跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.176) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/09/07 08:28
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:陳正哲
研究生(外文):Chen, Cheng-Che
論文名稱:青少年同儕壓力、同儕從眾、父母價值觀內化程度與偏差行為之關聯性
論文名稱(外文):The Relationships among Peer Pressure, Peer Conformity, Internalization of Parental Values, and Adolescent Deviant Behavior
指導教授:劉奕蘭劉奕蘭引用關係
指導教授(外文):Liu, Yih-Lan
口試委員:沈玉玲方紫薇
口試委員(外文):Shen, Yu-LinFang, Tzu-Wei
口試日期:2014,10,31
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:教育研究所
學門:教育學門
學類:綜合教育學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2014
畢業學年度:103
語文別:中文
論文頁數:80
中文關鍵詞:青少年同儕壓力同儕從眾偏差行為父母價值觀內化程度
外文關鍵詞:父母價值觀內化程度父母價值觀內化程度peer conformitydeviant behavioursinternalization of parental values
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:17
  • 點閱點閱:3123
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:719
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:3
本研究主要探討青少年知覺青少年同儕壓力、同儕從眾、父母價值觀內化程度與偏差行為之關連性,並且探討不同性別以及記過與否在不同的變項中是否有所差異。本研究採用問卷調查法,研究樣本為臺灣之北中南東四區之學校,共931位國中學生。根據受試者在「同儕壓力」、「同儕從眾」、「父母價值觀內化程度」、「偏差行為」的得分以描述統計、相關、2-way ANOVA、多元回歸等統計方法進行處理與分析。研究結果如下:
一、 青少年因為性別不同,在同儕壓力、同儕從眾、父母價值觀內化程度與偏差行為而有所差異。男生不僅在同儕壓力、同儕從眾及偏差行為上皆高於女生,另外在父母價值觀內化程度也高於女生之內化程度。
二、 青少年因為記過與否在同儕壓力、同儕從眾、父母價值觀內化程度與偏差行為之間有所差異。有記過者在面對同儕壓力、同儕從眾及偏差行為上皆會大於無記過者,但是在父母價值觀內化上看不出兩者差異。
三、 青少年會因為同儕壓力經由同儕從眾而形成偏差行為,形成中介效果。
四、 父母價值觀內化程度並不足以成為青少年偏差行為形成之緩衝因子。
本研究根據最後研究結果提出建議,以供教育工作者以及未來研究作為參考。

The present study primarily investigates the relationships between adolescents’ perception of peer pressure, peer conformity, internalization of parental values, and deviant behaviours. Moreover, the differential effects of gender and recording of demerits on these variables are investigated. A questionnaire survey was carried out in the present study, with 931 students of schools across northern, middle, southern, and eastern sections of Taiwan as samples. Descriptive statistics, correlation, Two-way ANOVA, and multiple regression were conducted and calculated to process and analyze subjects’ scores on “peer pressure”, “peer conformity”, “internalization of parental values”, and “deviant behaviours”. The results are as follows:
1. Adolescents’ scores on peer pressure, peer conformity, internalization of parental values, and deviant behaviours varied as a function of gender. Males not only scored higher on peer pressure, peer conformity, and deviant behaviours than girls, but also internalized parental values to a greater extent than females.
2. Adolescents’ scores on peer pressure, peer conformity, internalization of parental values, and deviant behaviours varied as a function of whether demerits are recorded. Those who had demerits recorded scored higher on peer pressure, peer conformity, and deviant behaviours than their counterparts, but the difference in internalization of parental values was not significantly different between the groups.
3. Adolescents will engage in deviant behaviours because of peer pressure, which is mediated by peer conformity.
4. Internalization of parental values is insufficient as a cushion factor against adolescent deviant behaviours.
The present study proposed suggestions based on the results, in order to provide a reference for educational workers and future research orientation.

中 文 摘 要 I
英 文 摘 要 II
致 謝 III
目錄 IV
表目錄 VI
圖目錄 VII
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究問題 4
第三節 研究目的 4
第四節 名詞釋義 4
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 父母、同儕對青少年發展的重要性 7
第二節 同儕與青少年之偏差行為探討 12
第三節 父母價值觀點內化為同儕與偏差行為之緩衝效果 23
第四節 本章小結 30
第三章 研究方法 31
第一節 研究架構 31
第二節 研究假設 32
第三節 研究對象 32
第四節 研究工具 33
第四章 研究結果 42
第一節 各研究變項描述性統計 42
第二節 國中生在同儕壓力、同儕從眾、偏差行為與父母價值觀點內化程度的性別與記過與否差異分析 45
第三節 青少年的同儕從眾在同儕壓力與偏差行為的中介效果 51
第四節 青少年的父母價值觀內化程度(交友領域)在同儕壓力及同儕從眾與偏差行為間之調節效果分析 54
第五章 討論 55
第一節 研究發現與討論 55
第二節 研究貢獻 62
第三節 研究限制與未來研究方向 64
參考文獻: 66
一、 中文部分 66
二、 英文部分 68
附錄一 同儕壓力量表 75
附錄二 同儕從眾量表 76
附錄三 偏差行為量表 78
附錄四 父母價值觀內化程度量表 79
附錄五 基本資料 80

一、 中文部分
ETtoday新聞雲(2014年2月8日)。13歲「大姊頭」撂6人 剝光20歲大女生痛毆。ETtoday 新聞雲。取自http://www.ettoday.net/news/20140208/323160.htm
司法院統計處(2001)。 少年暨非行事件調查摘要分析。台北市: 司法院 。
宋鎮照(2000)。團體動力學。台北市:五南。
林建鋒、朱俊彥、鄭敏玲(2013年4月9日)。閃電11人 教室打手槍。蘋果日報。取自http://www.appledaily.com.tw/appledaily/article/headline/20130409/34939590
吳武典(1992)。青少年問題與對策。台北市:張老師。
吳武典(1997)。國中偏差行為學生學校生活適應之探討。教育心理學報,29,25-50。
吳柳蓓(2007)。親職教養、學校功能與青少年偏差行為相關性之研究。家庭教育與諮商學刊,2,81-117。
吳麗娟、蔡秀玲、杜淑芬、方格正、陳品惠(2012)。人際歷程取向治療-整合模式(原著作:Teyber, E., McClure, F. H.)。台北市:雙葉書廊。(原著出版年:2011)。
侯崇文(2001)。家庭結構、家庭關係與青少年偏差行爲探討。應用心理研究,11,25-43。
連廷嘉、黃俊豪(2004)。青少年心理學(原著作:Rice, F. P., Dolgin, K. G.)。台北市:學富文化。(原著出版年:2002)
許春金、蔡田木、鄭凱寶(2012)。青少年早期偏差價值觀與偏差友伴接觸對犯罪變化影響研究。青少年犯罪防制研究期刊,4(2),109-138 。
黃光國(2001)。儒家關係主義的理論建構及其方法論基礎。教育與社會研究,2,1-34。
黃芳銘、楊金寶(2002)。國中生家庭階級影響偏差行為模式之研究。師大學報,47(2),203-230。
黃芳銘、楊金寶、許福生(2005)。在學青少年生活痛苦指標發展之研究。師大學報,50(2),97-119。
黃芳銘(2007)。結構方程模式: 理論與應用。台北市:五南。
黃煜烽、雷靂(1997)。國中生心理學。台北市:五南。
張春興 (2006)。 張氏心理學辭典。 台北市:東華書局。
葉光輝(2004)。現代華人家人的互動關係及其心理歷程。本土心理學研究,22,81-119。
董旭英、王文玲(2007)。國高中生依附父母、接觸偏差同儕、傳統價值觀念與偏差行為的關連性之差異性研究。犯罪學期刊,10(2),29-48。
廖經台(2002)。影響青少年偏差行為的家庭因素分析。社會科學學報,(1), 29-41。
錢基蓮(2011)。虎媽的戰歌(原著作:Chua A.)。台北市:天下文化。(原著出版年:2011)。
羅國英(1998)。青少年前期的同儕關係:與親子關係的延續、競爭、或彌補?。東吳大學社會工作學報,4,35-78。

二、 英文部分
Allen, J.P., Porter, M.R., McFarland, C.F., Marsh, P.A., &; McElhaney. K.B. (2005). The two faces of adolescents' success with peers: Adolescent popularity, social adaptation, and deviant behavior. Child Development, 76, 747-760.
Andrews, J. A., Tildesley, E., Hops, H., &; Li, F. (2002). The influence of peers on young adult substance use. Health Psychology, 21, 349–357.
Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgment. In H. Guetzkow (Eds.), Group, leadership and men. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press.
Assor, A., Vansteenkiste, M., &; Kaplan, A. (2009). Approach and avoidance introjected motivations: Approach is better than avoidance, but identified motivation is better than both. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 482–497.
Baron, R. M., &; Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategyc, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Benenson J. F., &; Benarroch D. (1998). Gender differences in responses to friends’ hypothetical greater success. Journal of Early Adolescence, 18, 192–208.
Berndt, T. J., (1979). Developmental changes in conformity to peers and parents. Developmental Psychology, 15 (6), 608-616.
Brown, B. B., Clasen, D. R., &; Eicher, S. A. (1986). Perceptions of peer pressure, peer conformity dispositions, and self-reported behavior among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 22(4), 521-530.
Capaldi, D. M., and Patterson, G. R. (1991). Relation of parental transitions to boys’ adjustment problems: I. a linear hypothesis. II. mothers at risk for transitions and unskilled parenting. Developmental Psychology, 27, 489–504.
Carson, D. C. (2013). Perceptions of prosocial and delinquent peer behavior and the effect on delinquent attitudes: A longitudinal study. Journal of Criminal Justice,41, 151-161.
Cho, Y. &; Chung, O. B. (2012). A mediated moderation model of conformative peer bullying. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 21, 520-529.
Clasen, D. R. &; Brown, B. B. (1985). The multidimensionality of peer pressure in adolescence. Youth and Adolescence, 14(6), 451-468.
Collins, W. A., Gleason, T., &; Sesma Jr, A. (1997). Internalization, autonomy, and relationships: Development during adolescence. In Grusec, J. E., &; Kuczynski, L. E. (Eds.), Parenting and children's internalization of values: A handbook of contemporary theory. John Wiley &; Sons Inc.
Contreras, J. M., &; Kerns, K. A. (2000). Emotional regulation processes: Explaining links between parent–child attachment and peer relationships. In K. A. Kerns, J. M. Contreras, &; A. M. Neal-Barnett (Eds.), Family and peers: Linking two social worlds (pp. 137-168). Westport, CN: Praefer.
Covlin, Mark, Cullen, F. T., &; Ven, T. V. (2002). Coercion, social support, and crime: An emerging theoretical consensus. Criminology, 40, 19-42.
Dekovic , M. (1999). Risk and protective factors in the development of problem behavior during adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 28, 667-685.
Dekovic, M., Wissink, I. B., Meijer, A., M. (2004). The role of family and peer relations in adolescent antisocial behaviour: Comparison of four ethnic groups. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 497-514.
Esbensen, F. A., Osgood, D. W., Taylor, T. J., Peterson, D., &; Freng, A. (2001). How great is G.R.E.A.T.?: Results from a quasi-experimental design. Criminology and Public Policy, 1, 87-118.
Eisenberg, N., &; Valiente, C. (2002).Parenting and children’s prosocial and moral development. In Bornstein, M. H. (Eds.), Handbook of parenting, vol 5, LEA: USA.
Elliott, G. R., &; Feldman, S. (1993). Capturing the adolescence experience. In S. Feldman &; G. R. Elliott (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 1-13). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Erikson, E. (1968). Identity, youth and crisis. Norton: New York.
Garnier, H. E. &; Stein, J. A. (2002). An 18-year model of family and peer effects on adolescent drug use and delinquency. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 1, 45-56.
Grolnick, W. S., Deci, E. L., &; Ryan, R. M. (1997). Internalization within the family: The self-determination perspective. In J. E. Grusec &; L. Kuczynski (Eds.), Parenting and children's internalization of values: A handbook of contemporary theory (pp. 135-161). New York: Wiley.
Hoffman, J. A. (1984). Psychological separateon of late adolescents from their parents. Journal of counseling psychology, 31(2), 170-178.
Hoffman, M. L. (1975a). Sex differences in moral internalizeation and values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(4), 720-729.
Hoffman, M. L. (1975b). Moral internalizeation, parental power, and the nature of parent-child interaction. Developmental Psychology, 11(2), 228-239.
Hoffman, M. L. (1994). Discipline and internalization. Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 26-28.
Joseelson, R. (1980). Ego development in adolescence. In J. Adelson (ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 180-210). New York: Wiley.
Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141-151.
Knafo, A. &; Schwartz, S. H. (2004). Identity formation and parent-child value congruence in adolescence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 439-458.
Kochanska, G. &; Thompson, R. A. (1997). The Emergence and development of conscience in toddlerhood and early childhood. In Grusec, J. E. &; Kuczynski, L. (Eds.), Parenting and children’s internalization of values:A handbook of contemporary theory. Canada: John Wiley &; Sons, Inc.
McDowell, D. J. &; Parke, R. D. (2009). Parental correlates of children’s peer relations: An empirical test of a tripartite model. Development Psychology, 45, 224-235.
Mcgloin, J. M. (2009). Delinquency balance: Revisiting peer influence. Criminology, 47(2), 439-477.
McGoldrick, M., Giordano, J., &; Garcia-Preto, N. (2005). Ethnicity and family therapy. Guilford Press.
Mears, D. P. &; Field S. H. (2002). A closer look at the age, peers, and delinquency relationship. Western Criminology Review, 4(1), 20-29.
Mize, J., Pettit, G. S., &; Meece, D. (2000). Explaining the link between parenting behavior and children’s peer competence: A critical examination of the “mediating process” hypothesis. In Kern, K. A., Contreras, M. J., &; Neal-Barnett A. M. (Eds.), Family and Peer: Linking two social worlds (pp.137-168). US: Panger.
Muthén, L.K. &; Muthén, B.O. (2010). Mplus User’s Guide, Seventh Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén &; Muthén .
Nargiso, J. E., Friend, K., &; Florin, P. (2013). An examination of peer, family, and community context risk factors for alcohol use and alcohol use intentions in early adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 33(7), 973-993.
Neidell, M. &; Waldfogel, J. (2010). Cognitive and noncognitive peer effects in early education. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93, 562-576.
Newman, P. R. &; Newman, B. M. (1976). Early adolescence and its conflict: Group identity versus alienation. Adolescence, 11, 261-274.
Oetting, E. R. &; Beauvais, F. (1986). Peer cluster theory: Drugs and the adolescent. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 65, 17-22.
Oetting, E. R. &; Beauvais, F. (1987). Peer cluster theory, socialization characteristics, and adolescent drug use: A path analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34(2), 205-213.
Reiss, D. (1981). The family's construction of reality. Harvard University Press.
Ryan, R. M. &; Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749-761.
Ryan, R. M., Connell, J. P., &; Grolnick, W. S. (1992). When achievement is not intrinsically motivated: a theory of self-regulation in school. In A. K. Boggiano &; T. S. Pittman (Eds.), Achievement and Motivation. New York: Cambridge University.
Ryan, R. M. &; Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67.
Ryan, R. M. &; Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-Determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
Santor, D. A., Messervey, D., &; Kusumakar, V. (1999). Measuring peer pressure, popularity, and conformity in adolescent boys and girls: Predicting school performance, sexual attitudes, and substance abuse. Developmental Psychology, 22, 251-530.
Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., &; Niemiec, C. P. (2009). Should parental prohibition of adolescents' peer relationships be prohibited? Personal Relationships, 16(4), 507-530.
Steinberg, L. &; Silverberg, S. B. (1986). The vicissitudes of autonomy in early adolescence. Child Development. 57, 841-851.
Steinberg, L. (2001). We know some things: Parent-adolescent relationship in retrospect and prospect. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 11(2), 1-19.
Thornberry, T. P. (1987). Toward an interactional theory of delinquency. Criminology, 25, 863-891.
Youniss, J. &; Smollar, J. (1985). Adolescent relations with mothers, fathers and friends. University of Chicago Press.

連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top