臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

台灣的教育單位鼓勵學生透過網際網路進行學習，許多教育工作者突破傳統以課本為中心的教學方式，改採用以鼓勵學生探索和建構自己的知識相關教學活動。但是許多教育工作者對於網際網路所提供的教材，受限於訊息提供不足以及無法了解內容，無法將網際網路之資源引入教學中。老師對於開發一個教材適合學生學習的教材，既沒有時間也沒有相關技術可以開發教材。網際網路提供一個分享創新教學媒體資源的環境。
現在政府和教育機構已經開始發佈課程綱要與教學理念。但是，它很難獲得合適的資源以滿足特定需求。教育工作者需要一個可快速搜尋與製作教材的工具教材，可搜索課外教材資源以及檢索教材以適用他們教學需要，並組織這些資源成為一個教案，並分享他們的教學經驗於網際網路上。本研究規劃設計一個教學服務平台（PSP）提供教師創作和展示環境，使他們能夠有效利用教學資源並將教學理念發佈於網際網路上。PSP系統主要是管理分散在網路上的教學資源，並提供查詢與瀏覽的機制讓老師能了解哪些資源是可用的。這一個工具提供修改教材資源、建立補充教材以及設計創新課程的環境。並鼓勵老師下載、推薦以及上傳自己的課程置自己的平台以分享她的教學方法與想法。

Internet use has been encouraged for K–12 students in Taiwan, and many educators would like to break through the confines of traditional textbook-centered teaching to present activities that encourage students to explore and construct their own knowledge. But many educators are not well prepared to teach curricular materials in form of multimedia with the internet, and internet use is limited in scope and substance. Since this requires developing innovative materials and curriculum tailored to local students, educators have neither the time nor the information to do much of this from scratch. The internet provides a medium for sharing innovative pedagogical resources broadly.
Governmental projects and educator organizations have already begun to post curriculum ideas on internet servers. However, it is difficult to obtain the right resources that meet specific needs. Educators need productivity tools for locating sites of materials by surfing the network, searching the individual curricular sources, adapting retrieved materials to their classrooms, organizing these resources in coherent lesson plans, and sharing their experiences across the internet. This study designed and prototyped a Pedagogical Service Platform (PSP) that provides authoring and presentation supports for educators so they can make effective use of contemporary pedagogical resources posted on the internet by Taiwanese governmental agencies. PSP maintains information for finding pedagogical resources distributed on the internet and provides query and browsing mechanisms to explore what is available. Tools are included for tailoring retrieved resources, creating supplementary materials, and designing innovative curriculum. PSP encourages educators to download, annotate, and upload their curricula to its server to share their ideas with other educators.

Table of Contents
致謝辭 i
中文摘要 ii
Abstract iii
Table of Contents v
List of Figures vii
List of Table ix
1. Introduction 1
1.1 Motivation 1
1.2 The Problems of Curriculum-Material Searching 2
1.3 Organization of the Thesis 3
2. Background 5
2.1 TWLOM V 2.0 for Curriculum 5
2.2 User Satisfaction 9
3. Pedagogical Service Platform 12
3.1 Requirement analysis 12
3.1.1 Functional Requirements 12
3.1.2 System Analysis 13
3.2. Pedagogical Functional Architecture 18
3.2.1 Locating and Searching Curricular Materials 21
3.2.2 Adapting to local needs 24
3.2.3 Organizing Resources into Lesson Plans 25
3.2.4 Portable Authoring Tool 26
3.3 Summary of Procedure Authoring Procedure 29
3.4 Examples on Practicing 31
4. Use Study 33
4.1 Case-Teaching Experience 33
4.2 Case-Using Procedure 33
4.3 Analysis of the Course Teaching Portfolio 35
4.4 Feedback of Using by Case of Teacher 37
4.5 Curriculum Framework and Application Scenarios 39
5. Evaluation of Satisfaction 42
5.1 Questionnaire Design and Sampling 42
5.2 Reliability and Validity 44
5.3 Results of PSP Satisfaction 48
6. Discussion and Conclusion 54
REFERENCES 57
APPENDIX A : Questionnaire of PSP Satisfaction 61

[1]Lin, F.R., Lin, S.C. & Huang, T.P. , "Knowledge sharing and creation in a teachers’ professional virtual community," Computers & Education, vol. 50, pp. 742–756, April 2008.
[2]N. Maibaum and T. Mundt, "JXTA: a technology facilitating mobile peer-to-peer networks," in Mobility and Wireless Access Workshop, 2002. MobiWac 2002. International, pp. 7-13, Oct. 2002.
[3]B. Low, et al., "Distributed Computing Education, Part 5: Coming to Terms with Intellectual Property Rights," Distributed Systems Online, IEEE, vol. 9, pp. 2-2, Dec. 2008.
[4]S. Ternier, et al. , "The Ariadne Infrastructure for Managing and Storing Metadata," Internet Computing, IEEE, vol. 13, pp. 18-25, July-Aug. 2009.
[5]I-Fan Liu, et al., "Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect Intention to Use an Online Learning Community," Computers & Education, vol. 54, pp. 600-610, February 2010.
[6]R. de Santiago and A. Raabe, "Architecture for Learning Objects Sharing among Learning Institutions-LOP2P," Learning Technologies, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 3, pp. 91-95, April-June 2010.
[7]Dragan Gašević and M. Hatala, "Ontology mappings to improve learning resource search," British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 37, pp. 375-389, May 2006.
[8]Elizabeth A. Davis and J. S. Krajcik, "Designing Educative Curriculum Materials to Promote Teacher Learning," Educational Researcher, vol. 34, pp. 3-14, April 2005.
[9]Fu-ren Lin, et al., "Knowledge sharing and creation in a teachers' professional virtual community," Computers & Education, vol. 50, pp. 742-756, April 2008.
[10]TWLOM. [Online]. Available: http://metadata.teldap.tw/elearning/index.html
[11]Chen, Y., Chen, N.S., & Tsai, C.C. , "The use of online synchronous discussion for web-based professional development for teachers," Computers & Education, vol.53, pp.1155–1166, December 2009.
[12]DeLone, W.H., & McLean, E.R. , "Measuring e-commerce success: applying the DeLone & McLean information systems success model," International Journal of Electronic Commerce, vol. 9, pp. 31-47, Number 1/Summer 2004.
[13]Liu, I.F., Chen, M.C., Sun, Y.S., Wible, D. & Kuo, C.H. ," Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect Intention to use an online learning community," Computers & Education, vol. 54, pp. 600–610, February 2010.
[14]Shee, D.Y. & Wang, Y.S. , "Multi-criteria evaluation of the web-based e-learning system: a methodology based on learner satisfaction and its applications," Computers & Education, vol. 50, pp. 894–905, April 2008.
[15]Doll, W.J., & Torkzadeh, G. , "The measure of end-user computing satisfaction," MIS Quarterly, vol. 12, pp. 259–274, June 1988.
[16]Peterson, R. & Wilson, W.R. , "Measuring customer satisfaction: fact and artifact," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 20, pp. 61-72, 1992.
[17]Doll, W.J., Deng, X., Raghunathan, T.S., Torkzadeh, G. & Weidong, X. , " The meaning and measurement of user satisfaction: a multigroup invariance analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument," Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 21, pp. 227-262, 2004.
[18]Johnson, M.D., Anderson, E.W. & Fornell, C. , "Rational and adaptive performance expectations in a customer satisfaction framework," Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 21, pp. 128-140, March 1995.
[19]Johnson, M.D., Gustafsson, A., Andreassen, T.W., Lervik, L. & Cha, J. , "The evolution and future of national customer satisfaction index models," Journal of Economic Psychology, vol. 22, pp. 217-245, April 2001.
[20]Oliver, R.L., "A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction," Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 17, pp. 460–469, November 1980.
[21]Kim, K.K. ,"User satisfaction: a synthesis of three different perspectives," Journal of Information Systems, vol.4, pp. 1-12, Fall 1989.
[22]Cyert, R.M., & March, J.G. , "A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs," NJ. Prentice-Hall, 1963.
[23]Ives, B., Olson, H. & Baroudi, J. , "The measurement of user information satisfaction," Communications of the ACM, vol. 26, pp. 785-793, October 1983.
[24]Seddon, P.B. , "A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success," Information Systems Research, vol. 8, pp. 240-253, September 1997.
[25]Bailey, J.E., & Pearson, S.W. , "Development of a tool for measure and analyzing computer user satisfaction," Management Science, vol. 29, pp. 530-545, May 1983.
[26]Johnson, M.D., Gustafsson, A., Andreassen, T.W., Lervik, L. & Cha, J. , "The evolution and future of national customer satisfaction index models," Journal of Economic Psychology, vol. 22, pp. 217-245, April 2001.
[27]Doll, W.J., & Torkzadeh, G. , " The measure of end-user computing satisfaction," MIS Quarterly, vol. 12, pp. 259–274, June 1988.
[28]Abdinnour-Helm, S.F., Chaparro, B.S., & Farmer, S.M. , "Using the end-user computing satisfaction (EUCS) instrument to measure satisfaction with a web site," Decision Sciences, vol. 36, pp. 341-364, May 2005.
[29]Shee, D.Y. & Wang, Y.S., " Multi-criteria evaluation of the web-based e-learning system: a methodology based on learner satisfaction and its applications," Computers & Education, vol. 50, pp. 894–905, April 2008.
[30]Tsai, H.T. & Huang, H.C., " Determinants of e-repurchase intentions: an integrative model of quadruple retention drivers," Information & Management, vol. 44, pp. 231–239, April 2007.