臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

媒體型態一直在改變，從早期大眾媒體當道，到現在變成各級媒體，包含大眾媒體與小眾媒體，同時影響社會大眾的意見分布與形成，大眾媒體為大家所熟知，所謂的小眾媒體，是指針對特定的目標族群傳遞資訊，閱聽眾人數較少的媒體。大眾媒體與小眾媒體除了閱聽眾的差異外，他們使用不同的傳播策略，像是對一議題的極端程度或是傳遞資訊的頻率，而對民眾造成不同的影響。本論文所探討的便是在各級媒體不同傳播策略的多方作用之下，對於社會意見形成與分布所造成的影響。
本研究採用「意見動態」中的「有界信心模型」模擬人際意見交流；擴充「無尺度網路」為模型的底層網路使其更符合真實社會情形；依據傳播學對於大眾媒體與小眾媒體的定義來設定模型中的個體以及其傳播模式。
根據結果顯示，小眾媒體的極端意見會促成社會意見分裂並且使社會意見極化程度更加嚴重，而大眾媒體扮演著維持社會和諧的重要角色；至於特別議題，例如同性戀議題，大眾媒體更扮演著「教育者」的角色，教導社會大眾正確的觀念；小眾媒體精確掌握目標族群並且傳遞訊息更有效率地影響社會大眾的意見。

The ecology of media keeps changing. In early ages, “Mass media” are the only media. Nowadays, “Mass media” and “Alternative media” affect opinion formation of the society. “Mass media” are well known, and “Alternative media” are the media which influence only the specific target audiences. In addition to the target audiences, the communicating strategies they use, including the degree of polarization or the frequency of the broadcast ratio, are the differences between two media. Different strategies lead to different effect on the audiences. What we concern is the influence of all rank of media on the social opinion formation.
We use “Bounded Confidence Model” to simulation the communication between agents, and we use the “Extended Scale Free Network” to be our social network. Based on the definition in communication, we add “Mass media” and “Alternative media” in our model.
According to the results of our experiences, we find that exaggerated reports from alternative media contribute to the fragmentation and the polarization of the society, and mass media play an important role in maintaining the concordance. In some special issues, such as “gay issue”, mass media is the “educator” teaching the society correct concept. The “Alternative media” broadcasting information to specific audiences impact the society more efficiently.

摘要 i
ABSTRACT ii
誌謝 iv
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 ix
一 . 序論 1
1.1. 研究動機 1
1.2. 研究背景 3
1.3. 研究目標 5
1.4. 研究問題 6
1.5. 論文架構 7
二 . 文獻探討 8
2.1. 社會網路 8
2.1.1. 正規網路 9
2.1.2. 隨機網路 9
2.1.3. 小世界網路 10
2.1.4. 無尺度網路 11
2.2. 傳播 14
2.3. 意見動態 16
2.4. 研究定位 20
三 . 模型設計 21
3.1. 底層網路 22
3.2. 個體挑選與設定 25
3.2.1. 個體挑選 25
3.2.2. 意見設定 26
3.3. 意見傳遞 27
3.3.1. 參數介紹 27
3.3.2. 人際交流 29
3.3.3. 媒體傳遞 29
3.3.4. 策略修正 30
3.4. 研究指標 32
3.5. 總結 33
四. 實驗 34
4.1 模型驗證 36
4.1.1 BC Model驗證 36
4.1.2 大眾傳播驗證 40
4.2 模型比較實驗 44
4.2.1 無尺度網路 44
4.2.2 各級媒體與人際交流的影響 50
4.2.3 觀看小眾媒體機率的影響 55
4.3 特別議題探討 57
4.3.1 小眾媒體影響意見相近的個體 57
4.3.2 同性戀議題探討 60
五. 結論 63
5.1 優點與貢獻 63
5.1.1 優點 63
5.1.2 貢獻 63
5.2 模型結論 65
5.3 未來發展 66
參考文獻 67

[1] J. Lull, Media, Communication, Culture: A Global Approach, 2 ed: Columbia University Press, 2000.
[2] 李. 楊忠川, "網際網路時代下的小眾媒介發展：虛擬社群的觀點," presented at 中華傳播學會, 1999.
[3] M. Castells, "The culture of real virtuality:the integration of electronic communication,the end of the mass audience,and the rise of interactive network," in The information Age:Economy,Society,and Culture Volume I：The Rise Of the Network Society, M. Castells, Ed.: blackwell Publishers Inc, 1997.
[4] J. C. Gonz�鴣ez-Avella, M. G. Cosenza, K. Klemm, V. M.Egu�殯uz, and M. S. Miguel, "Information Feedback and Mass Media Effects in Cultural Dynamics " Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 10, 2007.
[5] R. Hegselmann and U. Krause, "Opinion Dynamics and Bounded Confidence Model, Analysis, and Simulation," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 5, 2002.
[6] A. S. ELGAZZAR, "APPLICATION OF THE SZNAJD SOCIOPHYSICS MODEL TO SMALL-WORLD NETWORKS," International Journal of Modern Physics C, vol. 12, 2001.
[7] G. Mckeown and N. Sheehy, "Mass Media and Polarisation Processes in the Bounded Confidence Model of Opinion Dynamics," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 9, 2006.
[8] A.-L. Barab�龍i and R. Albert, "Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks," Science, vol. 286, pp. 509-512, 1999.
[9] D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz, "Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks," Nature, vol. 393, pp. 440-442, 1998.
[10] A.-L. Barab�龍i, R. Albert, and H. Jeong, "Scale-free characteristics of random networks: the topology of the world-wide web " Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 281, pp. 69-77, 2000.
[11] A.-L. Barab�龍i, E. Ravasz, and T. Vicsek, "Deterministic scale-free networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications vol. 299, pp. 559-564, 2001.
[12] H. J. a. A.-L. B. R�翳a Albert, "Error and attack tolerance of complex networks," 2000.
[13] G. Gerbner, "Mass media and human communication theory," in Human Communication Theory: Original Essays, F. E. X. Dance, Ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1967, pp. 332.
[14] C. E. Osgood, The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1957.
[15] H. D. Lasswell, "The structure and function of communication in society," in The Communication of Idea, e. Bryson, Ed. New York: Harper and ROW, 1948.
[16] D. McQUAIL and S. WINDAHL, Communication Models for the Study of Mass Communications, 2 ed: Longman, 1993.
[17] C. Atton, Alternative media: Sage Publications Inc, 2002.
[18] J. K. a. C. Pahl-Wostl, "Simulating political attitudes and voting behavior," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 7, 2004.
[19] K. Sznajd-Weron and J. Sznajd, " Opinion evolution in closed community," International Journal of Modern Physics C, vol. 11, pp. 1157-1165, 2000.
[20] S. Galam, "Social paradoxes of majority rule voting and renormalization group," Journal of Statistical Physics, vol. 61, pp. 943-951, 1990.
[21] G. Deffuant, D. Neau, F. Amblard, and G. Weisbuch, "Mixing beliefs among interacting agents," Advances in Complex Systems, vol. 3, pp. 87-98, 2000.
[22] G. Deffuant, F. Amblard, G. Weisbuch, and T. Faure, "How can extremism prevail? A study based on the relative agreement interaction model," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 5, 2002.
[23] D. Stauffer and H. Meyer-Ortmanns, "SIMULATION OF CONSENSUS MODEL OF DEFFUANT et al. ON A BARAB�昤I-ALBERT NETWORK," International Journal of Modern Physics C, vol. 15, pp. 241-247, 2004.
[24] D. Stauffer, A. Sousa, and C. Schulza, "Discretized Opinion Dynamics of The Deffuant Model on Scale-Free Networks," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 7, 2004.
[25] K. A. a. T. Norris, "ArrierosAlife" a Multi-Agent Approach Simulating the Evolution of a Social System: Modeling the Emergence of Social Networks with "Ascape," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation vol. 4, 2001.
[26] H. Haken, SYNERGETIK, 4 ed, 1986.
[27] F. C. S. LIU, "CONSTRAINED OPINION LEADER INFLUENCE IN AN ELECTORAL CAMPAIGN SEASON: REVISITING THE TWO-STEP FLOW THEORY WITH MULTI-AGENT SIMULATION," Advances in Complex Systems, vol. 10, pp. 233–250, 2006.
[28] M. G. a. M. E. J. N. Emily M. Jin, "Structure of growing social networks," Physical Review E, vol. 64 pp. 8, 2001.