|
ABSTRACT September 11,2012,the Japanese government nationalized the diameter line of Diaoyutai, including Diaoyu Dao and its affiliated islands/Senkaku Islands. This will not only lead to the strong protest and dissatisfaction of Taiwan and China governments, who hold the same claim to the rights of sovereignty over the Diaoyutai, and the anti-Japanese demonstrations occurred in the Chinese mainland, which are the most unprecedented scale since WW2. This instantaneously froze the Chinese-Japanese relations, causing the East China Sea in a tense situation. The Chinese-Japanese confrontation situation hasn''t changed until now, and there is a great possibility of becoming long-term oriented situation under the trend of recent struggles. Recalling the history of the Diaoyutai''s disputes, after the United Nations Economic and Social Organization confirmed on the continental shelf in the East China Sea is rich in resources since 1968, the issue of Diaoyutai got attentions instantly. Diaoyutai dispute hadn''t formally flared up until 1971 the United State''s returning Okinawa to the Japan government, the agreement is concerning the Ryukyu Islands and the Daito Islands" between Japan and the United States of America. The dispute has developed for more than 40 years, which is still on the tense and grimly explosive situation. Undoubtedly, the Diaoyutai issue in the East Asia has become an unexploded ordnance. As for the Diaoyutai issue, on the one hand, the rich resources on the continental shelf near the archipelago as mentioned are suspected; on the other hand in reality, its geographical position、strategic advantage and the continental shelf delimitation disputes in the future are all reasons that these countries are unable to make concessions on the issue of sovereignty. In addition, before the disputes between states which are over the islands occurred, what''s the difference between historical acknowledge on the belonging problem from country to country? Moreover, how can this dispute be left aside for such a long period of time after the dispute? These III problems which has failed to resolve so far, and solutions for negotiations will all be the focus issues in this essay. The overall framework of this essay is based on the historical data of the both sides. The Instrument Of Surrender of Japan after wars.The Treaty of San Francisco、agreements for returning Okinawa, and the circumstances of the Diaoyu Islands dispute are all going to be investigated, and analyzing the dispute incident after the development to the present situation. Finally, I would like to take the advantage of this research, dealing with the international territorial issue key points, exploring the trends of the Diaoyutai in the future, depending on the current Chinese-Japanese government official information、 news to understand the position and attitudes and identifying the key points of both sides.
|