跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.240) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/06/13 20:28
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:張志平
研究生(外文):CHANG, CHIH-PING
論文名稱:品嚐對洋芋片產品消費者選擇行為干擾之影響
論文名稱(外文):The Moderating effect of Potato Chips’ Attributes on Consumers' Choice Behavior
指導教授:劉佳怡劉佳怡引用關係劉伯康劉伯康引用關係
指導教授(外文):LIU, CHIA-YILIOU, BO-KANG
口試委員:許秋萍葉佳聖陳佩綺
口試委員(外文):HSU, CHIU-PINGYEH, JIA-SHENGCHEN,PEI-CHI
口試日期:2017-04-28
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:東海大學
系所名稱:食品科學系
學門:農業科學學門
學類:食品科學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2017
畢業學年度:105
語文別:中文
論文頁數:119
中文關鍵詞:洋芋片產品屬性認知資訊超載消費者行為
外文關鍵詞:Potato chipsProduct attributesPerceived information overloadConsumer behavior
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:1490
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:131
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
休閒食品除了追求吃飽,也開始追求心靈的滿足,而目前台灣休閒食品市場估計約有140億元,其中洋芋片為最受年輕人歡迎的零食之一,但鮮少有相關研究釐清洋芋片產品屬性對台灣消費者與其選擇行為之影響,故本研究針對台灣年輕族群,探討洋芋片產品屬性,品嚐,以及認知資訊超載,對其選擇行為的影響。
本研究以品嚐結合聯合分析法調查消費者,透過迴歸分析驗證屬性重視度對低熱量產品選擇行為的影響。結果指出:(1)於認知資訊上,當無法理解產品上所顯示的資訊時,其選擇低熱量產品的比例會降低。(2)於產品屬性部份,當消費者越注重熱量時,其選擇低熱量產品的比例會增加;當價格越高時;標示越複雜;口味越強,形狀(外觀)越美的食物時,其選擇低熱量產品的比例會降低。(3)於品嚐的干擾效果上,當有品嚐時(試吃行為)時會弱化消費者對於產品屬性的重視度與其選擇行為。
鑒於品嚐顯著的影響消費者選擇行為,故另進行感官品評試驗,調查消費者對洋芋片產品的喜歡程度與感官特性之關係。其結果指出:(1)消費者對於洋芋片的接受性介於「沒有喜歡/不喜歡」和「稍微喜歡」之間。(2)消費者較偏好淡黃色、海苔香氣、海苔風味、海苔餘味等特徵之洋芋片產品;較不偏好辛香氣、花椒香氣、辛風味、口覆感、胡椒餘味等特徵之洋芋片產品。(3)透過群集分析發現,洋芋片高接受群不會受到口味、形狀等因素影響;洋芋片低接受群,則受到產品形狀不同而影響。

People eating snacks don't only pursue to be full but also pursue to be satisfied spiritually. Currently, the snacks market in Taiwan take approximately NT $ 14 billion, including potato chips, one of which is the most popular snacks among youngsters. However, there are merely related research to identify the effect of the products of potato chips on Taiwanese customers’ choice behavior. Therefore, this study, aiming at exploring the potato chips’ attributes, tasting, and perceived information overload, has an impact on the choice behavior of youngsters in Taiwan.
In this study, consumers were investigated by tasting and questionnaires with regression analysis to verify the importance of product attributes, influencing on their choice behavior. The results are as follows. First, in the perceived information, when they cannot understand the information displayed on the product, the choice proportion of low-calorie products will be reduced. Second, in the product attribute, when consumers pay more attention to calorie, the proportion of their choice of low-calorie products will increase. At the same time, the higher price, the more complex label, the stronger taste, the prettier shape of the appearance will reduce the choice of low-calorie product ratio. Third, in tasting of the interference effect, if there are tasting tests, they will undermine the consumer's attention to the importance of product attributes and choice of behavior.
Given that tasting played a significant role in affecting customers’ choice of behavior, the sensory evaluation was conducted in order to investigate the relationship between the degree of preference and the sensory characteristics of potato products. The results are as follows. First, consumers' acceptance of potato chips is between "no likes / dislikes" and "slightly like”. Second, consumers prefer the light yellow, aroma, flavor, aftertaste of seeweed and other characteristics of the potato chips products and less preferred aroma, flavor and taste of chili of the potato chip products. Third, through the collective analysis analysis, it was found that the high acceptor group was not affected by the taste, shape and other factors. The low acceptance group was influenced by the different shape of the product.

第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
(一) 台灣休閒食品概況 1
(二) 台灣洋芋片消費概況 2
(三) 產品特性對消費者行為之影響 2
(四) 品嚐將干擾消費者選擇行為 3
第二節 研究目的與流程 4
(一) 研究目的 4
(二) 研究流程 4
第二章 文獻探討 6
第一節 消費者選擇之食品特性 6
(一) 以問卷調查法探討屬性之相關文獻 8
(二) 以感官品評法探討屬性之相關文獻 16
(三) 總結 17
第二節 消費者購買決策程序 18
(一) 資訊接收 19
(二) 資訊辨識 22
第三節 感官品評評估產品內部屬性 23
(一) 差異分析試驗 23
(二) 探討屬性之描述性試驗 23
(三) 情意測試 26
第三章 產品屬性與消費者選擇行為之關係及品嚐干擾效果 27
第一節 研究方法 27
(一) 研究架構 27
(二) 問卷設計 32
(三) 實驗設計與流程 37
(四) 資料處理與統計分析說明 54
第二節 分析結果 58
(一) 樣本與母體分配配適度(描述統計) 58
(二) 抽象購念之信度與效度 59
(三) 品嚐於產品屬性與產品選擇之干擾效果(多元迴歸分析) 60
第四章 洋芋片感官品評試驗 69
第一節 消費者試驗 69
第二節 材料與方法 70
(一) 樣品 70
(二) 品評員招募 70
(三) 描述語產生 70
(四) 正式試驗與評估方式 72
(五) 統計分析 73
第三節 分析結果 75
(一) 消費者接受性試驗結果 75
(二) 選擇適合項目法結果 78
(三) 群集分析結果 87
第五章 結論與建議 89
第一節 研究結論 89
第二節 管理意涵 91
(一) 著重於產品口味與外觀,可弱化消費者對於熱量的敏感度 91
(二) 品嚐會影響消費者的選擇行為:試吃活動 91
(三) 商品價格可以減緩消費者對熱量的要求 92
第三節 研究限制與建議 93
參考文獻 94
附錄一、招募海報 100
附錄二、完整問卷 102
附錄三、感官品評完整問卷內容 116


Almli, V. L., Verbeke, W., Vanhonacker, F., Næs, T., & Hersleth, M. (2011). General image and attribute perceptions of traditional food in six European countries. Food Quality and Preference, 22(1), 129-138.
Arvola, A., LÄHteenmÄKi, L., & Tuorila, H. (1999). Predicting the Intent to Purchase Unfamiliar and Familiar Cheeses: The Effects of Attitudes, Expected Liking and Food Neophobia. Appetite, 32(1), 113-126. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/appe.1998.0181
Bhuiyan, F. R., & Rahim, A. T. M. (2015). Consumer's sensory perception of food attributes : A survey on flavor. Journal of Food and Nutrition Sciences, 3(1-2), 157-160.
BOWER, J. A., & TURNER, L. (2001). Effect of liking, brand name and price on purchase intention for branded, own label and economy line crisp snack foods. Journal of Sensory Studies, 16(1), 95-116.
BOWER, J. A., & WHITTEN, R. (2000). Sensory characteristics and consumer liking for cereal bar snack foods. Journal of Sensory Studies, 15(3), 327-345.
Cerjak, M., Haas, R., & Kovacic, D. (2010). Brand familiarity and tasting in conjoint analysis: An experimental study with Croatian beer consumers. British Food Journal, 112(6), 561-579.
Chang, J. B., Moon, W., & Balasubramanian, S. K. (2012). Consumer valuation of health attributes for soy-based food: A choice modeling approach. Food Policy, 37(3), 335-342.
Cornelisse-Vermaat, J. R., Voordouw, J., Yiakoumaki, V., Theodoridis, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2008). Food-allergic consumers’ labelling preferences: a cross-cultural comparison. The European Journal of Public Health, 18(2), 115-120.
de Morais, E. C., Lima, G. C., de Morais, A. R., & André Bolini, H. M. (2015). Prebiotic and diet/light chocolate dairy dessert: Chemical composition, sensory profiling and relationship with consumer expectation. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 62(1, Part 2), 424-430. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2014.12.015
De Pelsmaeker, S., Dewettinck, K., & Gellynck, X. (2013). The possibility of using tasting as a presentation method for sensory stimuli in conjoint analysis. Trends in food science & technology, 29(2), 108-115.
Desai, K. K., & Ratneshwar, S. (2003). Consumer perceptions of product variants positioned on atypical attributes. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(1), 22-35.
Doan, A. R. (2010). Determining a sensory model for predicting successful and unsuccessful products: a case study of flavors for a snack category. Kansas State University.
Dransfield, E., Zamora, F., & Bayle, M.-C. (1998). Consumer selection of steaks as influenced by information and price index. Food Quality and Preference, 9(5), 321-326. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(98)00017-2
Fernqvist, F., & Ekelund, L. (2014). Credence and the effect on consumer liking of food–A review. Food Quality and Preference, 32, 340-353.
Gellynck, X., Verbeke, W., & Vermeire, B. (2006). Pathways to increase consumer trust in meat as a safe and wholesome food. Meat Science, 74(1), 161-171.
Grunert, K. G., & Wills, J. M. (2007). A review of European research on consumer response to nutrition information on food labels. Journal of Public Health, 15(5), 385-399. doi: 10.1007/s10389-007-0101-9
Gunden, C., & Thomas, T. (2012). Assessing consumer attitudes towards fresh fruit and vegetable attributes. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 10(2), 85-88.
Hague, P. N., & Jackson, P. (2000). 市場調查完全手冊 (孫拓, Trans. 1 Ed.). 台北市: 小知堂文化事業有限公司.
Hersleth, M., Monteleone, E., Segtnan, A., & Næs, T. (2015). Effects of evoked meal contexts on consumers’ responses to intrinsic and extrinsic product attributes in dry-cured ham. Food Quality and Preference, 40, 191-198.
Hurley, R. F. (1998). Customer service behavior in retail settings: A study of the effect of service provider personality. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(2), 115-127.
Jang, S. S., Ha, A., & Silkes, C. A. (2009). Perceived attributes of Asian foods: From the perspective of the American customers. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 28(1), 63-70.
Jinkarn, T., & Suwannaporn, P. (2015). Trade-off analysis of packaging attributes for foods and drinks. British Food Journal, 117(1), 139-156.
Johansen, S. B., Næs, T., Øyaas, J., & Hersleth, M. (2010). Acceptance of calorie-reduced yoghurt: Effects of sensory characteristics and product information. Food Quality and Preference, 21(1), 13-21.
Jones, C. F., & O’Brien, J. (2001). 小錯誤,大發明:40個發明的小故事(Mistakes That Worked) (成寒, Trans. 1 Ed.): 健行出版社.
Juric, B., & Worsley, A. (1998). Consumers' attitudes towards imported food products. Food Quality and Preference, 9(6), 431-441.
Kelly, B., Hughes, C., Chapman, K., Louie, J. C.-Y., Dixon, H., Crawford, J., . . . Slevin, T. (2009). Consumer testing of the acceptability and effectiveness of front-of-pack food labelling systems for the Australian grocery market. Health promotion international, 24(2), 120-129.
Kim, M., Lopetcharat, K., & Drake, M. A. (2013). Influence of packaging information on consumer liking of chocolate milk. Journal of dairy science, 96(8), 4843-4856.
Kollat, D. T., Engel, J. F., & Blackwell, R. D. (1970). Current problems in consumer behavior research. Journal of Marketing Research, 327-332.
Lando, A. M., & Labiner-Wolfe, J. (2007). Helping Consumers Make More Healthful Food Choices: Consumer Views on Modifying Food Labels and Providing Point-of-Purchase Nutrition Information at Quick-service Restaurants. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 39(3), 157-163. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2006.12.010
Lange, C., Issanchou, S., & Combris, P. (2000). Expected versus experienced quality: trade-off with price. Food Quality and Preference, 11(4), 289-297. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(99)00074-9
Lee, H.-J., & Yun, Z.-S. (2015). Consumers’ perceptions of organic food attributes and cognitive and affective attitudes as determinants of their purchase intentions toward organic food. Food Quality and Preference, 39, 259-267.
Letona, P., Chacon, V., Roberto, C., & Barnoya, J. (2014). A qualitative study of children’s snack food packaging perceptions and preferences. BMC public health, 14(1), 1.
Li, X. E., Lopetcharat, K., & Drake, M. (2014). Extrinsic attributes that influence parents’ purchase of chocolate milk for their children. Journal of food science, 79(7), S1407-S1415.
Loureiro, M. L., & Umberger, W. J. (2007). A choice experiment model for beef: What US consumer responses tell us about relative preferences for food safety, country-of-origin labeling and traceability. Food Policy, 32(4), 496-514.
Madzharov, A. V., & Block, L. G. (2010). Effects of product unit image on consumption of snack foods. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(4), 398-409.
Messner, C., & Wänke, M. (2011). Unconscious information processing reduces information overload and increases product satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(1), 9-13.
Moser, R., Raffaelli, R., & Thilmany-McFadden, D. (2011). Consumer preferences for fruit and vegetables with credence-based attributes: a review. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 14(2), 121-142.
Moskowitz, H., Silcher, M., Beckley, J., Minkus-McKenna, D., & Mascuch, T. (2005). Sensory benefits, emotions and usage patterns for olives: using Internet-based conjoint analysis and segmentation to understand patterns of response. Food Quality and Preference, 16(4), 369-382.
Nørgaard, M. K., Sørensen, B. T., & Grunert, K. G. (2014). Social and individual determinants of adolescents' acceptance of novel healthy and cool snack products. Appetite, 83, 226-235.
Nelson, R., Jolly, C., Hinds, M., Donis, Y., & Prophete, E. (2003). Consumer Preferences for Peanut Butter (Mamba) Products in Haiti: A Conjoint Analysis. Peanut Science, 30(2), 99-103.
Ortega, D. L., Wang, H. H., Wu, L., & Olynk, N. J. (2011). Modeling heterogeneity in consumer preferences for select food safety attributes in China. Food Policy, 36(2), 318-324.
Resurreccion, A. (2004). Sensory aspects of consumer choices for meat and meat products. Meat Science, 66(1), 11-20.
Richardson, P. S., Dick, A. S., & Jain, A. K. (1994). Extrinsic and intrinsic cue effects on perceptions of store brand quality. The Journal of Marketing, 28-36.
Shaharudin, M. R., Mansor, S. W., & Elias, S. J. (2011). Food quality attributes among Malaysia’s fast food customer. International Business and Management, 2(1), 198-208.
Singh, V. P., Hansen, K. T., & Gupta, S. (2005). Modeling preferences for common attributes in multicategory brand choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(2), 195-209.
Spence, C., Levitan, C. A., Shankar, M. U., & Zampini, M. (2010). Does food color influence taste and flavor perception in humans? Chemosensory Perception, 3(1), 68-84.
Ubilava, D., & Foster, K. (2009). Quality certification vs. product traceability: Consumer preferences for informational attributes of pork in Georgia. Food Policy, 34(3), 305-310.
Vidal, L., Barreiro, C., Gómez, B., Ares, G., & Giménez, A. (2013). Influence of Information on Consumers' Evaluations Using Check‐All‐That‐Apply Questions and Sorting: A Case Study with Milk Desserts. Journal of Sensory Studies, 28(2), 125-137.
Wansink, B., Sonka, S. T., & Hasler, C. M. (2004). Front-label health claims: when less is more. Food Policy, 29(6), 659-667. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2004.10.004
Wilson, A., & Fox, G. (2008). Consider the Consequences: The Effect of Consequence Information on Consumer Choice of Snack Foods. Advances in Consumer Research, 35.
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. The Journal of Marketing, 2-22.
Zhang, K. M., & Vickers, Z. (2014). The order of tasting and information presentation in an experimental auction matters. Food Quality and Preference, 36, 12-19. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.02.008
王昭傑. (2001). 消費者對水果醋屬性偏好之研究─聯合分析法之應用. (碩士), 屏東科技大學, 屏東縣.
王素梅, & 李河水. (2008). 台灣不同年齡層族群對食品特質選擇之評估. 食品市場資訊, 7(12), 13-17.
台灣糖菓餅乾麵食工業同業公會. (2013). 102年產銷存量值表. from file:///C:/Users/t14789600/Downloads/102Year.xls
朱容增. (2007). 知覺價格, 產品資訊對機能性健康食品購買意願之影響-以健康概念為干擾變數. 大同大學事業經營學系所學位論文, 1-183.
吳慧嫻. (1991). 中式香腸之消費者偏好形為市場區隔研究-聯合分析法之應用. (碩士), 國立臺灣大學, 台北市.
李昆龍. (2010). 消費者對有機豆腐偏好及願付價格之研究. (碩士), 國立東華大學, 花蓮縣.
李皇照. (2004). 家計單位購買進口農產品調查分析. 農政與農情, 141, 59-63.
李淑華. (2012). 台灣消費者對於特色茶葉屬性消費偏好之研究. (碩士), 國立中興大學, 台中市.
汪志堅. (2011). 消費者行為 (3 ed.). 新北市: 全華圖書股份有限公司.
兒童福利聯盟. (2009). 兒福聯盟「2009年台灣兒童零食消費習慣」調查報告發表. 公民新聞. Retrieved from http://www.peopo.org/news/35543
波仕特線上市調網. (2009). Pollster波仕特線上市調:2009第四季洋芋片品牌大調查,口味推陳出新最能抓住消費者的心. from http://www.pollster.com.tw/Aboutlook/lookview_item.aspx?ms_sn=524
波仕特線上市調網. (2011). Pollster波仕特線上市調:您偏好哪一類口味的零食? . from http://www.pollster.com.tw/Aboutlook/lookview_item.aspx?ms_sn=1352
邱皓政. (2002). 量化研究與統計分析. 台北市: 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
邱雅琪. (2015). 市售咖哩產品感官特性分析:整合分析型與消費型之品評數據. (碩士), 中臺科技大學, 台中市.
施陵子. (2000). 消費者對全國性品牌與自有品牌食品認知評比與行為分析. (碩士), 東海大學, 台中市.
徐文玲, & 林佳儀. (2014). 零食誰最賣? 本土老品牌奪冠. 聯合報. Retrieved from http://udn.com/news/story/7193/502650-%E9%9B%B6%E9%A3%9F%E8%AA%B0%E6%9C%80%E8%B3%A3%EF%BC%9F-%E6%9C%AC%E5%9C%9F%E8%80%81%E5%93%81%E7%89%8C%E5%A5%AA%E5%86%A0
徐若萍. (1999). 品牌權益之價值分析:包裝水消費市場之實證研究. (碩士), 國立東華大學, 花蓮縣.
陳子玲. (2009). 屏東縣國小學童休閒零食內在知識、外在環境及其消費行為之研究. (碩士), 國立屏東教育大學, 屏東縣.
陳玉玲. (2014a). 台灣市場趨勢-休閒食品賣健康 從口感與素材創新. 工商時報. Retrieved from http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20140318001424-260207
陳玉玲. (2014b). 全球休閒食品發展趨勢及新品推出概況. 食品產業發展趨勢專輯, 46(10), 11.
陳姵君. (2014). 對於不同涉入程度的消費者之忠誠度影響- 應用體驗行銷於購買休閒食品為例. (碩士), 東海大學, 台中市.
陳宥妤. (2011). 中式點心與西式點心之消費者行為研究. (碩士), 東海大學, 台中市.
陳源旺. (2014). 消費者對台灣不同標章茶葉偏好之研究. (碩士), 東海大學, 台中市.
創世際市場研究顧問. (2010). 創市際休閒食品篇. from http://www.ixresearch.com/specialtopic/2010_10_22/
創世際市場研究顧問. (2011). 創市際休閒食品篇. from http://www.ixresearch.com/specialtopic/2011_07_18/
游嵐宇. (2006). 全球化下消費者對生鮮水果消費與在地價值觀之特徵價格研究-以台中市西屯區居民為例. (碩士), 東海大學, 台中市.
黃偉侊. (2009). 消費者網路食品消費行為對顧客價值與支付意願之影響. (碩士), 東海大學, 台中市.
黃璋如, & 周孟萱. (2009). 以聯合分析法評估有機農產品之驗證政策.
黃顗倫. (2015). 食品標示資訊, 食品添加物知識, 態度與行為之關聯性.
劉伯康, & 莊朝琪. (2014). 食品感官品評:理論與實務 (1 ed.). 新北市: 新文京開發出版股份有限公司.
劉素瑜. (2002). 個人化電子服務接受度之研究--以電子報為例. (碩士), 國立臺灣科技大學, 台北市.
魯真, & 蔡宜倫. (2003). 進口/國產水果偏好群之水果屬性認知差異. 農業金融論叢, 49, 109-137.
賴姿妤. (1999). 消費者對安全性蔬菜偏好之聯合分析. (碩士), 國立中興大學, 台中市.
藍淑芬. (2013). 2012全年度台灣消費生活調查報告:食品/零嘴-洋芋片. 台北市: 全國意向顧問股份有限公司.
顏賽芬. (2013). 你零食成癮了嗎? 7成學童常吃零食!. uho優活健康網. Retrieved from http://www.uho.com.tw/hotnews.asp?aid=27876

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top