跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.217.151) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/07/22 01:05
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:張裕昇
研究生(外文):Chang, Yu-Sheng
論文名稱:效率市場假說驗證:動態調整交易系統之全球股、匯市測試
論文名稱(外文):Verification on market efficiency: Dynamic Trading Indicators on global Equity and Currency Markets
指導教授:賴明治賴明治引用關係周國端
指導教授(外文):Lai, Ming-ChihJou, David
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:應用數學系數學建模與科學計算碩士班
學門:數學及統計學門
學類:數學學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2009
畢業學年度:98
語文別:英文
論文頁數:55
中文關鍵詞:行為財務學效率市場假說動態調整交易指標決策樹反射理論
外文關鍵詞:behavioral financeefficient market hypothesisdynamic trading indicatorCARTreflexivity
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1065
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:205
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
行為財務學(behavioral finance)與傳統技術分析都有相似的起源, 兩者皆導因於,假設人類的投資行為其實會受到外來環境影響,而產生傳統財務學者所認為的『不理性』行為;且兩者皆藉由試圖辨識人類行為的模式,以尋找可能的市場超額利潤。基於是傳統財務學的代表,效率市場假說(Efficient Market Hypothesis)一直被測試其真實性與可靠性,但其仍然是目前學術界未有肯定答案的問題。效率市場假說認為,『市場價格已經隱含了所有可取得資訊的影響力』,其意味著無人能對未來價格形成持續並成功地預測;另一方面,像技術分析這類的交易指標,其正是透過對過去價格走勢與市場型態的研究,試圖尋找未來可能的類似走勢,以期達到擊敗市場的目標。基於交易策略的超額報酬能視為預測能力的展現,交易指標應能當作效率市場假說的驗證方法。本論文透過創立一個『自動交易流程』,其包含『動態調整交易指標』與統計方法『決策樹(Classification and Regression Tree)』,以驗證目前全球股、匯市之超額報酬取得的可能性。本篇論文的結論是,我們所提供的方法的確在新興市場的股、匯市獲取極高之樣本外超額報酬,然而在已開發國家之股、匯市則無明顯擊敗市場報酬之能力;導致我們無法於,以開發國家獲取超額報酬的原因,可能可指向金融市場的反射理論(reflexivity)。
Behavioral finance and traditional technical trading indicators are similar in their roots. Both are rooted in the assumption that man acts for behavioral reasons in ways that may seem irrational by the standards of classical finance. Both of them approach financial markets by identifying patterns of human behavior to uncover opportunities of profits. On the behalf of classical finance, “Efficient Market Hypothesis” (EMH) has been testing for its validity, though it’s still an unsolved argument for academic finance now. The EMH states that the current market price incorporates all the information available, which leads to a conclusion that given the information available, no prediction of the future price changes can be made. On the other hand, trading indicator such as technical analysis, which is essentially the search for recurrent and predictable patterns in asset prices, attempts to forecast future price changes. To the extend that return of a trading strategy can be regarded as a measure of predictability, trading indicator can be seen as a test of the EMH. This paper attempts on creating an automated trading process, which includes “dynamic technical trading indicators” and statistical method “CART” (Classification and Regression Tree) to check the profitability on global equity and Currency Markets. We conclude that, our testing methods do make obvious positive profits on developing countries’ equity and foreign currency markets; the reason why our method can’t generate obvious positive profit in developed countries maybe can point to the “reflexivity” of financial market.
1. Introduction…1
2. Theory and Literature Review…3
2.1 Technical Trading Indicators…3
2.2 CART(Classification and Regression Tree) …6
2.3 Representative Studies…8
3. Methodology and Empirical results…11
3.1 Currency Market…12
3.1.1 Single Moving Average…12
3.1.2 Dual Moving Average…13
3.1.3 Combination of Single Moving average with stochastic oscillator…15
3.2 Equity Market…19
3.2.1 Single Moving Average…19
3.2.2 Dual Moving Average…21
3.2.3 Combination of Single Moving average with stochastic oscillator…22
3.3 Discussion on the appropriateness of our trading criteria…24
3.3.1 The trade off between stabilization and efficiency…24
3.3.2 The choice of back-test and forecasting Period…27
3.4 The issue of reflexivity…27
3.4.1 CART analysis on stochastic oscillator…29
3.4.2 The selection of price in entering and exiting position …32
4. Conclusion…35
Reference…37
Appendix…39
1.Park, C., & Irwin, S.H. “The profitability of technical analysis: A review”. AgMAS Project Research Report ,April (2004), http://ssrn.com/abstract=603481
2.Brorsen, B. W., and S. H. Irwin. “Futures Funds and Price Volatility.” The Review of Futures Markets, 6(1987):118-135.
3.Billingsley, R. S., and D. M. Chance. “Benefits and Limitations of Diversification Among Commodity Trading Advisors.” Journal of Portfolio Management, (Fall 1996):65-80
4.Henry O. Pruden , B. Paranque, and W. Baets. “Behavior Finance and Technical Analysis:,Interpreting Data From an Experiment on Irrational Exuberance: Applying a Cups Catastrophe Model and Technical Analysis Rules”, Journal of Technical Analysis ,Spring (2004)
5.Menkhoff, L. “Examining the Use of Technical Currency Analysis.” International Journal of Finance and Economics, 2(1997):307-318.
6.Andrew w. Lo, Herry Mamaysky, and Jiang Wang“Foundations of Technical Analysis: Computational Algorithms, Statistical Inference, and Empirical Implementation”, Journal of Finance, May (2000)
7.Cheung, Y. W., and C. Y. P. Wong. “A Survey of Market Practitioners’ Views on Exchange Rate Dynamics.” Journal of International Economics, 51(2000): 401-419
8.Cheung, Y. W., and M. D. Chinn. “Currency Traders and Exchange Rate Dynamics: A Survey of the US Market.” Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(2001):439-471.
9.Farrell, C. H., and E. A. Olszewski. “Assessing Inefficiency in the S&P 500 Futures Market.” Journal of Forecasting, 12(1993):395-420
10.Dooley, M. P., and J. R. Shafer. “Analysis of Short-Run Exchange Rate Behavior: March 1973to November 1981.” In D. Bigman and T. Taya, (ed.), Exchange Rate and Trade Instability: Causes, Consequences, and Remedies, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1983
11.Levich, R. M., and L. R. Thomas. “The Significance of Technical Trading Rule Profits in the Foreign Exchange Market: A Bootstrap Approach.” Journal of International Money and Finance, 12(1993):451-474.
12.Osler, C. L., and P. H. K. Chang. “Head and Shoulders: Not Just a Flaky Pattern.” Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Staff Reports, 4, 1995
13.Neftci, S. N., and A. J. Policano. “Can Chartists Outperform the Market? Market Efficiency Tests for ‘Technical Analysis.’” Journal of Futures Markets, 4(1984):465-478.
14.Neftci, S. N. “Naïve Trading Rules in Financial Markets and Wiener-Kolmogorov Prediction Theory: A Study of ‘Technical Analysis.’” Journal of Business, 64(1991):549-571.
15.Taylor, M. P., and H. Allen. “The Use of Technical Analysis in the Foreign Exchange Market.” Journal of International Money and Finance, 11(1992):304-314.
16.Lui, Y. H., and D. Mole. “The Use of Fundamental and Technical Analyses by Foreign Exchange Dealers: Hong Kong Evidence.” Journal of International Money and Finance
17.Alexander, S. S. “Price Movements in Speculative Markets: Trends or Random Walks.” Industrial Management Review, 2(1961):7-26.
18.Alexander, S. S. “Price Movements in Speculative Markets: Trends or Random Walks No. 2.” Industrial Management Review, 5(1964):25-46.
19.Van Horne, J. C., and G. G. C. Parker. “The Random-Walk Theory: An Empirical Test.” Financial Analysts Journal, 23(1967):87-92.
20.Dryden, M. “Filter Tests of U.K. Share Prices.” Applied Economics, 1(1970a):261-275.
21.Dryden, M. “A Statistical Study of U.K. Share Prices.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 17 (1970b):369-389.
22.Logue, D. E., R. J. Sweeney, and T. D. Willett. “The Speculative Behavior of Foreign Exchange Rates during the Current Float.” Journal of Business Research, 6(1978):159-174.
23.Dale, C., and R. Workman. “Measuring Patterns of Price Movements in the Treasury Bill Futures Market.” Journal of Economics and Business, 33(1981):81-87.
24.Brock, W., J. Lakonishock, and B. LeBaron. “Simple Technical Trading Rules and the Stochastic Properties of Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance, 47(1992):1731-1764.
25.Ratner, M., and R. P. C. Leal. “Tests of Technical Trading Strategies in the Emerging Equity Markets of Latin America and Asia.” Journal of Banking & Finance, 23(1999):1887-1905.
26.Goodacre, A., and T. Kohn-Speyer. “CRISMA Revisited.” Applied Financial Economics, 11 (2001):221-230.
27.Lee, C. I., K. C. Gleason, and I. Mathur. “Trading Rule Profits in Latin American Currency Spot Rates.” International Review of Financial Analysis, 10(2001):135-156.
28.Olson, D. “Have Trading Rule Profits in the Currency Markets Declined over Time?” Journal of Banking and Finance, 28(2004):85-105.
29.Jensen, M. C., and G. A. Benington. “Random Walks and Technical Theories: Some Additional Evidence.” Journal of Finance, 25(1970):469-482.
30.Sullivan, R., A. Timmermann, and H. White. “Data Snooping, Technical Trading Rule Performance, and the Bootstrap.” Journal of Finance, 54(1999):1647-1691.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊