資料載入處理中...
跳到主要內容
臺灣博碩士論文加值系統
:::
網站導覽
|
首頁
|
關於本站
|
聯絡我們
|
國圖首頁
|
常見問題
|
操作說明
English
|
FB 專頁
|
Mobile
免費會員
登入
|
註冊
切換版面粉紅色
切換版面綠色
切換版面橘色
切換版面淡藍色
切換版面黃色
切換版面藍色
功能切換導覽列
(216.73.217.151) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/07/22 01:05
字體大小:
字級大小SCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,如為IE7或Firefoxy瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT功能
:::
詳目顯示
recordfocus
第 1 筆 / 共 1 筆
/1
頁
論文基本資料
摘要
外文摘要
目次
參考文獻
電子全文
紙本論文
QR Code
本論文永久網址
:
複製永久網址
Twitter
研究生:
張裕昇
研究生(外文):
Chang, Yu-Sheng
論文名稱:
效率市場假說驗證:動態調整交易系統之全球股、匯市測試
論文名稱(外文):
Verification on market efficiency: Dynamic Trading Indicators on global Equity and Currency Markets
指導教授:
賴明治
、
周國端
指導教授(外文):
Lai, Ming-Chih
、
Jou, David
學位類別:
碩士
校院名稱:
國立交通大學
系所名稱:
應用數學系數學建模與科學計算碩士班
學門:
數學及統計學門
學類:
數學學類
論文種類:
學術論文
論文出版年:
2009
畢業學年度:
98
語文別:
英文
論文頁數:
55
中文關鍵詞:
行為財務學
、
效率市場假說
、
動態調整交易指標
、
決策樹
、
反射理論
外文關鍵詞:
behavioral finance
、
efficient market hypothesis
、
dynamic trading indicator
、
CART
、
reflexivity
相關次數:
被引用:0
點閱:1065
評分:
下載:205
書目收藏:0
行為財務學(behavioral finance)與傳統技術分析都有相似的起源, 兩者皆導因於,假設人類的投資行為其實會受到外來環境影響,而產生傳統財務學者所認為的『不理性』行為;且兩者皆藉由試圖辨識人類行為的模式,以尋找可能的市場超額利潤。基於是傳統財務學的代表,效率市場假說(Efficient Market Hypothesis)一直被測試其真實性與可靠性,但其仍然是目前學術界未有肯定答案的問題。效率市場假說認為,『市場價格已經隱含了所有可取得資訊的影響力』,其意味著無人能對未來價格形成持續並成功地預測;另一方面,像技術分析這類的交易指標,其正是透過對過去價格走勢與市場型態的研究,試圖尋找未來可能的類似走勢,以期達到擊敗市場的目標。基於交易策略的超額報酬能視為預測能力的展現,交易指標應能當作效率市場假說的驗證方法。本論文透過創立一個『自動交易流程』,其包含『動態調整交易指標』與統計方法『決策樹(Classification and Regression Tree)』,以驗證目前全球股、匯市之超額報酬取得的可能性。本篇論文的結論是,我們所提供的方法的確在新興市場的股、匯市獲取極高之樣本外超額報酬,然而在已開發國家之股、匯市則無明顯擊敗市場報酬之能力;導致我們無法於,以開發國家獲取超額報酬的原因,可能可指向金融市場的反射理論(reflexivity)。
Behavioral finance and traditional technical trading indicators are similar in their roots. Both are rooted in the assumption that man acts for behavioral reasons in ways that may seem irrational by the standards of classical finance. Both of them approach financial markets by identifying patterns of human behavior to uncover opportunities of profits. On the behalf of classical finance, “Efficient Market Hypothesis” (EMH) has been testing for its validity, though it’s still an unsolved argument for academic finance now. The EMH states that the current market price incorporates all the information available, which leads to a conclusion that given the information available, no prediction of the future price changes can be made. On the other hand, trading indicator such as technical analysis, which is essentially the search for recurrent and predictable patterns in asset prices, attempts to forecast future price changes. To the extend that return of a trading strategy can be regarded as a measure of predictability, trading indicator can be seen as a test of the EMH. This paper attempts on creating an automated trading process, which includes “dynamic technical trading indicators” and statistical method “CART” (Classification and Regression Tree) to check the profitability on global equity and Currency Markets. We conclude that, our testing methods do make obvious positive profits on developing countries’ equity and foreign currency markets; the reason why our method can’t generate obvious positive profit in developed countries maybe can point to the “reflexivity” of financial market.
1. Introduction…1
2. Theory and Literature Review…3
2.1 Technical Trading Indicators…3
2.2 CART(Classification and Regression Tree) …6
2.3 Representative Studies…8
3. Methodology and Empirical results…11
3.1 Currency Market…12
3.1.1 Single Moving Average…12
3.1.2 Dual Moving Average…13
3.1.3 Combination of Single Moving average with stochastic oscillator…15
3.2 Equity Market…19
3.2.1 Single Moving Average…19
3.2.2 Dual Moving Average…21
3.2.3 Combination of Single Moving average with stochastic oscillator…22
3.3 Discussion on the appropriateness of our trading criteria…24
3.3.1 The trade off between stabilization and efficiency…24
3.3.2 The choice of back-test and forecasting Period…27
3.4 The issue of reflexivity…27
3.4.1 CART analysis on stochastic oscillator…29
3.4.2 The selection of price in entering and exiting position …32
4. Conclusion…35
Reference…37
Appendix…39
1.Park, C., & Irwin, S.H. “The profitability of technical analysis: A review”. AgMAS Project Research Report ,April (2004), http://ssrn.com/abstract=603481
2.Brorsen, B. W., and S. H. Irwin. “Futures Funds and Price Volatility.” The Review of Futures Markets, 6(1987):118-135.
3.Billingsley, R. S., and D. M. Chance. “Benefits and Limitations of Diversification Among Commodity Trading Advisors.” Journal of Portfolio Management, (Fall 1996):65-80
4.Henry O. Pruden , B. Paranque, and W. Baets. “Behavior Finance and Technical Analysis:,Interpreting Data From an Experiment on Irrational Exuberance
: Applying a Cups Catastrophe Model and Technical Analysis Rules”, Journal of Technical Analysis ,Spring (2004)
5.Menkhoff, L. “Examining the Use of Technical Currency Analysis.” International Journal of Finance and Economics, 2(1997):307-318.
6.Andrew w. Lo, Herry Mamaysky, and Jiang Wang“Foundations of Technical Analysis: Computational Algorithms, Statistical Inference, and Empirical Implementation”, Journal of Finance, May (2000)
7.Cheung, Y. W., and C. Y. P. Wong. “A Survey of Market Practitioners’ Views on Exchange Rate Dynamics.” Journal of International Economics, 51(2000): 401-419
8.Cheung, Y. W., and M. D. Chinn. “Currency Traders and Exchange Rate Dynamics: A Survey of the US Market.” Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(2001):439-471.
9.Farrell, C. H., and E. A. Olszewski. “Assessing Inefficiency in the S&P 500 Futures Market.” Journal of Forecasting, 12(1993):395-420
10.Dooley, M. P., and J. R. Shafer. “Analysis of Short-Run Exchange Rate Behavior: March 1973to November 1981.” In D. Bigman and T. Taya, (ed.), Exchange Rate and Trade Instability: Causes, Consequences, and Remedies, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1983
11.Levich, R. M., and L. R. Thomas. “The Significance of Technical Trading Rule Profits in the Foreign Exchange Market: A Bootstrap Approach.” Journal of International Money and Finance, 12(1993):451-474.
12.Osler, C. L., and P. H. K. Chang. “Head and Shoulders: Not Just a Flaky Pattern.” Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Staff Reports, 4, 1995
13.Neftci, S. N., and A. J. Policano. “Can Chartists Outperform the Market? Market Efficiency Tests for ‘Technical Analysis.’” Journal of Futures Markets, 4(1984):465-478.
14.Neftci, S. N. “Naïve Trading Rules in Financial Markets and Wiener-Kolmogorov Prediction Theory: A Study of ‘Technical Analysis.’” Journal of Business, 64(1991):549-571.
15.Taylor, M. P., and H. Allen. “The Use of Technical Analysis in the Foreign Exchange Market.” Journal of International Money and Finance, 11(1992):304-314.
16.Lui, Y. H., and D. Mole. “The Use of Fundamental and Technical Analyses by Foreign Exchange Dealers: Hong Kong Evidence.” Journal of International Money and Finance
17.Alexander, S. S. “Price Movements in Speculative Markets: Trends or Random Walks.” Industrial Management Review, 2(1961):7-26.
18.Alexander, S. S. “Price Movements in Speculative Markets: Trends or Random Walks No. 2.” Industrial Management Review, 5(1964):25-46.
19.Van Horne, J. C., and G. G. C. Parker. “The Random-Walk Theory: An Empirical Test.” Financial Analysts Journal, 23(1967):87-92.
20.Dryden, M. “Filter Tests of U.K. Share Prices.” Applied Economics, 1(1970a):261-275.
21.Dryden, M. “A Statistical Study of U.K. Share Prices.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 17 (1970b):369-389.
22.Logue, D. E., R. J. Sweeney, and T. D. Willett. “The Speculative Behavior of Foreign Exchange Rates during the Current Float.” Journal of Business Research, 6(1978):159-174.
23.Dale, C., and R. Workman. “Measuring Patterns of Price Movements in the Treasury Bill Futures Market.” Journal of Economics and Business, 33(1981):81-87.
24.Brock, W., J. Lakonishock, and B. LeBaron. “Simple Technical Trading Rules and the Stochastic Properties of Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance, 47(1992):1731-1764.
25.Ratner, M., and R. P. C. Leal. “Tests of Technical Trading Strategies in the Emerging Equity Markets of Latin America and Asia.” Journal of Banking & Finance, 23(1999):1887-1905.
26.Goodacre, A., and T. Kohn-Speyer. “CRISMA Revisited.” Applied Financial Economics, 11 (2001):221-230.
27.Lee, C. I., K. C. Gleason, and I. Mathur. “Trading Rule Profits in Latin American Currency Spot Rates.” International Review of Financial Analysis, 10(2001):135-156.
28.Olson, D. “Have Trading Rule Profits in the Currency Markets Declined over Time?” Journal of Banking and Finance, 28(2004):85-105.
29.Jensen, M. C., and G. A. Benington. “Random Walks and Technical Theories: Some Additional Evidence.” Journal of Finance, 25(1970):469-482.
30.Sullivan, R., A. Timmermann, and H. White. “Data Snooping, Technical Trading Rule Performance, and the Bootstrap.” Journal of Finance, 54(1999):1647-1691.
電子全文
國圖紙本論文
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
網路書籤
當script無法執行時可按︰
網路書籤
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
評分
當script無法執行時可按︰
評分
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
相關論文
相關期刊
熱門點閱論文
1.
企業策略宣告對股價報酬率之影響-以生技醫療產業為例
2.
考量價量關係的股票市場技術指標
3.
應用灰色理論改良技術指標投資績效之研究-以德國DAX指數成分股為例
4.
動態灰柏努力預測模型
5.
行為財務學—文獻回顧與未來發展
6.
氣候變異對台灣股票報酬率的影響
7.
情緒過度自信對投資決策影響之分析
8.
預測股票報酬與辨識價值錯訂股票:台灣股市效率性驗證
9.
氣候變遷對股票報酬率的影響—以中國大陸(上海、深圳)股票市場為例
10.
台灣股票市場弱式效率性與行為財務理論之研究
無相關期刊
1.
效率市場假說之實證研究-以亞太地區股市為例
2.
效率市場假說與多元化投資組合存在長期利潤之再研究:以美國及其主要外國直接投資夥伴之股市為例
3.
檢定越南股票市場之效率市場假說
4.
大小臺指期貨日內價差套利交易策略及效率市場研究
5.
弱勢效率市場下共同基金績效之動態評估
6.
成交量在台灣股票市場是否有參考價值:效率市場假說之驗證
7.
開放平盤以下放空與現股當沖對效率市場的影響
8.
擇時、四四三三法則與貝它避險策略下基金之績效分析:短期效率市場之驗證
9.
歐洲轉型國家弱勢效率市場檢定-用序列追蹤選擇方法之應
10.
選擇權效率市場之研究
11.
台灣股市效率市場之研究-以42日移動平均線為例
12.
效率市場於臺灣期貨市場之驗證
13.
台灣股市即時資訊之弱式效率市場再檢視
14.
以台灣10年期熱門券政府公債探討效率市場假說
15.
台股IPO無漲跌幅限制下之超額報酬與效率市場性
簡易查詢
|
進階查詢
|
熱門排行
|
我的研究室