臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

在現代資訊發達和民主自由的社會，人類犯罪行為中最嚴重的是剝奪他人自由和生存權利，也是人類犯罪行中最為嚴重的一項。而且人民對社會治安的焦點，往往都會放在兇殘的他殺案件(例如: 八里富商夫婦命案等)，如何防範和偵查也是人民對社會治安信任的指標。目前在台灣雖然對他殺死亡相關案件有所記錄，但深入分析和探討的研究極為少數，他殺相關分析資料也極為欠缺(例如: 性別、地區、年齡及他殺方式的長期趨勢等)，因此其他相關的研究也無法對他殺案件分析透徹。所以分析和探討他殺案件，並找出其相關聯的因子，是值得在他殺案件偵辨方面，且有相關聯的法醫人員更進一步探討研究。本研究以台灣都市化和人口密度較高的大台北地區為探討對象。
本次論文回顧了(2001-2010)十年間，大台北地區(台北市和新北市)地檢署，發生的他殺案件，做為本次研究的主資料。依據本研究所需的案件資料，將其收集和分類，分別就性別、年齡、發生年份、使用方法、職業和地點等方向著手，本研究透過這些資料進行分析其關聯性，並加以探討其背景。
以大台北地區來說，平均每年發生約65件，發生最多的年份為2001年，有83位被害者。最多的男性年齡族群為46-50歲，而女性部份則為小於15歲。犯案方法則以銳器類使用最多佔237件(36.1%)，第二多的則為鈍器類共205件(31.2%)。藉由此統計資料分析結果，期望往後能對他殺案件調查上有所助益，並可以提供更多資料解釋他殺行為的發生，進而幫助加強社會安全對他殺案件的防範。

In today’s society, technology is booming, in which democracy and freedom is fully practiced; one of the worst crimes is to deprive other people of their freedom and right to live. As far as social security is concerned, most people put emphasis on brutal homicide cases, such as the New Taipei City’s Bali double-homicide case. Therefore, prevention of and investigation into such crimes are indicators that of showing to which extent such people are satisfied with the social order maintained by government.Though there have been records documenting the homicide cases in Taiwan,at present,however, little research has been conducted into analyzing and studying them in depth, let alone the analysis on gender, region, age, methods of killing, long-term trend of homicide, etc. As a result, the lack of research hinders other relevant studies from investigating homicide cases thoroughly. The homicide cases in Taiwan, therefore, deserve further analysis, discussion, and exploration of factors, which can provide forensic professional with smooth investigation. This paper focuses on the Taipei City area, which is highly modernized and densely populated.
This paper reviews and studies homicide cases recorded in the District Prosecutor’s Offices in both Taipei City, and New Taipei City from 2001 to 2010. The research analyzes the correlation amongst gender, age, time (by year), methods of killing, occupation, and crime scene location. The paper will and also investigate the background of these cases.
Each year in Taipei City and New Taipei City, there were 65 cases of homicide on average, and the year that had the most cases, was year in 2001 numbering 83 victims. Most of the male victims were between at age 46 to 50 years old, while many female victims being younger than 15. The weapons used that were most commonly used in those criminal offenses (237 cases accounting for 36.1%) were sharp tools, followed by blunt tools in 205 cases (accounting for 31.2%). The results from the data analysis might provide a helping hand in the investigation of homicide cases, as well as providing a furthermore explanation of why the offenses happened. In doing so, it may be able to prevent the occurrence of such crimes in the future and reinforce social security.

中文摘要 II
Abstract III
目錄 V
圖目錄 VII
表目錄 VIII
第一章 緒論 1
1. 前言 1
2. 文獻回顧 2
2.1 他殺行為探討 2
2.2 他殺方法探討 2
2.3 他殺因素分析 6
2.4 加害者與被害者之關係(Offenders - Victims Relations) 8
2.5 他殺後自殺(Homicide-Suicide) (H-S) 8
3. 研究動機 10
第二章 材料與方法 12
1. 材料 12
2. 方法 13
第三章 實驗結果 14
1. 被害者(Victims) 14
2. 地點(Locations) 14
3. 他殺使用方法(Homicide Method) 15
3.1 銳器傷(Sharp Wound) 16
3.2 鈍器傷(Blunt Wound) 16
3.3 勒絞(Strangulation) 16
3.4 槍擊(Shooting) 17
3.5 溺斃(Drowned) 17
3.6 縱火(Arson) 17
3.7 其他類別(Other miscellaneous) 18
4. 幼童他殺趨勢 18
5. 地區 19
6. 都市間比較 19
第四章 討論 21
第五章 實務與展望 23
參考文獻 24

1.Richard Quinney: Suicide, Homicide, and Economic Development. Social Forces 1965, 43 (3): 401-406.
2.LaFree G. A summary and review of cross-national comparative studies of homicide. Homicide: A Sourcebook of Social Research 1999, 125-145.
3.Wilson M, Daly M: Spousal homicide risk and estrangement. Violence and Victims 1993, 8:3-3.
4.Eisner M. Modernity strikes back? A historical perspective on the latest increase in interpersonal violence (1960–1990). International Journal of Conflict and Violence 2008, 2:288-316.
5.Rogde S, Hougen HP, Poulsen K. Homicide by sharp force in two Scandinavian capitals. Forensic Science International 2000, 109:135-145.
6.Kua EH, Yuan AF, Ang AL. Homicide in Singapore. Medicine, Science, and the Law 1985, 25:26-28.
7.Bohnert M, Huttemann H, Schmidt U. Homicides by sharp force. Forensic Pathology Reviews 2006, 65-89.
8.Bajanowski T, Varro A, Sepulchre MA: Death caused by sharp injury. Criminologic and Criminalistic Aspects. Archiv fur Kriminologie 1991, 187:65-74.
9.Hunt AC, Cowling RJ: Murder by stabbing. Forensic Science International 1991, 52:107-112.
10.Padosch SA, Passinger C, Schmidt PH, Madea B. Analysis of 1989-1999 homicide crimes in the catchment area of the Bonn Institute of Forensic Medicine with reference to selected aspects. Archiv fur Kriminologie 2003, 211:147-159.
11.Henderson J, Morgan S, Patel F, Tiplady M. Patterns of non-firearm homicide. Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine 2005, 12:128-132.
12.Kazerouni NN, Shah N, Lathrop S, Landen M. Non-firearm-related homicide. New Mexico, 2001–3. Injury Prevention 2009, 15:317-321.
13.Thore Karlsson. Sharp force homicides in the Stockholm area, 1983–1992, Stockholm, Sweden, 1998.
14.Felson RB, Lane KJ. Does violence involving women and intimate partners have a special etiology. Criminology; an Interdisciplinary Journal 2010, 48:321-338.
15.Pollak S. Clinical forensic medicine and its main fields of activity from the foundation of the German Society of Legal Medicine until today. Forensic Science International 2004, 144:269-283.
16.Ambade VN, Godbole HV. Comparison of wound patterns in homicide by sharp and blunt force. Forensic Science International 2006, 156:166-170.
17.H Maxeiner, Britta Bockholdt. Homicidal and suicidal ligature strangulation—a comparison of the post-mortem findings, 14 October 2003.
18.Hata N, Kominato Y, Shimada I, Takizawa H, Fujikura T, Morita M, Funayama M, Yoshioka N, Touda K, Gonmori K, Misawa S, Sakairi Y, Sakamoto N, Tanno K, Thaik-Oo M, Kiuchi M, Fukumoto Y, Sato Y. Regional differences in homicide patterns in five areas of Japan. Leg Med (Tokyo) 2001, 3:44-55.
19.Fischer J, Kleemann W, Troger H. Types of trauma in cases of homicide. Forensic Science International 1994, 68:161.
20.Hakkanen H. Homicide by ligature strangulation in Finland: offence and offender characteristics. Forensic Science International 2005, 152:61-64.
21.Margaret A. Zahn and Philip C. Sagi. Stranger Homicides in Nine American Cities, The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Summer, 1987.
22.Smith TW. 2001 National Gun Policy Survey of the National Opinion Research Center: Research Findings. Edited by National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago, 2001.
23.Schuster MA, Franke TM, Bastian AM, Sor S, Halfon N. Firearm storage patterns in US homes with children. American Journal of Public Health 2000, 90:588.
24.鐘秉勳. The Influential Factors and Evolution of U.S. Gun Control Policy：1968-2005：Master’s Thesis, Graduate Institute of National Development, National Taiwan University, 2008.
25.Mathers CD, Salomon JA, Ezzati M, Begg S, Lopez AD, Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses for burden of discase and risk factor estimates. Global burden of discase and risk factors. New York, Oxford University Press, 2004, 399-426.
26.Pernanen K. Alcohol and crimes of violence. The Biology of Alcoholism: Social Aspects of Alcoholism 1976, 4:351-444.
27.Collins JJ, National Institute of Justice (U.S.), Research Triangle Institute.: Alcohol use and criminal behavior : an executive summary. 1981.
28.Rehm J, Mathers C, Popova S, Thavorncharoensap M, Teerawattananon Y, Patra J. Global burden of disease and injury and economic cost attributable to alcohol use and alcohol-use disorders, 2009.
29.Bye EK. Alcohol and Homicide in Eastern Europe A Time Series nalysis of Six Countrie. Homicide Studies 2008, 12:7-27.
30.Landberg J. Population drinking and fatal injuries in Eastern Europe: a time-series analysis of six countries. European Addiction Research 2010, 16:43-52.
31.Kalish CB. International crime rates. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report 2003, 1-11.
32.Kivivuori J, Lehti M: The social composition of homicide in Finland, 1960–2000. Acta Sociologica 2006, 49:67-82.
33.Loeber R, Farrington DP, Stallings R. The Pittsburgh Youth Study. Young Homicide Offenders and Victims 2011, 19-36.
34.Byard RW, Knight D, James RA, Gilbert J. Murder-suicides involving children: a 29-year study. The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology 1999, 20:323-327.
35.Chan CY, Beh S, Broadhurst RG. Homicide–suicide in Hong Kong, 1989–1998, Forensic Science International 2004, 140:261-267.
36.Marzuk PM, Tardiff K, Hirsch CS. The epidemiology of murder-suicide. JAMA 1992, 267:3179-3183.
37.Bennett MD Jr, Hall J, Frazier L Jr, Patel N, Barker L, Shaw K. Homicide of children aged 0-4 years, System results from the National Violent Death Reporting. Injury Prevention 2006, 39-43.
38.Butchart A, Engstrom K. Sex-and age-specific relations between economic development, economic inequality and homicide rates in people aged 0-24 years: a cross-sectional analysis. Bulletin of The World Health Organization 2002, 797-805.
39.秦永泰. The 10-Year Epidemiologic Review of Homicide Cases in Kaoushiung City, Master’s Thesis, Graduate Institute of Forensic Medicine College of Medicine National Taiwan University, 2012.
40.Martin CC, Melki JA, Guimaraes MA. Assessment of methods of homicides in a Brazilian city: a preliminary study. Forensic Science International 1999, 106:19-25.
41.Sumner SA, Layde PM, Guse CE. Firearm death rates and association with level of firearm purchase background check. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2008, 35:1-6.
42.Kivivuori J, Lehti M. The social composition of homicide in Finland, 1960–2000. Acta Sociologica 2006, 49:67-82.