臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究探討台灣華人人際互動時，無意識覺察自發的行為模仿現象與情緒的調節作用。實驗一操弄楷模有無表現玩筆行為，及測量個體與楷模關係親疏的程度與個體的情緒狀態，行為模仿的楷模為成對參與實驗的參與者之一。結果顯示有變色龍效應，參與者會模仿楷模的玩筆行為舉動。實驗二操弄參與者的情緒狀態為正向、中性或負向。參與者觀看影片中的女性楷模在從事文書處理工作時，偶而翹腳與晃腳、摸髮、與掩嘴打哈欠，或者沒有表現這三種行為。結果顯示情緒會調節變色龍效應。負向情緒會抑制行為模仿，負向情緒的參與者較慢，表現較少楷模的行為；正向情緒與中性控制組的參與者在行為模仿上並無差異。本研究修正van Baaren、Fockenberg、Holland、Janssen和van Knippenberg（2006）的結論：正向情緒並未促進行為模仿，而是負向情緒抑制行為模仿。本研究結果不但重複驗證西方研究的部份結果，並且釐清正負向情緒調節行為模仿的作用方向。

This research investigates the moderation of the mood on unconscious, spontaneous behavioral mimicry among Taiwanese Chinese. In Experiment 1, whether a model played a pen or not was manipulated, and the closeness of the relationship between participants and a model, and participants’ mood state were measured. The model was one of the two participants. The results showed the chameleon effect; participants mimicked the model’s pen-playing behaviors. In Experiment 2, participants’ positive, neutral, or negative mood state was manipulated. Each participant viewed a film depicting a female model doing some office works. The model would either occasionally shake her foot, stroke her hair, cover her mouth and yawn, or not exhibit any of the three behaviors. The results revealed the moderation effect of mood on the chameleon effect. Participants in a negative mood were less likely to mimic the model’s behaviors. They were slower to mimic and mimicked less of the model’s behaviors than those in the positive and neutral mood. No difference was found in behavioral mimicry between those in the positive and neutral mood. These findings extend van Baaren, Fockenberg, Holland, Janssen and van Knippenberg (2006), and demonstrate that positive mood does not facilitate behavioral mimicry, whereas negative mood inhibits behavioral mimicry. The present research not only replicates previous Western research but also clarifies the direction of the moderation of the mood on behavioral mimicry.

中文摘要........................................................................................................................I
英文摘要.......................................................................................................................II
目錄..............................................................................................................................IV
圖表目錄 .................................................................................................................... V
緒論 ..............................................................................................................................1
研究問題與假設..........................................................................................................11
實驗一 ........................................................................................................................14
研究方法 ............................................................................................................14
研究結果 ............................................................................................................17
討論 ....................................................................................................................20
實驗二前測 ................................................................................................................22
研究方法 ............................................................................................................22
研究結果 ............................................................................................................25
討論 ....................................................................................................................26
實驗二 ........................................................................................................................27
研究方法 ............................................................................................................27
研究結果 ............................................................................................................33
討論 ....................................................................................................................49
綜合討論 ....................................................................................................................51
參考文獻 ....................................................................................................................54
附錄 ............................................................................................................................57

孫維志（2005）。「音樂情緒對設計師發散性思考的影響」。實踐大學產品與建築設計研究所碩士論文。
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596-612..
Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230-244.
Carlston, D. E. (1993). The truth about social cognition. Social Cognition, 11, 271-275.
Cesario, J., Plaks, J. E., & Higgins, E. T. (2006). Automatic social behavior as motivated preparation to interact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 893-910.
Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: How the perception-behavior link facilitates social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893-910.
Chartrand, T. L., van Baaren, R. B., & Bargh, J. A. (2006). Linking automatic evaluation to mood and information processing style: Consequences for experienced affect,　impression formation, and stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Psychology：General, 135, 70-77.
Cheng, C. M., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). Self-monitoring without awareness: Using mimicry as a nonconscious affiliation strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1170-1179.
Dijksterhuis, A., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). The perception-behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 1-40.
Dijksterhuis, A., & van Knippenberg, A. (1998). The relation between perception and behavior or how to win a game of Trivial Pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 865-877.
Di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91, 176-180.
Dunn, J. R., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2005). Feeling and believing: The influence of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 736-748.
Hassin, R. R., Uleman, J. S., & Bargh, J. A. (2005). Beyond the perception-behavior link: The ubiquitous utility and motivational moderators of nonconscious mimicry. In W. W. Chartrand., R. B. Maddux, & J. L.Lakin (Eds.), The new conscious. (pp. 334-361). New York: Oxford university press.
Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999). Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science, 286, 2526-2528.
Innes-Ker, A., & Niedenthal, P. M. (2002). Emotion concepts and emotional states in social judgment and categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 804-816.
Johnston, L. (2002). Behavioral mimicry and stigmatization. Social Cognition, 20, 18-35.
Keppel, G. (1982). Detailed analysis of main effects and interaction. In Design and analysis, a researcher’s handbook (2nd ed., pp. 212-232). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey：Prentice-Hall.
Kunda, Z. (1999). Hot cognition. Social Cognition: Making sense of people (pp. 211-263). Cambridge, MA：MIT press.
Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., Neter, J., & Li, W. (2005). ANOVA diagnostics and remedial measures. In Applied linear statistical models (5th ed., pp. 775-809). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lakin, J. L., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport. Psychological Science, 14, 334-339
Maddux, W. W., Mullen, E., & Galinsky, A. D. (in press). Chameleons bake bigger pies and take bigger pieces: Strategic behavioral mimicry facilitates negotiation outcomes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and
mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852-863.
Rizzolatti, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1998). Language within our grasp. Trends in Neuroscience, 21, 188-194.
Sigall, H., & Mills, J. (1998). Measures of independent variables and mediators are useful in social psychology experiments: But are they necessary？Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 218-226.
van Baaren, R. B., Fockenberg , D. A., Holland, R. W., Janssen, L.& van Knippenberg, A. (2006). The moody chameleon: The effect of mood on non-conscious mimicry. Social Cognition, 24, 426-437.
van Baaren, R. B., Horgan, T. G.., Chartrand, T. L., Dijkmans, M. (2004). The forest, the trees, and the chameleon: Context dependence and mimicry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 453-459.
van Baaren, R. B., Holland, R. W., Steenaert, B., & van Knippenberg, A. (2003). Mimicry for money: Behavioral consequences of imitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 393-398.
van Baaren, R. B., Maddux, W. W., Chartrand, T. L., de Bouter, C., & van Knippenberg, A. (2003). It takes two to mimic: Behavioral consequences of self-construals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1093-1102.