臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

摘 要
問題解決歷程可以視為一種自我調節（self-reguration）歷程(薛雅明 &; 徐玉瓊，2005)。數位遊戲所具有的特性之一是問題解決(Prensky, 2001)，本研究採取實驗相關研究法及調查研究法，研究對象為國小六年級學童(N=267)，將問題解決測驗聚焦在生活中的問題以及非特定課程領域的問題，透過電腦，採用2012PISA電腦化問題解決樣本試題進行問題解決測驗，依學童的數位遊戲現況、遊戲中的自我調整學習、遊戲進行中的問題解決歷程表現，分階段收集學童的遊戲經驗，並且加入學童的學業成就，探討學童的遊戲經驗與問題解決表現的關係。本研究主要的發現如下：
一、 多數學童具有數位遊戲的經驗，家長在數位遊戲的管教態度上傾向自由民主。
二、 有遊戲經驗的學童的問題解決表現優於沒有遊戲經驗的學童，但玩遊戲年資的長短並不會影響問題解決表現。
三、 學童在數位遊戲中的學習處於高自我調整學習的狀態，但並未與問題解決表現成正相關。
四、 學童在遊戲中問題解決歷程表現的優劣對其電腦化問題解決表現具有預測力。
五、 學童在遊戲中問題解決歷程表現與科技情境的問題相關程度高於非科技情境的問題；與動態本質的問題相關程度高於靜態本質的問題。
六、 學童的學業成就表現與數位遊戲中的問題解決歷程表現對於電腦化問題解決表現的有相同程度的相關與影響，但兩者不會在問題解決產生交互影響。

Abstract
Problem solving has received broad public interest as an important competency in modern societies.Problem-solving process is self-regulation process, Problem solving is one of the features of digital games (Prensky, 2001). The research aims to find the relationship between players’ game experiences and the performance of problem solving. Problem-solving assessments focus on real life problems and domain-general problems and are mediated by computers. Players’ game experiences are collected in three different ways in stages： The performance of slef-regujated learning during palying a game, the performance of the problem-solving process while playing a game, and the players’ status about game experiences. Furthermore, players’ academic performance is also the variable in this research.
This research adopts experimentation, correlation research, and survey research. The research targets are the elementary school students (N=267), and most problem solving items are the sample items of the PISA 2012 computer based problem solving assessment published by the OECD (2011). According to the results, players’ game experiences are positively correlated with their problem solving performance. The conclusions are as follow:
1. The parents’ disciplinary attitudes toward playing digital games are democratic and most students are digital game players.
2. Students who are digital game players have better performance in computer based problem solving assessment than those who are not. However wheather or not they have long playing experience doesn’t result in different degrees of performance.
3. Students are in good self-regulated learning status during playing digital games, but that isn’t positively correlated with their problem solving performance.
4. The performance of problem solving process while playing game can predict the performance of computer-based problem solving assessment.
5. The relationship between the performance of problem solving process in digital game and computer-based problem solving assessment varies in different natures of problem and problem context.
6. Students’ academic performance and performance of problem solving process while playing digital game affect the performance of computer-based problem solving assessment to the same degree, but the two factors do not interact with each other.

目 錄
摘 要 i
Abstract ii
誌 謝 iv
目 錄 v
表目錄 viiii
圖目錄 x
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的 5
1.3 研究問題 5
1.4 名詞解釋 6
二、文獻探討 8
2.1問題解決 8
2.1.1問題的定義與本質 8
2.1.2問題解決的內涵與意義 10
2.1.3問題解決的思考與步驟 12
2.1.4電腦化問題解決 14
2.2遊戲經驗與自我調節學習 15
2.2.1自我調節學習 17
2.3數位遊戲與學習 19
2.3.1 數位遊戲 19
2.3.2數位遊戲學習與體驗式學習 22
2.3.2數位遊戲學習與情境學習 23
2.4結語 25
第三章 研究方法與設計 26
3.1 研究架構 26
3.2 研究問題 27
3.3 研究對象 27
3.4 研究工具與方法 27
3.4.1自我調整學習量表 28
3.4.1.1自我調整學習「學習動機」量表檢驗 28
3. 4.1.2自我調整學習「行動控制」量表檢驗 37
3.4.1.1自我調整學習「學習動機」量表檢驗 45
3.4.2玩家遊戲現況調查問卷 57
3.4.3數位遊戲 58
3.4.4遊戲中問題解決歷程評量試題 59
3.4.5電腦化問題解決試題 60
3.5 研究流程 63
第四章 資料分析與討論 64
4.1學童個人遊戲經驗描述性統計 64
4.2有遊戲經驗與沒數位遊戲經驗的學童及遊戲年資不同的學童在電腦化問題解決表現的差異 70
4.3遊戲中自我調整學習與電腦化問題解決相關分析 71
4.3.1遊戲中自我調整學習描述性統計 71
4.3.2遊戲中自我調整學習與電腦化問題解決相關分析 72
4.4遊戲中問題解決歷程得分與電腦化問題解決表現相關分析 73
4.4.1遊戲中問題解決歷程得分與電腦化問題解決表現的描述性統計 73
4.4.2遊戲中問題解決歷程得分與電腦化問題解決表現的關係 74
4.4.3遊戲中問題解決各歷程得分與電腦化問題解決表現的關係 75
4.5遊戲中問題解決歷程及各分項歷程得分與不同問題本質及不同為問題情境的問題解決表現的關係 77
4.5.1遊戲中問題解決歷程與不同本質、不同情境的電腦化問題解決表現的關係 77
4.5.2遊戲中問題解決各歷程得分與不同本質、不同情境的電腦化問題解決表現的關係 78
4.6學業成就及遊戲中問題解決歷程表現與電腦化問題解決表現相關分析 83
4.6.1學業成就與電腦化問題解決表現相關分析 83
4.6.2學業成就、遊戲中問題解決歷程表現與電腦化問題解決表現相關分析 84
4.7不同學業成就及遊戲中問題解決歷程表現在電腦化問題解決表現的差異 85
第五章 結論與建議 88
5.1結論 88
5.2建議 90
參考文獻 92
附錄一 98
 

中文部分
毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台(2003)。創造力研究。台北:心理。
中央通訊社(2014)。PISA數位能力評量 台輸星韓日。2014年4月2日，取自http://www.cna.com.tw/news/afe/201404010415-1.aspx
杜威(1992)。我們如何思維。賈馥茗主編。台北市：五南。原著出版年(1910年)。
林宴瑛、程炳林(2007)。個人目標導向、課室目標結構與自我調整學習策略之潛在改變量分析。臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系教育心理學，39(2)，173-194。
季永明(2003)。資訊科技融入問題解決教學活動對國小學童問題解決能力及態度的影響。國立高雄師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
兒童福利聯盟文教基金會網站。http://www.children.org.tw/research/detail/68/241
洪國勳（2003）。線上遊戲式學習系統之建置─以科技學習為例。臺灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
洪榮昭(2003)。遊戲的教育意義。國民教育，45（3)，9-16。
孫春在. (2013). 遊戲式數位學習 (張. 宋曜廷 Ed.). 台北市: 高等教育文化事業有限公司.
郭靜晃(譯) (2000)。兒童遊戲：遊戲發展的理論與實務。（原作者：Johnson, J.E.Christie, J. F.&; Yawkey, T.D. )。台北：揚智。（原著出版年：1992）
張春興(2001)。教育心理學。台北市：東華書局。
教育部(2007)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。台北：教育部。
黃幸美(2003)。兒童的問題解決思考研究。台北市：心理出版社。
詹秀美、吳武典 (2007)：新編問題解決測驗指導手冊。台北：心理。
程炳林、林清山 (2001)。中學生自我調整學習量表之建構及其信效度研究。測驗年刊，48(1)，1-41。
程炳林、林清山 (2003)。國中生自我調整學習的發展現象暨多重目標組型調節效果之縱貫研究(一)。國科會91年度計畫：編號NSC91-2413-H006-008。
鄭麗玉(1993)：認知心理學—理論與應用。台北市：五南圖書公司。
薛雅明, &; 徐玉瓊. (2005). 自我調整學習策略與學習者控制在超媒體互動環境之應用研究. 嘉南學報(31), 345-360.

英文部分
Azevedo, R., Winters, F. I., and Moos, D. C. (2004). “An students collaboratively use hypermedia to learn science? The dynamics of self-and other-regulatory processes in an ecology classroom.” Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(3), 215-245.
Bransford, J. D., &; Brown, A. L. (Eds.). (1 999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Brown, Collins and Duguid (1989) Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning, Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.
Castelli, C., &; Colazzo, L., and MolinariA.(1998), “Cognitive variables and patterns of hypertext performance: Lessons learned for educational hypermedia construction”, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 7(2): 177-206.
Corno, L. (1994). Student volition and education: Outcomes, influence, and pratices. In D. H., Schunk &; B. J., Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 229-254). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper &; Row.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.
Franziska Perels*, Tina Gurtler, Bernhard Schmitz(2005).Training of self-regulatory and problem-solving competence, Learning and Instruction , 15,123-139
Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy.New York, NY:Palgrave.
Gee, J. P. (2004). Learning by design: Game as learning machines. Interactive Educational Multimedia, 8, 15-23.
Gee, J. P. (2005). Why Are Video Games Good For Learning. Retrieved December 31, 2006, from Advanced Distributed Learning Co-Lab Web site:http://www.academiccolab.org/initiatives/papers.html
Georgia Lazakidou *, Symeon Retalis(2010). Using computer supported collaborative learning strategies for helping students acquire self-regulated problem-solving skills in mathematics, Computers &; Education, 54, 3-13
Greiff, Samuel, Wüstenberg, Sascha, Holt, Daniel V., Goldhammer, Frank, &; Funke, Joachim. (2013). Computer-based assessment of Complex Problem Solving: concept, implementation, and application. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(3), 407-421. doi: 10.1007/s11423-013-9301-x
Hayes, J . R. (1989) . The complete problem solver. N. J . : Lawrence Er lbaum Associates.
Hsiao, H. (2007). A brief review of digital games and learning, IEEE International Workshop on Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning (IEEE DIGITEL 2007), 124-129.
Kiili, Kristian. (2005). Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(1), 13-24. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.12.001
Kiili, K. (2007). Foundation for problem-based gaming. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 394-404.
Krulik, S. , &; Rudnick, J . A. (1987) . Problem solving: Ahandbook for teachers (2nd ed. ) , Boston: Al lyn and Bacon, Inc. .
Kolb, D (1984). Experiential Learning as the Science of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kuhl, J. (2000). A functional-design approach to motivation and self-regulation: The dynamics of personality systems and interactions. In M. Boekaerts &; P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 111-169). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Macaulay,C, &; Cree, V. E. (1 999) Transfer of learning: Concept and process. Social Work Education.18(2), 183-194
Mayer, R. E. (1992). Thinking, problem solving, cognition. New York: W. H. Freeman Company.
Newell, A. and Simon, H. (1972). Human Problem Solving . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
OECD. (2003). The PISA 2003 assessment framework: Mathematics, reading, science and problem solving knowledge and skills. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/preschoolandschool/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/33694881.pdf
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). PISA 2012 field trial problem solving framework. Accessed. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/46962005.pdf
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). PISA 2012 field trial problem solving framework. Accessed at:http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/46962005.pdf
Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Game-Based Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts &; P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (1996): Cognitive psychology. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt teaching creative problem -solving.Waco, TX： Prufrock Press. BraceCollege Publishers
Shapiro, A., &; Niederhauser, D. (2004). “Learning from hypertext: Research issues and technology”, 2nd edition, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Siegler, R. S.(1991).Childern’s thinking (2nd ed.).New Jersey:Prentice-Hall Inc.
Suchman, L. (1987) Plans and situated actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1967). Play and it’s role in the mental development of the child. Soviet Psychology,12, 62-76.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. In D. H. Schunk &; B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 1-19). New York: The Guilford Press.
Wigfield, A., &; Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81