跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.88) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/02/14 14:27
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:邱渼桄
研究生(外文):Mei-Kuang Chiu
論文名稱:台灣國小學生英文學習策略使用之研究
論文名稱(外文):A Study on Language Learning Strategy Use: A Case Study of Elementary School Students in Taiwan
指導教授:張智惠張智惠引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chih-hui Chang
口試委員:倪淑芳莊琍玲張智惠
口試日期:2014-01-15
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:大葉大學
系所名稱:應用外語研究所
學門:人文學門
學類:外國語文學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2014
畢業學年度:102
語文別:英文
論文頁數:100
中文關鍵詞:學習策略
外文關鍵詞:Learning Stategy
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:581
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:46
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
此研究旨在探討台灣國小學生英文學習策略之使用。七項自變項包括性別、居住地、父親的教育程度、母親的教育程度、父親的職業、母親的職業,以及學生開始學習英文的年齡,和語言學習策略之間的關係。這份研究提供台灣小學生語言學習策略使用之概況,將有助於教育工作者和決策者規畫一個較具激勵性與更有效率的小學教育環境。

此研究對象有六十八個男生和五十五個女生,共一百二十三位國小六年級學生參與。其中有六十一位學生來自都市(台中市),而六十二位來自鄉村(彰化縣)。

所有學生皆完成了兩部分的問卷。第一部分的問卷收集了有關自變項的統計數據,而第二部分則是1990年R. Oxford的語言學習策略量表。量化分析採用SPSS(第十九版)進行分析。描述性統計以及多變項分析做為資料統計。

本研究結果為學生在學習英文時使用中等(有時如此2.5-3.4)的學習策略頻率。記憶策略最為常用,而認知策略使用頻率最少。女學生對於學習策略之應用高於男學生。早學習英文者運用學習策略的頻率明顯比晚學習者多。然而,住在都市與鄉村的國小六年級學生在學習英文時所使用之學習策略並無明顯差異性。七自變項中──年齡、父親的教育程度、母親的教育程度、父親的職業,以及開始學習英文年齡與學生使用學習策略有顯著影響。

本研究顯示出台灣國小六年級學生英文學習策略使用之一般概況,提供未來相關教育者可參考本調查以增進學生對語言學習策略使用。

This study was designed to explore Language Learning Strategy Use (LLSU) of English as Foreign Language (EFL) elementary school students in Taiwan. The study analyzed the relationships between seven independent variables (gender, location, father’s education, mother’s education, father’s occupation, mother’s occupation, and starting age of learning English) and LLSU. The study provides a general review of the LLSU of elementary students in Taiwan, which will assist educators, policy makers, parents and students in creating a more stimulating and effective English educational environment for elementary school students.

One hundred and twenty-three participants took part in the study. All of the participants were from grade six. Sixty-eight boys and 55 girls participated in the study. Sixty-one of the participants were from an urban area (Taichung city) while 62 were from a rural area (Changhua county). All of the participants completed a two-section questionnaire. The first part of the questionnaire gathered demographic data regarding the independent variables, while the second part was a Chinese translated version of Oxford’s (1990) Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL). Quantitative analysis was conducted using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 19. Descriptive statistics as well as analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Multivariate analysis of Variance (MANOVA) tests were conducted to analyze the data.

The results showed that there is medium overall strategy use among the participants. The most frequently used strategy category was the memory category, while the least frequently used strategy category was cognitive. Girls used strategies more frequently than boys. Those who started learning English earlier tended to use strategies more frequently than learners who started learning English later. However, there is no significant difference in LLSU between urban (Taichung city) and rural (Changhua county) locations. In other words, the results reveal that the participants in sixth grade in Taichung and Changhua used the same amount of LLS. Five of the seven variables had a significant impact on overall strategy use, gender, father’s education, mother’s education, father’s occupation, mother’s occupation and starting age of learning English.

This study investigated the LLSU of elementary aged EFL learners in Taiwan. Results offer a general view of the LLSU of these participants. The stakeholders can employ the findings to increase the effectives of Language Learning Strategy use in the future.

ENGLISH ABSTRACT iv
CHINESE ABSTRACT vi                            
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS viii             
TABLE OF CONTENTS ix              
LIST OF TABLES xiii            
CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION 1                           
1.1 Introduction 1                                      
1.2 Background of Research 2                                     
1.3 Purpose of the Research 3                                    
1.4 Significance of the Research 4                   
1.5 Research Objectives and Questions 5                                     
1.5.1 Research Objectives 5                                     
1.5.2 Research Questions 6                                     
1.6 Definition of Terms 6                                     
1.7 Summary of Chapter One 7                                       
CHAPTER II. LITERAUTRE REVIEW 9                 
2.1 Introduction 9                                        
2.2 Definitions of Learning Strategy 9                    
2.2.1 Background on Language Learning Strategy Research 10                    
2.2.2 Classifying Language Learning Strategies 11                        
2.2.3 Research on Good Language Learners 16                       
2.2.4 The Relationship between Good Language Learners and Language Learning Strategies 17              2.3 Factors Affecting Language Learning Strategies Use 18                      
2.3.1 Gender Differences 18                                  
2.3.2 Age 19                                          
2.3.3 Urban versus Rural Area 20                              
2.3.4 Educational and Professional Background of Parents 21                   
2.3.5 Age of First Starting English Language Learning 21                      
2.4 Language Learning Strategies on Taiwanese Elementary Learners 22                           
2.5 Summary of Chapter Two 24                                          
CHAPTER III. METHODOLGY 26                            
3.1 Introduction 26                                          
3.2 The Quantitative Research Tradition 26                                  
3.2.1 The Strengths of the Quantitative Research Tradition 27                          
3.2.2 The Weakness of the Quantitative Research Tradition 27        
3.3 Research Design 28                        
3.3.1 Research Participants 28                                  
3.3.2 Instrumentation 29                                                     
3.4 Research Questions of the Current Study 29                
3.5 The Instrumentation of the Current Study: Oxford’s Strategy Inventory for Language Learning 30        3.5.1 Validity and Reliability of the Instrument 33                          
3.6 Data Collection 34                                         
3.6.1 Data Collection Procedure 34                                  
3.7 Data Analysis Procedure 36                                  
3.8 Summary of Chapter Three 36                                  
CHAPTER IV. DATA ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS 37            
4.1 Results of Research Question One 37                                  
4.1.1 Comparison between the Current Study and Previous Studies 38            
4.2 Results of Research Question Two 39                                  
4.3 Results of Research Question Three 43                                  
4.3.1 Differences in Overall Strategy Use 44                          
4.3.1.1 Gender 44                        
4.3.1.2 Location 45                        
4.3.1.3 Education of Father 45                        
4.3.1.4 Education of Mother 46                       
4.3.1.5 Father’s Occupation 47                         
4.3.1.6 Mother’s Occupation 48                        
4.3.1.7 Age of First Starting Learning English 49            
4.3.2 Differences in the Use of Six Strategy Categories 50                    
4.3.2.1 Gender 51                        
4.3.2.2 Mother’s Education 51                                  
4.3.2.3 Starting Age of Learning English 52                
4.4 Results of Research Question Four 53                                  
4.4.1 Gender 54                                          
4.4.2 Location 55                        
4.4.3 Father’s Education 55                       
4.4.4 Mother’s Education 56                                  
4.4.5 Father’s Occupation 57                                  
4.4.6 Mother’s Occupation 58                                  
4.4.7 Age of Starting Learning English 58                                  
4.5 Summary of Chapter Four 59                                           
CHAPTER V. DISCUSSION, LIMITATIONS AND IMPLICATIONS 62                        
5.1 Discussion 62                                          
5.1.1 The Broad Profile of the Overall Strategy and for Each of the Six Strategy Categories 62           5.1.2 Comparison the Use of Strategy Item 66             
5.1.3 The Impact of the Independent Variables 71                  
5.1.4 Conclusion for the Discussion 72                  
5.2 Limitations of the Study 73                                  
5.2.1 Sampling Limitations 73                                          
5.2.2 Methodological Limitations 74                  
5.3 Implications 74                                          
5.3.1 English as a Foreign Language Educators and Policy Makers 74                   
5.3.2 English as a Foreign Language Learners 75                        
5.3.3 English as a Foreign Language Educators 75                      
5.3.4 For Parents and Caregivers 76                   
5.4 Summary of Chapter Five 76                            
REFERENCES 77                            
Appendix A: Definitions of Learning Strategy 86              
Appendix B: Questionnaire 88                            
Appendix C: The Strategy Inventory for Language Learning, ESL/EFL Version 7.0 (English version, Oxford, 1990) 91 Appendix D: Means of Strategy Items 95                            
Appendix E: Most and Least Used Strategy for Each Category 97              
Appendix F: ANOVA with Location Impacted on Overall and Six SCs 99      
Appendix G: ANOVA with Mother’s Occupation Impacted on Overall and Six SCs 100                       
REFERENCES

Anderson, T. (1960). The Optimum Age for Beginning the Study of Modern Languages. International Review of Education VI.
Bellingham, L. (2000). Language acquisition after 40? Babel, 35(1), 24-38.
Carter, R., & Nunan, D. (2001). The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Chamot, A.U. (2004). Issues in Language Learning Strategy Research and Teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1(1), 14-26.
Chamot, A. U., Barnhart, S., l-Dinary, P.B. & Robbins, J. (1999). The Learning Strategies Handbook. White Plains, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
Chamot, A. U. & Kupper, L. (1989). Learning strategies in foreign language instruction. Foreign Language Annuals, 22, 13-24.
Chang, C. (2010). Language Learning Strategy Profile of English as Foreign Language Learners in Taiwan: A Comparative Case Study. Taipei, Taiwan: Crane Publishing.
Chang, C. (2012). EFL learning strategy use of Taiwanese university EFL learners. Cultivators’ Forum: English Language and Literature, 1, 1-23.
Chang, C. & Liu, H. (2013). Language learning strategy use and language learning motivation of Taiwanese EFL university student. Electronic Journal of Foureign Language Teaching, 10 (2), 196-209.
Chang, C., Liu S. & Lee, Y. (2007). A study of language learning strategies used by college EFL learners in Taiwan. MingDao Journal of General Education, 2, 235-247.
Chen, C. S. (2005). Relationship Between Non-native English Speaking EFL Pre-service Teachers’ English Language Strategies and Believes Toward Teaching Methodologies. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University.
Chang, H. (2005). The Relationship Between Extrinsic/Intrinsic Motivation And Language Learning Strategies Among College Students of English In Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, Ming Chuan University, Taiwan.
Chen, M. (2009). Influence of grade level on perceptual learning style preferences and language learning strategies of Taiwanese English as a foreign language learners. Learning and Individual Differences. Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in Learning and Using a Second Language. Essex, U.K.: Longman.
Chen, T. & Jonas, A., M. (2009). Understanding Taiwanese College Students’ Strategies for English Language Learning. Chaoyang Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 7, 97-130.
Couchman, J. (1997). Making sense: cross-cultural variation in the organization of academic. Academic Communication across Disciplines and Culture, 67-76. Melbourne: Victoria University of Technology.
Cohen, A. D. (2003). The learner’s side of foreign language learning: Where do styles, strategies, and tasks meet? IRAL, 41, 279-291.
Coyle, Y. & Valcarcel, M. (2002). Children’s Learning Strategies In The Primary FL Classroom. CAUCE, 25, 423-458
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications, Incorporated.
Day, R. R. & Bamford, J. (1998). Extensive Reading in the Second Language Classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press.
DeKeyser, R. M. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499-533.
Denscombe, M. (2003). The Good Research Guide: for small-scale social research projects (2nd ed.). NY: Open University Press.
Ehrman, M., & Oxford, R. L. (1988). Effects of sex difference, career choice, and psychological type on adult language learning strategies. The Modern Language Journal, 72, 253-265.
Ehrman, M., & Oxford, R. L. (1989). Effects of sex differences, career choice, and psychological type on adult language learning strategies. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 1-13.
Frankfort-Nachmias, C., & Nachmias, D. (1992). Research methods in the social science (4th ed.). New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Fryer, D. (1991). Qualitative methods in occupational psychology: Reflections upon why they are so useful but so little use. The Occupational Psychologist, 14, 3-6.
Fuller, M. L., & Olsen,G (1998). Home-school relations: Working successfully with parents and families. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Goh, C. C. M., & Foong, K. P. (1997). Chinese ESL students’ learning strategies: A look at frequency, proficiency, and gender. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 39-53.
Green, J., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 261-297.
Griffiths, C. (2004). Language Learning Strategies: Theory and Research. Occasional Paper No. 1.
Griffiths, C. (2003). Patterns of language learning strategy use. System, 31, 367-383. DOI: 10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00048-4.
Hashemi, M. (2012), The impact of gender on language learning strategy of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(2), 280-285.
Hsu, S. C. (2007). English learning strategy use by elementary school students. Nanya Institute of Technology, 27. Retrieved July 15, 2009, from http://web.nanya.edu.tw/acof/acen/Word/Nanya27/960702.pdf
Hsiao, T., & Oxford, R.L. (2002). Comparing Theories of language Learning Strategies: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 86, 368-383
Hsu, Y. J. (2007). Elementary School EFL Students’ Learning Style Preferences and Strategy Use and Their Relationship with the Students’ English Learning Achievement. Unpublished master’s thesis.
Huang, B., & Tsai, C. (2009.) The Influence of English Learning at an Earlier Age on English Scores of the College Entrance Examination. Bulletin on Hungkuang Institute of Technology, 58, 81-89.
Huang, S. (2005). A Comparative Study on English Reading Comprehension of Urban and Rural Junior High School Students. Unpublished master’s thesis, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Kealey, D. J., & Protheroe, D. R. (1996). The effectiveness of cross-cultural training for expatriates: An assessment of the literature on the issue. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20(2), 141-165.
Ku, P. Y. N. (1997). Predictors of strategy choice by EFL students in Taiwan. Paper presented at RELC Seminar, Singapore, April 1997.
Kung, W. C. (2004). An Exploratory Study on Vocabulary Learning Strategies by Taiwanese EFL Elementary School Students. Unpublished master’s theses, National Taipei Teachers College, Taipei.
Lan, R.L. (2005). Language learning Strategies Profiles of EFL Elementary School Students In Taiwan. Unpublished doctoral Dissertation, University of Maryland. USA.
Lan, R., & Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning strategy profiles of elementary school students in Taiwan. IRAL, 41(4), 339-379.
Lee, R. L. & Oxford, R. (2008). Understanding EFL Learners’ Strategy Use and Strategy Awareness. The Asian EFL Journal, 10, 7-32.
Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language, New York.
Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1999). How languages are learned (2nd ed.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lin, H. (2011). A Study on English Learning Strategy Trend of Students at English Departments in National Universities of Technology. Unpublished master’s thesis, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan.
Li, J. & Qin, X. (2006). Language learning Styles and Learning Strategies of Tertiary-Level English Learners in China. RELC Journal, 37, 67-90.
Lu, J. (2011). English Learning Strategy Used by Primary School Students in Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, Chung Cheng University, Chiayi, Taiwan.
Magno, C. (2010). Korean students’ language strategies and year of studying English as predictors of proficiency in English. TESOL Journal, 2, 39-61.
MacIntyre, P. D. (1994). Toward a social psychological model of strategy use. Foreign Language Annals, 27(2), 185-195.
Mochizuki, A. (1999). Language learning strategies used by Japanese university students. RELC Journal, 30(2), 101-113.
Magogwe, J. M. & Oliver, R. (2007). The relationship between language learning strategies, proficiency, age and self-efficacy beliefs: A study of language learners in Botswana. System, 35, 338-352. DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2007.01.003.
Mullins, P. (1992). Successful English Language Learning Strategies of Students Enrolled in the Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, United States International University, San Diego, CA.
Naiman, N., Fröhlich, M., Stern, H. H., & Toedesco, A. (1978). The good language learner. Toronto: Modern Language Center, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE).
O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge, U. K.: Cambridge University Press.
O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Kupper, L., & Russo, R. P. (1985). Learning strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESL students. Language Learning, 35, 21-46.
Oxford, R. L. (1989). Use of language learning strategies: A synthesis of studies with implications for strategy training. System, 17(2), 235-247.

Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. NY: Newbury House Publishers.
Oxford, R. L. (1993). Instructional implications of gender difference in language learning styles and strategies. Applied Language Learning, 4, 65-94.
Oxford, R. L. (1993). Language learning strategies in a nutshell: Update and ESL suggestions. TESOL journal, 2(2), 18-22.
Oxford, R. L. (1999a). Language Learning Strategies in the Context of Autonomy, Synthesis of Findings from the International Invitational Conference on Learning Strategy Research, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Oxford, R. L. (1999b). Relationships between learning strategy use and language proficiency in the context of learner autonomy and self-regulation. In L. Bob (Ed.), Learner Autonomy as a Central Concept of Foreign Language Learning, Special Issue of Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 38, 109-126.
Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning styles and strategies: An overview. GALA, 1-25.
Oxford, R.L. & Burry-Stock, J., A. (1995). Assessing The Use Of Language Learning Strategies Worldwide With The ESL/EFL Version Of The Strategy Inventory For Language Learning (SILL). System, 23, 1-23.
Oxford, R. L., & Ehrman, M. E. (1993). Second language research on individual differences. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 188-205.
Oxford, R. L., & Ehrman, M. E. (1995). Adults’ language learning strategies in an intensive foreign language program in the United States. System, 23, 359-386.
Oxford, R. L., Hollaway, M., & Murillo, D. (1992). Language learning styles: Research and practical considerations for teaching in the multicultural tertiary ESL/EFL classroom. System, 20, 439-456.
Park, G. P. (1997). Language learning strategies and English proficiency in Korean University. Foreign Language Annals, 30(2), 211-221.
Park, S. (2005). Language Learning Strategies and The Relationship of These Strategies to Motivation and English Proficiency Among Korean EFL Students. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Kansas, USA.
Penfield, W. G., & Roberts, L. (1959). Speech and Brain-Mechanisms. Princeton: Princeton University Press; London: Oxford University Press.
Pinter, A. (2006).Verbal evidence of task related strategies: Child versus adult interactions, System, 34(4), 615-630, DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2006.09.005.
Purpura, J. (1997). An analysis of the relationships between test takers’ cognitive and metacognitive strategy use and second language test performance. Language Learning, 42(2), 289-325.
Purpura, J. (1999). Learner characteristics and L2 test performance. In R. L. Oxford (Ed.), Language Learning Strategies in the Context of Autonomy, Synthesis of Findings from the International Invitational Conference on Learning Strategy Research (pp. 61-63), Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Reger, Z. (1990). Mothers' speech in different social groups in Hungary. In G Conti-Ramsden & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Children's language, 7. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
Reid, J. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 21(1), 87-111.
Rigney, J. W. (1978). Learning strategies: A theoretical perspective. In: O’Neal Jr, H. F. (Ed.), Academic Press, New York, 165-205.
Rubin, J. (1975). What the good language learner can teach us? TESOL Quarterly, 9, 41-51.
Rubin, J. (1981). Study of cognitive processes in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 117-131.
Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies: Theoretical assumptions, research history and typology. In Wenden A., & Rubin J. (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning, 15-29. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Sadeghi K. & Attar M. (2013). The relationship between learning strategy use and starting age of learning EFL. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 387-396.
Sheorey, R. (1999). An examination of language learning strategy use in the setting of an indigenized variety of English. System, 27, 173-190.
Shmais, W. A. (2003). Language learning strategy use in Palestine. TESL-EJ, 7(2), 1-17.
Stevick, E. (1989). Success with foreign languages: Seven who achieved it and what worked for them. New York: Prentice Hall International.
Stern, H. H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner? Canadian Modern Language Review, 31, 304-318.
Su, M. H. (2002). An investigation of English language learning strategies of grade 5-6 students in Taipei, Taiwan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Spalding University.
Su, M. H. (2003). An investigation of Taiwan grade 5-6 student’ EFL language learning strategies and language learning experience. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 3 (1).
Tran, T. V. (1988). Sex differences in English language acculturation and learning strategies among Vietnamese adults aged 40 and over in the United States. Sex Roles, 19, 747-758.
Wang, J. (2013). A Study of EFL Learning Strategy Use Profile of University Students in Central Taiwan. Unpublished master’s thesis, Da-Yeh University, Changhua, Taiwan.
Wharton, G. (2000). Language learning strategy use of bilingual foreign language learners in Singapore. Language Learning, 50(2), 203-243.
White, C. (1995) Autonomy and strategy use in distance foreign language learning: Research findings. System, 23, 207-221, DOI: 10.1016/0346-251X(95)00009-9.
Wenden, A. (1987). How to be a successful language learner: Insights and prescriptions from L2 learners. In: Wenden, A., Rubin, J. (Eds.), Learner Strategies in Language Learning, 103-118. Prentice/Hall International, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Yamamori, K., Isoda, T., Hiromori, T., & Oxford, R. L. (2003). Using cluster analysis to uncover L2 learner differences in strategy use, will to learn, and achievement over time. IRAL, 41(4), 381-409.
Yamashita, J. (2004). Reading attitudes in L1 and L2, and their influence on L2 extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 16(1), 1-19.
Yang, M. (2007). Language Learning Strategies for Junior College Students in Taiwan: Investigation Ethnicity and Proficiency. The Asian EFL Journal, 9(2), 34-54.
Yin, C. (2008). Language Learning Strategies In Relation To Attitudes, Motivations, And Learner Beliefs: Investigating Learner Variables In The Context Of English As A Foreign Language In China. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Zeynali, S. (2012). Exploring the gender effect on EFL learners’ learning strategies. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(8), 1614-1620.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 程又強(1995)。談影響校園暴力之家庭因素。學生輔導,37,44-49。
2. 陳麗欣(1992)。國中學生生活方式與校園暴行被害經驗之關係。嘉義師院學報,6,157-194。
3. 陳麗欣(1992)。國中學生生活方式與校園暴行被害經驗之關係。嘉義師院學報,6,157-194。
4. 陳皎眉(1998)。校園的衝突與暴力。學生輔導通訊,57,20-31。
5. 陳皎眉(1998)。校園的衝突與暴力。學生輔導通訊,57,20-31。
6. 陳祖輝(2003)。國中校園被害經驗研究:學生觀點的回顧。學生事務,42(4) ,67-72。
7. 陳祖輝(2003)。國中校園被害經驗研究:學生觀點的回顧。學生事務,42(4) ,67-72。
8. 張保光(1995)。從校園暴力談家庭教育。桃縣文教,2,2-4。
9. 張保光(1995)。從校園暴力談家庭教育。桃縣文教,2,2-4。
10. 高金桂(1995)。暴力行為之法律上的意義及其違法性。學生輔導通訊,37,20-27。
11. 高金桂(1995)。暴力行為之法律上的意義及其違法性。學生輔導通訊,37,20-27。
12. 侯崇文、黃啟賓(2002)。由校園環境探討學生偏差行為之發生與被害經驗。警學叢刊,32(5),145-176。
13. 侯崇文、黃啟賓(2002)。由校園環境探討學生偏差行為之發生與被害經驗。警學叢刊,32(5),145-176。
14. 周愫嫻、侯崇文(2000)。青少年被害影響因素的探討。犯罪學期刊,5,79-106。
15. 周愫嫻、侯崇文(2000)。青少年被害影響因素的探討。犯罪學期刊,5,79-106。