臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

論文摘要
本研究的目的是在探討為什麼中國人會時常用親屬稱謂來稱呼沒有親屬關係的人，並且調查這些親屬稱謂在台灣的使用情形。有四百一十九位在大台北地區就讀的學生參與這研究，他們可區分為四個年齡組，分別為10-11、12-15、16-18和20-30。資料的收集方式為問卷調查，本問卷的設計是針對不同年齡層與性別的人，調查他們在不同的情況下會使用何種稱呼語。本問卷的內容可區分為兩個範圍：家中以及公共場所。這兩個範圍共包含了十二種情況，受試者被要求選擇他們覺得適合的答案。結果顯示不同的年齡與性別在使用稱呼語上會有所差異。一般來說，在同學家中，大部分的受試者看到年長的人，都會以親屬稱謂來稱呼對方。在公共場所，對於陌生的長者，大部分年紀小的受試者仍會用親屬稱謂稱呼對方，到了第二個年齡組(約12-15歲)，受試者漸漸用社會頭銜(如：先生、小姐)來取代親屬稱謂的使用。因此，我們可以得知隨著年齡的增長，親屬稱謂的使用會減少。此外，相較於男性，女性似乎使用較多親切些的親屬稱謂。最後，本研究也討論到親屬稱謂以稱呼非親屬關係著的改變，這結果會反應在現今的社會現象上。

ABSTRACT
The aim of this study is to investigate why Chinese often use kinship terms as address forms for non-kins, and how they are used in Taiwan. This study is carried out on 419 Chinese students in Taipei. They are divided into four age groups--10-11, 12-15, 16-18 and 20-30. The data are collected by questionnaires. The questionnaire is designed for different sexes and ages to choose which address forms they would use in different situations. The content of the questionnaire is divided into two domains: home and public domains. These two domains include twelve situations. The subjects are asked to select an appropriate selection they can think of to address their listeners in each situation. The results show that the differences are significant. It means different sexes and ages will affect the use of address forms. Generally speaking, in the home domain, most subjects use kinship terms to the elders. In the public domain, kinship terms are not the dominant address forms for the elder strangers. Most young subjects still use kinship terms to call elder strangers. However, our subjects in age groupⅡ(about ages 12-15) gradually use social titles to replace kinship terms. Hence, we can see that the use of kinship terms will decrease with one''s age increase. Besides, females use more intimate kinship terms than males do. At last, this study also discusses the change of the use of kinship terms for non-kins. The results reflect the changing society.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHINESE ABSTRACT..............................................i
ENGLISH ASTRACT..............................................ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT.............................................iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS............................................iv
LIST OF FIGURES..............................................vi
LIST OF TABLES..............................................vii
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
1.1 Motivation and Purpose..................................1
1.2 The Definition of Address Forms and Classification of Kinship Terms as Address Forms for Non-kins.............2
1.3 Review of Related Literature............................3
1.4 Objectives..............................................5
1.5 Methodology.............................................5
1.5.1 Subjects...........................................5
1.5.2 Materials..........................................6
1.5.3 Procedures.........................................7
1.5.4 Data Analysis......................................8
1.6 The Organization of the Thesis..........................8
Notes to Chapter One........................................9
CHAPTER TWO: SOCIAL BACKGROUND AND CULTURE VALUES
2.1 Social Structure.......................................10
2.2 Family Relationships Within the family.................14
2.2.1 Father and Son/Daughter/..........................15
2.2.2 Mother and Son/Daughter...........................16
2.2.3 Brothers and Sisters..............................17
2.2.4 Grandparents and Grandchildren....................17
2.2.5 Relations in the Joint Family.....................18
2.3 Culture Values.........................................19
2.3.1 Intimacy..........................................20
2.3.2 Age...............................................21
2.3.3 Status............................................22
2.3.4 Deference and Modesty.............................23
2.3.5 Formality.........................................24
Notes to Chapter Two.......................................26
CHAPTER THREE: DATA ANALYSIS.................................27
Note to Chapter Three......................................74
CHAPTER FOUR: DISCUSSIONS
4.1 The General Pattern of the Use of Kinship Terms for Non-kins...............................................75
4.2 The Factors Affecting the Use of Kinship Terms for Non-kins...............................................77
4.2.1 Sex Factor........................................77
4.2.2 Age Factor........................................78
4.3 The Change of the Use of Kinship Terms.................80
4.3.1 The Old Usage.....................................81
4.3.2 The New Usage.....................................83
Notes to Chapter Four......................................86
CHAPTER FIVE: CONCLUSIONS
5.1 Conclusion.............................................87
5.2 Contributions..........................................90
5.3 Suggestions for Further Studies........................90
APPENDIX.....................................................92
BIBLIOGRAPHY.................................................99

BIBLIOGRAPHY
Baker, Hugh D. R. 1979. Chinese Family and Kinship. Taipei: Southern Materials Center, Inc.
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, R. & Ford, M. 1964. "Address in American English", in Dell Hymes, ed. Language in Culture and Society, pp. 234-244. New York: Harper & Row.
Cai,Wen-Hui (蔡文輝)。1981. 社會學與中國研究。台北:三民書局。
Cai,Wen-Hui (蔡文輝)。1982. 社會變遷。 台北:三民書局。
Chaika, Elaine. 1982. Language: The Social Mirror. Rowley: Newbury House.
Chao, Paul. 1983. Chinese Kinship. Boston: Kegan Paul International.
Chao, Yuen-Ren. 1956. "Chinese Terms of Address", Language, 32, 1: 217-241.
Chen, Li-Fu. 1987. "The Thought of Confucius and Mencius: As Truth to Mankind", in Kao Ming, ed. Confucianism and Chinese Culture, pp. 78-93. Taipei: National Institute for Compilation and Translation.
Coser, R. L. 1960. "Laughter Among Colleagues", Psychiatry, 23: 81-95.
Coulanges, Fustel De. 1990. 希臘羅馬古代社會研究。李玄伯譯。上 海：上海文藝出版社。
Dil, Anwar S., ed. 1978. Language, Culture and History. California: Stanford University Press.
Ervin-Tripp, S. 1969. "Sociolinguistic Rules of Address", in Pride & Holmes, eds. Sociolinguistics (1972), pp. 225-241. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Ltd.
Fang, Hanquan & J. H. Heng. 1983. "Social Changes and Changing Address Norms in China", Language in Society, 12:495-507.
Fasold, Ralph. 1990. Socioliguistics of Language. Oxford: Blackwell.
Freedman, Maurice, ed. 1970. Family and Kinship in Chinese Society. California: Stanford University Press.
Gilley, H. M. & Summer, C. S. 1970. "Sex Differences in the Use of Hostile Verbs", Journal of Psychology, 76: 33-37.
Goodenough, W. H. 1957. "Cultural Anthropology and Linguistics", in P. L. Garvin ed. Report of the Seven Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Study. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Gu, Yueguo. 1990. "Politeness Phenomena in Modern Chinese", Journal of Pragmatics, 14: 237-257.
Hsu, Francis L. K. 1967. Under the Ancestors'' Shadow: Kinship,
Personality and Social Mobility in China. 2nd edition. California:Stanford Universal Press.
Hua, Chung-Lin. 1987. "Confucianists and the Chinese Scholar", in Kao Ming, ed. Confucianism and Chinese Culture, pp. 126-134. Taipei: National Institute for Compilation and Translation.
Jin,Yao-Ji (金耀基)。1993. 中國社會與文化。香港:牛津大學出
版社。
Kung, Fang-Yun. 1977. Language in Social Strata: A Sociolinguistics Study of Chinese Pronominal Usage.
M. A.thesis, Fu Jen Catholic University.
Lakoff, Robin. 1975. Language and Women''s Place. New York: Harper and Row.
Landar, Herbert. 1966. Language and Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lang, Olga. 1946. Chinese Family and Society. Taipei: Southern Materials
Cetner, Inc.
Lee-Wong, Song-Mei. 1994. "Address Forms in Modern China: Changing Ideologies and Shifting Semantics", Linguistics, 32: 299-324.
Liang, Su-Ming (梁漱溟)。1988. 中國文化要義。台北:五南圖書公司 。
Lii-Shih, Yu-hwei E. 1986. Conversational Politeness and Foreign Language Teaching. Taipei: the Crane Publishing Co., Ltd.
Lin, Mei-Rong (林美容)。1990. 漢語親屬稱謂的結構分析。台北: 稻 香出版社。
Scotton, Carol Myers and Zhu Wanjin. 1983. "Tongzhi in China: Language Change and Its Conversational Consequences", Language in Society, 12: 477-497.
Selman, R. L. 1980. The Growth of Interpersonal Understanding :
Developmental and Clinical Analyses. New York: Academic
Press.
Singer, Dorothy. G. & Tracey A. Revenson. 1978. A Piaget Primer: How a Child Thinks. New York: Penguin Books, Ltd.
Sun, Long-Ji (孫隆基)。1990. 中國文化的深層結構。台北:唐山出版 社。
Tannen, Deborah. 1990. You Just Don''t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: Morrow.
Wardhaugh, Ronald. 1992. An Introduction to Socioliguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wen, Chong-Yi (文崇一)。1988. "從價值取向談中國國民性"，中國人 的性格、李亦園、楊國樞編。台北:桂冠圖書公司。
Yang, C. K. 1959. The Chinese Family in the Communist Revolution. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Yum, June Ock. 1991. "The Impact of Confucianism on Interpersonal Relationships and Communication Patterns in East Asia" in Samovar, Larry A. and Richard E. Porter, ed. Intercultural Communication. 6th edition. California: Wadsworth PublishingCompany, Inc.
WEBIBLIOGRAPHY
Xing-Zheng-Yuan Zhu-Ji-Chu (行政院主計處)。(Dec. 12, 1994) "婦 女婚育與就業調查"，Jan. 30, 1997 [On Line] Availble: http://www.gbasey.gov.tw