臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本論文試以精神分析的角度閱讀希區考克《後窗》與《驚魂記》兩部影片中的恐怖意涵與觀影經驗，透過觀眾與社會的幻想框架解讀恐怖的迷人因素，深入探討存在於文本與文化脈絡中無法驅除並且不斷復返的恐怖元素。第一章以佛洛伊德 「詭奇」及拉岡「凝視」理論的共通點為基礎，在模糊界線，打破內外決然二分的前提下，同時建立恐怖在本論文中的定義。影片中主角皆反應了與凝視相關的問題主體，本章將透過希區考克在電影形式與技巧上的呈現，討論電影中的凝視與詭奇。第二章以拉岡的理論為依歸區分變態狂與精神病的差異，進而揭開主角精神結構的問題，而恐怖的焦點也將轉移到分析主角的心理機制以及主對體間的關係，此外，「幻想」與「真實層」等觀念也有助於釐清本章對主體慾望及恐怖之間的關聯。第三章延伸之前的論述並且結合哥德小說中的恐怖，闡述身體/屍體如何反應主角的心理狀態，運用拉岡精神分析理論中「物」的觀念，試闡述屍體所隱含恐怖但又難以抗拒的特性如何創造詭譎的觀影經驗與觀眾的焦慮。藉由精神分析理論重新定義的恐怖包含了享受、創傷與怪物性，提供一個詮釋文類上的轉變、檢視個人心理黑暗面以及正視社會內部敵對本質的角度。

The psychoanalytic reading of Alfred Hitchcock’s Rear Window and Psycho in this study aims to reconceptualize horror in the films as well as the audiences’ cinematic experience. Accordingly, this thesis provides an angle to look into the fascination of horror through the audiences’ and the society’s fantasy and, therefore, contributes to uncovering the horror which can not be expelled but emerges over and over again within the text as well as the context. Chapter One discusses the congeniality between the Freudian uncanny and Lacanian gaze, as both underscore the irresistible attraction of horror. Transgressing the borderline between the familiar and unfamiliar, the interior and exterior, such an analogy builds up the foundation of discussion and digs out the secret of horror. The protagonists, Jeffries in Rear Window and Norman in Psycho both attest to the influence of the gaze on the subject. In Chapter One, the gaze is exhibited formally through many scenes of Hitchcockian style. Chapter Two focuses on the characterization of perversion and psychosis based on Lacanian approach and discusses the representation of these structural problems in the films. From formal techniques of the films to the interiority of the characters’ psychological mechanism, horror can be represented not only by what can be seen but also by the intersubjective activity. Besides, this chapter also discusses the issue of the fantasy and the Real that discloses the myth of the characters’ desire and the origin of horror. Chapter Three extends the previous discussions to the Gothic horror with respect to the representation of the body in the films. The different strategies of representing body truly reflect the protagonists’ psychological condition. The enigmatic fascination of the body can be deciphered through the Thing, the object of desire. The scenario about the body also creates the cinematic experience of the uncanny as well as the audiences’ anxiety. Since horror conveys the monstrosity as well as enjoyment which can not be eliminated but compulsively reappears in the text and the context, the psychoanalytical reconceptaulization of horror provides a stance to see through the generic transformations, the darkest part of the subject as well as the antagonism of the society.

Introduction -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1
Chapter One Gaze and the Uncanny ----------------------------------------------------------- 10
Theoretical Framework ---------------------------------------------------------- 11
The Hitchcockian Stain and Montage in Rear Window and Psycho ----- 20
Chapter Two The Gaze and the Clinical Structure: Perversion and Psychosis -------- 28
Lacanian Clinical Structure: The Theoretical Basis of Perversion and
Psychosis ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 29
Encountering the Impossible: Jeffries’ Fantasy Structure in Rear
Window ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 38
The Painful Enjoyment: Norman’s Psychosis in Psycho ------------------ 42
Chapter Three Framing the Body: The Thing and Gothic Horror ------------------------- 47
The Fascinating Object: The Uncanniness and Impossibility of the
Thing --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 48
From Absence to Exposure: The Body and the Gaze ---------------------- 51
Conclusion ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 66
Works Cited -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 72

Allen, Richard, and Sam Ishii-Gozalès. “Introduction.” Alfred Hitchcock: Centenary
Essays. Ed. Richard Allen and Sam Ishii-Gozalès. London: British Film Institute,
1999. i-xviii.
Bonitzer, Pascal. “Hitchcockian Suspense.” Žižek, Everything 15-30.
Boothby, Richard. “Figurations of the Object a.” Jacques Lacan: Critical Evaluations in
Cultural Theory. Vol. 2 in 4 volumes. Ed. Slavoj Žižek. London: Routledge, 2003.
159-91.
Bowman, Curtis. “Heidegger, the Uncanny, and Jacques Tourneur’s Horror Films.” Dark
Thoughts: Philosophic Reflections on Cinematic Horror. Ed. Steven Jay Schneider and
Daniel Shaw. Lanham: The Scarecrow P, 2003. 65-83.
Božovič, Miran. “The Man Behind His Own Retina.” Žižek, Everything 161-77.
Chion, Michel. “The Impossible Embodiment.” Žižek, Everything 195-207.
Copjec, Joan. “Vampires, Breast-Feeding, and Anxiety.” Octobor 58 (1991): 25-43.
Corber, Robert J. In The Name of National Security: Hitchcock, Homophobia, and the
Political Construction of Gender in Postwar America. London: Duke UP, 1993.
Creed, Barbra. The Monstrous-Feminine: Film, Feminism, Psychoanalysis. London:
Routledge, 1993.
Dolar, Mladen. “‘I Shall Be with You on Your Wedding-Night’: Lacan and the Uncanny.”
October 58 (1991): 5-23.
Evans, Dylan. An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis. London:
Routledge, 1996.
---. “From Kantian Ethics to Mystical Experience: An Exploration of Jouissance.” Nobus
1-28.
Feldstein, Richard, et al., eds. Reading Seminar XI: Lacan’s Four Fundamental Concepts of
Psychoanalysis. Albany: State U of New York P, 1995.
Fink, Bruce. A Clinical Introduction to Lacanian Psychoanalysis: Theory and Technique.
Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1997.
---. The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and Jouissance. Princeton: Princeton UP,
1995.
Freedman, Jonathan, Richard Millington. Hitchcock’s America. Ed. Jonathan Freedman
and Richard Millington. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1999.
Freud, Sigmund. Sigmund Freud: The Uncanny. London: Penguin, 2003.
Gottlieb, Sidney, ed. “Introduction.” Hitchcock on Hitchcock: Selected Writings and
Interviews. Berkeley: U of California P, 1997. xi-xxiv.
Grigg, Russell. “From the Mechanism of Psychosis to the Universal Condition of the
Symptom: On Foreclosure.” Nobus 48-74.
Hayward, Susan. Cinema Studies: The Key Concepts. New York: Routledge, 2003.
Hitchcock, Alfred. “Master of Suspense.” Gottlieb 122-24.
---. dir. Psycho. Perf. Anthony Perkins and Janet Leigh. 1960. DVD. Universal
Studios, 2001.
---. dir. Rear Window. Perf. James Stewart and Grace Kelly. 1954. DVD. Universal
Studios, 2001.
Huang, Han-yu. Horror and Evil in the Name of Enjoyment: A Psychoanalytic Critique of
Ideology. Bern: Peter Lang, 2007.
Humphries, Reynold. The American Horror Film: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh
UP, 2002.
Kaplan, E. Ann. ed. Psychoanalysis and Cinema. New York: Routledge, 1990.
Kay, Sarah. Žižek: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Polity, 2003.
Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book III: The Psychoses 1955-1956.
Trans. Russell Grigg. Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller. New York: Norton, 1997.
---. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XI: The Four Fundamental Concepts
of Psycho-Analysis. Trans. Alan Sheridan. Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller. New York:
Norton, 1998.
---. “The Subversion of the Subject and the Dialectic of Desire in the Freudian
Unconscious.” Écrits: A Selection. Trans. and ed. Bruce Fink et al. New York:
Norton, 2002. 292-325.
McGowan, Todd. “Looking for the Gaze: Lacanian Film Theory and Its Vicissitudes.”
Cinema Journal 42 (2003): 27-47.
Modleski, Tania. The Women Who Knew Too Much. New York: Routledge, 1988.
Mulvey, Laura. “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.” Film Theory and Criticism:
Introductory Readings. Ed. Leo Braudy and Marshall Cohen. New York: Oxford UP,
1999. 833-44.
Nobus, Dany, ed. Key Concepts of Lacanian Psychoanalysis. New York: Other P, 1999.
Orr, John. Hitchcock and the 20th Century Cinema. London: Wallflower P. 2005.
Punter, David. The Literature of Terror: A History of Gothic Fictions from 1765 to the
Present Day. Vol. 1 in 2 volumes. London: Longman, 1996.
Quinet, Antonio. “The Gaze as an Object.” Feldstein et al. 139-47.
Samuels, Robert. Hitchcock’s Bi-Textuality: Lacan, Feminism, and Queer Theory. New
York: State U of New York P, 1998.
Spoto, Donald. The Dark Side of Genius: The Life of Alfred Hitchcock. Boston: Da Capo
P, 1999.
Thurston, Luke. “Ineluctable Nodalities: On the Borromean Knot.” Nobus 139-63.
Waller, Gregeory A. “Introduction to American Horrors.” The Horror Reader. Ed. Ken
Gelder. London: Routledge, 2000. 256-64.
Wells, Paul. The Horror Genre: From Beelzebub to Blair Witch. London: Wallflower P,
2000.
Žižek, Slavoj, ed. Enjoy Your Sympton!: Jacques Lacan in Hollywood and Out. New
York: Routledge, 1992.
---. Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Lacan (But Were Afraid to Ask
Hitchcock). London: Verso, 1992.
---. Looking Awry: An Introduction to Jacques Lacan through Popular Culture.
Cambridge: The MIT P, 1991.
---. “The Seven Veils of Fantasy.” Nobus 190-218.