跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.106) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/04/04 22:06
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:楊詠晴
研究生(外文):YANG, YUNG CHING
論文名稱:短期魚油攝食對淚液特性與乾眼症狀改善之效應分析
論文名稱(外文):Alleviating effects of short-term fish oil intake on tear characteristics and dry eye symptoms
指導教授:姜泰安姜泰安引用關係林培正林培正引用關係
口試委員:姜泰安林培正殷立德
口試日期:2012-06-08
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:中華醫事科技大學
系所名稱:醫學檢驗生物技術系碩士班
學門:醫藥衛生學門
學類:醫學技術及檢驗學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2012
畢業學年度:100
語文別:中文
論文頁數:71
中文關鍵詞:魚油乾眼症生化檢測臨床檢測
外文關鍵詞:fish oildry eye diseasesbiochemical assessmentsclinical assessments
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:939
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:75
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
魚油雖然已經被廣泛用作心血管的保健,但是對於乾眼症的症狀
改善功能,目前的文獻報告並沒有一致性。因此本研究大幅度修改魚
油配方,看是否可以改善乾眼症狀。給予24 位自願受試者每日早晚
各一顆魚油配方,成份包含有濃縮魚油504 毫克(20% EPA、50%DHA)。
受試者於受試前和連續食用魚油配方三週後,檢測其乾眼症狀,包含
淚液試紙測試、淚液膜破裂時間、結膜紅腫程度、和淚液滲透壓。同
時測試淚液中的鈉離子、鉀離子、氯離子、澱粉酵素、三酸甘油脂等
淚液生化值,並分析不同性別受試者是否有不同的乾眼症狀改善效
果。結果顯示: 1.短期內攝食富含omega-3 必需脂肪酸魚油,可能對
乾眼症提供部份症狀之緩解。2. 隨著攝食魚油配方,淚液滲透壓到
第三週上升,因此未必能直接推論到長期的效應。3. 淚液滲透壓在
淚液中包含鈉離子、鉀離子、氯離子、與三酸甘油脂。4. 實驗結果
支持以淚液滲透壓當作較好的乾眼症狀診斷方法。5. 推論在攝食
富含omega-3 必需脂肪酸後,眼睛有種未知的平衡系統,用以維持淚
液滲透壓的恆定性。6. 淚液生理男女有別,特別是在淚液膜破裂時
間上。本研究提供短期攝食魚油的功效數據,對後續研究提供良好的
基礎資訊。
Fish oil has been used extensively for cardiovascular protection,
whereas its use for dry eye symptom alleviation is not
well-documented with consensus. This study used an improved
formula and recruited 24 volunteers to take twice daily fish oil
capsules containing 540 mg(20% EPA、50%DHA) for 3 weeks. After
fish oil intake, the volunteers were examined for dry eye symptoms,
including TBUT, Schirmer test, Bulbar Redness, and tear osmolarity,
along with biochemical tear constituents of K, Cl, K, amylase, and TG.
The data were used for comparison between groups of either gender
or difference level of alleviations. The results showed that 1.
Short-term fish oil intake may alleviate dry eye symptoms. 2. Tear
osmolarity elevated at week3 after the intake, suggesting lng term
change may be possible. 3. Tear osmolarity factors included K, Cl, K,
and TG. 4. Tear osmolarity may be used as a better criterion for dry
eye diagnosis. 5. Fish oil intake may trigger an unknown system to
improve teat osmolarity homeostasis. 6. Gender-specific difference of
tear characteristics exist. To conclude, this study provided the
baselines data for further investigation on the use of fish oil for dry
eye alleviation.
簽名頁……………………………………………………………………i
誌謝…………………………………………………………………….ii
摘要……………………………………………………………………iii
Abstract……………………………………………………………….iv
目錄……………………………………………………………………..v
圖目錄…………………………………………………………………ix
表目錄…………………………………………………………………xi
第一章 前言…………………………………………………………….1
1.1 淚液來源分泌與淚液層介紹………………………………………1
1.1.1 淚液來源與分泌…………………………………………………1
1.1.2 淚液層……………………………………………………………3
1.2 乾眼症………………………………………………………………4
1.2.1 乾眼症的定義與分類…………………………………………….4
1.2.2 乾眼症的罹患率與風險因子……………………………………14
1.2.3 乾眼症的實驗診斷………………………………………………16
1.2.4 乾眼症的藥物治療與處置………………………………………17
1.2.4.1 乾眼症的治療…………………………………………………17
1.3 魚油…………………………………………………………………21
1.3.1 魚油的來源和成份配方…………………………………………21
1.3.2 魚油對全身性代謝的效應………………………………………24
1.3.3 魚油對乾眼的效應………………………………………………26
1.3.3.1 攝食omega -6 對乾眼的效應…………………………………26
1.3.3.2 攝食omega-3 對乾眼的效應…………………………………28
1.3.3.3 攝食omega-3 和omega-6 對乾眼的共伴效應………………29
1.4 研究動機與研究問題………………………………………………30
1.4.1 研究動機…………………………………………………………30
1.4.2 本研究要解答的問題……………………………………………31
第二章 材料與方法……………………………………………………34
2.1 魚油的來源與配方…………………………………………………34
2.2 食用方式……………………………………………………………34
2.3 受試者召募…………………………………………………………34
2.4 實驗設計與流程……………………………………………………35
2.5 樣本收集與量測方法………………………………………………36
2.5.1 淚液收集…………………………………………………………36
2.5.2 淚液滲透壓測量與相對淚液滲透壓變化值計算………………36
2.5.3 球結膜充血程度評估……………………………………………38
2.5.4 淚液試紙分析……………………………………………………40
2.5.5 淚液膜破裂時間分析(Tear film Break-Up Time; TBUT)……41
2.5.6 淚液生化值檢測…………………………………………………42
第三章 結果……………………………………………………………42
3.1 受試者基本資料……………………………………………………42
3.2 攝食魚油前後受試者雙眼的乾眼測試和相對淚液滲透壓平均值的
變化…………………………………………………………………43
3.3 攝食魚油前後受試者的乾眼測試和相對淚液滲透壓雙眼差異平均
值的變化……………………………………………………………44
3.4 以單隻眼睛為單位分析攝食魚油前後受試者雙眼的乾眼測試和相
對淚液滲透壓變化…………………………………………………46
3.5 攝食魚油前後受試者雙眼的乾眼測試和相對淚液滲透壓平均值的
分佈變化……………………………………………………………47
3.6 攝食魚油前後受試者雙眼的結膜紅腫程度的分佈變化…………50
3.7 攝食魚油前後雙眼的淚液試紙測試值差小於平均值族群的結膜
紅腫程度變化………………………………………………………51
3.8 攝食魚油前後受試者雙眼的乾眼測試和相對淚液滲透壓差異的分
佈情形………………………………………………………………52
3.9 攝食魚油前相對淚液滲透壓和其它乾眼測試值的相關性分析…53
3.10 攝食魚油前後相對淚液滲透壓和其它乾眼測試差值的相關性分
析…………………………………………………………………54
3.11 攝食魚油前後相對淚液滲透壓和其它乾眼測試差值與攝食魚油
後測試值的相關性分析…………………………………………55
3.12 以雙眼測試平均值分佈圖分析攝食魚油對於改善乾眼症狀的性
別差異……………………………………………………………56
3.13 以雙眼測試差值分佈圖分析攝食魚油對於改善乾眼症狀的性別
差異………………………………………………………………57
3.14 攝食魚油後淚液生化值與乾眼症狀檢測值的相關性…………58
第四章 討論……………………………………………………………60
第五章 結論與建議……………………………………………………64
參考文獻………………………………………………………………65
1. Lemp, M.A. Report of the National Eye Institute/Industry workshop on
Clinical Trials in Dry Eyes. CLAO J, 1995; 21(4): 221–232.
2. Lemp, M.A. The definition and classification of dry eye disease: report
of The Definition and Classification Subcommittee of The International
Dry Eye WorkShop (2007). Ocul Surf, 2007; 5(2):75–92.
3. Rolando, M., Zierhut, M. The ocular surface and tear film and their
dysfunction in dry eye disease. Surv Ophthalmol,
2001; 45 Suppl 2: S203–S210.
4. Abelson, M.B., Ousler, G.W. 3rd, Maffei, C. Dry eye in 2008. Curr
Opin Ophthalmol, 2009; 20(4): 282–286.
5. Holly, F.J., Lemp, M.A. Tear physiology and dry eyes. Surv
Ophthalmol, 1977; 22(2):69–87.
6. Lemp, M.A. Advances in understanding and managing dry eye disease.
Am J Ophthalmol, 2008; 146(3): 350–356.
7. Stern, M.E., et al. The pathology of dry eye: the interaction between the
ocular surface and lacrimal glands. Cornea,
1998; 17(6):584–589.
8. Perry, H.D. Dry eye disease: pathophysiology, classification, and
diagnosis. Am J Manag Care, 2008; 14(3 Suppl):
S79–S87.
9. Behrens A, Doyle JJ, Sterm L et al. Dysfunctional tear syndrome: A
Delphi approach to treatment recommendations. Cornea 25:90-97, 2006.
10. Schaumberg, D.A., et al. Prevalence of dry eye disease among US
men: estimates from the Physicians’ Health Studies. Arch Ophthalmol,
2009; 127(6):763–768.
11. Schaumberg, D.A., et al. Prevalence of dry eye syndrome among USwomen. Am J Ophthalmol, 2003; 136(2): 318–326.
12. Zhang Y, Chen H, Wu X. Prevalence and Risk Factors Associated
with Dry Eye Syndrome among Senior High School Students in a County
of Shandong Province, China. Ophthalmoc Epidemiolol. 2012 May 31
(E-Published ahead of print).
13. Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE. Prevalence of and risk factors for dry
eye syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118(9):1264–1268.
14. Bandeen-Roche K, Munoz B, Tielsch JM, et al. Self-reported
assessment of dry eye in a population-based setting. Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 1997;38(12):2469 –2475.
15. Munoz B, West SK, Rubin GS, et al. Causes of blindness and visual
impairment in a population of older Americans: The Salisbury Eye
Evaluation Study. Arch Ophthalmol 2000; 118(6):819–825.
16. McCarty CA, Bansal AK, Livingston PM, et al. The epidemiology of
dry eye in Melbourne, Australia. Ophthalmology
1998;105(6):1114 –1119.
17. Chia EM, Mitchell P, Rochtchina E, et al. Prevalence and associations
of dry eye syndrome in an older population: the Blue Mountains Eye
Study. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2003;31(3):229 –232.
18. Hikichi T, Yoshida A, Fukui Y, et al. Prevalence of dry eye in
Japanese eye centers. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
1995;233(9):555–558.
19. Uchino M, Schaumberg DA, Dogru M, et al. Prevalence of dry eye
disease among Japanese visual display terminal users. Ophthalmology
2008;115(11):1982–1988.
20. Uchino M, Dogru M, Uchino Y, et al. Japan Ministry of Health study
on prevalence of dry eye disease among Japanese high school students.
Am J Ophthalmol 2008;146(6): 925–929 e2.
21. Shimmura S, Shimazaki J, Tsubota K. Results of a population-based
questionnaire on the symptoms and lifestyles associated with dry eye.
Cornea 1999;18(4):408–411.
22. Sahai A, Malik P. Dry eye: prevalence and attributable risk factors in
a hospital-based population. Indian J Ophthalmol 2005;53(2):87–91.
23. Lekhanont K, Rojanaporn D, Chuck RS, Vongthongsri A. Prevalence
of dry eye in Bangkok, Thailand. Cornea 2006; 25(10):1162–1167.
24. Lee AJ, Lee J, Saw SM, et al. Prevalence and risk factors associated
with dry eye symptoms: a population based study in Indonesia. Br J
Ophthalmol 2002;86(12):1347–1351.
25. Ashraf Z, Pasha U, Greenstone V, et al. Quantification of human
sebum on skin and human meibum on the eye lid
margin using Sebutape(r), spectroscopy and chemical analysis. Curr Eye
Res. 2011;36553-62.
26. Azartash K, Kwan J, Paugh JR, et al. Pre-corneal tear film thickness
in humans measured with a novel technique. 2011;17:756-67.
27. Ban Y, Ogawa Y, Goto E, et al. Tear function and lipid layer
alterations in dry eye patients with chronic graft-vs-host disease. Eye.
2008;23:202-8.
28. Barabino S, Montaldo E, Solignani F, et al. Immune response in the
conjunctival epithelium of patients with dry eye. Exp Eye Res.
2010;91:524-9.
29. Barr JT, Schechtman KB, Fink BA, et al. Corneal scarring in the
Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study:
baseline prevalence and repeatability of detection. Cornea.
1999;18:34-46.
30. Bawazeer AM, Hodge WG. One-minute Schirmer test with anesthesia.Cornea. 2003;22:285-7.
31. Bayeye S, Elass E, Mazurier J, et al. Lactoferrin: a multifunctional
glycoprotein involved in the modulation of the inflammatory process.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 1999;37:281-6.
32. Begley CG, Chalmers RL, Abetz L, et al. The relationship between
habitual patient-reported symptoms and clinical
signs among patients with dry eye of varying severity. Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci. 2003;44:4753-61.
33. Behrens A, Doyle JJ, Stern L, et al. Dysfunctional tear syndrome: a
Delphi approach to treatment recommendations.
Cornea. 2006;25:900-7.
34. Bentivoglio AR, Bressman SB, Cassetta E, et al. Analysis of blink
rate patterns in normal subjects. Mov Disord. 1997; 12:1028-34.
35. Bitton E, Keech A, Simpson T, et al. Variability of the analysis of the
tear meniscus height by optical coherence tomography. Optom Vis Sci.
2007;84:E903-8.
36. Blackie CA, Korb DR, Knop E, et al. Nonobvious obstructive
meibomian gland dysfunction. Cornea. 2010; 29:1333-45.
37. Borchman D, Yappert MC, Foulks GN. Changes in human meibum
lipid with meibomian gland dysfunction using principal component
analysis. Exp Eye Res. 2010; 91:246-56.
38. Borchman D, Foulks GN, Yappert MC, et al. Human meibum lipid
conformation and thermodynamic changes with meibomian gland
dysfunction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:3805-17.
39. Bourcier T, Acosta MC, Borderie V, et al. Decreased corneal
sensitivity in patients with dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.
2005;46:2341-5.
40. Brignole F, Pisella PJ, Goldschild M, et al. Flow cytometric analysis of inflammatory markers in conjunctival epithelial
cells of patients with dry eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.
2000;41:1356-63.
41. Brignole-Baudouin F, Ott AC, Warnet JM, et al. Flow cytometry in
conjunctival impression cytology: a new tool for exploring ocular surface
pathologies. Exp Eye Res. 2004;78:473-81.
42. Bron A, Benjamin L, Snibson G. Meibomian gland disease.
Classification and grading of lid changes. Eye (London,
England). 1991;5:395-411.
43. Bron A, Tiffany J, Yokoi N, et al. Using osmolarity to diagnose dry
eye: a compartmental hypothesis and review of our
assumptions. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2002;506(Pt B):1087-95.
44. Bron AJ, Evans VE, Smith JA. Grading of corneal and conjunctival
staining in the context of other dry eye tests. Cornea. 2003;22:640-50.
45. Bron AJ, Smith JA, Calonge M. Methodologies to diagnose and
monitor dry eye disease: report of the Diagnostic Methodology
Subcommittee of the International Dry Eye WorkShop. Ocul Surf.
2007;5:108-23.
46. Sall K, Stevenson OD, Mundorf TK, et al. Two multicenter,
randomized studies of the efficacy and safety of cyclosporine ophthalmic
emulsion in moderate to severe dry eye disease. CsA Phase 3 Study
Group. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:631–639.
47. Stevenson D, Tauber J, Reis BL. Efficacy and safety of cyclosporin A
ophthalmic emulsion in the treatment of moderate-to-severe dry eye
disease: a dose-ranging, randomized trial. The Cyclosporin A Phase 2
Study Group. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:967–974.
48. Benelli U, Nardi M, Posarelli C, et al. Tear osmolarity measurement
using the TearLab osmolarity system in the assessment of dry eye
treatment effectiveness. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2010;33:61–67.
49. Walker PM, Lane KJ, Ousler GW III, et al. Diurnal variation of visual
function and the signs and symptoms of dry eye. Cornea. 2010;29:
607–612.
50. Bron AJ, Yokoi N, Gafney E, et al. Predicted phenotypes of dry eye:
proposed consequences of its natural history. Ocul Surf. 2009;7:78–92.
51. Gaffney EA, Tiffany JM, Yokoi N, et al. A mass and solute balance
model for tear volume and osmolarity in the normal and the dry eye. Prog
Retin Eye Res. 2010;29:59–78.
52. Schnebelen C, Viau S, Gregoire S, Joffre C, Creuzot-Garcher CP,
Bron AM, Bretillon L, Acar N. Nutrition for the eye: different
susceptibility of the retina and the lacrimal gland to dietary omega-6 and
omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid incorporation. Ophthalmic Res 2009;
41:216–24.
53 Viau S, Maire MA, Pasquis B, Gregoire S, Acar N, Bron AM,
Bretillon L, Creuzot-Garcher CP, Joffre C. Efficacy of a 2-month dietary
supplementation with polyunsaturated fatty acids in dry eye induced by
scopolamine in a rat model. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
2009;247:1039–50.
54. Barham JB, Edens MB, Fonteh AN, Johnson MM, Easter L, Chilton
FH. Addition of eicosapentaenoic acid to gammalinolenic
acid-supplemented diets prevents serum arachidonic acid accumulation in
humans. J Nutr 2010; 130:1925–31.
55. Miles EA, Banerjee T, Calder PC. The influence of different
combinations of gamma-linolenic, stearidonic and eicosapentaenoic acids
on the fatty acid composition of blood lipids and mononuclear cells in
human volunteers. Prostaglandins, Leukot Essent Fatty Acids
2004;70:529–38.
56. Calder PC. n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, inflammation, and
inflammatory diseases. Am J Clin Nutr 2006; 83:1505S–1519S.
57. Culp BR, Titus BG, Lands WE. Inhibition of prostaglandin
biosynthesis by eicosapentaenoic acid. Prostaglandins Med 1979;
3:269–78.
58. Schnebelen C, Gregoire S, Pasquis B, Joffre C, Creuzot-Garcher CP,
Bron AM, Bretillon L, Acar N. Dietary n-3 and n-6 PUFA enhance DHA
incorporation in retinal phospholipids without affecting PGE(1) and PGE
(2) levels. Lipids 2009; 44:465–70.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top