跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.24) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/06/10 05:55
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:黃健豪
研究生(外文):Chien Hao, Huang
論文名稱:真誠領導對前瞻工作行為之預測效果: 時間觀與真誠氣候的角色
論文名稱(外文):Authentic Leadership Predicts Proactive Work Behavior:Role of Followers’ Time Perspective and Authentizotic Climates
指導教授:蔡啟通蔡啟通引用關係
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立彰化師範大學
系所名稱:人力資源管理研究所
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:其他商業及管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
畢業學年度:103
語文別:中文
論文頁數:182
中文關鍵詞:真誠領導前瞻工作行為時間觀真誠氣候
外文關鍵詞:authentic leadershipproactive work behaviortime perspectiveauthentizotic climates
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:666
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:146
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
真誠領導是近年來受到矚目的領導型態,它具備自我察覺、關係透明度、均衡資訊處理與內化道德觀等特性(Neider &; Schriesheim, 2011);雖有眾多研究探討其與員工績效之關聯,卻鮮少提及其與員工前瞻工作行為之關係。此外,時間觀往往決定了個體的思維與行動,商管領域卻常忽略其影響力;最後,真誠氣候具有潛移默化之功效,卻仍未與領導風格相互連結。因此,本研究從上述缺口進一步探討各變項之涵義與連結,並提出以下目的:(1)確立真誠領導與前瞻工作行為之關係;(2)確立時間觀概念,並改良測量工具;(3)探討員工時間觀之干擾效果;(4)探討真誠氣候之中介效果。
研究對象為各行各業,採立意抽樣法發放主管部屬配對問卷。本研究為求嚴謹,以研究一確立時間觀概念與測量,共110份有效問卷;以研究二驗證完整架構,共407份有效問卷。研究結果發現:(1)現在與未來時間觀皆與前瞻工作行為有所關連,而修改後的時間觀量表具良好信效度;(2)真誠領導與前瞻工作行為有正向關係;(3)僅現在享樂型時間觀對「真誠領導與前瞻工作行為之正向關係」有干擾作用;(4)真誠氣候扮演完全中介角色。
管理意涵如下:(1)鼓勵主管展現真誠領導風格,進而塑造真誠氣候;(2)個體前瞻工作行為將有利於組織發展與個人職涯成長;(3)從時間觀角度瞭解員工差異,進而於招募甄選、教育訓練、任務分派等過程提出需求。

Authentic leadership draw greatest attention in recent years, it’s construct consists of the four factors: self-awareness, relational transparency, balanced processing and internalized moral perspective (Neider &; Schriesheim, 2011), but rarely refer to the relationship of employees’ proactive work behavior. In addition, individual's time perspective always determines their own thinking and action, but domain of business management often ignores its influence. Lastly, authentizotic climates provide an imperceptibly influence on organization, but still do not link with leadership style.
Thus, there are four objectives in this article: First, to establish the relationship between the authentic leadership and proactive behavior. Second, to establish the concept of time perspective, and reform the assessment tool. Third, to exam the moderating effect of employee’s time perspective. Fourth, to exam the mediating effect of authentizotic climates.
Research sample was collected from various jobs, we used purposive sampling method with a dyadic (supervisor-worker) survey approach. In Study 1, we establish the concept of time perspective, and reform the assessment tool. Research results based on 110 pair-wise data show that employees’ present and future time perspective indeed positively affect their own proactive work behavior, and after the reform steps, the time perspective assessment tool with good reliability and validity will be used in Study2. In Study 2, we exam the integrated research framework. Research results based on 407 pair-wise data show that authentic leadership indeed positively affect employees’ proactive work behavior. However, only present-hedonistic time perspective did exert a moderating effect. Finally, authentizotic climates will complete mediation “authentic leadership and employees’ proactive work behavior” relationships.
Research findings remind organizations to encourage supervisors to show authentic leadership style, and then create authentizotic climates. Besides, proactive work behavior are favorable for organizational development and personal career growth. Last but not least, organizations should learn the individual differences from time perspective, then make request for recruitment manage, training &; development and task assignment.

目 錄
中文摘要 Ⅰ
Abstract Ⅱ
目錄 III
表目次 VI
圖目次 VIII
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 9
第三節 研究流程 10
第四節 名詞釋義 11
第二章 文獻探討 13
第一節 真誠領導 13
第二節 前瞻工作行為 27
第三節 時間觀 40
第四節 真誠氣候 53
第三章 研究方法 59
第一節 <研究一:時間觀對前瞻工作行為之影響> 59
壹、 研究架構與假設 59
貳、 研究對象 60
參、 研究工具 60
肆、 研究過程 71
伍、 資料分析 72
第二節 <研究二:真誠領導對前瞻工作行為之預測效果:時間觀與真誠氣候的角色> 74
壹、 研究架構與假設 74
貳、 研究對象 75
參、 研究工具 75
肆、 研究過程 89
伍、 資料分析 89
第四章 <研究一>結果與討論 92
第一節 樣本描述 92
第二節 相關分析 96
第三節 迴歸分析結果 98
第四節 結果與討論 100
第五章 <研究二>結果與分析 103
第一節 樣本描述 103
第二節 相關分析結果 107
第三節 時間觀對前瞻工作行為的線性迴歸分析 110
第四節 真誠領導與前瞻工作行為之正向關係及時間觀的干擾效果迴歸分析 112
第五節 真誠氣候對「真誠領導與前瞻工作行為之正向關係」的中介效果 118
第六章 結論與建議 121
第一節 研究結果與發現 121
第二節 研究結果與討論 124
第三節 研究貢獻與意涵 128
第四節 研究限制與建議 138
參考文獻 146
附錄
附錄一 <研究一>主管問卷 167
附錄二 <研究一>員工問卷 170
附錄三 <研究二>問卷發放指導語 173
附錄四 <研究二>主管問卷 176
附錄五 <研究二>員工問卷 178


表目次
表2-1: 真誠領導與真誠領導者之定義 18
表2-2: 真誠領導構念的演進 20
表2-3: 真誠領導對部屬的影響 25
表2-4: 前瞻工作行為種類與定義說明 31
表2-5: 前瞻工作行為的前置因素相關研究 36
表3-1: 「現在時間觀」量表探索性分析結果 65
表3-2: 「未來時間觀」量表探索性分析結果 66
表3-3: 時間觀量表信度分析結果 67
表3-4: 「前瞻工作行為」量表探索性分析結果 69
表3-5: 前瞻工作行為量表信度分析結果 70
表3-6: <研究一>各量表信度分析結果 70
表3-7: 「真誠領導」量表探索性分析結果 78
表3-8: 真誠領導量表信度分析結果 79
表3-9: 「前瞻工作行為」量表探索性分析結果 80
表3-10: 前瞻工作行為量表信度分析結果 81
表3-11: 「現在時間觀」量表探索性分析結果 82
表3-12: 「未來時間觀」量表探索性分析結果 83
表3-13: 時間觀量表信度分析結果 84
表3-14: 「真誠氣候」量表探索性分析結果 86
表3-15: 真誠氣候量表信度分析結果 87
表3-16: <研究二>各量表信度分析結果 87
表3-17: 驗證性因素分析結果 88
表3-18: 問卷發放與有效回收統計 89
表4-1: 受測員工基本背景資料 93
表4-2: 受測主管基本背景資料 94
表4-3: 研究變項平均數、標準差及各變項之相關係數 97
表4-4: 現在時間觀與前瞻工作行為淨相關之線性迴歸分析 99
表4-5: 未來時間觀與前瞻工作行為淨相關之線性迴歸分析 99
表4-6: <研究一>資料分析結果彙整 100
表5-1: 受測員工基本背景資料 104
表5-2: 受測主管基本背景資料 106
表5-3: 研究變項平均數、標準差及各變項之相關係數 109
表5-4: 現在時間觀與前瞻工作行為淨相關之線性迴歸分析 111
表5-5: 未來時間觀與前瞻工作行為淨相關之線性迴歸分析 111
表5-6: 現在時間觀對「真誠領導與前瞻工作行為之正向關係」干擾效果之迴歸分析 113
表5-7: 未來時間觀對「真誠領導與前瞻工作行為之正向關係」干擾效果之迴歸分析 114
表5-8: 現在享樂型時間觀對「真誠領導與前瞻工作行為之正向關係」干擾效果之迴歸分析 115
表5-9: 現在宿命型時間觀對「真誠領導與前瞻工作行為之正向關係」干擾效果之迴歸分析 117
表5-10: 真誠氣候對「真誠領導與前瞻工作行為」中介效果之迴歸分析 120
表6-1: 本研究資料分析結果彙整 123
表6-2: 提升真誠領導的策略 133

圖目次
圖2-1: 真誠領導演進脈絡圖 16
圖3-1: <研究一>研究架構 59
圖3-2: <研究二>研究架構 74
圖5-1: 現在享樂型時間觀對真誠領導與前瞻工作行為之干擾作用圖 116
圖6-1: 時間焦點對快樂與選擇之效果概念模型 127

一、中文部分
何欣恬(2011)。真誠領導對前瞻性行為影響之研究:對主管認同與調節焦點一致性的調節式中介效果模式。國立東華大學企管學系碩士論文。
邱皓政 (2011)。結構方程模式: LISREL的理論:技術與應用。雙葉書廊。
洪祥悰(2011)。時間觀點影響訓練遷移成效路徑之研究。國立彰化師範大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
柯敏姍(2013)。家族企業主管之仁慈領導與員工主動行為之影響研究-中介與調節效果。國立中正大學勞工關係學系碩士論文。
彭台光、高月慈與林鉦棽(2006)。管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、測試與補救。管理學報,23(1),77-98。
鍾怡萍(2013)。員工角色拓展自我效能與彈性角色導向對積極性行為之影響:以領導—員工交換理論為調節變項。國立中正大學勞工關係學系碩士論文。
鄧伯宸譯, Zimbardo, P., &; Boyd, J. 著,(2011)。你何時要吃棉花糖?-時間心理學與七型人格。心靈工坊。
譚家瑜、葉有聲譯,Schults, H. 著,2011。勇往直前-我如何拯救星巴克。聯經。

二、英文部分
Aiken, L. S., &; West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.
Alisa, M., &; Ilona, B. (2013). Explaining authentic leadership work outcomes from the perspective of self-determination theory. Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, 65, 63-75.
Alok, K., &; Israel, D. (2012). Authentic leadership and work engagement. The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 47(3), 498-510.
Ashford, S. J., &; Black, J. S. (1996). Proactivity during organizational entry: The role of desire for control. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 199-214.
Ashford, S. J., Blatt, R., &; Vande Walle, D. (2003). Reflections on the looking glass: A review of research on feedback-seeking behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 29, 773-799.
Aspinwall, L. G. (2005). The Psychology of future-oriented thinking: from achievement to proactive coping, adaptation, and aging. Motivation and Emotion, 29(4), 203-235.
Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 315 – 338.
Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., &; May, D. R. (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 801-823.
Avolio, B. J., &; Walumbwa, F. O. (2012). Authentic leadership theory, research and practice: Steps taken and steps that remain. In D. V. Day (Ed.), Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O. &; Webber, T. J. (2009). Leadership: current theories,research, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 421-449.
Bal, P. M., Jansen P. G.W., van der Velde M. E.G., de Lange, A. H. Rousseau, D. M. (2010). The role of future time perspective in psychological contracts: A study among older workers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(3), 474-486.
Bandura, A.(1986). Social foundations of Thought and action. Englewood. .Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
Bass, B. M., &; Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 181-217.
Bateman, T. S., &; Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 103–118.
Belschak, F. D., &; Den Hartog, D. N. (2010). Pro self, prosocial, and pro organizational foci of proactive behaviour: Differential antecedents and consequences. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(2), 475-498.
Bembenutty, H., &; Karabenick, S. A. (2003). Academic delay of gratification, future goals, and self-regulated learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Bird, J. J., &; Wang, C. (2011). Authentic leadership and budget-building: superintendents reveal origins, strategies, and connections. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, (15), 143-159.
Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley.
Blausten, P. (2009). Can authentic leadership survive the downturn? Business Strategy Review, 20(1), 84-87.
Bolino, M., Valcea, S., &; Harvey., J. (2010). Employee, manage thyself: The potentially negative implications of expecting employees to behave proactively. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 325-345.
Brislin, R. W., Lonner, W. J., &; Thorndike, R. M. (1973). Cross-cultural research methods. New York: Wiley.
Brown, W. T., &; Jones, J. M. (2004). The Substance of Things Hoped For: A Study of the Future Orientation, Minority Status Perceptions, Academic Engagement, and Academic Performance of Black High School Students. Journal of Black Psychology, 30, 248-273.
Brown, M. E., Trevino, L. K., &; Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117-134.
Burton, J.P., Sablynski, C.J., &; Sekiguchi, T. (2008). Linking justice, performance, and citizenship via Leader-Member Exchange. Journal of Business and Psychology, 23: 51-61.
Cate, R. A., &; John, O. P. (2007). Testing models of the structure and development of future time perspective: Maintaining a focus on opportunities in middle age. Psychology and Aging, 22, 186–201.
Conger, J. A., &; Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment Process : Integrating thery and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471-482.
Cooper, C. Scandura, T. A., &; Schriesheim, C. A. (2005). Looking forward but learning from our past: potential challenges to developing authentic leaders. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 475-493.
Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435-462.
Day, D. V. (2000). Leadership development : A review in context. Leadership Quarterly, 11, 581-613.
Den Hartog, D. N., &; Belschak F. D. (2012). When does transformational leadership enhance employee proactive behavior? The role of autonomy and role breadth self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 194–202.
De Lange, A., Bal, P, M., Van der Heijden, B., De Jong, N., &; Schaufelig, W., B. (2011). When I’m 64: Psychological contract breach, work motivation and the moderating roles of future time perspective and regulatory focus. Work &; Stress, 25(4), 338-354.
De Volder, M. L. (1982). Academic achievement and future time perspective as a cognitive-motivational concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(3), 566-571.
Erkutlu, H., &; Chafra, J. (2013). Effects of trust and
Psychological contract violationon authentic leadership and organizational deviance. Management Research Review, 36(9), 828-848
Erickson, R. J. (1994). Our society, our selves: Becoming authentic in an inauthentic world. Advanced Development Journal, 6, 27-39.
Fay, D., &; Frese, M. (2001). The concept of personal initiative: An overview of validity studies. Human Performance, 14(1), 97-124.
Frese, M., Kring, W., Soose, A., &; Zempel, J. (1996). Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(l), 37-63.
Frese, M., Fay, D., Hilburger, T., Leng, K., &; Tag, A. (1997). The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples. Journul of Organizutional and Occupational Psychology, 70, 139-l 61.
Frese, M., &; Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 133-187.
Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., May, D. R., &; Walumbwa, F. (2005). Can you see the real me? A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 343-372.
George, B.(2003). Authentic Leadership: Rediscovering the Secrets to Creating Lasting Value. Jossey-Bass.
George, B., Sims, P., McLean, A. N., &; Mayer, D.(2007).Discovering your authentic leadership. Harvard Business Review, 85(2),129-138.
Graen, G., &; Cashman, J. F. (1975). A role making model of leadership in formal organizaitons: A developmental approach. In J.G. Hunt and L.L. Larson (Eds), Leadership frontiers, Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
Grant, A. M., &; Ashford, S. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research Organizational Behavior, 28, 3-34.
Hair, J. F., Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., &; Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis with readings (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., &; Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 268-279.
Harter, S. (2002). Authenticity. In C. R. Snyder &; S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp.382-394). London: Oxford University.
Hsiung, H. H. (2012). Authentic Leadership and Employee Voice Behavior: A Multi-Level Psychological Process. Journal of Business Ethics. 107, 349–361.
Husman, J., &; Lens, W. (1999). The role of the future in student motivation. Educational Psychologist, 34, 113.
Husman, J., &; Shell, D. F. (2008). Beliefs and perceptions about the future: A measurement of future time perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 166–175.
Ilies, R., Morgeson, F. P., &; Nahrgang, J. D. (2005). Authentic leadership and eudaemonic well-being:Understanding leader–follower outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 373-394.
Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(5), 513-541.
Jensen, S. M., &; Luthans, F. (2006). Relationship between entrepreneurs' psychological capital and their authentic leadership. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18,254-273.
Judge, T. A., Erez, A., &; Bono, J. E.(1998). The power of being positive : The relation between positive self-concept and job performance. Human performance, 11(2/3), 167-187.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York7 Basic Books.
Kanungo, R. N., &; Mendonca, M. (1996). Ethical dimensions of leadership. Sage Publication, Inc.
Kernis, M. (2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14(1), 1-26.
Kets de Vries, M. F. R. (2001). Creating authentizotic organizations: Well-functioning individuals in vibrant companies. Human Relations, 54(1), 101-111.
Khan, S. N., (2010). Impact of Authentic Leaders on Organization Performance. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(12),167-172.
Klenke, K. (2005). The internal theater of authentic leader: Integrating cognitive, affective, conative and spiritual facets of authentic leadership. In W. L. Gardner, B. J. Avolio, &; F. O. Walumbwa (Eds.), Authentic leadership theory and practice: Origins, effects and development (pp. 55–183). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Kuenzi, M. &; Schminke. M. (2009). Assembling fragments into a lens: A review, critique, and proposed research agenda for the organizational climate literature. Journal of Management, 35, 634-717.
Kuppelwieser, V., G. &; Sarstedt, M. (2014). Applying the future time perspective scale to advertising research. International Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 113-136.
Lamm,H., Schmidt, R. W., &; Tromsdorff, G. Sex and Social Class as Determinants of Future Orientation (Time Perspective) in Adolescents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 34(3), Sep 1976, 317-326.
LePine, J. A., &; Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in ^vork groups. Joumal of Applied Psychology, 83, 853-868.
Leroy, H., &; Palanski, M. E. (2012). Authentic Leadership and Behavioral Integrity as Drivers of Follower Commitment and Performance. Journal of Business Ethics. 107,255-264.
Lewin, K. A Dynamic Theory Of Personality:Selected papers. New York:McGraw-Hill.1935)
Lewin, K. &; Lewin, G. W.(Eds.). (1948). Resolving Social Conflicts. Selected papers on group dynamics. New York: Harper &; Brothers.
Liden, R. C., &; Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionafity of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24(1), 43-72.
Lloyd-Walker, B., &; Walker, D. (2011). Authentic leadership for 21st century project delivery. International Journal of Project Management, 29 (4), 383-395.
Luthans, F., &; Avolio, B. (2003). authentic leadership: A positive developmental approach. Positive Organizational Scholarship, 241-261.
Martin, A., Jones, E., Callan, V.J. (2005). The role of psychological climate in facilitating employee adjustment during organizational change. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14 (3), 263-289.
Martin, S. L., &; Liao, H. (2013) Directive versus empowering leadership: A field experiment comparing impacts on task proficiency and proactivity. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1372-1395.
May, D. R., Chan, A. Y. L., Hodges, T. D., &; Avolio, B. J. (2003). Developing the moral component of authentic leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 32(3), 247-260.
McCain, J., &; Salter, M. (2004).Why courage matters: the way to a braver life. Random House Inc.
Mhatre, K. H., &; Conger, J. A. (2011). Bridging the gap between Gen X and Gen Y. Journal of Leadership Studies, 5(3). 72-76.
Miller, R. B., &; Brickman, S. J., (2004). A model of future-oriented motivation and self-regulation1. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 9-33.
Mogilner, C., Aaker, J., &; Kamvar, S.D. (2012). How happiness affects choice. Journal of consumer research, 39, 429-443.
Morrison, E. W. (1993). Newcomer information-seeking: Exploring types, modes, sources, and outcomes. Academy of Management Joumal, 36, 557-589
Morrison, E. W., &; Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 403-419.
Neider, L., &; Schriesheim, C. (2011). The Authentic Leadership Inventory (ALI):development and empirical tests. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 1146-1164.
Norman, S. M., Avolio, B. J., &; Luthans, F. (2010). The impact of positivity and transparency on trust in leaders and their perceived effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 350-364.
Nunnally, J.C., (1978), Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nuttin, J., &; Lens, W. (1985). Future Time Perspective and Motivation: Theory and Research Method. Leuven, Belgium, &; Hillsdale, NJ: Leuven University Press; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.)
Nuttin, J. R. (1964). The future time perspective in human motivation and learning. Acta Psychologica, 23, 60-82.
Ohly, S., &; Fritz, C. (2007). Challenging the status quo: What motivates proactive behaviour? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(4),623-629.
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome.Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Parker, S. K. (2000). From passive to proactive motivation: The importance of flexible ole orientations and role breadth self efficacy. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49(3),447-469.
Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K., &; Strauss, K. (2010). Making Things Happen: A Model of Proactive Motivation. Journal of Management, 36(4), 827-856.
Parker, S. K., Wall, T. D., &; Jackson, P. R. (1997). “That’s not my job”: Developing flexible employee work orientations. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 899-929.
Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., &; Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 636.
Parker, S. K., &; Collins, C. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36: 633-662.
Parker, S. K., Johnson, A., Collins, C., &; Nguyen, H. (2013). Making the most of structural support: moderating influence of employees' clarity and negative affect. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 867-892.
Peus, C., Wesche, J. S., Streicher, B., &; Frey, S. B. D. (2012). Authentic leadership: An empirical test of its antecedents, consequences, and mediating mechanisms. Journal of Business Ethics, 107, 331-348.
Rego, A., &; Cunha, M. P. (2006). Perceptions of Authentizotic climates and employee happiness : Pathways to individual performance? FEUNL Working Paper Series, 499.
Rego, A., &; Cunha, M. P. (2008). Perceptions of authentizotic climates and employee happiness: Pathways to individual performance? Journal of Business Research, 61(7), 739–752.
Rego, A., &; Cunha, M. P. (2012). They need to be different, they feel happier in authentizotic climates. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 701-727.
Rego. A., Sousa, F., Marques, C., &; Cunha, M. P. (2012). Authentic leadership promoting employees' psychological capital and creativity. Journal of Business Research .65. 429–437
Rego, A., Sousa, F., Marques, C., &; Cunha. M. P. (2014). Hope and positive affect mediating the authentic leadership and creativity relationship. Journal of Business Research, 67, 200–210.
Rego, A., Vitória, A., Magalhães, A., Ribeiro, N., &; Cunha. M. P. (2013). Are authentic leaders associated with more virtuous, committed and potent teams? The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 61-79.
Scholz, S., Illich, Y., Ivens, B. S., &; Steul-Fischer, M. (2012). Influence of Future Time Perspective on Involvement: An Approach with two Studies. Advances in Consumer Research, 40, 646-648.
Seibert, S. E., Crant, J. M., &; Kraimer, M. L. (1999). Proactive personality and careersuccess. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 416-427.
Seijts, G. H. (1998). The importance of future time perspective in theories of work motivation. The Journal of Psychology, 132, 154–168
Shamir, B. &; Eilam, G. (2005). What's your story? A life-stories approach to authentic leadership development. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 395-417.
Shipp, A. J. &; Jansen, K. J. (2011). Reinterpreting time in fit theory:Crafting and recrafting narratives of fit in medias res. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 76-101.
Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between nonwork and work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 518.
Strauss, K., Griffin, M. A., &; Rafferty, A. E. (2009). Proactivity directed toward the team and organization: The role of leadership, commitment and role breadth self efficacy. British Journal of Management, 20(3), 279-291.
Suddendorf, T., &; Corballis, M.(1997). Mental time travel and the evolution of the human mind. Genetic, Social &; General Psychology Monographs, 123, 133.
Milfont, T. L., Wilson, J., &; Diniz, P. (2012). Time perspective and environmental engagement: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Psychology, 47(5), 325-334.
Tonkin, T. H., (2013). Authentic versus transformational leadership: Assessing their effectiveness on organizational citizenship behavior of followers. International Journal of Business and Public Administration, 10(1), 40-61.
Toor, S. R., &; Ofori, G., (2008). Leadership for future construction industry: Agenda for authentic leadership, International Journal of Project Management,26, 620-630.
VandeWalle, D., (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement,57, 995–1015.
Wallace, M. (1956). Future time perspective in schizophrenia. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52(2), 240-245.
Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., &; Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentics leadership: development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89.
Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., &; Oke, A.(2011). Authentically leading groups-The mediating role of collective psychological capital and trust.Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 4–24.
Wang, H., Sui, Y., Luthans, F., Wang, D., &; Wu, Y. (2014). Impact of authentic leadership on performance: Role of followers’ positive psychological capital and relational processes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 5-21.
Wrzesniewski, A., &; Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active grafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26, 179-201.
Yagil, D., &; Medler-Liraz, H. (2014). Feel Free, be yourself : Authentic leadership, emotional expression, and employeeAuthenticity. Journal of Leadership &; Organizational Studies, 21(1), 59-70.
Yammarino, F. J., Dionne, S. D., Schriesheim, C. A., &; Dansereau, F. (2008). Authentic leadership and positive organizational behavior: A meso, multi-level perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 693-707.
Zacher, H., &; Frese, M. (2009). Remaining time and opportunities at work: Relationships between age, work characteristics, and occupational future time perspective. Psychology and Aging, 24, 487-493.
Zimbardo, P., &; Boyd, J. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271-1288.

連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top