease: A scenario of reoccurrence for Scotland’s tourism industry. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 11(2), 179-190.
73.Zube, E. H. (1987). Perceived land use patterns and landscape values. Landscape ecology, 1(1), 37-45.
74.Zube, E. H., Sell, J. L., & Taylor, J. G. (1982). Landscape perception: research, application and theory. Landscape planning, 9(1), 1-33.