臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

莎士比亞的著名悲劇《哈姆雷特》，描述丹麥王子哈姆雷特經由鬼魂之詞，得知生父遭其叔父殺害後，經由一系列舉動，計畫報殺父之仇。他的目標，與他的父親(的鬼魂)所渴望的相同；鬼魂與哈姆雷特都渴望復仇。在賈克‧拉康(Jacques Lacan)的主體理論中，個體的主體性建立於他者的慾望。與拉康理論中帶有佛洛伊德色彩的解釋不同，哈姆雷特並沒有因戀母，想成為母親慾望對象(也就是他的父親)的替代者；而是遵守父親的法律，殫精竭慮地想實現他父親所渴望的復仇。
另一方面，中國元雜劇名作《趙氏孤兒大報讎》，同樣以父親被殺，兒子為父報仇為主題。東方的復仇劇與西方大有不同：趙氏孤兒在生父被殺後，由養父養育成人，在其養父的計畫下，又認殺害生父的仇人為義父。孤兒必須在三個父親(生父、養父、義父)中間選擇歸屬。做為趙家後代，孤兒在宗法制度與儒家社會中，必須義無反顧為父報仇。趙氏孤兒的主體性同樣建立於他與父親間的關係之上。
父親被殺，意味著個體的主體性遭到迫害；二位主角必須在他們身邊的父子關係中做出選擇，並藉由復仇重建他們的主體性。本論文將以拉康的理論分析二位失去父親的兒子的主體性，並探究兩齣戲劇中，不同的傳統宗教與文化背景對復仇行動的影響。

In Shakespeare’s tragedy Hamlet, the Prince of Denmark not only loses his father, but also his relationships with others whom he used to rely on to establish his identity. Rather than trying to become the substitute of his father, who is the object of Gertrude’s desire in the viewpoint of Jacques Lacan and his previous Freudian scholars’, Hamlet strives to fulfill his father’s desire to revenge.
The theme of the lost father is also seen in Chinese Yuan Dynasty Play The Orphan of Zhao. Having lost his biological father, the orphan of Zhao also loses his identity as the firstborn descendant of the Zhao’s clan. The killer of his biological father and family members later becomes his father in honour. The grown orphan has to figure out which of his three fathers (the biological father, the adoptive father and the godfather) he should pay his filial piety to and whether he should revenge for his biological father.
The revenges in the two plays have their meanings for the two avengers to restore their subjectivity, and contain the cultural and religious significance. This thesis discusses the religious and psychological factors that lead to the different consequences of the two plays based on the notion of ‘revenge’.

Table of Contents

Chapter One. Introduction…… p.1

I. Plots of the Two plays ……p. 1
II. Methodology: The Application of Lacanian Reading……p.7
III. Review of Previous Literature of Two Plays……p.10
IV. Thesis Statement……p.12


Chapter Two. The Philosophical Background in the Two Plays……p.14

I. Hamlet As A Humanist Prince…… p.15
A. The Humanist Traits of the Prince
B. Hamlet’s Interpretation of the Ghost
C. The Delay

II. Confucianism and Patriarchal Religion in Ancient China…… p. 22
A. The Confucian Gentlemen
B. Patriarchal Religion and the Filial Piety
C. The Delay

III. Chapter Conclusion…… p. 30


Chapter Three. The Kinship and the Subjectivity…… p. 31

I. The Mother’s Issue…… p. 35
A. Gertrude’s Relationship with Hamlet
B. the Absence of Zhao Wu’s Mother

II. The Father Characters: A Lacanian Reading…… p. 39
A. Hamlet’s Model and Foe
B. Zhao Wu’s Three Fathers

III. Self- Realisation and Identity Transformation: Subjectivity Lost And Found…… p. 45
A. Hamlet’s “Failed” Revenge
B. Zhao Wu’s Moral Responsibility

IV. Chapter Conclusion…… p.56


Chapter Four. Conclusion…… p.60

I. The True Meaning of Revenge……p. 60
II. The Similarity and Difference between Prince Hamlet and The Orphan of Zhao ......p.64

Aoki, Masaru. The Complete Collection of Masaru Aoki. Vol,4. Tokyo: Shunjusha. 2007. Print.

Bradley, A.C. “from Shakespearean Tragedy, 1904” Hamlet: Enter Critic. Eds, Sacks, Clair; Whan, Edgar. New York: Appleton. 1960. Print.

Battenhouse, Roy W. “The Ghost in Hamlet: A Catholic ‘Linchpin’? ”Studies in Philology 48. 2(1951): 161-192. Web. Accessed: 7, July, 2016.

Calderón, Norman Marín. “A Lacanian Reading of Hamlet: The Mourning Subject of Desire,” Revista de Lenguas Modernas, N° 22, 2015. 25-34. Web. Accessed: 14, December, 2016.

Carroll, Clare. “Humanism and English Literature in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries,” The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Humanism, ed. Jill Kraye. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1996. Print. 246-268.

Chen, Xiyong, 陳錫勇. Zongfa Tienming Yu Chunchiu Sixian Chu Tan宗法天命與春秋思想初探(Preliminary Study on the Patriarchal Religion and the Philosophy in the Spring and Autumn Era). Taipei: Wen Jin文津, 1992. Print

Chen,Shihchuan, 程石泉. The Confucian Analects: A New Translation of The Corrected Text of Lun Yü. Taipei: Li Ming黎明, 1985. Print.

Dillenberger, John; Welch, Claude. Protestant Christianity: Interpreted Through Its Development. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1955. Print

Dong, Zong Shu (Han Dynasty)(漢)董仲舒. Chunqiu Fanlu春秋繁露 (The Explanation and Notes of The Record of Chun Qiu), ed. Zong Zhao Peng鍾肇鵬. Hebei: Hebei People’s Publication河北人民出版社. 2005. Print.

Doubt, Keith. "Hamlet and Friendship," Hamlet Studies: An International Journal of Research on the Tragedie of Hamlet, Prince of Denmarke, vol. 17, no. 1-2, 1995, pp. 54-62. Web. Accessed: 31, October, 2016.
Du, Cheng杜鋮.“Cong Lacan Zhu Ti Li Lun Jiao Du Fen Xi Hamlet Fu Chou Xing Dong Zhong De Yeng Dang Wen Ti從拉康主體理論角度分析哈姆雷特復仇行動中的延宕問題(Analysis on Hamlet’s Delay in His Revenge with Jacques Lacan’s Theory of Subjectivity)” Theory Research Magazine文學理論雜誌 . No. 27, 2009. 252-253. Web. Accessed: 20. June. 2016.

Du, Sheng Fong杜聲鋒. Lacan Jiegou Zhuyi Jingshen Fenxi xue拉康結構主義
精神分析學 (Jacques Lacan’s Psychoanalysis with Structuralism). Taipei:
Yuan-Liu.遠流. 1996. Print.

Eliot, T. S. “Hamlet and His Problems,” Hamlet: Enter Critic. Eds, Sacks, Clair; Whan, Edgar. New York: Appleton Century Crofts, Inc. 1960. Print.

Engle, Lars. "How Is Horatio Just? How Just Is Horatio?" Shakespeare Quarterly 62.2 (2011): 256-262. Web. Accessed: 14 May. 2016.

Evans, Martin. “Shakespeare, Hamlet,” The Literature of Crisis, Stanford University Open Courses. 2007. iTunes. Accessed: 10, December, 2016.

Gardner, Helen. “Hamlet and The Tragedy of Revenge,” Shakespeare Modern Essays in Criticism. Ed. Dean, Leonard E. New York: Oxford University Press. 1980. Print. 218-226.

Geckle, George L. Rev. of Hamlet as Minister and Scourge, by Fredson Bowers. South Atlantic Review 56.1 (1991): 100-103.

Greenblatt, Stephen. Hamlet in Purgatory, Princeton: Princeton University Press. 2013. Print.

Groves, Beatrice. Texts and Traditions: Religion in Shakespeare, 1592-1604. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2007. Print.

Glowinski, Huguette. Zita Marks, Sara Murphy, eds. A Compendium of Lacanian Terms. London: Free Association Books, 2001. Print.

Hamilton, Alastair. “Humanists and Bible”, The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Humanism, ed. Jill Kraye. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1996. Print. 100-117.
Heilbrun, Carolyn. "The Character of Hamlet's Mother." Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 8, no. 2, 1957, pp. 201-206. Web. Accessed: 29, August, 2016.

Hughes, Geoffrey. "The Tragedy of a Revenger's Loss of Conscience: A Study of Hamlet." English Studies: 57 (1976). 395-409. Web. Accessed: 8, June, 2016.

Huang, Kan(Liang Dynasty)(梁)皇侃. Lunyü Yishu論語義疏(The Detailed Explanation of the Confucian Analect). Proofreading, Gao Shang Ju高尚榘. Beijing: Zhong Hua中華書局. 2013. Print.

Jackson, Ken; Marotti, Arthur F. ”Introduction,” Shakespeare And Religion: Early Modern and Postmodern Perspectives. Ed. Jackson, Ken; Marotti, Arthur F. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press. 2011. Print.

Ji, Junxiang紀君祥. Zhaoshi Gu’er趙氏孤兒(The Orphan of Zhao) in Yuanqu Xuan元曲選(Anthology of Yuan Dynasty Plays), Vol.4,. ed. Zang, Jinshu臧晉叔, Ming Dynasty. Vol. 4. Beijing: Zhong Hua中華書局. 1989. Print. 1476- 1498.

Lacan, Jacques. "Desire and the Interpretation of Desire in Hamlet," Yale French Studies, Nos. 55/56. 1979. 11-52. Web. Accessed: 26. December. 2015.
－Écrit: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Routledge Publication. 1977. Print.
－ “Le Séminaire: Hamlet”in Ornicar? n。24 (Paris, 1981). Print. 7-31.
－The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book I. Freud’s Papers on Technique, 1953-1954. Trans. Sylvana Tomaselli; ed. Jacuqes-Alain Miller. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1988. Print.
－ The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book II. The Ego in Freud’s Theory and in the Techniques of Psychoanalysis, 1954-1955. Trans. Sylvana Tomaselli; ed. Jacuqes-Alain Miller. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1988. Print.
－ Language of the Self (A. Wilden Trans). NewYork: Detla. 1968. Print.

Li, Jixiang李紀祥. “Zhaoshi Gu’er De Shi Yu Ju: Wen Shu Yu Yan Shu趙氏孤兒的史與劇：文述與演述The History and Drama of The Orphan of Zhao: Presentation in Literacy and Performance,” Sinology Studies漢學研究, 18:1. 209-236. June, 2000. Web. Accessed: 15, May, 2015.



Liu, Guang Ming 劉廣明, Zongfa Zhonguo宗法中國－中國宗法社會的定型、完型和發展動力 (China and the Patriarchal Religion: The Construction, Formation and Evolution Force of Chinese Patriarchal Society). Nanjing: Nanjing University Press南京大學出版社, 2011. Print.

Luo, Jing-Tang 羅錦堂. Yuan Zaju Benshi Kao 元雜劇本事考 (The Origin of Yuan Dynasty Drama), Taipei: ShunXian順先出版公司, 1976. Print.

Mack, Maynard. “The World of Hamlet,” Shakespeare Modern Essays in Criticism, ed. Leonard E. Dean. New York: Oxford University Press, 1980. Print. 242-262.

Muller, John P. “Psychosis and Mourning in Lacan’s Hamlet,” New Literary History, Vol. 12, No. 1, Psychology and Literature: Some Contemporary Directions (Autumn, 1980), 147-165. Web. Accessed: 26, March, 2017.

Planinc, Zdravko. "'It Begins with Pyrrhus' (2.2.451): The Political Philosophy of Hamlet," Hamlet Studies: An International Journal of Research on the Tragedie of Hamlet, Prince of Denmarke, vol. 20, no. 1-2, 1998, pp. 35-49. Web. Accessed: 26, March, 2017.

Pollnitz, Aysha.” Educating Hamlet and Prince Hal,” Shakespeare and Early Modern Political Thought, eds. David Armitage, Conal Condren and Andrew FiztMaurice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2009. 119-138. Web. Accessed: 26, March, 2017.

Prosser, Eleanor. Hamlet And Revenge. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1967. Print.

Rabaté, Jean- Michel. Jacques Lacan. New York: Palgrave. 2001. Print.

Rea, John D. “Hamlet and the Ghost Again,” The English Journal 18. 3(1929): 207-213.

Sarup, M. Jacques Lacan. New York: Harvester Wheastsheaf. 1992. Print.

Shakespeare, William. “The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark,” Norton Shakespeare, eds. Stephen Greenblatt; Cohen. New York: W.W Norton, 1986, 1997. Print. 1659-2090.
The Book of Songs詩經. Taipei: Zhi Young智揚, 1991. Print.

Tkacz, Catherine Brown, “The Wheel of Fortune, the Wheel of State, and Moral Choice in Hamlet,” South Atlantic Review, Vol. 57, No. 4 (Nov., 1992). 21-38. Web. 31, October, 2016.

Wallenfels, Immy. "Gertrude as a Character of Intersection in Hamlet," Journal of the Wooden O Symposium, vol. 6, 2006, pp. 90-99. Web. Accessed: 28, May, 2016.

Wang, Guo-Fang王國芳, Kuo, Ben-Yu郭本禹. Lacan拉岡. Taipei: Sheng Zhi,生智, 1997. Print.

Wang, Guowei王國維. Xiqu Lunwen Ji:Song Yuan Xiqu Kao Ji Qita宋元戲曲考及其他 (Essays on Drama: Song and Yuan Dynasty Drama and Others). Taipei: Li-Ren里仁. 2000. Print.

Wei, Zheng Tong韋政通. Zhong Guo Si Xiang Shi中國思想史 (The History of Chinese Philosophy). Taipei: Dalin大林. 1979. Print.

Xiao Jing Yi Zhu孝經譯注(The Classic of Piety With Annotation and Modern Translation),ed. Wang Shoukuan汪受寬, Shanghai: Guji上海古籍. 2004. Print.

Xu, Fuming徐扶明. “Shijie Da Beiju Zhaoshi Gu’er 世界大悲劇《趙氏孤兒》(The World’s Great Tragedy, The Orphan of Zhao)” Mingjia Lun Mingju名家論名劇(Famous Scholars On Famous Plays,) ed. Chang, Dan-Chi常丹琦. Beijing: The Capital Teachers’ University Press首都師范大學出版社, 1994. Print. 68-80.

Xu, Wen 徐雯, “The Comparison of Revanchist Way Between Hamlet And The Orphan of Chao” Journal of HuBei TV University湖北廣播電視大學學報, Vol.27, No.10, October. 2007. 73-74. Web. Accessed: 16. November. 2016.

Ye, Guanghui 葉光輝. “Xiao Dao Gai Nien De Xin Li Xue Tan Tao孝道概念的心理學探討 (the Psychological Study Of Filial Piety)” The Local Magazine Of Psychology Study本土心理學研究 9:53- 117. 1998. 53-117. Web. Accessed: 31, March, 2016.

Zhang, Zhejun張哲俊. “Beiju Xingshi: Zhaoshi Gu’er Yuan Ming Kan Ben De Bijiao悲劇型式：《趙氏孤兒》元明刊本的比較 The Form of Tragedy: A Comparison of the Differences Between the Yuan Dynasty Edition And The Ming Dynasty Edition of The Orphan of Zhao,” Literature Legacy文學遺產 2002:2. 74-85. Web. Accessed: 22, May,2016.

Zeng, Zhaoxu曾昭旭. “Gurou Xiaqqin Zhiye Xiangcheng: Xiao Dao Guang Nien De Fazhan骨肉相親，志業相承－孝道觀念的發展The Bound of Blood and the Passing of the Will: Conceptial Development of Filial Piety” Tiendao Yu Rendao《天道與人道》The Way of Heaven and The Way of Men, eds, Liu, Dai; Huang and Jun-Jie. Taipei: Linking 聯經, 1982, 1989. Print. 209-242.

Zheng, Chien 鄭騫. Jingwu Congbian《景午叢編》(Essays Collection of Jingwu). Vol, 1. Taipei: Zhong Hua中華書局, 1972. 2016. Print

Zheng, Xuan (Han Dynasty) (漢)鄭玄. Annotated, Kong, Ying-Da(唐)孔穎達, ed. Li, Xueqin李學勤. LiJi ZhengYi: QuLi禮記正義:曲禮 (The Equitable Annotation of The Classic of Rites: Ceremonial Rites). Taipei: Taiwan Guji台灣古籍. 2001. Print.