跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.19) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/09/05 02:54
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:劉彩霈
研究生(外文):Tsai-Pei Liu
論文名稱:自動倉儲系統載具選擇與儲位規劃之評估
論文名稱(外文):An Evaluation of Shuttle Selection and Storage Assignment for AS/RS
指導教授:郭幸民郭幸民引用關係
指導教授(外文):Shin-Ming Guo
學位類別:博士
校院名稱:國立高雄第一科技大學
系所名稱:管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2011
畢業學年度:99
語文別:中文
論文頁數:153
中文關鍵詞:自動倉儲系統載具類型模擬馬可夫過程分類儲存
外文關鍵詞:Markov ProcessSimulationS/R MachineAutomated Storage and Retrieval System (AS/RS)Class-based Storage
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:668
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
自動倉儲系統由電腦控制存/取貨作業,它的硬體設施以存取機為最重要的組件,有傳統的單載具與新興的雙載具之分。近年來國內外文獻針對這兩種載具進行評估,均認為雙載具系統有較佳的作業效能,但是國內目前以單載具系統居多。根據訪查設備業者的意見,雙載具的設置成本約高出單載具系統40%以上,因此在相同環境下,使用者有興趣的是雙載具之效能應顯著超越單載具40%以上,才能成為合理的投資選擇,然而現有研究甚少觸及兩種載具的成本效益分析。
本研究根據業者訪談結果建構系統的架構與環境條件,首先引用馬可夫過程分析,建立各狀態的平衡方程式,以瞭解自動倉儲單/雙載具系統動態等候行為模式。在已給定等候存/取貨作業個數限制下,建立M/G/1/K等候模式,根據不同的存取機旅行速度及料架參數,比較自動倉儲單/雙載具系統的運作績效表現。整體分析結果發現雙載具的績效並沒有超越40%的設置門檻。
為擴大考慮層面,本研究採用Arena 12.0模擬軟體來建構自動倉儲模型以比較單載具與雙載具系統的績效差異,評估標準包括儲存與取回之平均等待時間、系統最大存取速率以及雙指令之執行比例。本研究假設進出貨時段重疊與否、入出庫站可能設於不同側及批量存/取需求等。單走道實驗結果發現在入出庫站位置分離、且進出貨時段不重疊、且批量進出貨需求作業下,雙載具系統的作業效率明顯優於單載具系統,成為較佳的投資選擇。多走道實驗結果發現,在指定走道規則下、且入出庫站位置同側、且進出貨時段重疊、且分類儲位指派,可改善雙載具系統的作業相對績效表現。
雖然目前國內業者缺乏雙載具的軟硬體技術,但是未來終將發展與採用進階功能以提升績效,本研究在單/雙載具成本效益分析的成果,可提供給學界及業界在建構自動倉儲系統有用之參考資訊。
An Automated Storage and Retrieval System (AS/RS) operates a shuttle with computer process control to execute the storage and retrieval of warehouse stock. It can be equipped with the traditional single shuttle or the newly developed twin shuttle. There has been a significant literature on the comparison of single shuttle systems versus twin shuttle systems. Researchers agree that twin shuttle systems have better operational performance. However, a twin shuttle system costs about 40% more than a comparable single shuttle system. Therefore, given the same operating environment, we believe that the capacity or effectiveness of a twin shuttle system should outperform a single shuttle system by at least 40% to justify the cost.
This study has interviewed equipment vendors and users in Taiwan to undertand the operating requirements and managerial concerns. Then we develop Markov processes and use a system of state equations to describe the dynamic behavior of single/twin shuttle S/R machines performing storage and retrieval transactions in a single aisle. Processing times are mixtures of exponential distributions or mixtures of Erlang distributions. We find that the twin shuttle is better but does not outperform the single shuttle significantly.
The study also develops Arena 12.0 simulation programs to compare single shuttle and twin shuttle systems under various operating environments. The comparison is based on average storage/retrieval waiting time, the effective storage/retrieval capacity, and the ratio of dual command. We assume different time periods of storage and retrieval operations may or may not overlap, input and output stations may not be in the same location, and there may be batch demands for storage and retrieval operations. Simulation results of single-aisle suggest that twin shuttle systems would be the better investment if the input/output stations are in separate locations, time periods of storage/retrieval operations do not overlap, or batch demands are significant. Simulation results of multi-aisle suggest that twin shuttle systems are more cost-effective when the dedicated aisle rule is implemented. If I/Os are located at the same side and S/R periods overlaps, the class-based storage rule will significantly improve the relative performance of twin shuttle systems.
We believe that users will need more sophiscated systems and techniques in the future. Our results based on the cost performance ratio can provide useful information to practitioners planning to implement AS/RSs in real world applications.
目錄
中文摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
誌謝 IV
目錄 V
表目錄 IX
圖目錄 X
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景 1
1.2 研究動機與目的 3
1.3 研究範圍與限制 4
1.4 研究架構與流程 5
1.5 論文架構 7
第二章 文獻探討 8
2.1 自動倉儲系統 9
2.1.1 自動倉儲系統硬體構造 9
2.1.2 自動倉儲系統進出貨流程 11
2.1.3 自動倉儲系統存取機種類 13
2.2 存取機控制指令 15
2.2.1 單載具存取機,單指令循環(Single Command Cycle)模式 15
2.2.2 單載具存取機,雙指令循環(Dual Command Cycle)模式 16
2.2.3 雙載具存取機,單指令、雙指令、四指令循環模式 17
2.3 自動倉儲系統績效分析 20
2.3.1 外界環境績效分析 21
2.3.2 存取機旅行時間 21
2.3.3 單/雙載具系統績效分析 22
2.3.4 馬可夫過程分析 23
2.3.5 系統模擬分析 24
2.3.6 儲位指派績效分析 25
2.4 業界訪談 27
2.4.1 導入自動倉儲系統企業訪談 27
2.4.2 自動倉儲系統提供業者訪談 31
2.5 小結 36
2.5.1 自動倉儲系統控制與績效小結 36
2.5.2 業界訪談小結 36
第三章 研究方法與設計 39
3.1 專家訪談 39
3.2 馬可夫分析 41
3.2.1 隨機過程(Stochastic Process) 41
3.2.2 馬可夫過程(Markov Process) 42
3.2.3 生死過程 43
3.2.4 等候系統的結構 44
3.2.5 服務時間分配為Mixture of Exponential Distribution 47
3.2.6 服務時間分配為Mixture of Phase Type Distribution 48
3.3 系統模擬分析 49
3.3.1 外界環境設計 52
3.3.2 儲位指派規則 53
3.3.3 存取機控制模式 54
3.3.4 模擬實驗模組 58
3.3.5 系統模擬分析績效指標 59
3.4 小結 59
第四章 馬可夫分析 61
4.1 Mixture of exponential distribution等候模式 62
4.1.1 單載具作業系統(Mixture of exponential distribution) 64
4.1.2 雙載具作業系統(Mixture of exponential distribution) 65
4.1.3 單/雙載具Mixture of exponential distribution效能分析 67
4.2 Mixture of phase type distribution等候模式 70
4.2.1 單載具作業系統(Mixture of phase type distribution) 72
4.2.2 雙載具作業系統(Mixture of phase type distribution) 72
4.2.3 單/雙載具Mixture of phase type distribution效能分析 74
4.3 小結 76
第五章 系統模擬分析 77
5.1 電腦模擬軟體 78
5.2 模擬績效評估準則 78
5.3 系統符號定義及範例說明 79
5.3.1 系統符號定義 79
5.3.2 範例說明 79
5.4 模擬實驗分析設計 82
5.5 單走道模擬實驗結果 85
5.5.1 實驗一、不同存/取環境條件下的存/取速率 85
5.5.2 實驗二、固定存貨速率條件之存/取等候時間 92
5.5.3 單走道系統實驗小結: 95
5.6 雙走道模擬實驗結果 96
5.6.1 實驗三、指定走道或隨機選擇走道,不同環境條件下的存/取速率 96
5.6.2 實驗四、在分類儲存條件下,不同環境條件下的存/取速率 101
5.6.3 雙走道系統實驗小結: 103
第六章 結論與未來研究方向 104
6.1 結論 104
6.2 未來研究方向 107
參考文獻 108
附錄A 自動倉儲業界訪談內容 114
附錄B 單載具作業系統(Mixture of exponential distribution) 116
附錄C 雙載具作業系統(Mixture of exponential distribution) 119
附錄D 單載具作業系統(Mixture of phase type distribution) 125
附錄E 雙載具作業系統(Mixture of phase type distribution) 129
1.吳炎崑,古思明,劉永誠,2000,作業研究,修訂版,育友圖書有限公司。
2.李安騰,2006,進出分離與需求偏向之自動倉儲系統績效分析,國立高雄第一科技大學碩士論文。
3.林張群,陳可杰,2003,作業研究,第九版,滄海書局。
4.楊精松,莊昭榮,2004,管理數學,東華書局。
5.廖慶榮,2003,作業研究,修訂二版,三民書局。
6.劉亦揚,2001,多載量自動倉儲系統-儲位和出入庫站位選擇之控制策略,國立中央大學碩士論文。
7.劉賓陽,2000,作業研究,三民書局股份有限公司。
8.Azadivar, F., 1986, Maximization of the throughput of a computerized automated warehousing system under system constraints, International Journal of Production Research 24 (3), pp. 551–566.
9.Bozer, Y. A. and Cho, M., 2005, Throughput performance of automated storage/retrieval system under stochastic demand, IIE Transaction 37(4), pp. 367-378.
10.Bozer, Y. A. and White J. A., 1984, Travel-time models for automated storage/retrieval systems, IIE Transactions 16(4), pp. 329–338.
11.Bozer, Y. A., Schorn, E. C., and Sharp, G. P., 1990, Geometric approaches to solve the Chebyshev traveling salesman problem. IIE Transactions 22(3), pp. 238–254.
12.Chang, D.T, Wen, U.P. and Lin, I.T., 1995, The impact of acceleration/deceleration on travel-time models for automated storage/retrieval system, IIE Transactions 27, pp. 108-111.
13.Elsayed, E. A. and Unal, O. I., 1989, Order batching algorithms and travel time estimation for automated storage/retrieval systems, International Journal of Production Research 27(7), pp. 1097-1114.
14.Foley, R. D., Frazelle, E. H., and Park, B. C., 2002, Throughput bounds for miniload automated storage/retrieval systems. IIE Transactions 34, pp. 915–920.
15.Graves, S. C., Hausman, W. H. and Schwarz, L. B., 1977, Storage retrieval interleaving in automatic warehousing systems, Management Science 23(9), pp. 935-945.
16.Gudehus, T., 1973, Principles of order picking: operations in distribution and warehousing systems, W. Girardet, Essen, West Germany.
17.Han, M. H., McGinnis, L. F., Shieh, J. S., and White, J. A., 1987, On sequencing retrievals in an automated storage / retrieval system, IIE Transactions 19(1), pp. 56–66.
18.Hausman, W. H., Schwarz, L. B., and Graves, S. C., 1976, Optimal Storage Assignment in Automatic Warehousing Systems, Management Science 22(6), pp. 629-639.
19.Hur, S., and Nam, J., 2006, Performance analysis of automatic storage/retrieval systems by stochastic modelling, International Journal of Production Research 44(85), pp. 1613-1629.
20.Hur, S., Lee, Y. H., Lim, S. Y., Lee, M. H., 2004, A performance estimation model for AS/RS by M/G/1 queuing system. Computers & Industrial Engineering 46, pp. 233–241.
21.Hwang, H. and Lee, S. B., 1990, Travel-time models considering the operating characteristics of the storage and retrieval machine, International Journal of Production Research 28 (10), pp. 1779-1789.
22.Hwang, H. Kim, C. S. and Ko, K. H., 1988, A study on multi-aisle system served by a single/retrieval machine, International Journal of Production Research 26(11), pp. 1727-1737.
23.Hwang, H. Kim, C. S. and Ko, K. H., 1999, Performance analysis of carousel systems with double shuttle, Computers & Industrial Engineering 36(2), pp. 473-485.
24.Kelton, W. D., Sadowski, R. P., and Sakowski, D. A., 2002, Simulation with Arena, 2nd edition, McGraw Hill, USA.
25.Keserla, A., and Peters, B. A. 1994, An analysis of dual shuttle automated storage/retrieval systems, Journal of Manufacturing Systems 13(6), pp. 424-434.
26.Kleinrock, L., Queueing System, 1975, Vol. I: Theory, Johm Wiley & Sons, USA.
27.Koh, S. G., Kwon, H. M., and Kim, Y. J., 2005, An analysis of the end-of-aisle order picking system: Multi-aisle served by a single order picker, International Journal of Production Economics 98, pp. 162-171.
28.Kuo, P. H., Krishnamurthy A., and Malmborg C. J., 2007, Design models for unit load storage and retrieval systems using autonomous vehicle technology and resource conserving storage and dwell point policies, Applied Mathematical Modelling 31, pp. 2332-2346.
29.Lee, H. F. and Schaefer, S. K., 1996, Retrieval sequencing for unit-load automated storage and retrieval systems with multiple openings, International Journal of Production Research 34(10), pp. 2943-2962.
30.Lee, H. F., 1997, Performance analysis for automated storage and retrieval systems, IIE Transactions 29, pp. 15–28.
31.Lerher, T., 2006, Design and evaluation of the class-based multi-aisle AS/RS, International Journal of Simulation Model 5(1), pp. 25-36
32.Lerher, T., Sraml, M., Kramberger, J., Potrc, I., Borovinsek, M., and Zmazek, B., 2006, Analytical travel time models for multi aisle automated storage and retrieval systems, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 30, pp. 340-356.
33.Linn, R. J. and Wysk, R. A., 1987, An analysis of control strategies for an AS/RS. INFOR 25(1), pp. 66-83.
34.Malmborg, C. J. and Altassan, K. M., 1998, Analysis of storage assignment policies in less than unit load warehousing systems, International Journal of Production Research 36, pp. 459-3475.
35.Malmborg, C. J. and Deutsch, S. J., 1988, A stock location model for dual address order picking systems. IIE Transactions 20, pp. 44-52.
36.Malmborg, C. J., 2000, Interleaving models for the analysis of twin shuttle automated storage and retrieval systems, International Journal of Production Research 38(18), pp. 4599-4610.
37.Malmborg, C. J., Altassan, K. M., 1997, Approximating work cycle times in warehousing systems. International Journal of Industrial Engineering 4(1), pp. 14–23.
38.Mansuri, M., 1997, Cycle-time computation, and dedicated storage assignment, for AS/R systems, Computers Industry Engineering 33(1-2), pp. 307-310.
39.Marshall, C., and Rossman, G. B., 1999, Designing qualitative research, 3rd edition, SAGE, UK.
40.Meller, R. D. and Mungwattana, A., 1997, Multi-shuttle automated storage/retrieval systems, IIE Transactions 29, pp. 925-938.
41.Park, B. C., 1991, Analytical models and optimal strategies for automated storage/retrieval system operations, Ph.D. Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA.
42.Park, B. C., Foley, R. D., White, J. A., and Frazelle, E. H., 2003, Dual command travel times and miniload system throughput with turnover-based storage, IIE Transactions 35, pp. 343-355.
43.Potrc, I., Lerher, T., Kramberger, J., and Sraml, M., 2004, Simulation model of multi-shuttle automated storage and retrieval systems, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 157-158, pp. 236-244.
44.Randhawa, S. U. and Shroff, R., 1995, Simulation-based design evaluation of unit load automated storage/retrieval systems, Computers Industry Engineering 28(1), pp. 71-79.
45.Roll, Y. and Rosenblatt, M. J., 1984, Warehouse design with storage policy considerations, International Journal of Production Research 22(5), pp. 809-821.
46.Roodbergen, K. J. and Vis, I. F. A., 2009, A Survey of Literature on Automated Storage and Retrieval Systems, European Journal of Operational Research 194, pp. 343-362.
47.Rosenblatt, M. J., and Roll, Y., 1984, Warehouse design with storage policy considerations. International Journal of Production Research 22(5), pp. 809-821.
48.Ross, S. M., 1996, Stochastic Processes, 2nd edition, Wiley, USA.
49.Sarker, B. R. and Babu, P. S., 1995, Travel time models in automated storage/retrieval systems: A critical review, International Journal of Production Economics 40, pp. 173-184.
50.Van Den Berg, J. P., 2002, Analytic expressions for the optimal dwell point in an automated storage/retrieval system, International Journal of Production Economics 76, pp. 13-25.
51.Wen, U.P., Chang, D.T and Chen, S.P., 2001, The impact of acceleration/deceleration on travel-time models in class-based automated storage/retrieval system, IIE Transactions 33, pp. 599-608.
52.Wimmer, R.D. and Dominick, J. R., 1991, Mass media research: An Introduction, Wadsworth, USA.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 鄧振源、曾國雄,1989,「層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(上)」,中國統計學報,第27卷,第6期。
2. 20.傅立文,「對美國發表『中國軍事與安全發展報告』」之評析,中共研究第44卷第9期(2010年9月),頁45。
3. 高博銓,2002,「教育研究法:焦點團體訪談法」,教育研究月刊,103期。
4. 10.邵宗海,「胡錦濤對『一中原則』及『九二共識』之立場分析」,中共研究第43卷第11期(2009年11月),頁39-40。
5. 18.蔡明彥,「美國東亞軍事優勢地位的挑戰:中國『反介入』與美國『反反介入』的角力」,全球政治評論第21期(2008年5月),頁69-70。
6. 9.吳漢、董慧明,「美中台三角關係對美台軍事售之影響:從雙層賽局理論分析」,展望與探索第7卷第5期(2009年8月),頁49。
7. 17.蔡宏明,「兩岸關係的新情勢與新政府的新作為」,遠景基金會季刊,第9卷第3期(2008年7月),頁199-243。
8. 16.劉復國,「綜合性安全與國家安全:亞太安全概念是用性之檢討」,問題與研究,第38卷第2期(1999年2月),頁 21-37。
9. 15.陳一新,「歐胡會後的美中台關係」,中共研究第43卷第12期(2009年12月),頁98-102。
10. 陳金貴,2002,「非營利組織社會企業化經營探討」,新世紀智庫論壇,第19期:p.p.39-51。
11. 8.初國華,「全球化與兩岸關係新遠景」,中國大陸研究,第51卷第4期(2008年12月),頁89-114。
12. 7.林正義,「『戰略模糊』、『戰略明確』或『雙重明確』:美國預防台海危機的政策辯論」,遠景基金會季刊第8卷第1期(2007年1月),頁38。
13. 林怡君,2008,「社會企業在臺灣的發展與限制以多元就業開發方案經濟型計畫為例」,就業安全半年刊,第7卷,第1期。
14. 6.林正義,「美國與臺灣軍事合作:威脅的評估與因應」,遠景基金會季刊,第10卷第2期(2009年4月),頁101-152。
15. 5.林正義,「美國與台海兩岸信心建立措施」,問題與研究,第44卷第6 期(2005年11月),頁1-28。