臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本研究以「生物演化」為主題，設計一套名為「虛擬四十六億年（Virtual Age）」的數位遊戲，提供學習者透過模擬不同的生物角色來學習演化概念。因此，本研究的主旨在探討數位遊戲式學習對於學生學習生物演化概念、沉浸經驗與學習動機的影響。同時，本研究也設計一套與「虛擬四十六億年」相同學習內容的動畫，以瞭解兩種學習模式（遊戲式學習與動畫式學習）對學習上的影響。並且探討學習者的沉浸經驗與學習動機的相關性。
本研究採用準實驗設計法，以七年級的四個班級學生作為研究對象，學生人數共145人，隨機分為兩組學習模式：實驗組採用數位遊戲進行科學學習，對照組則採用動畫進行科學學習。實驗組共進行四節課的數位遊戲學習（每節課一小時），在每次遊戲結束後，馬上實行沉浸經驗感受問卷以及學習動機問卷的後測，並分別在第一次及第四次遊戲之後，施行成就測驗；對照組則進行一節課的數位動畫活動，結束後實行所有測驗的後測。
研究結果顯示，兩種數位學習模式在演化概念測驗與演化概念整合型問卷的學習成績上，並無顯著的差異，但實驗組在生物演化概念測驗的立即學習效應與維持有達到顯著，對照組則無；而兩組在演化概念整合型問卷的立即學習效應與維持均達到顯著。針對實驗組學生分析結果，在演化概念學習成效上，顯示高成就組學生在演化概念的學習與理解上顯著優於中、低成就組，且中成就組顯著優於低成就組。在遊戲得分的分析上，高成就組學生在第四次的遊戲得分顯著優於中、低成就組。另外，在遊戲各變項的分析上，結果顯示學習者能藉由遊戲中所提供的資訊來選擇適當的生物角色，中生代關卡以爬蟲類為主、新生代關卡以哺乳類與鳥類為主，以達成遊戲所設定的目標；且研究發現使用生物角色之個數與遊戲回合數可以預測遊戲得分。在沉浸經驗的分析結果，發現學習者在完全沉浸分量上，自前測之後的每一次後測（後測1、2、3、4）有進步的趨勢。在學習動機的分析結果，發現學習者在期望成功向度上，後測3高於後測1，後測4高於後測2，後測4高於後測1。此外，逐步回歸分析的結果，顯示學習動機的內在目標導向與興趣，可以預測沉浸經驗的投入、全神貫注與完全沉浸。

This study develops a Virtual Age game based learning involving the content of evolution. The virtual age game provided students’ opportunity to learn the evolution through simulated different roles. In addition, the same content of evolution virtual age game learning was modified to an animation. One of the aims of this study was to explore the effects of game-based learning on students’ learning of evolution concepts, immersion experience and motivation. In addition, it also to investigate the effectiveness between two different learning approaches (game-based learning vs. animation learning). Moreover, the relationships between learners’ immersion experience and their motivation was examined.
To test the above presented idea, a quasi-experimental design was used in this study. A total of 145 7th grade students from four classes participated in this study and they were randomly assigned into two different groups which are game-based learning group (experimental group) and animation learning group (control group). Experimental group students received four different times of learning opportunities (each take an hour), and the evolution achievement test, immersion experience and motivation questionnaires were administered after each time of learning. Unlike the experimental group, students in the control group only receive one time learning of the animation following by taken the evolution achievement test, immersion experience and motivation questionnaires.
The results showed there was no statistically significant difference in students’ evolution conceptual understanding performance and evolution synthesis level performance between two learning approaches. However, the experimental students made better immediate and retaining performance on both assessments than to the control group. Within the experimental group, high achievers significantly outperformed than to the medium and low achievers, and medium achievers outperformed than to the low achievers on their evolution conceptual understanding performance. High achievers also significantly outperformed than to the medium and low achievers on their game scores after their fourth time of learning. For the immersion experience, it was found that students made progress on their total immersion pretest to post test and from posttest to their 4th posttest. For their motivation, it was found that students made progress on their success expectation scale 3rd posttest to 1st posttest, 4th posttest to 2nd posttest, and 4th posttest to 1st posttest. Moreover, the stepwise regression result indicated that intrinsic goal orientation and interest of motivation can predict their engagement, engrossment, and total immersion.

中文摘要 I
英文摘要 III
誌 謝 V
目 錄 VII
表 目 錄 X
圖 目 錄 XI
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 研究問題與假設 3
第四節 名詞釋義 4
第五節 研究範圍與限制 5
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 數位遊戲式學習 7
第二節 沉浸經驗 12
第三節 生物演化概念 17
第三章 研究方法 21
第一節 研究對象 21
第二節 研究設計 22
第三節 研究流程 24
第四節 研究工具設計 25
第五節 資料蒐集與分析 33
第四章 研究結果與討論 37
第一節 生物演化概念學習成效分析 37
第二節 生物演化概念質性資料分析 38
第三節 數位遊戲式學習歷程分析 40
第四節 遊戲資料庫之質性資料分析 55
第五章 結論與建議 63
第一節 結論 63
第二節 建議 66
參考文獻 69
附錄一 演化概念測驗卷 73
附錄二 生物演化概念整合型問卷 78
附錄三 沉浸經驗感受問卷 80
附錄四 學習動機問卷 82
附錄五 數位遊戲式學習教材內容與畫面 83
附錄六 天災事件之詳細說明 85
附錄七 對照組動畫內容及畫面 87
附錄八 生物演化概念整合型問卷評分編碼表 94

吳靜吉、程炳林（1992）。激勵的學習策略量表之修訂。測驗年刊（Psychological Testing），39，59-78。
吳靜吉、程炳林（1993）。國民中小學生學習動機、學習策略與學業成績之相關研究。國立政治大學學報，(66)，13-39。
林佳儀（2008）。5E學習環教學模式對國一學生學習演化單元概念影響之研究。國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
洪榮昭、劉明洲（民71）。電腦輔助教學之設計原理與應用。台北：師大書苑。
財團法人台灣網路資訊中心（2010年3月30日）。2010年台灣寬頻網路使用調查報告出爐[新聞發佈]。台北市：交通部。2012年5月1日，取自http://www.twnic.net.tw/NEWS4/103.pdf
張竣凱、王姿文、田乃月、高毓瑩、羅怡珮（譯）（民97）。生物學：A brief guide to biology with physiology（原作者：Krogh, D.）。台北縣：學銘圖書。（原著出版年：2006）
盧秀琴（2007）。「生物演化」的繪本電子書編製與教學研究。2007年臺灣教育學術研討會論文集（編號：2007-03-07, 頁227-252）。市立台北教育大學。
顧錦濤（2001）。國小學童生物演化概念學習之研究--融入學習角學習策略。國立屏東師範學院數理教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
Anderson, D. L., K. M. Fisher, &; Norman, G. J. (2002). Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 952-978. doi:10.1002/tea.10053
Annetta, L. A., Mangrum, J., Holmes, S., Collazo, K., &; Cheng, M. T. (2009). Bridging reality to virtual reality: Investigating gender effects and students engagement on learning through video game play in an elementary school classroom. International Jornal of Science Education., 31(8), 1091-1113. doi:10.1080/09500690801968656
Bishop, B. A., &; Anderson, C. W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(5), 415-427. doi:10.1002/tea.3660270503
Brown, E., and Cairns, P. (2004). A Grounded Investigation of Game Immersion. CHI‘04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors and Computing Systems (Vienna, April 2004), ACM Press, pp. 1297-1300. doi:10.1145/985921.986048
Brumby, M. N. (1984). Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students. Science Education, 68(4), 493-503. doi:10.1002/sce.3730680412
Campbell, N., Mitchel, L., &; Reece, J. (2000). Biology, Concepts and Connections. Pearson Benjamin Cummings, San Francisco, USA.
Chen, H., Wigand, R. T., &; Nilan, M. S. (1999). Optimal experience of Web activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(5), 585-608. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(99)00038-2
Cheng, M. T. (2009). Middle school students’ learning of the impact of methamphetamine abuse on the brain through serious game play. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
Cheng, M. T., She, H. C., &; Annetta, L. A. (submitted). Development and validation of an inventory to measure game play experience: Game Immersion Questionnaire (GIQ). Cyberpsychology &; Behavior.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper-Perennial.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., &; Csikszentmihalyi, I. (1988). Introduction to part IV. In M. Csikszentmihalyi, &; I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., &; LeFevre, J. (1989). Optimal experience in work and leisure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 815-822. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.815
Dickey, M. D. (2005). Three‐dimensional virtual worlds and distance learning: two case studies of Active Worlds as a medium for distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 439-451. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00477.x
Ermi, L., &; Mäyrä, F. (2005). Fundamental components of the gameplay experience: Analysing immersion. In S. de Castell &; J. Jenson (Eds.), Proceedings of DiGRA 2005 Conference: Changing Views-Worlds in Play (pp. 15-27).
Federation of American Scientists.（2006）. Summit on educational games 2006: Harnessing the power of video games for learning. Available from http://www.fas.org/gamesummit/Resources/Summit%20on%20Educational%20Games.pdf
Ferrari, M., &; M. T. H. Chi (1998). The nature of naive explanations of natural selection. International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1231-1256. doi:10.1080/0950069980201005
Garris, R., Ahlers, R., &; Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation and Gaming, 33(4), 441-467. doi:10.1177/1046878102238607
Gee, J. P. (2003). What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy? ACM Computers in Entertainment, 1(1), 1-4. doi:10.1145/950566.950595
Gee, J. P. (2004). Learning by design: Game as learning machines. Interactive Educational Multimedia, 8, 15-23.
Gee, J. P. (2005). Why video games are good for your soul: Pleasure and learning, Common Ground.
Gee, J. P. (2008). Good videogames, the human mind, and good learning. In T. Willoughby &; E. Wood (Eds.), Children's learning in a digital world (pp. 40-63). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Gudmundsen, J. (2006). Movement aims to get serious about games. Retrieved August 2, 2008, from http://www.usatoday.com/tech/gaming/2006-05-19-serious-games_x.htm
Hogle, J. G. (1996). Considering games as cognitive tools: In search of effective 'Edutainment', University of Georgia. Retrieved July 11, 2012, from http://twinpinefarm.com/pdfs/games.pdf
Hsiao, H. C. (2007). A brief review of digital games and learning, IEEE. International Workshop on Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning (IEEE DIGITEL 2007), 124-129. doi:10.1109/DIGITEL.2007.3
Jennett, C., Cox, A. L., Cairns, P., Dhoparee, S., Epps, A., Tijs, T., Walton, A. (2008). Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(9), 641-661. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.04.004
Jensen, M. S., &; Finley, F. N. (1995). Teaching evolution using historical arguments in a conceptual change strategy. Science Education, 79(2), 147-166. doi:10.1002/sce.373079020
Jensen, M. S., &; Finley, F. N. (1996). Changes in students' understanding of evolution resulting from different curricular and instructional strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 879-900. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199610)33:8<879::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-T3
Kiili, K. (2005a). Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(1), 13-24. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.12.001
Kiili, K. (2005b). Educational game design: Experiential gaming model revised. Tampere University of Technology. Pori. Research report 4. Retrieved May 18, 2012, from http://amc.pori.tut.fi/publications/EducationalGameDesign.pdf
Kiili, K. (2006). Towards a participatory multimedia learning model. Education and Information Technologies, 11(1), 21-32. doi:10.1007/s10639-005-5711-7
Kirriemuir, J., &; McFarlane, A. (2004). Literature review in games and learning. Retrieved from http://telearn.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/19/04/53/PDF/kirriemuir-j-2004-r8.pdf
Lawson, A. E. (2004). What kinds of concepts exist? Paper presented at Workshop on Enhancing Scientific Reasoning for better Science Teaching, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
Lawson, A.E., Abraham, M.R., &; Renner, J.W. (1989). A Theory of Instruction: Using the Learning Cycle to Teach Science Concepts and Thinking Skills. NARST,1. Retrieved July 10, 2012, from http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED324204.pdf
Lawson, A. E., Alkhoury, S., Benford, R., Clark, B. R., &; Falconer, K. A. (2000). What kinds of scientific concepts exist? Concept construction and intellectual development in college biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 9, 996–1018. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<996::AID-TEA8>3.0.CO;2-J
Malone, T. W. (1981). What makes computer games fun? Byte, 6(12), 258-277.
Malone, T. W. &; M. R. Lepper (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. Aptitude learning and instruction, 3(3), 223-253.
Mayr, E. (2001). What evolution is. New York. Basic Books.
NAS. (1998). Teaching about Evolution and the Nature of Science. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press, 1998. p 61. Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com/lib/nctu/Doc?
Oblinger, D. G. (2004). The next generation of educational engagement. Journal of interactive media in education, 2004(1).
Oblinger, D. G. (2006). Games and Learning: Digital games have the potential to bring play back to the learning experience. EDUCASE Quarterly, 29(3), 5-7.
Passmore, C. &; Stewart, J. (2002). A modeling approach to teaching evolutionary biology in high schools*. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 185-204. doi:10.1002/tea.10020
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., &; McKeachie, W. J. (1989). A Manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Mich: National center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning (NCRIPTAL), School of Education, The University Michigan.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.