|
Chang T''ai-Yian has been a cultural figure and a scholarly in
late imperial China .He was too radical and too conservative,
to his era again and again, with actions full of symbolic- fore''
he earned multiple identities for himself and wrote his own a
piece of ambiguity texts. Ch''ien-chia p''u-shueh was the
homeland of his scholarship.He with him throughout his life and
let "hsiao-shueh " face the linguistics and named "hsiao-shueh"
as "yu-yuen wen-tzie study of lingistics and philology).
However,he went back to the "hsiao-shueh". His abrupt shift
supplies me with a key point to into his intellectuel world. I
try to understand how and why he reconstructed such a genealogy
of both knowledge and spirit of in oeder to explore how and
why "hsiao-shueh" dominated hisre ). He went back to the
golden classical age of ancient China in many kinds of ways in
terms of the archaic diction and the within the traditional
Chinese classics. At the end heorigin of the struture of his
philology-linguistics and build up his own concerning with "yu-
yuen wen-tzi. Tracing Chang T''ai-yien''s trace, I have selected
fivensions for my thesis: (1) The sphere of the knowledge of "
Ch''ien-chia The biographical materials on Chang as the
symbolical texts; (3) " Ku-wen Ching-hsueh; (4) The problem of
" Ch''i-wu lun shih"; (5) cognition of "literature" in Chang''s
knowledge-geneology. Through such complex analyses, I have
tried to understand why claimed that "yu-yuen wen-tzi chih-
hsueh " is "the unitaryl scholaly (on the Chinese classics)".
|