跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.106) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/04/03 02:41
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:吳愔琪
研究生(外文):Yin-Chi Wu
論文名稱:以擴散權重影像鑑別診斷肝臟結節病灶
論文名稱(外文):Diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiation of hepatic nodules
指導教授:陳潤秋陳潤秋引用關係
指導教授(外文):Ran-Chou Chen
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立陽明大學
系所名稱:生物醫學影像暨放射科學系
學門:醫藥衛生學門
學類:醫學技術及檢驗學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2014
畢業學年度:102
語文別:中文
論文頁數:75
中文關鍵詞:擴散權重影像表觀擴散係數肝臟結節病灶b值訊號強度
外文關鍵詞:Diffusion-weighted imaging(DWI)Apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC)hepatic noduleb-valuesignal intensity(SI)
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:576
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
本研究目的為比較肝臟良性及惡性病灶在擴散權重影像(Diffusion-weighted imaging,DWI)中的訊號強度(Signal intensity,SI)、在七組不同b值組合所得到表觀擴散係數圖 (Apparent diffusion coefficient,ADC map)中的ADC值與ADC ratio比,並提出用來鑑別診斷肝臟病灶最佳化的b值組合。
我們以回溯性方式自2012年1月至2012年6月期間,連續收錄198名接受過腹部磁振造影含打顯影劑檢查之病患,共212個肝臟病灶,並將病灶分為良性及惡性兩大類,其中良性病灶包含了36個囊腫、73個血管瘤、9個局部結節增生、17個再生不良結節、2個膿瘍及1個血管肌肉脂肪瘤,惡性病灶包含67個肝細胞癌及7個肝轉移性腫瘤。本研究中磁振造影檢查為使用Philips 1.5T磁振造影儀;在擴散權重影像中設定使用四個b值(0, 100, 500, 1000 s/mm²),及經由四個b值做不同的組合(分別為b= 0、100,b= 0、500,b= 0、1000,b= 0、500、1000,b= 0、100、500,b= 0、100、1000,b= 0、100、500、1000),在所得到的七組表觀擴散係數圖中以ROI(Region of interest)方式圈選病灶,量測病灶在DWI影像中每一個b值(0, 100, 500, 1000 s/mm²)的訊號強度及在ADC map中量測病灶及肝實質的ADC值,並將病灶ADC值除以肝實質ADC值以求得ADC ratio比值。
由兩位有臨床判讀MRI影像經驗之放射科醫師分別獨立判讀本研究所收錄之肝臟結節病灶在擴散權重影像中的亮度差異,並將判讀結果分為H3(High 3)、H2(High 2)、H1(High 1) 、I(Iso)、L(Low)五級。
以t-Test及Mann-Whitney U Test分析比較不同組合間的差異,並以ROC analysis去評估七組ADC map的Sensitivity、Specificity及Accuracy,評估出哪一組設定最適合用於診斷肝臟病灶,及分析用來鑑別區分出肝臟良性病灶及惡性病灶之ADC Cut-off value(閾值);再以Kappa Test去分析觀測者間在目測DWI影像中病灶亮度的差異性。
經由結果分析可發現DWI中的訊號強度及ADC map中量測到的ADC值及ADC ratio比值可區分出肝臟良性及惡性病灶(p值分別為< 0.001、< 0.001、< 0.001),且肝臟良性病灶的ADC值高於惡性病灶, ADC閾值為1.454。良性病灶中的囊腫有著最高的ADC值,血管瘤的ADC值為次高;而惡性病灶中的肝細胞癌及肝臟轉移性腫瘤的平均ADC值和其他四種良性病灶(包含局部結節增生、再生不良結節、肝膿瘍及血管肌肉脂肪瘤)的平均ADC值則十分接近。由放射科醫師判讀擴散權重影像中的亮度,發現不同肝臟結節病灶是有差異的,Kappa值為0.65~0.76屬高度吻合 (Good)。經由統計,最適合用來診斷肝臟病灶的b值組合為b=0、1000, 其診斷肝臟病灶的Sensitivity、Specificity及Accuracy為89.2%、79%及82.6%。
最後本研究結論為建議最適合用來診斷肝臟病灶的b值組合為b=0、1000;而用來區分肝臟良性及惡性病灶的ADC Cut-off value(閾值)為1.454。

關鍵字:擴散權重影像、表觀擴散係數、肝臟結節病灶

Purpose:
To compare the signal intensity(SI) in diffusion-weighted imaging(DWI) and the apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC) values in ADC map between benign and malignant hepatic nodules, and to determined the optimal b-value for differentiation of the liver lesions.

Materials and Methods:
Between 2012 January and 2012 June, a total of 198 consecutive patients with 212 hepatic nodules were including in our study, and all patients underwent the contrast enhancement abdomen MRI examination. The 212 lesions were classified into benign and malignant groups: the benign groups including 36 cysts, 73 hemangiomas, 9 focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), 17 dysplastic nodule(DN), 2 abscesses and 1 angiomyolipoma ; the malignant groups including 67 hepatocellular carcinomas(HCC) and 7 metastases. MRI examinations were performed using a Philips 1.5T MR system. In DWI, four b-value (0, 100, 500, and 1000 s/mm²) were used, and there were seven different ADC maps created by using different b-values combination, including b=0,100; 0, 500; 0, 1000; 0, 100, 500; 0, 100, 1000; 0, 500, 1000; 0, 100, 500, and 1000.
The signal intensities were measured by placing regions of interest in the lesions on the DWI for each b-value (0, 100, 500, and 1000 s/mm²), and we then measured the ADC value of the lesion and liver parenchyma. The ADC ratio (ADC value of lesion/ADC value of liver parenchyma) was also calculated. Two radiologists visually evaluated the brightness of all the lesions in b=0,100,500, and 1000, separately.
Comparisons between groups were performed by t-test and Mann-Whitney U test. Kappa test was used to evaluate the difference between the two radiologists. ROC analysis was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the quantitative ADC values for differentiating between benign and malignant lesions. A p value of < 0.05 was deemed to indicate statistical significance.

Results:
The SI on DWI, ADC value and ADC ratio were significantly different between benign and malignant liver lesions (p value were <0.001, <0.001, <0.001, separately). The ADC values of benign lesions were significantly higher than those of malignant lesions, the ADC cut-of value is 1.454. The brightness recorded by the radiologist was significant different among the lesions. The inter-observers’ agreement is good (0.65-0.76). The b-value combination ( b=0,1000 s/mm²) is best for the differentiation of benign and malignant liver lesions, the sensitive, specificity, accuracy was 89.2%、79% and 82.6% .

Conclusion:
In DWI, we suggest the use of the b-value combination ( b=0,1000 s/mm²) for the differentiation of benign and malignant hepatic nodules, and the ADC cut-off value of choice was 1.454.

Key words: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)、Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC )、hepatic nodules
致謝……………………………………………………………………………………i
中文摘要……………………………………………………………………….ii
Abstract………………………………………………………………………iii
目錄……………………………………………………………………………...v
圖目錄…………………………………………………………………………......ix
表目錄…………………………………………………………………………….….....xi
第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………………..…..…1
1.1 研究背景與動機…………………………………………………………….....1
1.2 研究目的………………………………………………………………..……...2
1.3 研究架構…………………………………………………………………...…..3
第二章 肝臟解剖構造與肝臟結節特性…………………………………….…..….4
2.1 肝臟結構…………………………………………………………………….....4
2.2 肝臟結節病灶……………………………………………………………….....5
2.2.1 肝臟囊腫………………..…………………………..……………………6
2.2.2 肝臟血管瘤………………..………………………………..……………7
2.2.3 肝臟局部結節增生……………..…………..…………………….……...8
2.2.4 再生不良結節…..……………………………..………………………....9
2.2.5 肝臟膿瘍…………………………………………..………..…………..10
2.2.6 血管肌肉脂肪瘤……………………..……………..…………………..11
2.2.7 肝細胞癌……………………..………………………………..………..12
2.2.8 肝臟轉移性腫瘤………..……………………………………..………..13
第三章 磁振造影各參數原理……………………………………………………....14
3.1 磁振造影原理………………………………………………………………...14
3.2 擴散權重影像(Diffusion-weighted imaging,DWI)與b值(b factor)….....17
3.3 表觀擴散係數(Apparent diffusion coefficient,ADC)之原理…….……......20
第四章 材料與方法………………………………………………………………....21
4.1 研究對象……………………………………………………………………...21
4.2 磁振造影方法與流程…………………………………………………….…..23
4.2.1 MRI參數設定…………………………………………………..…...…23
4.2.2 Data量測及ROI圈選………………………………………………....25
4.2.3 目測法判別病灶DWI亮度……………………………………………27
4.3 統計分析……………………………………………………………….……..27
4.4 八種肝臟結節病灶在DWI及ADC的圖像………………………………….28
4.4.1 肝臟囊腫……………………..…………………………………………28
4.4.2 肝臟血管瘤………………..……………………………………………30
4.4.3 肝臟局部結節增生………………………..…………………………....32
4.4.4 肝臟再生不良結節…………..………………………….……………...34
4.4.5 肝臟膿瘍……………………..…………………………………………36
4.4.6 肝臟血管脂肪肌肉瘤…………………………..………………….…...38
4.4.7 肝細胞癌………………………………..…....…………………….…...40
4.4.8 肝臟轉移性腫瘤…………………………………..……………….…...42
第五章 結果與討論……………………………………………………….…….…..44
5.1 統計分析結果……………………………………………………….…………44
5.1.1 肝臟良性及惡性病灶在DWI中之SI差異…………………………..44
5.1.2 八種肝臟結節病灶在DWI中之SI差異……………………………..46
5.1.3 肝臟良性及惡性病灶在ADC map中之ADC值差異……………….48
5.1.4 八種肝臟結節病灶在ADC map中之ADC值差異………………….50
5.1.5 肝臟良性及惡性病灶之ADC ratio比值差異……………….…….…52
5.1.6 八種肝臟結節病灶之ADC ratio比值差異………..…..……….……54
5.1.7 以ROC分析八種肝臟病灶在ADC圖中差異之結果..........56
5.1.8 八種肝臟病灶在b=0、1000組合中之ADC值範圍及平均ADC值.57
5.1.9 以ADC值1.454區別八種肝臟病灶之結果…………………………59
5.1.10 以目測法分析病灶在DWI中亮度及以Kappa Test分析觀測者
間差異………………………………………………………………....61
5.2 討論……………………………………………………………………….…..65
第六章 結論與未來展望………………………………………………………...….70
6.1 結論…………………………………………………………….………….….70
6.2 未來展望………………………………………………………………….…..70
參考文獻………………………………………………………………………….….72



圖目錄
圖3-1 RF pulse開啟及關閉時氫核方向之變化………………………………...14
圖3-2 T1及T2遲緩時間之圖示………………………………………………...15
圖4-1 形狀規則之病灶ROI圈選圖示……………………………………….….26
圖4-2 不規則形狀之病灶ROI圈選圖示……………………………………..…26
圖4-3 Cyst在T2WI中的成像及在注射顯影劑後的成像.....28
圖4-4 Cyst在DWI中四個b值的成像...................29
圖4-5 Cyst在七組ADC圖中的成像..................29
圖4-6 Hemangioma在T2WI中的成像及在注射顯影劑後的動脈相..30
圖4-7 Hemangioma在DWI中四個b值的成像...........31
圖4-8 Hemangioma在七組ADC圖中的成像.............31
圖4-9 FNH在T2WI中的成像及在注射顯影劑後的動脈相....32
圖4-10 FNH在DWI中四個b值的成像..................33
圖4-11 FNH在七組ADC圖中的成像...................33
圖4-12 DN在Dual T1中的成像及在注射顯影劑後的動脈相..34
圖4-13 DN在DWI中四個b值的成像....................35
圖4-14 DN在七組ADC圖中的成像.....................35
圖4-15 Abscess在T2中的成像及在注射顯影劑後的動脈相..36
圖4-16 Abscess在DWI中四個b值的成像...............37
圖4-17 Abscess在七組ADC圖中的成像................37
圖4-18 AML在T2中的成像及在注射顯影劑後的動脈相......38
圖4-19 AML在DWI中四個b值的成像...................39
圖4-20 AML在七組ADC圖中的成像....................39
圖4-21 HCC在T2中的成像及在注射顯影劑後的動脈相......40
圖4-22 HCC在DWI中四個b值的成像...................41
圖4-32 HCC在七組ADC圖中的成像....................41
圖4-24 Metastasis在T2中的成像及在注射顯影劑後的動脈相..42
圖4-25 Metastasis在DWI中四個b值的成像............43
圖4-26 Metastasis在七組ADC圖中的成像.............43
圖5-1 肝臟良性病灶及惡性病灶在DWI中各b值之SI之曲線圖……………45
圖5-2 八種肝臟病灶在DWI中各b值之SI曲線圖……………………………47
圖5-3 肝臟良性及惡性病灶在七組ADC圖中的ADC值曲線圖……………...49
圖5-4 八種肝臟病灶在七組ADC圖中的ADC值曲線圖……………………...51
圖5-5 肝臟良性及惡性病灶的ADC ratio比值之曲線圖……………………....53
圖5-6 八種肝臟病灶的ADC ratio比值之曲線圖...........55



表目錄
表4-1 本研究收錄病患及病灶之相關數據……………………………………..22
表4-2 MR相關參數………………………………………………………………........24
表5-1 肝臟良性病灶及惡性病灶在DWI中各b值之訊號強度………………..45
表5-2 八種肝臟病灶在DWI中各b值之訊號強度……………………………..47
表5-3 肝臟良性及惡性病灶在七組ADC圖中的ADC值……………………..49
表5-4 八種肝臟病灶在七組ADC圖中的ADC值…………………………….51
表5-5 肝臟良性及惡性病灶的ADC ratio比值…………………………………53
表5-6 八種肝臟病灶的ADC ratio比值.................55
表5-7 以ROC分析八種肝臟病灶在七組ADC圖中差異之結果……56
表5-8 八種肝臟病灶之ADC值範圍及平均ADC值..........58
表5-9 以ADC Cut-off value:1.454來區分212個肝臟結節病灶之結果…60
表5-10 肝臟病灶在DWI中成像亮度之分級…………………………………….62
表5-11 肝臟病灶在DWI中b=0時亮度差異…………………………………..63
表5-12 肝臟病灶在DWI中b=100時亮度差異…………………………………63
表5-13 肝臟病灶在DWI中b=500時亮度差異………………………………….63
表5-14 肝臟病灶在DWI中b=1000時亮度差異……………………………….64



[1]. Danrad R, Martin DR. MR imaging of diffuse liver diseases. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2005; 13(2):277-93.
[2]. Low RN. Abdominal MRI advances in the detection of liver tumors and characterisation. Lancet Oncol 2007; 8(6):525-35.
[3]. Nils Albiin. MRI of foccal liver lesions. Current Medical Imaging Review 2012; 8:107-116.
[4]. Sasaki K, Ito K, Fujita T, et al. Small hepatic lesions found on single-phase helical CT in patients with malignancy: diagnostic capability of breath-hold,
multisection fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery(FLAIR) MR imaging using half-fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo(HASTE) sequence. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25(1):129-36.
[5]. Federle MP G-CS, Anne VS et al. Hepatobiliary and Pancreas. In: MP F, editor.Diagnostic Imaging Abdomen. Salt Lake City: Amirsys Inc.; 2005; 1-149.
[6]. Mathieu D, Kobeiter H, Maison P, et al. Oral contraceptive use and focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver. Gastroenterology 2000; 118(3): 560-4.
[7]. Iavarone M1, Manini MA, Sangiovanni A, Fraquelli M, Forzenigo LV, Di Tommaso L, Aghemo A, Roncalli M, Ronchi G, Colombo M. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography and ultrasound-guided liver biopsy to diagnose dysplastic liver nodules in cirrhosis. Dig Liver Dis. 2013 Jan; 45(1):43-9.
[8]. Chou CT, Chou JM, Chang TA, Huang SF, Chen CB, Chen YL, Chen RC. Differentiation between dysplastic nodule and early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: the utility of conventional MR imaging. World J Gastroenterol 2013 Nov; 19(42):7433-9.
[9]. Kilickesmez O, Bayramoglu S, Inci E, Climilli T. Value of apparent diffusion coefficient measurenment for discrimination of focal benign and malignant hepatic masses. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2009; 53(1): 50-5.
[10]. Chan JH, Tsui EY, Luk SH, et al.Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the liver:distinguishing hepatic abscess from cystic or necrotic tumor. Abdom Imaging 2001; 26(2):161-5.
[11]. Du S, Li Y, Mao Y, Sang X, Lu X, Wang W, Zhang Q, Xue H, Yang X, Li S, Chi T, Zhong S, Huang J. Diagnosis and treatment of hepatic angiomyolipoma. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2012 Dec; 1(1):19-24.
[12]. Bruix J, Sherman M. Practice Guidelines Committee, American Association for
the Study of Liver Diseases. Management of hepatocrllular carcinoma. Hepatology 2005; 42:1208-1236.
[13]. Jordi Bruix, Morris Sherman. Management of Hepatocellular carcinoma: An update. Hepatology 2011 Mar; 53(3):1020-2. .
[14]. Ray H. Hashrmi WGB, Christppher J. Lisanti. MRI: The basic.2 ed: Lippincolt Williams and Wilkins; 2003.
[15]. Le Bihan D, Mangin JF, Poupon C, Clark CA, Pappata S, Molko N, Chabriat H. Diffusion tensor imaging:concepts and application. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001 Apr;13(4):534-46,
[16]. Bammer R. Basic principles of diffusion-weighted imaging. Eur J Radiol 2003; 45: 169-184.
[17]. Yoshikawa T1, Ohno Y, Kawamitsu H, Ku Y, Seo Y, Zamora CA, Aoyama N, Sugimura K. Abdominal apparent diffusion coefficient measurements: effect of diffusion-weighted image quality and usefulness of anisotropic images. Magn Reson Imaging 2008 Dec; 26(10):1415-20.
[18]. Parikh T, Drew SJ, Lee VS et al. Focal lesion detection and characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison with standard breath-hold T2-weighted imaging. Radiology 2008; 246:812-821.
[19]. Nicholson C, Philips JM. Ion diffusion modified by tortuosity and volume fraction in the extracellular microenvironment of the rat cerebellum. J Physiol 1981; 321:225-57.
[20]. Szafer A, Zhong J, Anderson AW, Gore JC. Diffusion-weighted imaing in tissues: theoretical models. NMR Biomed 1995; 8(7-8):289-96.
[21]. Szafer A, Zhong J, Gore JC. Theoretical model for water diffusion in tissues. Magn Reson Med 1995; 33(5):697-712.
[22]. Collaghan PT. Principle of nuclear magnetic resonance microscopy, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987:492.
[23]. Hashami RH, Bradley WG, MRI the basic. Willams & Wikins, 1997.
[24]. Tappouni R, ElKady RM, Sarwani N, Dykes T. Comparison of the accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging versus dynamic contrast enhancement magnetic resonance imaging in characterizing focal liver lesions. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2013 Nov-Dec; 37(6):995-1001.
[25]. Burakiewicz J, Charles-Edwards GD, Goh V, Schaeffter T. Water-fat separation in diffusion-weighted EPI using an IDEAL approach with image navigator. Magn Reson Med 2014 Apr .
[26]. Butts K, Riederer SJ, Ehman RL, Felmlee JP, Grimm RC. Echo-planar imaging of the liver with a standard MR imaging system. Radiology 1993; 189(1):259-64.
[27]. Turner R, Le Bilan D, Chesnick AS. Echo-planar imaging of diffusion and perfusion. Magn Reson Med 1991; 19(2):247-53.
[28]. Hersh Chandarana, Bachir Taouli. Diffusion and perfusion imaging of the liver. Eur J Radiol 2010; 76:348-358.
[29]. Miller FH, Hammond N, Siddiqi AJ et al. Utility of diffusion-weighted MRI in distinguishing benign and malignant hepatic lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Jul; 32(1):138-47.
[30]. Nasu K, Kuroki Y, Nawano S et al. Hepatic metastasis: diffusion-weighted MR sensitivity encoding versus SPIO-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2006; 239:122-130.
[31]. Nishie A, Tajima T, Ishigami K et al. Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using super paramagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced MRI: Added value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). J Magn Reson Imaging 2010 Feb; 31(2):373-82.
[32].Bilgili MY. Reproductibility of apparent diffusion coefficients measurements in diffusion-weighted MRI of the abdomen with different b values. Eur J Radiol.
2012 Sep; 81(9):2066-8.
[33]. Bialal Kaya, Zafer Koc. Diffusion-weighted MRI and optimal b-value for characterization of liver lesions. Acta Radiol 2013; August 27.
[34].Zater Koc, MD,* and Gurcan Erbay, MD. Optimal b-value in diffusion-weighted imaging for differentiation of abdominal lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2013.
[35]. Landis JR, Koch GG . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33:159-174.
[36].Duran R, Ronot M, Kerbaol A, Van Beers B, Vilgrain V. Hepatic hemangiomas: factors associated with T2 shine-through effect on diffusion-weighted MR sequences. Eur J Radiol. 2014 Mar; 83(3):468-78.
[37]. J. H. M. Chan, E. Y. K. Tsui, S. H. Luk, A. S. L. Fung, M. K. Yuen, M. L. Szeto, Y. K. Cheung, K. P. C. Wong. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the liver: distinguishing hepatic abscess from cystic or necrotic tumor. Abdominal Imaging 2001 Mar; 26(2):161-165
[38]. Ozgur Kilickesmez, Gulseren Yirik, Sibel Bayramoglu, Tan Cimilli, Sibel Aydin. Non-brearhe-hold hogh b-value diffusion-weighted MRI with parallel imaging technique: apparent diffusion coefficient determination in normal abdominal organs. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2008 Jun; 14(2):83-7.
[39]. Sofia Gourtsoyianni, Nickolas Papanikolaou, Spyros Yarmenitis, Thomas Maris, Apostolos Karantanas, Nicholas Gourtsoyiannis. Respiratory gated diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver: value of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in the differentiation between most commonly encountered benign and malignant focal liver lesions. European Radiology 2008 March; 18(3):
486-492.
[40]. Galea N, Cantisani V, Taouli B. Liver lesion detection and characterization: role of diffusion-weighted imaging.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Jun; 37(6):1260-76.
[41]. Forner A, Vilana R, Ayuso C, et al. Diagnosis of hepatic nodules 20 mm or smaller in cirrhosis: prospective validation of the noninvasive diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2008; 47:97-104.
[42]. Naganawa S, Kawai H, Fukatsu H, Sakurai Y, Aoki I, Miura S, Mimura T, Kanazawa H, Ishigaki T. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver: technique challenges and prospects for the future. Magn Reson Med Sci 2005; 4:175-186.
[43]. Charles-Edwards EM, deSouza NM. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and its application to cancer. Cancer Imaging 2006; 6:135-143.
[44]. Thoeny HC, De Keyzer F. Extracranial applications of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 2007; 17:1385-1393.
[45]. Petra G Kele, Eric J van der Jant. Diffusion weighted imaging in the liver. WJG 2010; 16(13): 1567-1576.
[46]. Coenegrachts K. Magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: New imaging strategies for evaluating focal liver lesions. World J Radiol 2009 Dec 31; 1(1):72-85.


連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top