臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究係提出一整合「資訊檢索」、「重現問題」與「探索突破」於專利迴避設計之想法。許多學者投入全力發展更快速及更精確之方法分析專利資訊，然而，那些方法卻多不能在設計時提供有效之新線索，尤其是在專利迴避設計。實際上，在專利迴避設計過程中，最令人困擾者莫過於重現標的專利之原始問題；因此，本研究引入一關鍵詞彙庫比對方法，該詞彙庫可對應於TRIZ工程參數與發明法則，用於了解目標專利之原始問題，類比產生其問題情境；隨後用TRIZ矛盾矩陣找出該問題之其他可行新解，而那些新解將可有利於專利迴避設計，產生實質不同之創新設計。另外，為了使本研究提出之想法具體化，本研究建構一電腦輔助工具「SDAL（Smart Design-Around Tool，智慧專利迴避設計工具）」，其可協助開發人員在進行專利迴避設計時快速地產生新靈感。目前SDAL之測試資料庫收集了多件關於高齡者與下肢不便者輔助起身座椅之中華民國專利資訊與關鍵詞彙庫，而本研究亦使用SDAL成功地發展該類型座椅之專利迴避設計原型。目前該原型已通過侵害測試，即將申請新專利。

The research is to make an idea integrating surveying patent information, reappearing problem and discovering breakthrough into design-around. Many researchers have made their efforts to develop faster and more precise approach to analyze the patent information; however, those approaches could not provide effective clues for design project, especially design-around. In practice, the most perplexing situation during design-around is to reappear the original problem of objective patent; therefore, an idea, which introduces a keyword recognition approach based on a specific keyword bank and its corresponding TRIZ parameters and inventive principles, is proposed for resolving that situation. After analogizing the original problem of the objective patent by the keyword bank, a scenario of the problem could be showed clearly and new other candidates of solution could be found through the TRIZ contradiction matrix, and then those candidates would be beneficial to design-around and even lead an innovation. Further, this research constructs a computer-aided tool “SDAL (Smart Design-Around Tool)” for making the proposed idea practical, and it could assist designers to inspire new ideas for their design-around projects. So far the test database of the SDAL involves the Taiwanese patent information of the “Assisting-Rising-Movements-Chair for Elder and Lower-Limb Challenged.” A new design-around prototype of the chair has been successfully developed through the SDAL, and it has passed the infringement test. The prototype is still in improvement and will be filed for new patent.¬

中文摘要
英文摘要
誌 謝
目 錄
表目錄
圖目錄
第一章 緒論
1.1 前言
1.2 研究動機
1.3 研究目的
1.4 本文架構
第二章 文獻回顧
2.1專利資訊檢索與分析
2.1.1相關學理研究之探索
2.1.2專利資訊之商業用途發展
2.2重現與解決TRIZ問題
2.2.1 TRIZ理論架構
2.2.2以TRIZ為基礎發展專利迴避設計
2.2.3以TRIZ探究重現問題之研究
2.3 小結
第三章 研究方法
3.1整合資訊檢索與TRIZ於專利迴避設計
3.2檢索專利資訊
3.3重現TIRZ問題與發明法則
3.4探索與突破
3.5 小結
第四章 案例推演-高齡者與下肢不便者輔助起身座椅設計
4.1國內當前產品與本案設計目標
4.2欲迴避之檢索專利資訊
4.3建立專利分析摘要
4.4重現欲迴避專利之TIRZ問題與發明法則
4.5探索與突破
4.6 小結
第五章 發展電腦輔助工具SDAL
5.1 SDAL總體架構
5.2操作實例
5.2.1檢索專利資訊
5.2.2重現TIRZ問題與發明法則
5.2.3探索與突破
5.3 小結
第六章 結論與建議
6.1 結論
6.2 建議
6.3 後續發展
參考文獻
專利文獻
附錄一 39個TRIZ 工程參數與解釋
附錄二 40個TRIZ 發明法則與解釋
附錄三 TRIZ矛盾矩陣
附錄四 專利分析摘要
附錄五 高齡者與下肢不便者輔助起身座椅專用之對應TRIZ發明法則與設計建議
自述與歷年發表著作

Altshuller, G. (1999), The Innovation Algorithm：TRIZ, Systematic Innovation and Technical Creativity, Technical Innovation Center, Worcester.
Ashton, W. B. & SEN, R. K. (1988), “Using Patent Information in Technology Business Planning-I,” Research Technology Management, Vol. 31, pp. 42-46.
Ashton, W. B. & SEN, R. K. (1989), “Using Patent Information in Technology Business Planning-II,” Research Technology Management, Vol. 32, pp. 36-42.
Barzilay, R. & Elhadad, M. (1997), “Using Lexical Chains for Text Summarization,” In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Intelligent Scalable Text Summarization, pp. 10-17, Madrid, Spain, August.
Breitzman, A., Thomas, P., & Cheney, M. (2002), “Technological powerhouse or diluted competence: techniques for assessing mergers via patent analysis,” R&D Management, Vol. 32, pp. 1-10.
Brunn, M., Chali, Y., & Pinchak, C. J. (2001), “Text Summarization Using Lexical Chains,” In Workshop on Text Summarisation in conjunction with the ACM SIGIR Conference, pp. 135-140, New Orleans, Louisiana, September.
Cavallucci, D., Rousselot, F., & Zanni, C. (2011), “Using patents to populate an inventive design ontology,” Procedia Engineering, Vol. 9, pp. 52-62.
Chang H. T. & Chen J. L. (2004b), “The Confl ict-Problem-Solving CAD Software Integrating TRIZ into Eco-Innovation,” Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 35, pp. 553-566.
Chang, H.-T. & Chen, J. L. (2004a), “An approach combining extension method with TRIZ for innovative product design,” Journal of the Chinese Society of Mechanical Engineers, Vol. 25, No. 1 , pp. 13-22.
Chen, J. L., Liu, S. J., & Tseng. C. H. (2000), “Technological innovation and strategy adaptation in the product life cycle,” Technology Management: Strategies and Application, Vol. 5, pp. 183-202.
Ercan, G. & Cicekli, I. (2008), “Lexical Cohesion Based Topic Modeling for Summarization,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4919, pp. 582-592.
Fey, V. R. & Rivin, E. I. (2005), Innovation on Demo: New Product Development Using TRIZ, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Ghoula, N., Khelif, K., & Dieng-Kuntz, R. (2007), “Supporting Patent Mining by using Ontology-based Semantic Annotations,” IEEE international Conference on Web intelligence, pp. 435-438, Fremont, CA, November.
Guo, H., Jiang, J., Hu, G., & Zhang, T. (2005), “Chinese named entity recognition based on multilevel linguistic features,” Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 3248, pp.90-99
Hsiao, M. Y., Chen, C. C., & Chen, J. H. (2009), “Using UMLS to Construct a Generalized Hierarchical Concept-based Dictionary of Brain Function for Information Extraction from the FMRI Literature,” Journal of Biomedical Informatics, Vol. 42, No. 5, pp. 912-922.
Hsu, F.-C., Trappey, A. J. C., Trappey, C. V., Hou, J.-L., & Liu, S.-J. (2006), “Technology and knowledge document cluster analysis for enterprise R&D strategic planning,” International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 36, pp. 336-353.
Hu, X. & Wu, B. (2006). “Automatic Keyword Extraction Using Linguistic Features,” IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, Vol.6, pp.19-23, Hong Kong.
Hu, Y., Li, H., Cao, Y., Teng, L., Meyerzon, D., & Zheng, Q. (2006), “Automatic extraction of titles from general documents using machine learning,” Information Processing and Management, Vol. 42, pp.1276-1293.
Hung, Y. C. & Hsu, Y. L. (2007), “An Integrated Process for Designing Around Existing Patents Through the Theory of Inventive Problem-solving,” Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, Vol. 221, No. 1, pp. 109-122.
Lai, K.-K., Yang, K. O., Weng, C. S. & Yang, W.-G. (2009), “Patent analysis of technology-performance by integrating patent family and patent citation,” Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology, pp. 1432-1446, Portland, OR, September.
Li, Y. R., Wang, L. H., & Hong, C. F. (2009), “Extracting the significant-rare keywords for patent analysis,” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 36, pp. 5200-5204.
Li, Z. & Xing, L. (1998), “Search the Chinese Web-Design and the Operation of Net-Compass,” Proceedings of the First Asia Digital Library Workshop, pp. 42-46.
Mann, D., Dewulf, S., Zlotin, B., & Zusman, A. (2003), Matrix 2003: Updating The TRIZ Contradiction Matrix, Creax, Belgium.
Mann, D. (2007), “Evaporating Contradictions - Physical and/or Technical,” The TRIZ Journal, August. http://www.triz-journal.com/archives/2007/03/02/.（截至2011年7月仍有效）
Mogee, M. E. (1991), “Using patent data for technology analysis and planning,” Research Technology Management, Vol. 34, pp. 43-49.
O’Grady, W. (2001), “A linguistic approach to the study of language acquisition,” Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 5, pp.57-71.
O’Grady, W. (2003). “The radical middle: nativism without Universal Gramma,” The handbook of second language acquisition, pp. 43-62, Oxford, UK.
Savransky, S. D. (2000), Engineering of Creativity: Introduction to TRIZ Methodology of Inventive Problem Solving, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
Soo, V. W., Lin, S. Y., Yang, S. Y., Lin., S. N., & Cheng, S. L. (2006), “A cooperative multi-agent platform for invention based on patent document analysis and ontology,” Expert System with Applications, Vol. 31, pp. 766-775.
Taduri, S., Lau, G. T., Law, K. H., Yu, H., & Kesan, J. P. (2011), “An Ontology to Integrate Multiple Information Domains in the Patent System,” IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society, pp. 23-25, USA, May.
Trappey, A. J. C. & Trappey, C. V. (2008), “An R&D knowledge management method for patent document summarization,” Industrial Management and Data System, Vol. 108, pp. 245-257.
Trappey, A. J. C., Trappey, C. V., & Wu C.-Y. (2009), “Automatic patent document summarization for collaborative knowledge systems and services,” Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, Vol. 18, pp. 71-94.
Yu, H., Taduri, S., Kesan, J., Lau, G., & Law, K. H. (2010), “Retrieving Information Across Multiple, Related Domains Based on User Query and Feedback: Application to Patent Laws and Regulations”, 4th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, pp. 143-151, Beijing, China, October. (Best Research Paper Award on Foundation)
余 駿 (2006), 本體論為基之智慧型專利文件自動摘要方法論研究, 國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理學系, 碩士論文
邱 宜霆 (2007), 應用專利所屬分類號及分類階層架構之技術叢集研究, 國立臺灣大學工業工程學研究所, 碩士論文
吳 權峰 (2007), XML形專利資料之循環運用架構, 國立台灣科技大學機械工程系, 碩士論文
周 煒程 (2006), 整合TRIZ解題技術與專利迴避概念於產品發展之研究, 樹德科技大學應用設計研究所, 碩士論文
林 明憲 (2007), 系統化專利分析與成果評估於迴避設計之研究, 樹德科技大學應用設計研究所, 碩士論文
林 美秀 (2004), 運用TRIZ原理探討專利開發實例, 中原大學機械工程學系, 碩士論文
林 建州 (2008), 中文專利斷詞方法建立及其專利技術與功能之分析, 國立臺灣科技大學機械工程系, 碩士論文
陳 智偉 與 陳 建彰 (2010), “蘋果告宏達電侵20項專利,” 蘋果日報, 頭條要聞, 03月03日
張 祥唐 (2004), 整合TRIZ與可拓方法之綠色創新設計研究, 國立成功大學機械工程學系, 博士論文
許 芙瑲 (2005), 智慧型專利文件分析以群集及分類方法為基, 國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理學系, 碩士論文
曾 如瑩 (2010), “郭董挑防鴻鍊弱點引爆專利地雷,” 商業週刊, 1197期, 頁42-44, 11月
黃 翊軒 (2007), 本體論為基之智慧型專利文件分類方法論研究, 國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理學系, 碩士論文
楊 格權 (2004), 高科技廠商專利策略與專利布局-以半導體封裝業為例, 國立交通大學管理學院碩士在職專班科技管理組研究所, 碩士論文
廖 立群 (2004), 設計師於新產品開發流程中專利資訊應用之研究-以台灣中小企業為例, 國立雲林科技大學工業設計研究所, 碩士論文
廖 健志 (2007), 概念式中文專利搜尋系統之研究, 國立臺灣大學電機工程學研究所, 碩士論文
劉 志成 (2003), TRIZ改良與綠色創新設計方法之研究, 國立成功大學機械工程學系, 碩士論文
蕭 詠今 (2006), 創意快閃TRIZ大思維, 台海文化
檀 潤華 (2002), TRIZ：發明問題解決理論, 機械工業出版社
謝 佳宏 (2005), 以本體論為基之類神經網路電子文件自動分類管理系統, 國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理學系, 碩士論文
蘇 子皓 (2006), 以RDF規範為基礎之專利授權知識結構解析與表達技術, 國立清華大學工業工程與工程管理學系, 碩士論文