臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

研究旨在探討我國中老年人孝道期望、孝道信念及幸福感受之現況及影響因子，並檢驗孝道期望、孝道信念與幸福感受之關係，以期拓展孝道模型在不同年齡之研究並增進其應用價值。研究屬於橫斷面問卷調查，研究樣本為臺灣地區的中老年人，回收有效樣本共299人，年齡分佈由45到94歲，平均為61.38歲，中年人佔全樣本之71.2%，老年人佔全樣本之28.8%；中年人定義為45至64歲，老年人定義為65歲以上。研究工具包含「雙元孝道量表」（FPS-16，取自葉光輝，2003）、「生活滿意度量表」（SWLS-5，Diener等人，1985）、「平衡式情感量表」（ABS-10，取自楊中芳，1997）、以及「心理幸福感量表」（PWB-18，取自Li，2014），人口學變項則收集受試者之年齡及性別、子女之年齡、性別、居住狀況及婚姻狀況。資料以描述性統計、t檢定、皮爾森積差相關與階層多元迴歸進行統計分析及檢定。研究結果整理如下：
（一）中老年人孝道期望、孝道信念及幸福感受之現況：
（1）中老年人對於子代仍抱持相當程度的相互性孝道期望，而對權威性孝道之期望僅持中等程度；孝道信念方面，中老年人仍抱持相當程度的相互性孝道信念及略高於中等程度之權威性孝道信念；孝道期望、孝道信念之測量為李克特氏六點量表。
（2）中年人之主觀幸福感及心理幸福感皆高於中等程度；老年人之主觀幸福感位於中等程度，而心理幸福感則在中等程度之上；主觀幸福感之生活滿意度、正向情感、負向情感分別為李克特氏七點、四點、四點量表，心理幸福感則為李克特氏六點量表。
（二）中老年人孝道期望、孝道信念及幸福感受之差異：
（1）中老年人孝道期望與子代之年齡及居住狀況相關，而與盡孝對象（父、母）、自身之年齡及性別、子代之性別及婚姻狀況等無關。
（2）中老年人之子代年齡越大，其「子代對母親」之相互性孝道期望越低，而「子代對父親」之權威性孝道期望越高。
（3）中老年人對於與己同住之子代有較高的權威性孝道期望。
（4）中老年人對子代盡孝之期望，相互性大於權威性。
（5）中老年人孝道信念與年齡相關，與盡孝對象（父、母）、性別無關。
（6）自身或子代的年齡越大，中老年人相互性孝道信念越低、權威性孝道信念越高。
（7）中老年人所抱持之孝道信念，相互性大於權威性。
（8）孝道期望與孝道信念兩者呈正相關；在不同孝道類型、不同盡孝對象，中老年人對於子代的孝道期望程度皆不及自身抱持的孝道信念。
（9）中年人相比老年人有較高的幸福感受，反映在生活滿意度、負向情感及心理幸福感上。
（三）孝道變項對中老年人幸福感受之預測力：（控制受試者性別及年齡）
（1）中老年人的相互性孝道信念、相互性孝道期望、權威性孝道期望等變項共可解釋主觀幸福感中負向情感變異量的29.1%。相互性孝道信念越高、相互性孝道期望越高、權威性孝道期望越低，其負向情感越低。
（2）中老年人的相互性孝道信念、相互性孝道期望、權威性孝道期望等變項共可解釋心理幸福感變異量的23.2%。相互性孝道信念越高、相互性孝道期望越高、權威性孝道期望越低，其心理幸福感越高。
（3）孝道期望及孝道信念對中老年人幸福感受具有預測力；相互性孝道與權威性孝道、孝道期望與孝道信念對於幸福感受之作用效果皆不相同。
最後，提出研究限制和未來的研究方向。

The purpose of the research is to investigate the current status and influencing factors of the elderly filial expectations, filial beliefs, subjective well-being(SWB) and psychological well-being(PWB), analyze the relationship of filial expectations, filial beliefs and well-being, expand the dual filial piety model in different ages and enhance the value of the model. This is a cross-sectional questionnaire survey study, 299 valid samples from Taiwan were obtained. Age distribution in samples are from 45-94, and mean age is 61.38 years old; 71.2% of the total sample are middle-aged, and 28.8% of the total sample are elderly. Middle-aged is defined as 45-64 years of age, the elderly is defined as 65 years or more. The instruments include Filial Piety Scale (FPS-16), Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS-5), Affect Balance Scale (ABS-10), and Psychological Well-Being Scale (PWB-18). The demographic information consisting of the gender and age, as well as subject’s children''s age, gender, marital status and living conditions. The collected data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, t-test, Pearson’s product-moment correlation and hierarchical multiple regression analysis. The results are as follows:
(1) The current status of filial expectations, filial beliefs and well-being:
(a) In filial expectations, middle-aged and elder still hold a considerable degree of reciprocal filial expectations, while the degree of authoritarian filial expectations only the average level. In filial beliefs, middle-aged and elder still hold considerable degree of reciprocal filial beliefs and slightly higher than the average of authoritarian filial belief. The measuring of filial expectations and filial beliefs are 6-point Likert scales.
(b) In the middle-aged, both SWB and PWB are above average. In the elderly, SWB is about average, and PWB is above average. The measuring of life satisfaction, positive emotions, negative emotions and PWB are 7-point, 4-point, 4-point and 6-point Likert scales.
(2) The difference of filial expectations, filial beliefs and well-being:
(a) Filial expectations are related to child’s age and living conditions, are not related to filial object, their own age and gender, and child’s gender and marital status.
(b) When the children’s ages are larger, the reciprocal filial expectations (to mother) are lower, and the authoritarian filial expectations (to father) are higher.
(c) Middle-aged and elder have higher authoritarian filial expectations to the child who live together.
(d) In filial expectations, reciprocal filial piety is greater than authoritarian filial piety.
(e) Filial beliefs are related to age, are not related to filial object and gender.
(f) When their own age or the children’s ages are larger, the reciprocal filial beliefs are lower and the authoritarian filial beliefs are higher.
(g) In filial beliefs, reciprocal filial piety is greater than authoritarian filial piety.
(h) It has a positive correlation between filial expectations and filial beliefs. No matter which types of filial piety or filial objects, the filial expectations are less than the filial beliefs.
(i) Middle-aged compared to the elderly have higher feelings of well-being, particularly in life satisfaction, negative emotional and PWB.
(3) The filial variables to predict the well-being:
(a) Reciprocal filial beliefs, reciprocal filial expectations and authoritarian filial expectations explain 29.1% variance of negative emotion. Higher the reciprocal filial beliefs, higher reciprocal filial expectations and lower authoritarian filial expectations, their negative emotion is lower.
(b) Reciprocal filial beliefs, reciprocal filial expectations and authoritarian filial expectations explain 23.2% variance of PWB. Higher the reciprocal filial beliefs, higher reciprocal filial expectations and lower authoritarian filial expectations, their PWB is higher.
(c) Filial expectations and filial beliefs have predictive power for well-being in middle-aged and elder . The effect of reciprocal filial piety and authoritarian filial piety are different. The effect of filial expectations and filial beliefs are also different.
Finally, the researcher proposes some limitations and suggestions for future studies.

第一章、緒論 1
第一節、研究動機 1
第二節、研究目的與研究問題 3
第三節、名詞釋義 4
第二章、文獻探討 6
第一節、孝道的起源、轉變及近代趨勢 6
第二節、近代孝道研究之發展 12
第三節、雙元孝道模型及實徵研究 18
第四節、主觀幸福感與心理幸福感 21
第五節、孝道與幸福感 30
第三章、研究方法 34
第一節、研究架構與流程 34
第二節、研究假設 35
第三節、研究樣本 36
第四節、研究工具 36
第五節、統計分析方式 44
第四章、研究結果 45
第一節、人口學特徵 45
第二節、中老年人孝道期望、孝道信念及幸福感受之現況分析 48
第三節、中老年人孝道期望之表現差異 58
第四節、中老年人孝道信念之表現差異 63
第五節、孝道期望與孝道信念間之比較 66
第六節、孝道期望、孝道信念對主觀幸福感之預測分析 67
第七節、孝道期望、孝道信念對心理幸福感之預測分析 70
第五章、研究討論與建議 72
第一節、研究結論與結果討論 72
第二節、實務應用之建議 80
第三節、研究限制與研究建議 82
參考文獻 84
壹、中文部分 84
貳、英文部分 87
附錄一、雙元孝道量表使用同意書 94
附錄二、雙元孝道量表 95
附錄三、生活滿意度量表 99
附錄四、平衡式情感量表 100
附錄五、心理幸福感量表 101

內政部（2013）。內政統計通報。102年第21週。網址：http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/week/week10221.doc
內政部（2014）。內政統計通報。103年第3週。網址：http://sowf.moi.gov.tw/stat/week/week10303.doc
行政院主計總處（2010）。65歲以上常住人口居住情形。網址：http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/data/dgbas04/bc6/census029(final).html
朱嵐（2003）。中國傳統孝道的歷史考察。蘭臺。
朱瑞玲、章英華（2001）。華人社會的家庭倫理與家人互動：文化及社會的變遷效果。載於中央研究院經濟研究所 [華人家庭動態資料庫] 學術研討會，臺北市。
呂妙芬（2011）。孝治天下：《孝經》與近世中國的政治與文化。臺北：中央研究院。
肖群忠（2002）。中國孝文化研究。臺北：五南。
邢占軍（2005）。對主觀幸福感測量的反思。本土心理學研究，24，301-323。
周玉慧、楊文山、莊義利（1998）。晚年生活壓力、社會支持與老人身心健康。人文及社會科學集刊，10，227-265。
林安弘（1992）。儒家孝道思想研究。臺北：文津。
翁若雲（2011）。大學生生涯自我效能、生涯成熟與心理幸福感之結構方程模式分析。臺南大學諮商與輔導學系，碩士論文。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。
康琇喬（2002）。早年家庭暴力經驗、孝道與心理健康相關研究。臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所，碩士論文。
教育部（2010）。全國老年生活幸福感調查研究。網址：http://moe.senioredu.moe.gov.tw/front/bin/ptdetail.phtml?Part=10120002
章英華、杜素豪、廖培珊（2013）。台灣社會變遷基本調查計畫2011第六期第二次：家庭組執行報告。行政院國家科學委員會專案研究報告。臺北市: 中央研究院社會學研究所。
莊耀嘉、楊國樞（1991）。傳統孝道的變遷與實踐：一項社會心理學之探討。見楊國樞（主編），中國人的心理與行為（135-175頁）。臺北：桂冠。
陳嘉鳳、周才忠（2012）。臺灣民眾主觀快樂幸福感之樣貌與未來之發展方向。 應用倫理評論，52，83-113。
陸洛（1998）。中國人幸福感之內涵：測量及相關因素探討。國家科學委員會研究彙刊：人文及社會科學，8，115-137。
陸洛、高旭繁、陳芬憶（2006）。傳統性、現代性及孝道觀念對幸福感的影響：一項親子對偶設計。本土心理學研究，25，243-278。
陸洛、陳欣宏（2002）台灣變遷社會中老人的家庭角色調適及代間關係之初探。應用心理研究，14，221-249。
黃堅厚（1982）。現代生活中孝的實踐。見楊國樞（主編），中國人的心理。臺北：桂冠。
黃淑玲、游美惠（2007）。性別向度與台灣社會。臺北：巨流圖書。
黃瓊慧（2010）。成人完美主義、孝道信念與心理健康之相關研究。臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系，碩士論文。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。
楊中芳（1997）。性格與社會心理測量總覽：（上）。臺北：遠流.
楊國樞（1985）現代社會的新孝道。載於現代生活態度研討會論文集。臺北：中華文化復興運動推行委員會。
楊國樞、葉光輝、黃曬莉（1989）。孝道的社會態度與行為：理論與測量。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，65，171-227。
葉光輝（1997a）。台灣民眾之孝道觀念的變遷情形。見張苙雲、呂玉瑕、王甫昌（主編），九○年代的台灣社會：社會變遷基本調查研究系列二（下冊）（171-214頁）。臺北，中央研究院社會學研究所。
葉光輝（1997b）。親子互動的困境與衝突及其因應方式：孝道觀點的探討。見葉光輝、楊國樞（主編），中國人的孝道：心理學的分析。臺北：臺大出版中心。
葉光輝（1998）。年老父母居住安排的心理學研究：孝道觀點的探討。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，83，121-168。
葉光輝（2009a）。再論華人孝道雙元模型的幾個關鍵性議題。本土心理學研究，32，207-248。
葉光輝（2009b）。華人孝道雙元模型研究的回顧與前瞻。本土心理學研究，32，101-148。
葉光輝、楊國樞（1989）。孝道的認知結構與發展：概念與衡鑑。見葉光輝、楊國樞（主編），中國人的孝道：心理學的分析。臺北：臺大出版中心。
葉肅科（2011）。性別教育：超越兩性關係。臺北：洪葉文化。
劉敏珍（2000）。老年人之人際親密、依附風格與幸福感之關係研究。高雄師範大學成人教育研究所，碩士論文。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。
劉碧素（2006）。探討影響世代孝道行為之相關因素。台北護理學院護理研究所，碩士論文。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。
鄭欵（2005）。大學生對親代安養態度與自我老年安養期待之差異。南華大學生死學研究所，碩士論文。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。
Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: Americans'' perceptions of life quality. Chicago: Plenum Press.
Baird, B. M., Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2010). Life satisfaction across the lifespan: Findings from two nationally representative panel studies. Social Indicators Research, 99(2), 183-203.
Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2008). Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle? Social Science & Medicine, 66(8), 1733-1749.
Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2009). The U-shape without controls: A response to Glenn. Social Science & Medicine, 69(4), 486-488.
Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The Structure of Psychological Well-Being. Chicago: Aldine.
Charles, S., & Carstensen, L. L. (2010). Social and emotional aging. Annual review of psychology, 61, 383-409.
Chen, F., & Short, S. E. (2008). Household context and subjective well-being among the oldest old in China. Journal of Family Issues, 29(10), 1379-1403.
Chen, X., & Silverstein, M. (2000). Intergenerational social support and the psychological well-being of older parents in China. Research on aging, 22(1), 43-65.
Cheng, S. T. (2009). Generativity in later life: Perceived respect from younger generations as a determinant of goal disengagement and psychological well-being. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64B(1), 45-54. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbn027
Cheng, S. T., & Chan, A. C. (2006). Filial piety and psychological well-being in well older Chinese. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61(5), 262-269.
Cheng, S. T., Lee, C. K., Chan, A. C., Leung, E. M., & Lee, J. J. (2009). Social network types and subjective well-being in Chinese older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64B(6), 713-722. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbp075
Clark, A. E. (2007). Born to be mild? Cohort effects don''t (fully) explain why well-being is U-shaped in age (No. 3170). IZA Discussion Papers.
Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (2006). The curved relationship between subjective well-being and age. Working Papers n°2006-29. 2006.
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological bulletin, 95(3), 542-575.
Diener, E. (2006). Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1(2), 151-157. Doi: 10.1007/s11482-006-9007-x
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of personality assessment, 49(1), 71-75.
Easterlin, R. A. (2010). Happiness, growth, and the life cycle. Oxford: Oxford Economic Press.
Ferring, D., Michels, T., Boll, T., & Filipp, S. H. (2009). Emotional relationship quality of adult children with ageing parents: on solidarity, conflict and ambivalence. European Journal of Ageing, 6(4), 253-265.
Glenn, N. (2009). Is the apparent U-shape of well-being over the life course a result of inappropriate use of control variables? A commentary on Blanchflower and Oswald (66: 8, 2008, 1733–1749). Social Science & Medicine, 69(4), 481-485.
Ho, D. Y. F. (1994). Filial piety, authoritarian moralism, and cognitive conservatism in Chinese societies. Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs, 120(3), 349-365.
Hsu, H. C., Lew-Ting, C. Y., & Wu, S. C. (2001). Age, period, and cohort effects on the attitude toward supporting parents in Taiwan. The Gerontologist, 41(6), 742-750.
Ishii-Kuntz, M. (1997). Intergenerational relationships among Chinese, Japanese, and Korean Americans. Family Relations, 46(1), 23-32.
Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (Eds.). (1999). Well-being: Foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation.
Kivett, V. R., & Atkinson, M. P. (1984). Filial expectations, association, and helping as a function of number of children among older rural-transitional parents. Journal of Gerontology, 39(4), 499-503.
Lawrence, R. H., Bennett, J. M., & Markides, K. S. (1992). Perceived intergenerational solidarity and psychological distress among older Mexican Americans. Journal of Gerontology, 47(2), S55-S65.
Lelkes, O. (2007). Happiness over the life-cycle: Exploring age-specific preferences. Mainstreaming Ageing: Indicators to Monitor Sustainable Policies. Ltd: Ashgate Publishing.
Leung, A. N. M., Wong, S. S. F., Wong, I. W. Y., & McBride-Chang, C. (2010). Filial piety and psychosocial adjustment in Hong Kong Chinese early adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(5), 651-667.
Li, R. H. (2014). Reliability and validity of a shorter Chinese version for Ryff’s psychological well-being scale. Health Education Journal, 73(4), 446-452.
Liu, L. J., & Guo, Q. (2008). Life satisfaction in a sample of empty-nest elderly: a survey in the rural area of a mountainous county in China. Quality of life research, 17(6), 823-830.
Lu, L., & Shih, J. B. (1997). Sources of happiness: A qualitative approach. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137(2), 181-187.
Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 71(3), 616-628.
Moriwaki, S. Y. (1974). The Affect Balance Scale: A validity study with aged samples. Journal of Gerontology, 29(1), 73-78.
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 164-172.
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The satisfaction with life scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(2), 137-152.
Pinquart, M., & Sörensen, S. (2000). Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: a meta-analysis. Psychology and aging, 15(2), 187.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 141-166.
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 57(6), 1069-1081.
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 13-39.
Silverstein, M., Chen, X., & Heller, K. (1996). Too much of a good thing? Intergenerational social support and the psychological well-being of older parents. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58(4), 970-982.
Silverstein, M., Parrott, T. M., & Bengtson, V. L. (1995). Factors that predispose middle-aged sons and daughters to provide social support to older parents. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57(2), 465-475.
Springer, K. W., Pudrovska, T., & Hauser, R. M. (2011). Does psychological well-being change with age? Longitudinal tests of age variations and further exploration of the multidimensionality of Ryff’s model of psychological well-being. Social science research, 40(1), 392-398.
Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological bulletin, 134(1), 138-161. doi: : 10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.138
Sung, K. (1995). Measures and dimensions of filial piety in Korea. The Gerontologist, 35(2), 240-247.
Thompson, M. G., & Heller, K. (1990). Facets of support related to well-being: quantitative social isolation and perceived family support in a sample of elderly women. Psychology and Aging, 5(4), 535-544. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.5.4.535
Tsou, M. W., & Liu, J. T. (2001). Happiness and domain satisfaction in Taiwan. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2(3), 269-288.
van der Pas, S., van Tilburg, T., & Knipscheer, K. C. (2005). Measuring older adults’ filial responsibility expectations: Exploring the application of a vignette technique and an item scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(6), 1026-1045.
Wang, D., Laidlaw, K., Power, M. J., & Shen, J. (2009). Older people''s belief of filial piety in China: Expectation and non-expectation. Clinical Gerontologist, 33(1), 21-38.
Ward, R. A. (2008). Multiple parent–adult child relations and well-being in middle and later life. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 63(4), S239-S247.
Wu, C. H., & Yao, G. (2006). Analysis of factorial invariance across gender in the Taiwan version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(6), 1259-1268.
Yeh, K. H. (2003). The Beneficial and Harmful Effects of F ilial Piety: An Integrative Analysis. In K. S. Yang, K. K. Hwang, P. B. Pederson, & I. Daibo (Eds.), Asian social psychology: Conceptual and empirical contributions. CT: Praeger.
Yeh, K. H. (2014). Filial Piety and Autonomous Development of Adolescents in the Taiwanese Family. In The Family and Social Change in Chinese Societies (pp. 29-38). Springer Netherlands.
Yeh, K. H. (2006). The impact of filial piety on the problem behaviors of culturally Chinese adolescents. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 7(2), 237-257.
Yeh, K. H, & Bedford, O. (2003). A test of the dual filial piety model. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 6(3), 215-228.
Yeh, K. H, & Bedford, O. (2004). Filial belief and parent-child conflict. International Journal of Psychology, 39(2), 132-144.
Yue, X., & Ng, S. H. (1999). Filial obligations and expectations in China: Current views from young and old people in Beijing. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(2), 215-226.
Zaltman, G., & Burger, P. C. (1975). Marketing research: Fundamentals and dynamics (pp. 500-509). Hinsdale, Illinois: Dryden Press.
Zhang, J., & Bond, M. H. (1998). Personality and filial piety among college students in two Chinese societies the added value of indigenous constructs. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29(3), 402-417.