訪客IP:35.170.78.142
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果

詳目顯示:::

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:陳建松
研究生(外文):CHEN, CHIEN-SONG
論文名稱:探討銀髮族對採用居家智慧機器人之影響因素及行為意圖
論文名稱(外文):The behavior intention and influence factors for old peoples to adapt homecare smart robots
指導教授:湯玲郎湯玲郎引用關係
指導教授(外文):TANG, LING-LANG
口試委員:陳鴻基池文海陳順興黃敏萍陳家祥
口試委員(外文):CHEN, HOUN-GEECHIH, WEN-HAICHEN, SHUN-HSINGHUANG, MIN-PINGCHEN, JA-SHEN
口試日期:2020-01-10
學位類別:博士
校院名稱:元智大學
系所名稱:管理學院博士班
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2020
畢業學年度:108
語文別:中文
論文頁數:226
中文關鍵詞:智慧機器人科技接受模式計畫行為理論銀髮族使用意圖
外文關鍵詞:Smart RobotsTAMUTAUT2TPBIntention
Facebook:https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000765818124
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:111
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
書名頁…………………………………………………………………………………………i
論文口試委員審定書……………………………………………………………ii
中文摘要……………………………………………………………………………………iii
英文摘要……………………………………………………………………………………iv
誌 謝……………………………………………………………………………………vi
目 錄……………………………………………………………………………………viii
表 目 錄…………………………………………………………………………………… x
圖 目 錄…………………………………………………………………………………… xii
第一章、緒論………………………………………………………………………………1
1.1 研究背景和動機 …………………………………………………1
1.2 研究問題…………………………………………………………………11
1.3 研究目的……………………………………………………………… 14
1.4 研究流程……………………………………………………………… 15
第二章、文獻探討與假說推論……………………………………………17
2.1 理論基礎……………………………………………………………… 17
2.2 智慧機器人……………………………………………………………20
2.3 科技接受模式相關理論……………………………………30
2.4 延伸性科技接受模式……………………………………… 36
2.5 延伸性整合型科技接受模式……………………………40
2.6 高齡者科技接受模式……………………………………… 47
2.7 科技接收模型………………………………………………………49
2.8 國際近期研究機器人科技接受之文獻…………52
2.9 台灣近期研究機器人科技接受文獻發現……60
2.10 台灣人對機器人和人工智慧的態度分析……64
2.11 孝親文化理論…………………………………………………… 67
2.12 主路徑分析法…………………………………………………… 75
2.13 文獻總結……………………………………………………………… 81
2.14 研究之假說及推論………………………………………… 84
第三章、研究方法………………………………………………………………… 105
3.1 研究架構……………………………………………………………… 105
3.2 研究變數操作型定義與衡量題………………………111
3.3 調查問卷設計………………………………………………………121
3.4 前測試資料結果分析……………………………………… 122
第四章、資料分析……………………………………………………………… 124
4.1 資料處理分析…………………………………………………… 124
4.2 敘述性統計..…………………………………………………… 128
4.3 樣本資料對使用意願之檢定……………………………133
4.4 共同方法變異檢測………………………………………… 136
4.5 衡量模式分析……………………………………………… 137
4.6 信度及收斂效度分析……………………………………… 139
4.7 因素負荷與交叉因素分析………………………………141
4.8 因素分析與相關性分析……………………………………143
4.9 結構模型分析………………………………………………………144
4.9.1 結構模型修正TPB分析…………………………………… 144
4.9.2 中介效果……………………………………………………………… 149
4.9.3 干擾變數效果分析………………………………………………157
4.9.4 多群組比較……………………………………………………………161
4.10 討論…………………………………………………………………………170
第五章、結論與建議………………………………………………………………184
5.1 研究結論…………………………………………………………………184
5.2 研究義涵與實務貢獻…………………………………………194
5.3 研究限制與未來研究方向….……………………………195
參考文獻………………………………………………………………………………………198
附錄一、前測項目統計量……………………………………………………216
附錄二、修正模式eTPB迴歸………………………………………………218
附錄三、修正模式eTPB干擾模型…………………………………… 219
附錄四、國內有關機器人社會應用研究文獻一覽表…220
附錄五、研究問卷調查(2019)…………………………………………223

Aaltonen, I., Arvola, A., Heikkilä, P., & Lammi, H. (2017). Hello Pepper, May I Tickle You?: Children's and Adults' Responses to an Entertainment Robot at a Shopping Mall. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction.
Ahlgren, D., & Verner, I. (2009, August). Fostering development of students’ collective andself-efficacy in robotics projects. In Kim, J.H., Sam Ge, S., Vadakkepat, P., Jesse, N., Al Mamun, A., Puthusserypady, S., Rückert, U., Sitte, J., Witkowski, U., Nakatsu, R., Braunl, T., Baltes, J., Anderson, J., Wong, C.C., & Ahlgren, D. (Eds), Proceedings of the FIRA RoboWorld Congress 2009 (Vol. 44, pp. 240–247). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Alaiad, A., & Zhou, L. (2014). The determinants of home healthcare robots adoption: An empirical investigation. International journal of medical informatics, 83(11), 825-840.
Arenas Gaitán, J., Peral Peral, B., & Ramón Jerónimo, M. (2015). Elderly and internet banking: An application of UTAUT2. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 20 (1), 1-23.
Bae, Y., & Chang, H. (2012). Adoption of smart TVs: a Bayesian network approach. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 112(6), 891 - 910.
Bagozzi, R. P. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: a comment. In: SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unified theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Babin, B.J., Darden, W.R. and Mitch, G. (1994), ‘Work and/or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value’, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp.644-656.
Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (1998). Pajek-program for large network analysis. Connections, 21(2), 47—57.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
Bartneck, C., Nomura, T., Kanda, T., Suzuki, T., & Kato, K. (2005). Cultural differences in attitudes towards robots. Paper presented at the Proc. Symposium on robot companions (SSAISB 2005 convention).
Bartneck, C., Nomura, T., Kanda, T., Suzuki, T., & Kennsuke, K. (2005). A cross-cultural study on attitudes towards robots. Paper presented at the Hci international.
Bartneck, C., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., & Nomura, T. (2007). The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots. Ai & Society, 21(1-2), 217-230.
Bartneck, Christoph & Kulic, Dana & Croft, Elizabeth & Zoghbi, Susana. (2008). Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots. International Journal of Social Robotics. 1. 71-81. 10.1007/s12369-008-0001-3.
Bartneck, C., Kanda, T., Mubin, O. and Mahmud, A.A. (2009). Does the design of a robot influence its animacy and perceived intelligence. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(1),195–204.
Batra, R. and Ahtola, O.T. (1990), ‘Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources ofcustomer attitudes’, Marketing Letters, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 159-170.
Bessell, S. (2015). Inclusive and Respectful Relationships as the Basis for Child Inclusive Policies and Practice. International perspectives and empirical findings on child participation: From social exclusion to child-inclusive policies.
Beydoun, M. A., and B. M. Popkin. 2005. “The Impact of Socio-Economic Factors on Functional Status Decline among Community-
Dwelling Older Adults in China.” Social Science and Medicine 60 (9): 2045–2057.
Borenstein, J., & Arkin, R. (2016). Robotic nudges: the ethics of engineering a more socially just human being. Science and engineering ethics, 22(1), 31-46.
Broadbent, E., Stafford, R., & MacDonald, B. (2009). Acceptance of healthcare robots for the older population: Review and future directions. International journal of social robotics, 1(4), 319.
Brown, I., & Adams, A. (2007). The ethical challenges of ubiquitous healthcare. Int. Rev. Inf. Ethics, 8 (12), P53–60.
Brown, S. A., Venkatesh, Viswanath. (2005). Model of adoption of technology in households: A baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. Journal of Aging Studies, MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 426.
Blau, P. M. 1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley Blau, P. M., ed. 1975. Approaches to the Study.
Blau, P. M., ed. 1975. Approaches to the Study of Social Structure. New York: Free Blau, P. M. 1977. Inequality and Heterogene- ity. New York: Free
Chang, A. (2012). UTAUT and UTAUT 2: A review and agenda for future research. The Winners, 13(2), 10-114.
Chandon, P., Wansink, B. and Laurent, G. (2000), ‘A benefit congruency framework of sales promotion effectiveness’, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 64, No. 4, pp. 65-81.
Chen, C.-H., Kao, S.-C., & Hu, M.-C. (2018). Research on the Planning of Elderly Health Promotion Programs: Take the Learning Process of the Healthy Fitness Course as an Example. Chengren Ji Zhongshen Jiaoyu= Journal of Adult and Lifelong Education(30), 99-141.
Chen, K., & Chan, A. H. S. (2014). Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: a senior technology acceptance model (STAM). Ergonomics, 57(5), 635-652.
Chen, Jian-Song and Tang, Ling-Lang, (2018).“Understanding Elders Acceptance of Intelligent Robot Services: An Extended TAM and UTAUT Model”, theAsia Pacific Industrial Engineering & Management Systems Conference 2018, Dec 5-8, Hong Kong.
Chen, Chien-Song and Tang, Ling-Lang, andTsai, Chin-Tsang, (2019).“Exploring consumer concerns regarding acceptance and use of smart robots”, 2019 Apr 4-6,Northeast Decision Sciences Institute Annual Conference, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Cheng, S.-T., & Chan, A. C. (2006). Filial piety and psychological well-being in well older Chinese. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61(5), 262-P269.
Childers, T.L., Carr, C.L., Peck, J. and Carson, S. (2001), ‘Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior’, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 77, No.4, pp. 511-535.
Chin, W. W., & Chin, W. (2000). Frequently asked questions-partial least squares and PLS-graph.
Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information systems research, 14(2), 189-217.
Clement, M., Fabel, S. and Schmidt-Stolting, C. (2006), “Diffusion of hedonic goods: a literature review”,The International Journal on Media Management, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 155-163.
Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Information systems research,, 6(2), 118-143.
Cramer, H., Evers, V., Ramlal, S., van Someren, M., Rutledge, L., Stash, N., Wielinga, B. (2008). The effects of transparency on trust in and acceptance of a content-based art recommender. . User Model User-Adapt Interaction, 18(5), 455–496. doi:10.1007/s11257-008- 9051-3
Cuijpers, R. H., Bruna, M. T., Ham, J. R. C., & Torta, E. (2011). Attitude towards robots depends on interaction but not on anticipatory behavior. In B. Mutlu, C. Bartneck, J.Ham, V. Evers, T. Kanda (Eds.), Proceedings of the ICSR 2011 International Conference on Social Robotics. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
Culnan, M. J., & Armstrong, P. K. (1999). Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation. Organization science, 10(1), 104-115.
Czaja, S. J., N. Charness, A. D. Fisk, C. Hertzog, S. N. Nair, W. A. Rogers, and J. Sharit. 2006. “Factors Predicting the Use of Technology: Findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology nhancement (CREATE).” Psychology and Aging 21 (2): 333–352.
Dautenhahn, K., Nehaniv, C. L., Walters, M. L., Robins, B., Kose-Bagci, H., Mirza, N. A., & Blow, M. (2009). KASPAR–a minimally expressive humanoid robot for human–robot interaction research. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, 6(3-4), 369-397.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of applied social psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132.
De Gauquier, L., Cao, H.-L., Gomez Esteban, P., De Beir, A., van de Sanden, S., Willems, K., . . . Vanderborght, B. (2018). Humanoid Robot Pepper at a Belgian Chocolate Shop. Paper presented at the Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction.
De Graaf, M., Ben Allouch, S., & Van Dijk, J. (2017). Why do they refuse to use my robot?: Reasons for non-use derived from a long-term home study. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction.
De Graaf, M. M., & Allouch, S. B. (2013). Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 61(12), 1476-1486.
De Graaf, M. M., Ben Allouch, S., & van Dijk, J. A. (2019). Why would I use this in my home? A model of domestic social robot acceptance. Human–Computer Interaction, 34(2), 115-173.
De Graaf, M. M. A. (2016). An ethical evaluation of human-robot relationships. InternationalJournal of Social Robotics, 8(4), 589–598. doi:10.1007/s12369-016-0368-5
De Graaf, M. M. A., & Ben Allouch, S. (2013a). Exploring influencing variables for theacceptance of social robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 61, 1476–1486. doi:10.1016/j.robot.2013.07.007
De Graaf, M. M. A., & Ben Allouch, S. (2013b). The relation between people’s attitude andanxiety towards robots in human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the RO-MAN 2013International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. New York, NY: IEEE.
De Graaf, M. M. A., & Ben Allouch, S. (2016). Anticipating our future robot society: Theevaluation of future robot applications from a user’s perspective. Proceedings of the ROMAN2016 International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. New York,NY: IEEE.
DEMİRCİ, H. M. (2018). USER EXPERIENCE OVER TIME WITH CONVERSATIONAL AGENTS: CASE STUDY OF WOEBOT ON SUPPORTING SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING. MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY,
Demiris, G., Oliver, D. P., Dickey, G., Skubic, M., & Rantz, M. (2008). Findings from a participatory evaluation of a smart home application for older adults. Technology and health care, 16(2), 111-118.
DeSteno, D., Breazeal, C., Frank, R. H., Pizarro, D., Baumann, J., Dickens, L., & Lee, J. J. (2012). Detecting the trustworthiness of novel partners in economic exchange. . Psychological Science, 23(1549–1556, 0956797612448793.). doi:10.1177/0956797612448793
Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, D. M. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model with task–technology fit constructs. Information & management, 36(1), 9-21.
Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., and Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers. Journal of Marketing Research, (28:3), 307-319.
Ead, N. M. (2016). Instructional humanoid robot apparatus and a method thereof. In: Google Patents.
Efron, B. (1979). Computers and the theory of statistics: thinking the unthinkable. SIAM review, 21(4), 460-480.
EuropeanCommission. (2012). Public Attitudes towards Robots Special Eurobarometer 382, Conducted by TNS Opinion & Social at the request of Directorate-General for Information Society and Media (INSFO)
EuropeanCommission. (2015). AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS REPORT Special Eurobarometer 427.
EuropeanCommission. (2018). Attitudes towards the impact of digitisation and automation on daily life. Special Eurobarometer 460. doi:10.2759/835661
Ezer, N., Fisk, A. D., & Rogers, W. A. (2009). Attitudinal and intentional acceptance of domestic robots by younger and older adults. Paper presented at the International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Intention and Behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., & Dautenhahn, K. (2003). A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3-4), 143-166.
Forlizzi, J., & DiSalvo, C. (2006). Service robots in the domestic environment: a study of the roomba vacuum in the home. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Fulmer, T., Mate, K. S., & Berman, A. (2018). The age‐friendly health system imperative. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 66(1), 22-24.
Gaudiello, I., Zibetti, E., Lefort, S., Chetouani, M., & Ivaldi, S. (2016). Trust as indicator of robot functional and social acceptance. An experimental study on user conformation to iCub answers. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 633-655.
Gaudiello, I., Zibetti, E., Lefort, S., Chetouani, M. & Ivaldi, S. (2016). Trust as indicator of robot functional and social acceptance. An experimental study on user conformation to iCub answers. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 633-655.
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Inexperience and experience with online stores: the importance of TAM and trust. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50, 307-321.
Geraci, R. M. (2010). The popular appeal of apocalyptic AI. Zygon®, 45(4), 1003-1020.
Gnambs, T., & Appel, M. (2019). Are robots becoming unpopular? Changes in attitudes towards autonomous robotic systems in Europe. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 53-61.
Gregori, E. (2017). Evaluation of modern tools for an omscs advisor chatbot.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
HCAOA. (2019). Home Care Association of America ,https://www.nahc.org/美國家庭護理協會網站. 流覽日期:2019.10. 15
Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Evers, V., & Wielinga, B. (2010). Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: the almere model. International journal of social robotics, 2(4), 361-375.
Hegner, S. J., Mc Kevitt, P., Norvig, P., & Wilensky, R. (2000). Intelligent Help Systems for UNIX: Computational Models and Systems. Artificial Intelligence Review, 14, 1-4.
Hiltunen, M., Mannermaa, A., Thompson, D., Easton, D., Pirskanen, M., Helisalmi, S., . . . Soininen, H. (2001). Genome-wide linkage disequilibrium mapping of late-onset Alzheimer’s disease in Finland. Neurology, 57(9), 1663-1668.
Hinds, P. J., Roberts, T. L., & Jones, H. (2004). Whose job is it anyway? A study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task. Human-Computer Interaction, 19(1), 151-181.
Hirschman, E.C. and Holbrook, M.B. (1982), ‘Hedonic consumption: emerging concepts, methods and propositions’, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 92-101.
Hoffman, R. R., Lee, J. D., Woods, D. D., Shadbolt, N., Miller, J., & Bradshaw, J. M.(2009). The dynamics of trust in cyberdomains. In R. R. Hoffman,J. M. Bradshaw, & K. M. Ford (Eds.), Human-centered computing (pp. 5e11). IEEEComputer Society.
Hsu, F. L. (1971). Filial piety in Japan and China: Borrowing, variation and significance. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 2(1), 67.
Hsu, H.-C., Lew-Ting, C.-Y., & Wu, S.-C. (2001). Age, period, and cohort effects on the attitude toward supporting parents in Taiwan. The Gerontologist, 41(6), 742-750.
Huijnen, C. A., Lexis, M. A., & de Witte, L. P. (2016). Matching robot KASPAR to autism spectrum disorder (ASD) therapy and educational goals. International journal of social robotics, 8(4), 445-455.
IROS. (2018). Towards a Robotic Society. 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems(Madrid, Spain).
Kaplan, F. (2004). Who is afraid of the humanoid? Investigating cultural differences in the acceptance of robots. International journal of humanoid robotics, 1(03), 465-480.
Keong, M. L., Ramayah, T., Kurnia, S., & Chiun, L. M. (2012). Explaining intention to use an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system: an extension of the UTAUT model. Business Strategy Series, 13(4), 173 - 180.
Khalighinejad, N., Bahrami, B., Caspar, E. A., & Haggard, P. (2016). Social transmission of experience of agency: An experimental study. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 1315.
Kijsanayotin, B., Pannarunothai, S., & Speedie, S. M. (2009). Factors influencing health information technology adoption in Thailand's community health centers: Applying the UTAUT model. International journal of medical informatics, 78(6), 404-416.
Kijsanayotin, B., Pannarunothai, S., & Speedie, S. M. (2009). Factors influencing health information technology adoption in Thailand‘s community health centers: Applying the UTAUT model. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 7(8), 404-486.
Korchut, A., Szklener, S., Abdelnour, C., Tantinya, N., Hernández-Farigola, J., Ribes, J. C., . . . Rejdak, K. (2017). challenges for service robots—requirements of elderly adults with cognitive impairments. Frontiers in neurology, 8, 228.
Kramer, S. C., Friedmann, E., & Bernstein, P. L. (2009). Comparison of the effect of human interaction, animal-assisted therapy, and AIBO-assisted therapy on long-term care residents with dementia. Anthrozoös, 22(1), 43-57.
Kurzweil, R. (2014). The singularity is near. In Ethics and emerging technologies (pp. 393-406): Springer.
Lawrence, D. (2016). Caring for America's Seniors:The Value of Home Care. Home Care Association of America
LaRose, R., & Eastin, M. S. (1994). A social cognitive theory of internet uses and gratifications: Toward a new model of media attendance. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48(3), 358–377. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4803_2
Lee, M. K., Tang, K. P., Forlizzi, J., & Kiesler, S. (2011). Understanding users' perception of privacy in human-robot interaction. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Human-robot interaction.
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & management, 40(3), 191-204.
Lee, J. J., Knox, W. B., Wormwood, J. B., Breazeal, C., & DeSteno, D. (2013). Computationally modeling interpersonal trust. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1e14.
Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society,46(1), 50e80.
Lee, Y., K.A. Kozar, K.R.T. Larsen, The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, present and future, Communications of the Association for Information Systems 12 (2003) 752-780.
Leung, D. Y. P., Angela Y. M. Leung, and Iris Chi. 2011. “An Evaluation of the Factor Structure of the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Involvement and Capacity Scales of the Minimum Data Set for Home Care for Elderly Chinese Community Dwellers in Hong Kong.” Home Health Care Services Quarterly 30 (3): 147–159. doi:10.1080/01621424.2011.592421.
Leung, K. F., W. W. Wong, M. S. M. Tay, M. M. L. Chu, and S. S. W. Ng. 2005. “Development and Validation of the Interview Version of the Hong Kong Chinese WHOQOL-BREF.” Quality of Life Research 14 (5): 1413–1419.
Li, J. (2016). Social robots as interactive technology agents: Supporting design with exploratory assessment. Paper presented at the The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction.
Limayem, M., Hirt, S. G., & Cheung, C. M. (2007). How habit limits the predictive power of intention: The case of information systems continuance. MIS quarterly, 31(4).
Lin, P., Abney, K., & Bekey, G. (2011). Robot ethics: Mapping the issues for a mechanized world. Artificial Intelligence, 175(5-6), 942-949.
Lin, P., Abney, K., & Bekey, G. A. (2014). Robot ethics: the ethical and social implications of robotics: The MIT Press.
Liu, E. Z. F., Lin, C. H., & Chang, C. S. (2010). Student satisfaction and self-efficacy in a cooperative robotics course. Social Behavior and Personality, 38, 1135–1146. doi:10.2224/ sbp.2010.38.8.1135
Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y., Lu, W. M., & Lin, B. J. (2013). Data envelopment analysis 1978–2010: A citation-based literature survey. Omega, 41(1), 3-14.
Lu, L. Y., & Liu, J. S. (2013). An innovative approach to identify the knowledge diffusion path: The case of resource-based theory. Scientometrics, 94(1), 225-246.
Lu, L. Y., & Liu, J. S. (2016). A novel approach to identify the major research themes and development trajectory: The case of patenting research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 103, 71-82.
Mathieson, Kieran. (1991). Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior. Information Systems Research. 2. 173-191. 10.1287/isre.2.3.173.
Mahoney, D. F., & Goc, K. (2009). Tensions in independent living facilities for elders: a model of connected disconnections. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 23(3), 166-184.
Maldonado, U. P. T., Khan, G. F., Moon, J., & Rho, J. J. (2011). E-learning motivation and educational portal acceptance in developing countries. Online Information Review, 35(1), 66-85.
Marikyan, D., Papagiannidis, S., & Alamanos, E. (2019). A systematic review of the smart home literature: A user perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 138, 139-154.
Martyn, K., Dodds, P., & Brown, M. (2018). The PARO seal: weighing up. Journal of Dementia Care, 26(3), 32-33.
Metzler, T. A., Lewis, L. M., & Pope, L. C. (2016). Could robots become authentic companions in nursing care? Nursing Philosophy, 17(1), 36-48.
McDowell, Ian. 2006. Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires. Vol. 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. . (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192–222.
Moyle, W., Bramble, M., Jones, C., & Murfield, J. (2018). Care staff perceptions of a social robot called Paro and a look-alike Plush Toy: a descriptive qualitative approach. Aging & mental health, 22(3), 330-335.
Moyle, W., Jones, C., Cooke, M., O’Dwyer, S., Sung, B., & Drummond, S. (2014). Connecting the person with dementia and family: a feasibility study of a telepresence robot. BMC geriatrics, 14(1), 7.
Mukai, T., Hirano, S., Nakashima, H., Kato, Y., Sakaida, Y., Guo, S., & Hosoe, S. (2010). Development of a nursing-care assistant robot RIBA that can lift a human in its arms. Paper presented at the 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.
Nevejans, N. (2016). EUROPEAN CIVIL LAW RULES IN ROBOTICS. The European Parliament’s Legal Affairs Committee, LEGAL AFFAIRS.
Ng, A. C. Y., Phillips, D. R., & Lee, W. K.-m. (2002). Persistence and challenges to filial piety and informal support of older persons in a modern Chinese society: A case study in Tuen Mun, Hong Kong. Journal of Aging Studies, 16(2), 135-153.
Oduntan, O., & Adegboye, O. (2018). ENHANCING COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY THROUGH AN INTELLIGENT CHATBOT SYSTEM.
Osada, J., Ohnaka, S., & Sato, M. (2006). The scenario and design process of childcare robot, PaPeRo. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGCHI international conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology.
Parker, R. B. (2017). A definition of privacy. In Privacy (pp. 83-104): Routledge.
Phelps, J., Nowak, G., Ferrell, E., (2000). Privacy concerns and consumer willingness to provide personal information. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 19, 27-41.
Qian, Z., & Bi, Z. (2015). Recent development of rehabilitation robots. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 7(2), 563062.
Rajapakse, J. (2011). Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model. Paper presented at the The 4th International Conference on Interaction Sciences.
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations: modifications of a model for telecommunications. In Die diffusion von innovationen in der telekommunikation, 25-38.
Ru X., Qin H., Wang S (2019), RuQW.Young people's behaviour intentions towards reducing PM2.5 in China: Extending the theory of planned behaviour.
Ryu, M.-H., Kim, S., & Lee, E. (2009). Understanding the factors affecting online elderly user’s participation in video UCC services. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(3), 619-632.
Šabanović, S. (2014). Inventing Japan’s ‘robotics culture’: The repeated assembly of science, technology, and culture in social robotics. Social Studies of Science, 44(3), 342-367.
Sakagami, Y., Watanabe, R., Aoyama, C., Matsunaga, S., Higaki, N., & Fujimura, K. (2002). The intelligent ASIMO: System overview and integration. Paper presented at the IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems.
Salem, M., Lakatos, G., Amirabdollahian, F., & Dautenhahn, K. (2015). Towards safeand trustworthy social robots: ethical challenges and practical issues. In Social robotics (pp. 584e-593). Springer International Publishing.
Sankai, Y. (2006). Leading edge of cybernics: Robot suit hal. Paper presented at the 2006 SICE-ICASE International Joint Conference.
Savela, N., Turja, T., & Oksanen, A. (2018). Social acceptance of robots in different occupational fields: A systematic literature review. International journal of social robotics, 10(4), 493-502.
Schaal, S. (2019). Historical Perspective of Humanoid Robot Research in the Americas. Humanoid Robotics: A Reference, 9-17.
Schlegel DZDM,(1992).Schlegel R.P., DAvernas J.R., Zanna M.P., DeCourville N.H., Manske S.R.Problem Drinking: A Problem for the Theory of Reasoned Action?
Shin, D.-H., & Choo, H. (2011). Modeling the acceptance of socially interactive robotics: Social presence in human–robot interaction. Interaction Studies, 12(3), 430-460.
Shishehgar, D. K., Kerr, D., & Blake, J. (2017). The effectiveness of various robotic technologies in assisting older adults. Health Informatics Journal.Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458217729729
Shishehgar, M. (2018). Exploratory study of the usability of telepresence robots in aged care.
Sherry, J.F., Jr. (1990), ‘A sociocultural analysis of a midwestern American flea market’,Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 13-30.
Stahl, B. C., & Coeckelbergh, M. (2016). Ethics of healthcare robotics: Towards responsible research and innovation. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 86, 152-161.
Strom, J., Slavov, G., & Chown, E. (2009). Omnidirectional walking using zmp and preview control for the nao humanoid robot. Paper presented at the Robot Soccer World Cup.
Stuck, R. E., McDonald, E. M., & Rogers, W. A. (2018). Older Adult Preferences for Robot Care Providers. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting.
Sung, K.-t. (1995). Measures and dimensions of filial piety in Korea. The Gerontologist, 35(2), 240-247.
Takeda, T., Hirata, Y., & Kosuge, K. (2007). Dance step estimation method based on HMM for dance partner robot. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 54(2), 699-706.
Tanaka, F., Isshiki, K., Takahashi, F., Uekusa, M., Sei, R., & Hayashi, K. (2015). Pepper learns together with children: Development of an educational application. Paper presented at the 2015 IEEE-RAS 15th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids).
Taylor, S. T., P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176.
Tegmark, M. (2018). Being Human in the Age of Aritifical Intelligence (生命Life 3.0-人工智能時代,人類的進化與重生). 中國浙江教育出版社, 麥克斯.泰格馬克, 序文.
T. Zhou(2012).Examining location based services usage from theperspectives of unified theory of acceptance and use oftechnology and privacy risk, JECR 13 (2) (2012) 135–144.
Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1991). Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS quarterly, 15(1), 124-143.
Toharia, L. (1996). Empleo y paro en España: evolución, situación y perspectivas. Ekonomiaz: Revista vasca de economía(35), 36-67.
Tour_e-Tillery, M., & McGill, A. L. (2015). Who or what to believe: trust and the differential persuasiveness of human and anthropomorphized messengers.Journal of Marketing, 79(4), 94e110.
Triandis, H. C. (1977). Interpersonal behavior. Brooks/Cole Pub. Co..
Trovato, G., Zecca, M., Sessa, S., Jamone, L., Ham, J., Hashimoto, K., & Takanishi, A. (2013). Cross-cultural study on human-robot greeting interaction: acceptance and discomfort by Egyptians and Japanese. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 4(2), 83-93.
Tsuda, J. (2016). IFR World Robotics.
Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Oxford University Press on behalf of the Mind Association, 59, 433-460.
Turner, M., Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Charters, S., & Budgen, D. (2010). Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review. Information and software technology, 52(5), 463-479.
van Breemen, A., Yan, X., & Meerbeek, B. (2005). iCat: an animated user-interface robot with personality. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems.
Van Ittersum, K., Rogers, W. A., Capar, M., Caine, K. E., O’Brien, M. A., Parsons, L. J., & Fisk, A. D. (2006). Understanding technology acceptance: Phase 1–literature review and qualitative model development.
Van Quaquebeke, N., & Eckloff, T. (2010). Defining respectful leadership: What it is, how it can be measured, and another glimpse at what it is related to. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(3), 343-358.
Venkatesh, V. (2015). Technology acceptance model and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management, 1-9.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision sciences, 27(3), 451-481.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science, 46(2), 186-204.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS quarterly, 36(1), 157-178.
Verspagen, B. (2007). Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks: A study on the history of fuel cell research. Advances in Complex Systems, 10(01), 93-115.
Webster, M. (2003). Merriam-Webster's collegiate dictionary: Merriam-Webster Springfield, MA.
Weizenbaum, J. (1966). ELIZA---a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Communications of the ACM, 9(1), 36-45.
Werner, J. M., Carlson, M., Jordan-Marsh, M., & Clark, F. (2011). Predictors of computer use in community-dwelling, ethnically diverse older adults. Human factors, 53(5), 431-447.
Westlund, J. M. K., Martinez, M., Archie, M., Das, M., & Breazeal, C. (2016). A study to measure the effect of framing a robot as a social agent or as a machine on children's social behavior. Paper presented at the 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).
Wilkinson, C., Bultitude, K., & Dawson, E. (2011). “Oh yes, robots! People like robots; the robot people should do something”: perspectives and prospects in public engagement with robotics. Science Communication, 33(3), 367-397.
Wilson, B. (2010), ‘Using PLS to investigate interaction effects between higher order branding constructs’, inVinzi, V.E., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J., and Wang, H. (Eds.),Handbook of Partial Least Squares, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 621-652.
Wong, C.,Wei-Han Tan, G.,Loke, S.and Ooi, K.(2014). "Mobile TV: a new form of entertainment?",Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 114 No. 7, pp. 1050-1067.https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-05-2014-0146
Wong, E., J. Woo, E. Hui, and S. C. Ho. 2004. “Examination of the Philadelphia Geriatric Morale Scale as a Subjective Quality-of-Life Measure in Elderly Hong Kong Chinese.” Gerontologist 44 (3): 408–417.
Wong, K. K. K. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques using SmartPLS. Marketing Bulletin, 24(1), 1-32.
Wu, & Chen, J.-L. (2005). An extension of trust and TAM model with TPB in the initial adoption of on-line tax: an empirical study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62(6), P784-808.
Wu, Y.-H., Cristancho-Lacroix, V., Fassert, C., Faucounau, V., de Rotrou, J., & Rigaud, A.-S. (2016). The attitudes and perceptions of older adults with mild cognitive impairment toward an assistive robot. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 35(1), 3-17.
Wu, Y.-H., Fassert, C., & Rigaud, A.-S. (2012). Designing robots for the elderly: appearance issue and beyond. Archives of gerontology and geriatrics, 54(1), 121-126.
Xu, H., & Gupta, S. (2009). The effects of privacy concerns and personal innovativeness on potential and experienced customers’ adoption of location-based services. Electronic Markets, 19(2-3), P137-149.
Yue, X., & Ng, S. H. (1999). Filial obligations and expectations in China: Current views from young and old people in Beijing. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(2), 215-226.
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means–End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing Research, (52:3), 2-22.
Zhao, S. (2006). Humanoid social robots as a medium of communication. New Media & Society, 8(3), 401-419.
工業技術研究院(2018),科技專案成果-行動輔助機器人為身障者圓夢,經濟部技術處,瀏覽日期:2019.3.15。
內政部(2018),近10年我國老年人口增加38%,僅老年人居住者宅數則增加57%。 Report of the Senior Citizen Condition Survey。107年第41週內政統計通報。
王秀妍(2018),家庭助理機器人採用意願之影響因素,國立臺灣科技大學資訊管理系碩士論文,台北市,取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8j3cc5
王宣智, & 林品安(2016),台灣機器人相關政策與學術研究概況,科技政策觀點, NO.1, P36-40
王嘉順(2018),以科技接受模式探討銀髮族居家照護機器人之應用,東南科技大學工業管理研究所論文,新北市,取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/k6h62s
王穎梅(2009)。淺談我國春節禮品消費現狀,http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZZJJ200904074.htm
王瀅婷、成之約、廖文志(2016)。銀髮族適任工作類別之探討,商學學報24,P. 1-38,-2。
王凱、張震元(2010)。 整合實用性、享樂性與社群認同性建構社群網站態度衡量模型之研究,資訊管理學報,第十九卷第二期,275。
白麗(2018),陪伴型機器人使用者經驗評估─以智慧居家機器人 Zenbo 為例。福祉科技與服務管理學刊,6(3)。
世界經濟論壇 (2019) ,人工智慧和機器人。
朱祐萱、林清壽(2019) ,銀髮族使用Zenbo 機器人服務體驗洞察研究。福祉科技與服務管理學刊,7(1)。
任敏(2016) ,《中國老年社會追蹤調查》:我國70歲以下老人超過半數。人民日報。
行政院(2015) ,行政院生產力4.0發展方案Taiwan Productivity 4.0 Initiative。行政院科技會報辦公室。
行政院(2018) ,臺灣 AI 行動計畫(2018-2021年). 行政院 107年6月29日院臺科會字第 1070172174 號函核定。
余序江、 許志義、陳澤義(1998)。科技管理導論:科技預測與規劃。五南。
呂寶靜(2011)。老人照顧:老人、家庭、正式服務。台灣五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
李元旭(2000) ,建立 “銀髮” 消費市場勢在必行。科技導報,18(0009),49-52。
李淑貞、陳琬云(2018)。長期照顧的痛點,是機器人與智慧自動化產業的機會。智慧自動化產業期刊Journal of Automation Intelligence and Robotics, 26(國立陽明大學 ICF 暨輔助科技研究中心), 24-29。
李開復 (2017),人工智慧來了。遠見天下文化出版社,261-266, 361-369。
杜安芳(2015)。家庭價值對老年者照顧意願的影響。臺北大學社會學系學位論文, 1-37。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/5awxj6
杜鵬、孫鵑娟、張文娟、王雪輝(2016),中國老年人的養老需求及家庭和社會養老資源現狀——基於 2014 年中國老年社會追蹤調查的分析。人口研究, 40(6),49-61。
吳文智(2017),以整合型科技接受模式探討照護型機器人輔助於高齡者之服務研究。 福祉科技與服務管理學刊, 5(2)。
吳振強、崔光輝、張秀軍、孫業桓(2009),老年人家庭功能狀況及影響因素分析。中國公共衛生,25(2), 138-140。
吳漢東(2017),人工智慧時代的制度安排與法律規制,法律科學 (西北政法大學學報), 5, 128。
林文源、林宗德、楊谷洋(2018),科技社會人: STS 跨領域新驛路。國立交通大學出版社。
林月琴、黃靖文(2012),科技接受模式於政府歲計會計資訊管理系統之應用。科技管理學刊,17(4), 1-37。
金盛華(1994),角色理論與家庭兒童發展研究,心理發展与教育, 10(1),38-43。
周思蓉(2018)。旅館服務機器人的擬人化與自主性程度對顧客使用意願之影響,大同大學事業經營學系(所)論文,取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/62w48m
周淩君(2016),服務機器人產業的發展戰略—以 A 公司為例。臺灣大學臺大-復旦 EMBA境外專班學位論文, 1-63。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/988a9y
施柏榮(2017),2025年獨老化的臺灣:打造智慧化的照護模式。財團法人資訊工業策進會產研所。
施勝烽、盧煜焬(2015),以主路徑分析法探討中高齡者之多維度生命末期照護概,福祉科技與服務管理學刊 3(4),2015。
洪新原、粱定澎、張嘉銘(2005) ,科技接受模式之後設研究。資訊管理學報,12(4), 211-234。
洪德俊、林渭川(2019),中高齡創業文獻回顧,商管科技季刊,20(1), 43-67。
徐業良 (2014) ,老人福祉科技產業的機會與挑戰。福祉科技與服務管理學刊, 2(1), 83-90。
徐業良、白麗(2018),Gerontechnology-老人福祉科技的機會和挑戰。福祉科技與服務管理學刊, 6(1), 89-104。
徐達光、胡名霞(2013),輔具租賃消費行為:照顧者觀點分析。長期照護雜誌, 17(3), 229-245。
荒井秀典 (2019),高齢者の定義について。日本老年医学会雑誌, 56(1), 1-5。
郝燕蓓(2007)。東西方文化差異對消費者決策的影響。管理觀察, (3), 109-111。
張明 (2009),蹚過人生河. 社會心理學.科學出版社.
蕭穎謙、賴淑慧、白榮吉(2012 ) ,以科技接受模型探討消費者對銀髮族手機之使用意願,環境與管理研究,12(2),92-101。
郭欣鑫(2008),智慧生活概念接受度之研究-以居家服務機器人為例,成功大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班學位論文,取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/6u44xq
陳亮恭(2018),超高齡社會智慧醫療應用再進化。福祉科技與服務管理學刊,6(1), 81-87。
陳昭義(2005),智慧型機器人產業的發展與應用策略。行政院2005年產業科技策略會議。
陳美勇、鐘秉剛(2015)。工業 4.0 計畫中智慧型機器人發展之趨勢。中等教育,66(3), 6-13。
陳碧茵、黃國豪、王申驊、吉珮瑩、蕭怡容、賴泑伶(2018),人因對智慧型機器人導覽系統使用心流經驗之影響-以台灣中部某國小為例。TANET2018臺灣網際網路研討會,1679-1682。
陳燕禎(2017),長期照顧與產業發展之研究,社會學,育達科技大學健康照顧社會工作系。
陳瓊惠(2016),家用服務機器人採用之關鍵因素,南華大學碩士論文,取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/afs75p
勞動部(2019)。外籍工作者,產業及社福外籍勞工人數統計表。勞動力發展署, P198-201。
湯玲郎、李世迪、陳建松(2017),「以科技接受模型探討銀髮族對智慧型機器人之使用意願」,中華民國科技管理研討會發表研究論文,台北政治大學。
湯玲郎、陳建松、蔡金倉 (2018),「探討高齡者使用智慧型機器人之影響因素及使用意願」,亞太工業工程與管理學會2018年會暨學術研討會-發表研究論文,2018年12月5日香港大學。
湯玲郎、陳建松、蔡金倉(2019),「以延伸TAM和UTAUT模型,探討老年人對智慧機器人服務的接受程度」,中國工業工程學會108年度年會暨學術研討會-服務與科技管理 (A7)發表研究論文,台北科技大學。
陽翼、張寧(2009),中國獨生代消費行為特徵的實證研究。甘肅社會科學,2009(4), 42-44。
黃淑貞(2018),延伸型整合性科技接受模式探討照護型機器人之應用-以長照產業為例,國立臺南大學經營與管理學系科技管理碩士在職專班碩士論文,取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/egaq66
楊谷洋(2008),智慧型行動輔助居家照護機器人研發---總計畫。
楊國樞、葉光輝、黃曬莉(1989)。孝道的社會態度與行為:理論與測量。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊(65),171-227。
葉光輝(2009),華人孝道雙元模型研究的回顧與前瞻。本土心理學研究(32),101-148。
路丙輝(2018),善事父母的三維境遇及應對理路。倫理学研究(2018年04),32-38。
雷鋒網. (2018). 世界經濟論壇直擊:李開復、李飛飛、Mustafa Suleyman、Richard Socher,大老眼中的AI,科技新報。
廖韻茹(2017),探討物聯網科技應用於智慧家居使用意願之研究-以機器人為例,元智大學經營管理碩士班(行銷學程)論文,桃園市,https://hdl.handle.net/11296/ncknzc
熊興福、曲敏、 張峰(2004),孝心禮品的包裝策略。包装工程,25(5),70-72。
衛生福利部(2018),2017年老人狀況調查。
鄭欵 (2004),大學生對親代安養態度與自我老年安養期待之差異,南華大學生死學研究所碩士論文,嘉義縣,取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/nrwp6h
盧希鵬(2009),社會關係的建立:社會交換理論。經理人月刊。
蕭文龍、郭庭伊(2010),部落客持續使用部落格之研究:以整合期望確認、科技接受模式和個人因素觀點探討。電子商務學報,12:2, 221-249。
蕭文龍(2013),統計分析入門與應用SPSS中文版+PLS-SEM(Smart PLS),碁峯資訊股份有限公司,台北市。
薛承泰 (2008),臺灣家庭變遷與老人居住型態: 現況與未來。社區發展季刊(121), 47-56。
應斌(1999),老年人消費行為分析及營銷對策。市場與消費,1999年12期。


電子全文 電子全文(網際網路公開日期:20220122)
電子全文 電子全文(網際網路公開日期:20220122)
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
系統版面圖檔 系統版面圖檔