跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.176) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/09/08 07:55
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:吳秀珍
研究生(外文):Wu Show-Jane
論文名稱:應用天人菊防治南方根瘤線蟲
論文名稱(外文):Application of Gaillardia pulchella Fong for Controlling Southern Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita
指導教授:蔡東纂林奕耀
指導教授(外文):T. T. TsayProf. Y. Y. Lin
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中興大學
系所名稱:植物病理學系
學門:農業科學學門
學類:植物保護學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:1999
畢業學年度:87
語文別:中文
論文頁數:129
中文關鍵詞:南方根瘤線蟲天人菊拮抗線蟲植物殺線蟲成分萃取物根分泌物防治
外文關鍵詞:Meloidogyne incognitaGaillardia pulchellanematicidal compoundextractsexduatesantagonist plantcontrol
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:7
  • 點閱點閱:1303
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
將收集之71種菊科種子育苗測試其對南方根瘤線蟲之感病性,選擇百日草、萬壽菊、孔雀草,紋瓣大波斯菊、五爪金英及天人菊等6種抗性植物進行輪作及間作防治蕹菜南方根瘤線蟲病害試驗,防治效果以天人菊最優。外國進口之夏艷品種、台北白沙灣及澎湖之天人菊品種經感病性測試,皆為抗性,生長情形以澎湖之品種最好,其次為台北白沙灣之天人菊,而發芽率則以夏艷品種最高,達96%。不同花色之天人菊品系粗萃取水溶液,對南方根瘤線蟲之殺蟲效果於統計分析上有顯著差異,以舌狀紅花末端黃色品系之根組織粗萃取液效果最好,處理24小時致死率可達100%;根組織粗萃取液對葉芽線蟲、松材線蟲、根腐線蟲及腎形線蟲也有50%以上的致死率;其莖葉粗萃取液對南方根瘤線蟲之抑制孵化率,效果優於根組織粗萃取液,其處理之卵塊僅49隻二齡線蟲孵化,孵化率為對照組水處理的五分之一。粗萃取液之殺線蟲濃度以7%~10%最佳,致死率在90%以上,此粗萃取液澆灌於土壤中,可明顯降低線蟲之感染,僅有1個根瘤形成遠低於對照組之58個根瘤。天人菊之液體培養適合條件,為酸鹼值8.5葡萄糖濃度10000ppm之Gamborg''s B5培養液,適合溫度為24℃或28℃;其收集之根分泌物溶液,於3000ppm時可抑制線蟲卵之孵化且對南方根瘤線蟲具有99%的致死率。天人菊適合種植於中性及微鹼性之紅土、砂土及砂壤土等本省線蟲病最嚴重之土壤,12~32℃皆適合幼苗於砂壤土中生長;其根尖組織對南方根瘤線蟲具9.1%的誘引率,莖及葉部組織對線蟲具忌避效果,誘引率分別為-4.5%及-4.9%。濃度10%之全草粗萃取液於溫室中,對南方根瘤線蟲之防治效果優於5%及1%者,於植前澆灌粗萃取液於土壤中,對南方根瘤線蟲之防治效果優於植後處理;南方根瘤線蟲經粗萃取液處理後接種於蕹菜根部,對植物生長之危害低於線蟲接種於土壤中方澆灌粗萃取液之處理。5%及10%生鮮植體添加於土壤中,對南方根瘤線蟲之防治效果優於處理乾燥植體粉末及對照組;株齡為5個月之生鮮植體防治效果優於株齡為1個月者,但於統計分析上並無顯著差異。1、3及5株天人菊與蕹菜合植,以5株對線蟲之孵化抑制率最高,僅22隻線蟲孵化,低於對照組之94隻,但株數增加會抑制蕹菜之生長。比較添加1%乾燥粉末、5%生鮮植體、澆灌10%粗萃取液、天人菊輪作及天人菊間作之處理,第一季之蕹菜以添加生鮮植體生長情形最好,第二季之蕹菜以天人菊輪作之生長情形最好。田間試驗之防治效果,第一、二季之蕹菜皆以添加生鮮植體生長情形最好。天人菊植體內之有效抗蟲成分經分析為高極性、陰離子性型態,殺蟲物質在一種以上。
Results of testing susceptibility of 71 Asteraceace plants to Meloidogyne incognita indicated that Zinnia elegans, Tagetes patula, Tagetes eracta, Gaillardia pulchella, Cosmos bipinnatus and Tithonia diversifolia were resistant to and had the potential for controlling Meloidogyne incognita. The results showed that Gaillardia pulchella was more significantly effective in controlling plant nematode disease in the greenhouse.10% crude root extracts of G. pulchella were directly toxic to Meloidogyne incognita under laboratory condition, at 24hr exposure, nematodes were all dead. The extracts were also toxic to Aphelenchoides besseyi, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, Pratylenchus coffeae and Rotylenchus reniformis, causing mortalities more than 50%. Stem and leaf extracts could reduce significantly egg hatching ratios of Meloidogyne incognita. Water extracts of G. pulchella whole plant tissue at concentrations of 7%~10% could kill 90% of nematodes. Addition to soil of extracts decreased nematode populations in soil and prohibited gall formation in Ipomoea reptans roots. Gamborg’s B5 solution containing 10000ppm glucose, pH 8.5 was found to be the most optimal for growing G. pulchella. Root exudates at a concentration of 3000ppm could kill 99% of nematodes and inhibit egg hatching ratios of Meloidogyne incognita. G. pulchella grows well in sand, sand loam and red soil, at pH 6.5~8.0. The seedling developed well in sand loam soil at 12~32℃. Studies on chemotaxis of Meloidogyne incognita to G. pulchella showed that the root tissue could attract nematode with the food-finding (%) at 9.1%, but stem and leaf expelled nematode with the food-finding (%) at -4.5% and -4.9%, respectively. It was found that 10% extracts of G. pulchella was more effective than 5% and 1% for controlling the root-knot nematode in greenhouse. Adding extract to soil before planting I. Reptans was more effective for controlling nematode than treatment after planting. Damage caused by nematodes which treated with extracts before inoculation was lower than treated in soil. The greenhouse test showed that soil mixed with 5% or 10% fresh pieces of G. pulchella was able to control nematode disease; the effect was better than its dry powders. The degree of fresh pieces obtained from different growth stage of G. pulchella on controlling nematode disease was about the same. Mixing planting of 5 G. pulchella plants with I. reptans could inhibit egg hatching ratios, but the growth of I. reptans was decreased. Compaire different applications on controlling Meloidogyne incognita in field trial, Soil amendment with fresh pieces was the most effective for the control, while planting G. pulchella could reduce nematode populations in soil effectively. I. reptans which planted after G. pulchella grew well. Extracts of G. pulchella contained more than one nematicides which were high polarity and anion.
目 錄
壹、 前言………………………………………………………………….1
貳、 材料與方法………………………………………………………...14
一、供試線蟲之來源及培養…………………………………………..…14
(一) 南方根瘤線蟲之來源及培養…………………………………14
(二) 其它植物寄生性線蟲及腐生線蟲之來源……………………14
二、供試植物之栽培…………………………………………………..…14
(一) 蕹菜及菊科植物之栽培………………………..……………...14
(二) 天人菊栽培條件之選擇…………………………………….…15
1. 不同溫度對天人菊生長之影響…………………….…….…15
2. 不同質地及酸鹼值之土壤對天人菊生長之影響…………..16
三、南方根瘤線蟲之生物性探討………………………………………..16
(一) 南方根瘤線蟲孵化後不同天數對其感染蕹菜根部能力之影響
…………………………………………………………………16
(二) 南方根瘤線蟲寄生於蕹菜根部之生活史……….……………17
(三) 不同酸鹼值溶液對南方根瘤線蟲致死率之影響………….…17
(四) 不同濃度葡萄糖之Gamborg''s B5培養液對南方根瘤線蟲
致死率之影響………………………………………………….18
(五) 不同濃度之氯化鈉溶液對南方根瘤線蟲致死率之影響…….18
四、拮抗線蟲之菊科植物篩選…………………………………………..18
(一) 不同菊科植物對南方根瘤線蟲之抗感性比較………………..19
(二) 不同抗感性菊科植物後作對南方根瘤線蟲之防治效果..……20
(三) 不同抗感性菊科植物與蕹菜混植對南方根瘤線蟲之防治效果
...…..……..……………………………………………………..20
五、不同抗感性菊科植物粗萃取液對線蟲之影響……………..………20
(一) 粗萃取液對南方根瘤線蟲致死率之影響…………………….21
(二) 粗萃取液對南方根瘤線蟲感染蕹菜根部能力之影響……….21
(三) 粗萃取液對葉芽線蟲族群繁殖之影響……………………….21
六、南方根瘤線蟲對菊科植物之趨化性………………………………..22
(一) 對不同抗感性菊科植物根尖之趨化性…………….………….22
(二) 對天人菊之不同部位組織之趨化性……...…………………...23
七、拮抗線蟲之天人菊品種篩選…………………………………….….23
(一) 不同來源之天人菊植株特徵觀察及發芽率與感病性測試…..23
(二) 不同品系天人菊粗萃取液對南方根瘤線蟲致死率之影響…..24
八、天人菊根分泌物對南方根瘤線蟲之影響…………………………..24
(一) 天人菊組織培養容器之設計及培養液的選擇…………….….25
(二) 天人菊根分泌物的收集………………………………………..27
(三) 根分泌物對南方根瘤線蟲致死率之影響……………………..28
(四) 根分泌物對南方根瘤線蟲孵化率之影響……………………..28
九、天人菊植體粗萃取液對線蟲之影響………………………………..28
(一) 不同部位萃取液對線蟲致死率之影響………………………..28
(二) 不同部位粗萃取液對南方根瘤線蟲孵化率之影響…………..29
(三) 不同濃度之植體粗萃取液對南方根瘤線蟲致死率之影響….29
(四) 植體粗萃取液對土壤中南方根瘤線蟲族群消長之影響…….29
十、天人菊於溫室中對南方根瘤線蟲之防治效果…………………….30
(一) 植體粗萃取液對南方根瘤線蟲之防治效果…………….…..30
1. 不同濃度之粗萃取液對南方根瘤線蟲之防治效果………...30
2. 粗萃取液對不同齡期南方根瘤線蟲之防治效果…..……….30
3. 粗萃取液浸泡南方根瘤線蟲或施用於感染土對線蟲之防治
效果………………………………………………………..…31
(二) 添加天人菊植體於土壤中對南方根瘤線蟲之防治效果..….32
1. 不同株齡生鮮植體對南方根瘤線蟲之防治效果………..….32
2. 乾燥植體粉末與生鮮植體對南方根瘤線蟲之防治效果…...32
(三) 種植天人菊對南方根瘤線蟲之防治效果…………………...33
1. 對土壤中南方根瘤線蟲族群消長之影響……………..…….33
2. 不同株數天人菊與蕹菜混植對南方根瘤線蟲之防治效果...33
(四) 天人菊不同應用方式對南方根瘤線蟲之防治效果………...33
十一、天人菊之拮抗線蟲成分之分析………………………………….34
(一) 天人菊植體之萃取溶媒的選擇……………………………….34
(二) 天人菊植體之萃取與分離…………………………………….35
十二、天人菊應用於田間對南方根瘤線蟲之防治效果……..………...38
(一) 土壤質地、酸鹼值及線蟲相之調查………………………….38
(二) 試驗設計……………………………………………………….39
參、 結果………………………………………………………………..41
一、天人菊栽培條件之選擇…………………………………………….41
(一) 不同溫度對天人菊生長之影響……………………………….41
(二) 不同質地及酸鹼值之土壤對天人菊生長之影響…………….41
二、南方根瘤線蟲之生物性探討…………………………………….…41
(一) 南方根瘤線蟲孵化後不同天數對其感染蕹菜根部能力之影響
………………………………………………………………...42
(二) 南方根瘤線蟲寄生於空心菜根部之生活史………………...42
(三) 不同酸鹼值溶液對南方根瘤線蟲致死率之影響…………...43
(四) 不同濃度葡萄糖之Gamborg''s B5培養液對南方根瘤線蟲
致死率之影響………………………………………………...44
(五) 不同濃度之氯化鈉溶液對南方根瘤線蟲致死率之影響…...44
三、拮抗線蟲之菊科植物篩選…………………………….…………...45
(一) 不同菊科植物對南方根瘤線蟲之抗感性比較……………...45
(二) 不同抗感性菊科植物後作對南方根瘤線蟲之防治效果…...45
(三) 不同抗感性菊科植物與蕹菜混植對南方根瘤線蟲之防治效果
………………………………………………………………..46
四、不同抗感性菊科植物粗萃取液對線蟲之影響……………………46
(一) 粗萃取液對南方根瘤線蟲致死率之影響……………………46
(二) 粗萃取液對南方根瘤線蟲感染蕹菜根部能力之影響………47
(三) 粗萃取液對葉芽線蟲族群繁殖之影響………………………47
五、南方根瘤線蟲對菊科植物之趨化性………………………………48
(一) 對不同抗感性菊科植物根尖之趨化性………………………48
(二) 對天人菊之不同部位組織的趨化性…………………………48
六、拮抗線蟲之天人菊品種篩選………………………………………..49
(一) 不同來源之天人菊植株特徵、發芽率及感病性……………..49
(二) 不同品系之天人菊粗萃取液對南方根瘤線蟲致死率之影響..50
七、天人菊根分泌物對南方根瘤線蟲之影響…………………………..50
(一) 天人菊組織培養容器之設計及培養液的選擇………………..50
(二) 天人菊根分泌物的收集………………………………………..52
(三) 根分泌物對南方根瘤線蟲致死率之影響……………………..53
(四) 根分泌物對南方根瘤線蟲孵化率之影響……………………..53
八、天人菊植體粗萃取液對線蟲之影響……………………..…………53
(一) 不同部位之粗萃取液對線蟲致死率之影響………………….53
(二) 不同部位之粗萃取液對南方根瘤線蟲孵化率之影響……….54
(三) 不同濃度之植體粗萃取液對南方根瘤線蟲致死率之影響….54
(四) 植體粗萃取液對土壤中南方根瘤線蟲族群消長之影響…….55
九、天人菊於溫室中對南方根瘤線蟲的防治效果……………………..56
(一) 植體粗萃取液對南方根瘤線蟲的防治效果…………………..56
1. 不同濃度粗萃取液對南方根瘤線蟲之防治效果………….56
2. 粗萃取液對不同齡期南方根瘤線蟲之防治效果………….56
3. 粗萃取液浸泡南方根瘤線蟲或施用於感染土對線蟲之防治
效果………………………………………………………..…57
(二) 添加生鮮植體於土壤中對南方根瘤線蟲之防治效果………...57
1. 不同株齡生鮮植體對南方根瘤線蟲之防治效果………….57
2. 乾燥植體粉末與生鮮植體對南方根瘤線蟲之防治效果….58
(三) 種植天人菊對南方根瘤線蟲之防治效果……………………...58
1. 對土壤中南方根瘤線蟲族群消長之影響………………….58
2. 不同株數天人菊與蕹菜混植對南方根瘤線蟲之防治效果.59
(四) 天人菊不同應用方式對南方根瘤線蟲之防治效果…………..59
十、天人菊之拮抗線蟲成分之分析……………………………………..60
(一) 天人菊植體之萃取溶媒的選擇………………………………..60
(二) 天人菊植體之萃取與分離……………………………………..60
十一、天人菊應用於田間對南方根瘤線蟲之防治效果………………..64
(一) 土壤質地、酸鹼值及線蟲相之調查…………………………..64
(二) 試驗結果………………………………………………………..64
肆、 討論………………………………………………………………...65
伍、 參考文獻…………………………………………………………...72
陸、 中文摘要…………………………………………………………...79
柒、 英文摘要…………………………………………………………...81
捌、 圖表…..………….…………………………………………………83
1. 蔡東纂. 1996. 台灣作物線蟲連作障礙之發生及對策. 植物病理學會刊 5: 113-128.
2. 蔡東纂. 1998. 植物寄生性線蟲之演變. 植物病理學會刊 7: 1-9.
3. 蔡東纂. 1996. 根瘤線蟲在雜草上的生態. 除草劑安全使用及草類利用管理研討會專刊 pp: 309-324.
4. 蔡東纂、吳文希、林奕耀、程永雄. 1997. 台灣柑桔線蟲之發生及其生物型種內變異. 植物病理學會刊 6: 111-122.
5. 蔡東纂、程永雄. 1994. 台灣花卉線蟲問題. 台灣花卉病蟲害研討會專刊 pp: 225-241. 中華植物保護學會.
6. 蔡東纂、程永雄、陳弘毅、林奕耀、吳文希. 1995. 球根花卉線蟲病害之發生及防治. 植物病理學會刊 4: 180-192.
7. 顏志恆、林俊義、陳殿義、李明達、蔡東纂. 1998. 拮抗植物抑制南方根瘤線蟲族群之效用. 植物病理學會刊 7: 94-104.
8. Adeniji, M. O. and Chheda, H. R. 1971. Influence of six varieties of Cynodon on four Meloidogyne spp. J. Nematol. 3(3): 250-254.
9. Al-Sayed, A. A. and Thomason, I. J. 1988. Meloidogyne incognita and tomato response to thiamine, ascorbic acid, L-arginine, and L-glutamic acid. J. Nematol. 20(3): 451-456.
10. Blum, U. 1996. Allelopathic interactions involving phenolic acids. J. Nematol. 28(3): 259-267.
11. Birch, A. N. E., Robertson, W. M. and Geoghegan, Z. E. (eds.) 1993. DMDP-a plant - derived sugar analogue with systemic activity against plant parasitic nematodes. Nematologica 35 : 366-370.
12. Bird, A. F. 1971. Specialized adaptations of nematodes to parasitism. Pages 35-48. In: Plant Parasitic Nematodes. B. M. Zuckerman, W. F. Mai, and R. A. Rohde, eds. Academic Press, Inc.
13. Bosts, S. C. and Triantphyllou, A. C. 1982. Genetic basis of the epidemiologic effects of resistance to Meloidogyne incognita. J. Nematol. 14(4): 540-544.
14. Brueske, C. H. 1980. Phenylalanine ammonia lyase activity in tomato roots infected and resistant to the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita. Physiol. Plant. Pathol. 16: 409-414.
15. Castagnone-sereno, P., Bongiovanni, M. and Dalmasso, A. 1994. Reproduction of virulent isolates of Meloidogyne incognita on susceptible and Mi-resistant tomato. J. Nematol. 26(3): 324-328.
16. Cramer, L. L., Weissenborn, D. and Cottinghan, C. K. 1993. Regulation of defense-related gene expression during plant-pathogen interactions. J. Nematol. 25(4): 507-518.
17. Curl, E. A. and Truelove, B. 1986. Root exudates. Pages 55-92. In : The phizosphere. E. A. Curl, and B. Truelove, eds. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
18. Daris, E. L., Meyers, D. M., Dullum, C. J. and Feitelson, J. S. 1997. Nematicidal activity of fatty acid esters on soybean cyst and root-knot nematodes. J. Nematol. 29(4s): 677-678.
19. Davide, R. G. and Triantaphyllou, A. C. 1968. Influence of the environment on development and sex differentiation of root-knot nematodes. Nematologica 14: 37-46.
20. Dropkin, V. H. 1969. Cellular responses of plants to nematode infections. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 7: 101-122.
21. Dropkin, V. H., Helgeson, J. P. and Upper, C. D. 1969. The hypersensitivity reaction of tomatoes resistant to Meloidogyne incognita : reversal of cytokinins. J. Nematol. 22(1): 136-138.
22. Egunjobi, O. A. and Afolami, S. O. 1976. Effects of neem(Azadirachta indica) leaf extracts on populations of Pratylenchus brachyurus and on the growth and yield of maize. Nematologica 22: 125-132.
23. Faghihi, J., Vierling, R. A. and Halbrendt, J. M. (eds.) 1995. Resistance genes in a williams 82'' × Hartwing’ soybean cross to an inbred line of Heterodera glycines. J. Nematol. 27(3): 418-421.
24. Galhano, C. I. C., Ryan, M. F., Stantos, M. S. and Staritsky. G. 1997. Interactions between tannia(Xanthosoma sagittifolium) and the root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne megadora and M. javanica. Nematropica 27(1): 7-17.
25. Giebel, J. 1970. Phenolic content in roots of some solanaceae and its influence on IAA-oxidase. activity as an indicator of resistance to Heterodera rostochiensis. Nematologica 16: 29-33.
26. Gommers, F. J. 1971. A nematicidal principle from the roots of a Helenium hybrid. Phytochemistry 10: 1945-1946.
27. Gomners, F. J., Bakker, J. and Smits, L. 1980. Effects of singlet oxygen generated by the nematicidal compound -terthienyl from tagetes of the nematode Aphelenchus avenae. Nematologica 26: 369-375.
28. Hackeny, R.W. and Dickerson. O. J. 1975. Marigold, castor bean, and chrysanthemum as controls of Meloidogyne incognita and Pratylenchus alleni. J. Nematol. 7(1): 84-90.
29. Halbrendt, J. M. 1996. Allelopathy in the management of plant-parasitic Nematodes. J. Nematol. 28(1): 8-14.
30. Hatakeda, K., Saito, N., Ito, S., Ikusima, Y. and Asano, T. 1985. A new nematicidal compound in french marigold. Jpn. J. Nematol. 15: 11-13.
31. Hoan, L. T., and Davide, R. G. 1979. Nematicidal properties of root extracts of seventeen plant species on Meloidogyne incognita . Phil. Agr. 62: 285-295.
32. Houghton, P. J. and Raman, A. 1998. Methodes for extraction and sample clean-up. Pages 22-52. In: Laboratory Handbook for the Fraction of Natural Extracts. P. J. Houghton, and A. Raman, eds. Chapman&Hall, an imprint of Thomson Science.
33. Huang, J. S. 1985. Mechanisms of resistance to root-knot nematodes. Pages 165-176. In: An Advanced Treatise on Meloidogyne volumn I: Biology and Control. J. N. Sasser, and C. C. Carter, eds. North Carolina State University Graphics.
34. Hussey, R. S. 1985. Host- parasitic relationships and associated physiological change. Pages 143-153. In: An Advanced Treatise on Meloidogyne volumn I: Biology and Control. J. N. Sasser, and C. C. Carter, eds. North Carolina State University Graphics.
35. Kyo, M., Miyauchi, Y., Fujimoto T. and Mayama, S. 1990. Production of nematocidal compounds by hairy root cultures of Tagetes patula L. Plant Cell Reports 9: 393-397.
36. Malik, M. S., Pal, V. and Sangwan, N. K. (eds.) 1989. Nematicidal efficacy of substituted phenols phenoxyacetic acid esters and hydrazides: a structure-activity relationship study. Nematologica 35 : 366-370.
37. Mateeva, A. 1995. Use of unfriendly plants against root-knot nematodes. Acta. Hortic. 382: 178-182.
38. Maqbool, M. A. and kerry, B. 1997.Chemical control of nematology: efficiency and side effects. Pages 59-66. In: Plant Nematode Problems and Their Control in The Near East Region. M. A. Maqbool, and B. kerry, eds. Food and Agriculture organization of the United Nations.
39. Maqbool, M. A. and kerry, B. 1997. Plant nematology in developing countries: problem and progress. Pages 13-20. In: Plant Nematode Problems and their Control in the Near East Region. M. A. Maqbool, and B. kerry, Food and Agriculture organization of the United Nations.
40. Mcsorley, R., and Erederick, J. J. 1994. Response of some commom annual Bedding plants to three species of Meloidogyne. J. Nematol. 26(4s): 773-777.
41. McSorley, R. 1996. Cultural control of plant parasitic nematodes. Pages 149-166. In: Pest Management in the Subtropics. D. Rosen, F. D. Bennett, and J. L. Capinera, eds. Athenaeum Press, Gatesheag, Then & Wear.
42. Mende, N. V. 1997. Invasion and migration behavior of sedentary nematodes. Pages 51-64. In: Cellular and Molecular Aspects of Plant Nematode Interactions. C. Fenoll, F. M. W. Grundler, and S. A. Ohl, eds. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
43. Miller, H. N. and Died wardo, A. A. 1962. Leaf galls on siderasis fuscata caused by the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita. Phytopathology 52: 1070-1073.
44. Miller, P. M. and Ahrens J. F. 1969. Influence of growing marigolds, weeds, two cover crops and fumigation on subsequent populations of parasitic nematodes and plant growth. Plant. Dis. Reptr. 53(8): 642-646.
45. Miller, P. M., Turner, N. C. and Tomlinson, H. 1973. Toxicity of leaf and stem extracts to Tylenchorhynchus dubius. J. Nematol. 5(3): 173-177.
46. Mojtahedi, H., Brown, C. R. and Santo, G. S. 1995. Characterization of resistance in a somatic hybrid of Solanum bulbocastanum and S. tuberosum to Meloidogyne chitwoodi. J. Nematol. 27(1): 86-93.
47. Morton, H. V. 1986. Modification of proprietary chemicals for increasing efficacy. J. Nematol. 18(2): 123-128.
48. Mreller, J. D. and Noling, J. W. 1996. Standardization of reporting procedures for nematicide efficacy testing : a research and extension perspective. J. Nematol. 28(4S): 575-585.
49. Mcclure, M. A. and Viglierchio, D. R. 1966. The influence of host nutrition and intensity of infection on the sex ratio and development of Meloidogyne incognita in sterile agar culture of excised cucumber roots. Nematologica 12: 248-258.
50. Mukhopadhyaya, M. C., Das, T. K., Chattopadhyay, P. R. and Bose, T. 1980. Control of root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita with Typhonium tribolatum, an annual herb. Nematologica 26: 277-280.
51. Nasr, T. A., Ibrahim, I. K. A. , El-Aeab, E. M. and Hassan, M. W. A. 1980. Effect of root-knot nematodes on the mineral, amino acid and carbohydrate concentrations of almond and peach rootstocks. Nematologica 26: 133-138.
52. Nickle, W. R. 1991. Manual of Agriculture Nematology. Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York. 646pp.
53. Noe, J. P. 1998. Crop and nematode management systems. Pages 159-172. In: Plant and Nematode Interactions. K. R. Baker, G. A. Pederson, and G. L. Wind, eds. American Society of Agronomy, Inc. USA.
54. Oduor-Owino, P. 1993. Effects of aldicarb, Datura stramonium, Datura metel and Tagetes minuta on the pathogenicity of root-knot nematodes in kenya. Crop protection 12(4): 315-317.
55. Opperman, C. H., Taylor, C. G. and Conkling, M. A. 1994. Root-knot nematode-directed expression of a plant root-specific gene. Science. 263: 221-223.
56. Orion, D. and Minz, G. 1971. The influence of morphaction on the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne javanica, and its galls. Nematologica 17: 107-112.
57. Owino, P. O., Waudo, S. W. and Sikora, R. A. 1993. Biological control of Meloidogyne javanica in kenya : Effect of plant residues, benomyl and decomposition products of Mustrad ( Brassica campestris) Nematologica 39: 127-134.
58. Paracer, S., Tarjan, A. C. and Hodgson, L. M. 1987. Effective use of marine algae products in the management of plant-parasitic nematode. J. Nematol. 19(2): 194-200.
59. Paulson, R. E. and Webster, J. M. 1972. Ultrastructure of the hypersensitive reaction in roots of tomato, Lyvopersicon esculentum L. to infection by the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita. Physiol. Plant. Pathol. 2: 227-234.
60. Pline, M., Dies, J. A. and Dusenbery, D. B. 1988. Extremely sensitive thermotaxis of the nematode Meloidogyne incognita. J. Nematol. 20(4): 605-608.
61. Prakash, A. and Rao, J. 1997. Botanical pesticides against nematodes. Pages 299-344. In: Botanical Pesticides in Agriculture. A. Prakash, and J. Rao, eds. CRC Press, Inc.
62. Reay, F. and Wallace, H. R. 1981. The response of some australian native plants to Meloidogyne javanica. Nematologica 27: 449-457.
63. Reynolds, H. W. and O''Bannon, J. H. 1966. The efficacy and residual nature of experimental chemicals for controlling Meloidogyne incognita acrita on Deltapine cotton in Arizona. Plant. Dis. Reptr. 50: 512-515.
64. Rhoades, H. L. 1964. Effects of fallowing and flooding on root-knot nematode in peat soil. Plant. Dis. Reptr. 48: 303-306.
65. Roberts, P.A. 1995. Conceptual and practical aspects of variability in root-knot nematodes related to host plant resistance. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 33: 199-221.
66. Sasser, J. N. and Freckman, D. W. 1987. A world perspective on nematology: the role of the society. Pages 7-14. In: Vistas on Nematology: a Commemoration of the Twentyfifth Anniversary of the Society of Nematologists. J. A. Veech, and D. W. Diskson, eds. Society of Nematologists, Inc. Hyattsville, Maryland, USA.
67. Siddiqui, M. A. and Alam, M. M. 1987. Utilization of marigold plant wastes, for the control of plant parasitic nematode. Biological Wastes 21: 221-229.
68. Singh, B. and Choudhury, B. 1973. The chemical characteristics of tomato cultivars resistant to root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp) Nematologica 19: 443-448.
69. Stirling, G. R. 1991. Plant parasitic nematodes: the target of biological control. Pages 11-21. In: Biological Control of Plant Parasitic Nematodes Progress, Problems and Prospects. G. R. Stirling, eds. CAB International.
70. Tanda, A. S. and Atwal, A. S. 1988. Effect of sesame intercropping against the root-knot nematode ( Meloidogyne incognita in okra ). Nematologica 34: 484-492.
71. Tanda, A. S., Atwal, A. S. and Bajaj, Y. P. A. 1989. In vitro inhibition of root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita by sesame root exudate and its amino acids. Nematologica 35: 115-124.
72. Taylor, C. E., and Murant, A. F. 1966. Nematicidal activity of aqueous extracts from raspberry canes and roots. Nematologica 12: 488-494.
73. Trudgill, D. L. 1991. Resistance to and tolerance of plant parasitic nematodes in plants. Annu. Rev. phytopathol. 29: 167-192.
74. Van Driesche, R. G. and Bellows, Jr. T. S. 1996. Pest origins, pesticide and the history of biological control. Pages 3-20. In: Biological Control. R. G. Van Driesche, and Jr. T. S. Bellows, eds. International Thomson Publishing Company, USA.
75. Veech, J. A. 1978. An apparent relationship between methoxy - substituted terpenoid aldehydes and the resistance of cotton to Meloidogyne incognita. Nematologica 24: 81-87.
76. Veech, J. A. 1982. Phytoalexins and their role in the resistance of plants to nematodes. J. Nematol. 14(1): 2-9.
77. Veech, J. A. and Mccoure, M. A. 1977. Terpenoid aldehydes in cotton roots susceptible and resistant to the root-knot nematode. J. Nematol. 19(3): 225-229.
78. Viala, S. S., Brodie, B. B., Rodriguez, Z. and Gibson, D. M. 1998. The potential of thiarubrine C as a nematicidal agent against plant- parasitic nematodes. J. Nematol. 30(2): 192-200.
79. Walker, J. T. 1996. Crambe and rapeseed medal as soil amendments : nematicidal potential and phytotoxin effects. Crop Protection 15(5): 433-437.
80. Walker, J. T. , Melin, J. B. and Davis, J. 1994. Sensitivity of bedding plants to southern root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita race 3. J. Nematol. 26(4s): 778-781.
81. Webster, J. M. 1985. Interaction of Meloidogyne with fungi on crop plants. Pages 183-192. In: An Advanced Treatise on Meloidogyne Volumn I: Biology and Control. J. N. Sasser, and C. C. Carter, eds. North Carolina State University Graphics.
82. Whitehead, A. G. 1998. Plant parasitic nematodes, their importance and control. Pages 1-12. In : Plant Nematode Control. A. G. Whitehead, eds. CAB International, UK.
83. Whitehead, A. G. 1998. Sedentary endoparasites of roots and tubers. Pages 209-260. In : Plant Nematode Control. A. G. Whitehead, eds.CAB International, UK.
84. Zacheo, G., Bleve-Zacheo, T. and Melillo, M. T. 1997. Biochemistry of plant defence responses to nematode infection. Pages 201-216. In: Cellular and Molecular Aspects of Plant Nematode Interactions. C. Fenoll, F. M. W. Grundler, and S. A. Ohl, eds. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
85. Zacheo, G., Larnberti, F., Arrigoni-Liso, R. and Arrigoni, O. 1978. Mitochondrial protein-hydroxyproline content of susceptible and resistant tomatoes infected by Meloidogyne incognita. Nematologica 23: 471-476.
86. Zacheo, G., Orlando, C. and Bleve-Zacheo, T. 1993. Characterization of anionic peroxidases in tomata isolines infected by Meloieogyne incognita. J. Nematol. 25(2): 249-256.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top