跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.106) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/04/03 02:44
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:李怡姿
研究生(外文):Yi-Tzu Lee
論文名稱:包氏不動桿菌的臨床重要性與其碳醯胺基類抗藥性機制之研究
論文名稱(外文):Study on the clinical significance of Acinetobacter baumannii and its mechanism of carbapenem resistance
指導教授:陳德禮陳德禮引用關係
指導教授(外文):Te-Li Chen
學位類別:博士
校院名稱:國立陽明大學
系所名稱:臨床醫學研究所
學門:醫藥衛生學門
學類:醫學學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2013
畢業學年度:101
語文別:英文
論文頁數:108
中文關鍵詞:包氏不動桿菌碳醯胺基類抗藥性
外文關鍵詞:Acinetobacter baumanniicarbapenemresistance
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:955
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
抗生素治療包氏不動桿菌的療效難以確立,其原因包括:受到原有疾病因子的干擾、未校正感染嚴重度之差異、以及過去研究對象常摻雜了非包氏的其他不動桿菌菌株感染之病患。包氏不動桿菌與非包氏的不動桿菌其臨床重要性並不相同,以不動桿菌最常造成的臨床感染—肺炎—為例,包氏不動桿菌與非包氏的不動桿菌中最常見的菌種Acinetobacter nosocomialis相比,前者所造成之肺炎嚴重度較高,抗藥性比例較高,病患接受不適當抗生素治療的機會也較多。本回溯性研究不但利用分子生物學方法確定菌株菌種為包氏不動桿菌,排除多重菌種感染的病患,並根據APACHE II分數高低,將包氏不動桿菌菌血症病患病情嚴重度分級。結果發現,適當的抗生素治療可降低死亡率,而且其效應受到APACHE II分數的影響,嚴重度分群分析結果顯示,適當的抗生素治療降低死亡率的程度,在APACHE II分數高的族群更為顯著。進一步分析曾接受適當的抗生素治療的病患,其致病菌株不論是否對carbapenem具抗藥性,帶有ISAba1-blaOXA51-like基因結構即為死亡的獨立危險因子,為了探究此現象可能原因,我們繼續進行了以下的研究。在一位具有中央靜脈導管及腦室腹腔分流管的病人身上發現八株carbapenem heteroresistant之包氏不動桿菌(AbSK-11至-18)。其中一株(AbSK-17)在原先之敏感性實驗顯示對carbapenem 具感受性, 但使用meropenem 及amikacin治療感染結果卻失敗。這八株包氏不動桿菌族群中抗藥的細胞在所有細胞所佔的比例從1.85 ± 1.28 ×10-3 至5.59 ± 0.68 ×10-4 不等。在各種抗生素,包括β-lactam類抗生素的處理下,抗藥細胞的族群會增加。在這株包氏不動桿菌的質體上(pAbSK-OXA-82)有一blaOXA-82基因(屬於blaOXA-51-like家族),此blaOXA-82基因的上游有一ISAba1 (ISAba1-blaOXA-82)。不等成度抗藥性之原因乃pAbSK-OXA-82在細胞子代中不穩定的傳遞,造成有些子代有攜帶抗藥性的質體,而有些則無。獲得pAbSK-OXA-82的子代(AbSK-17R)其carbapenem的最低抑菌濃度為32 μg/ml;而不帶pAbSK-OXA-82的子代(AbSK-17S)其carbapenem的最低抑菌濃度則為2 μg/ml。在沒有抗生素的篩選下,AbSK-17R族群中抗藥的細胞比例會逐漸減少。然而,在有meropenem、sulbactam 及ciprofloxacin的培養環境下,可在不抗藥的AbSK-17S 中重新篩選出抗藥的突變株(AbSK-17SrevR)。此研究顯示包氏不動桿菌可以利用微調pAbSK-OXA-82的有無來應對環境中抗生素的有無。這也說明了即使phenotype對carbapenem為敏感,具有ISAba1-blaOXA-51-like的細菌仍可能在抗生素的存在下變成抗carbapenem,導致病患的不良預後。
The efficacy of antimicrobial therapy for Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia has been difficult to establish because of confounding by underlying diseases, severity of infection and differences in the pathogenicity of Acinetobacter species. There are differences in clinical significance between A. baumannii and other Acinetobacter species, among which Acinetobacter nosocomialis is the most common isolated species in clinical settings. Compared with patients with A. nosocomialis pneumonia, patients with A. baumannii pneumonia were significantly more likely to have more severe illness as determined by APACHE II score, and a greater frequency of antimicrobial resistance and inappropriate use of antimicrobials. This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the effect of appropriate antimicrobial therapy on 14-day mortality after adjustment for multiple risk factors. The population consisted of 252 patients with monomicrobial A. baumannii bacteremia admitted to a large teaching hospital in Taiwan. The isolates were identified to species level using reference molecular methods. Predictors of 14-day mortality were determined by logistic regression analysis. The influence of severity of infection, determined by Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, on the impact of appropriate use of antimicrobials on 14-day mortality was assessed by including an interaction term. The overall 14-day mortality was 75/252 (29.8%). The unadjusted mortality for appropriate antimicrobial therapy was 12/91 (13.2%). Appropriate therapy was independently associated with reduced mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.50; P < .001), and the effect was influenced by APACHE II score (OR for interaction term, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82-0.98; P = .02). Subgroup analysis revealed that the benefit of appropriate therapy limited to patients with high APACHE II scores (for scores > 25 and ≤ 35, OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.07-0.37 and for scores >35, OR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01-0.25). Appropriate antimicrobial therapy significantly reduced 14-day mortality for A. baumannii bacteremia in severely ill patients. In addition, carriage of the genetic structure ISAba1-blaOXA-82 in A. baumannii is an independent risk factor for 14-day mortality, regardless of carbapenem resistance or not. Therefore, the following study was performed to elucidate the possible mechanism of this phenomenon.
We have identified 8 carbapenem heteroresistant A. baumannii isolates (AbSK-11 to -18) belonging to the same strain from a patient with a central venous catheter and ventriculoperitoneal shunt related infection. One of the isolates (AbSK-17) was initially misidentified as susceptible to carbapenem by the agar dilution test, but the patient failed to response to combination therapy with meropenem and amikacin. Among the eight different isolates, the proportion of resistant cells in mid-log phase growth ranged from 1.85 ± 1.28 ×10-3 to 5.59 ± 0.68 ×10-4. The resistant subpopulation could be increased by treatment with several antibiotics, including non β-lactam antibiotics. In this strain, a blaOXA-51 -like, blaOXA-82 with ISAba1 upstream (ISAba1-blaOXA-82) was found on a plasmid (pAbSK-OXA-82). The reason for heteroresistance was found to be unstable propagation of pAbSK-OXA-82 in cells. The MICs of carbapenem in cells with or without pAbSK-OXA-82 was 32 μg/ml (AbSK-17R) and 2 μg/ml (AbSK-17S), respectively. The resistant subpopulation of AbSK-17R decreased in the absence of antibiotic selection. However, resistant revertants (AbSK-17SrevR) carrying pAbSK-OXA-82 could be re-isolated from AbSK-17S in the presence of meropenem, sulbactam and unexpectedly, ciprofloxacin. This bacterium might respond to selection pressure through the presence or absence of antibiotics by a fine-tuning of the mechanism for propagating pAbSK-OXA-82. It indicated that even though A. baumannii carrying plasmid borne ISAba1-blaOXA-82 were susceptible to carbapenems, they may become resistant to carbapenems in the presence of antibiotics and thereby contributed to a poor prognosis.

Abstract
In English ………………………………………………………………4
In Chinese ………………………………………………………………7
Introduction …………………………………………………………………9
Materials and Methods ……………………………………………………16
Results ………………………………………………………………………37
Discussion …………. ………………………………………………………83
References …………………………………………………………………90
Appendix ……………………………………………………………………105

1. Fournier PE, Richet H. The epidemiology and control of Acinetobacter baumannii in health care facilities. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42(5):692-9.
2. Joly-Guillou ML. Clinical impact and pathogenicity of Acinetobacter. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005;11(11):868-73.
3. Bergogne-Berezin E, Towner KJ. Acinetobacter spp. as nosocomial pathogens: microbiological, clinical, and epidemiological features. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1996;9(2):148-65.
4. Chang HC, Wei YF, Dijkshoorn L, Vaneechoutte M, Tang CT, Chang TC. Species-level identification of isolates of the Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-Acinetobacter baumannii complex by sequence analysis of the 16S-23S rRNA gene spacer region. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(4):1632-9.
5. Yamamoto S, Bouvet PJ, Harayama S. Phylogenetic structures of the genus Acinetobacter based on gyrB sequences: comparison with the grouping by DNA-DNA hybridization. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1999;49 Pt 1:87-95.
6. La Scola B, Gundi VA, Khamis A, Raoult D. Sequencing of the rpoB gene and flanking spacers for molecular identification of Acinetobacter species. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(3):827-32.
7. Nemec A, Musilek M, Maixnerova M, De Baere T, van der Reijden TJ, Vaneechoutte M, et al. Acinetobacter beijerinckii sp. nov. and Acinetobacter gyllenbergii sp. nov., haemolytic organisms isolated from humans. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009;59(Pt 1):118-24.
8. Houang ET, Chu YW, Chu KY, Ng KC, Leung CM, Cheng AF. Significance of genomic DNA group delineation in comparative studies of antimicrobial susceptibility of Acinetobacter spp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47(4):1472-5.
9. Vaneechoutte M, Dijkshoorn L, Tjernberg I, Elaichouni A, de Vos P, Claeys G, et al. Identification of Acinetobacter genomic species by amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33(1):11-5.
10. Dijkshoorn L, Van Harsselaar B, Tjernberg I, Bouvet PJ, Vaneechoutte M. Evaluation of amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis for identification of Acinetobacter genomic species. Syst Appl Microbiol. 1998;21(1):33-9.
11. Nemec A, Krizova L, Maixnerova M, van der Reijden TJ, Deschaght P, Passet V, et al. Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of the Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-Acinetobacter baumannii complex with the proposal of Acinetobacter pittii sp. nov. (formerly Acinetobacter genomic species 3) and Acinetobacter nosocomialis sp. nov. (formerly Acinetobacter genomic species 13TU). Res Microbiol. 2011;162(4):393-404.
12. Diancourt L, Passet V, Nemec A, Dijkshoorn L, Brisse S. The population structure of Acinetobacter baumannii: expanding multiresistant clones from an ancestral susceptible genetic pool. PLoS One. 2010;5(4):e10034.
13. Turton JF, Woodford N, Glover J, Yarde S, Kaufmann ME, Pitt TL. Identification of Acinetobacter baumannii by detection of the blaOXA-51-like carbapenemase gene intrinsic to this species. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(8):2974-6.
14. Chen TL, Siu LK, Wu RC, Shaio MF, Huang LY, Fung CP, et al. Comparison of one-tube multiplex PCR, automated ribotyping and intergenic spacer (ITS) sequencing for rapid identification of Acinetobacter baumannii. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007;13(8):801-6.
15. Ecker JA, Massire C, Hall TA, Ranken R, Pennella TT, Agasino Ivy C, et al. Identification of Acinetobacter species and genotyping of Acinetobacter baumannii by multilocus PCR and mass spectrometry. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(8):2921-32.
16. Espinal P, Seifert H, Dijkshoorn L, Vila J, Roca I. Rapid and accurate identification of genomic species from the Acinetobacter baumannii (Ab) group by MALDI-TOF MS. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011: doi:10.1111/j.469-0691.2011.03696.x.
17. Lim YM, Shin KS, Kim J. Distinct antimicrobial resistance patterns and antimicrobial resistance-harboring genes according to genomic species of Acinetobacter isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(3):902-5.
18. Lee JH, Choi CH, Kang HY, Lee JY, Kim J, Lee YC, et al. Differences in phenotypic and genotypic traits against antimicrobial agents between Acinetobacter baumannii and Acinetobacter genomic species 13TU. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;59(4):633-9.
19. Hsueh PR, Teng LJ, Chen CY, Chen WH, Yu CJ, Ho SW, et al. Pandrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii causing nosocomial infections in a university hospital, Taiwan. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8(8):827-32.
20. Fishbain J, Peleg AY. Treatment of Acinetobacter infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;51(1):79-84.
21. Maragakis LL, Perl TM. Acinetobacter baumannii: epidemiology, antimicrobial resistance, and treatment options. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(8):1254-63.
22. Munoz-Price LS, Weinstein RA. Acinetobacter infection. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(12):1271-81.
23. Sunenshine RH, Wright MO, Maragakis LL, Harris AD, Song X, Hebden J, et al. Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter infection mortality rate and length of hospitalization. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13(1):97-103.
24. Seifert H, Strate A, Pulverer G. Nosocomial bacteremia due to Acinetobacter baumannii. Clinical features, epidemiology, and predictors of mortality. Medicine (Baltimore). 1995;74(6):340-9.
25. Kwon KT, Oh WS, Song JH, Chang HH, Jung SI, Kim SW, et al. Impact of imipenem resistance on mortality in patients with Acinetobacter bacteraemia. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;59(3):525-30.
26. Falagas ME, Bliziotis IA, Siempos, II. Attributable mortality of Acinetobacter baumannii infections in critically ill patients: a systematic review of matched cohort and case-control studies. Crit Care. 2006;10(2):R48.
27. Chen HP, Chen TL, Lai CH, Fung CP, Wong WW, Yu KW, et al. Predictors of mortality in Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2005;38(2):127-36.
28. Cisneros JM, Reyes MJ, Pachon J, Becerril B, Caballero FJ, Garcia-Garmendia JL, et al. Bacteremia due to Acinetobacter baumannii: epidemiology, clinical findings, and prognostic features. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;22(6):1026-32.
29. Wisplinghoff H, Edmond MB, Pfaller MA, Jones RN, Wenzel RP, Seifert H. Nosocomial bloodstream infections caused by Acinetobacter species in United States hospitals: clinical features, molecular epidemiology, and antimicrobial susceptibility. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;31(3):690-7.
30. Falagas ME, Kasiakou SK, Rafailidis PI, Zouglakis G, Morfou P. Comparison of mortality of patients with Acinetobacter baumannii bacteraemia receiving appropriate and inappropriate empirical therapy. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;57(6):1251-4.
31. Erbay A, Idil A, Gozel MG, Mumcuoglu I, Balaban N. Impact of early appropriate antimicrobial therapy on survival in Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009;34(6):575-9.
32. Esterly JS, Griffith M, Qi C, Malczynski M, Postelnick MJ, Scheetz MH. Impact of Carbapenem Resistance and Receipt of Active Antimicrobial Therapy on Clinical Outcomes of Acinetobacter baumannii Bloodstream Infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55(10):4844-9.
33. Choi JY, Park YS, Kim CO, Yoon HJ, Shin SY, Kim YA, et al. Mortality risk factors of Acinetobacter baumannii bacteraemia. Intern Med J. 2005;35(10):599-603.
34. Coelho J, Woodford N, Turton J, Livermore DM. Multiresistant acinetobacter in the UK: how big a threat? J Hosp Infect. 2004;58(3):167-9.
35. Lee NY, Lee HC, Ko NY, Chang CM, Shih HI, Wu CJ, et al. Clinical and economic impact of multidrug resistance in nosocomial Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007;28(6):713-9.
36. Poirel L, Nordmann P. Carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii: mechanisms and epidemiology. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006;12(9):826-36.
37. Canduela MJ, Gallego L, Sevillano E, Valderrey C, Calvo F, Perez J. Evolution of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates obtained from elderly patients with respiratory tract infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;57(6):1220-2.
38. Limansky AS, Mussi MA, Viale AM. Loss of a 29-kilodalton outer membrane protein in Acinetobacter baumannii is associated with imipenem resistance. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40(12):4776-8.
39. del Mar Tomas M, Beceiro A, Perez A, Velasco D, Moure R, Villanueva R, et al. Cloning and functional analysis of the gene encoding the 33- to 36-kilodalton outer membrane protein associated with carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49(12):5172-5.
40. Gehrlein M, Leying H, Cullmann W, Wendt S, Opferkuch W. Imipenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumanii is due to altered penicillin-binding proteins. Chemotherapy. 1991;37(6):405-12.
41. Fernandez-Cuenca F, Martinez-Martinez L, Conejo MC, Ayala JA, Perea EJ, Pascual A. Relationship between beta-lactamase production, outer membrane protein and penicillin-binding protein profiles on the activity of carbapenems against clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003;51(3):565-74.
42. Marchand I, Damier-Piolle L, Courvalin P, Lambert T. Expression of the RND-type efflux pump AdeABC in Acinetobacter baumannii is regulated by the AdeRS two-component system. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48(9):3298-304.
43. Poirel L, Nordmann P. Acquired carbapenem-hydrolyzing beta-lactamases and their genetic support. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2002;3(2):117-27.
44. Walther-Rasmussen J, Hoiby N. OXA-type carbapenemases. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;57(3):373-83.
45. Queenan AM, Bush K. Carbapenemases: the versatile beta-lactamases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20(3):440-58.
46. Brown S, Amyes S. OXA (beta)-lactamases in Acinetobacter: the story so far. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;57(1):1-3.
47. Heritier C, Poirel L, Lambert T, Nordmann P. Contribution of acquired carbapenem-hydrolyzing oxacillinases to carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49(8):3198-202.
48. Bou G, Cervero G, Dominguez MA, Quereda C, Martinez-Beltran J. Characterization of a nosocomial outbreak caused by a multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii strain with a carbapenem-hydrolyzing enzyme: high-level carbapenem resistance in A. baumannii is not due solely to the presence of beta-lactamases. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38(9):3299-305.
49. Costa SF, Woodcock J, Gill M, Wise R, Barone AA, Caiaffa H, et al. Outer-membrane proteins pattern and detection of beta-lactamases in clinical isolates of imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii from Brazil. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2000;13(3):175-82.
50. Garner JS, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Horan TC, Hughes JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control. 1988;16(3):128-40.
51. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13(10):818-29.
52. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York, NY: John Wiley &; Sons, 1989.
53. Krawczyk B, Lewandowski K, Kur J. Comparative studies of the Acinetobacter genus and the species identification method based on the recA sequences. Mol Cell Probes. 2002;16(1):1-11.
54. CLSI. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: twenty-first informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S21. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. 2011.
55. Peleg AY, Seifert H, Paterson DL. Acinetobacter baumannii: emergence of a successful pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008;21(3):538-82.
56. Wu TL, Ma L, Chang JC, Su LH, Chu C, Leu HS, et al. Variable resistance patterns of integron-associated multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates in a surgical intensive care unit. Microb Drug Resist. 2004;10(4):292-9.
57. Tenover FC, Arbeit RD, Goering RV, Mickelsen PA, Murray BE, Persing DH, et al. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33(9):2233-9.
58. Woodford N, Ellington MJ, Coelho JM, Turton JF, Ward ME, Brown S, et al. Multiplex PCR for genes encoding prevalent OXA carbapenemases in Acinetobacter spp. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006;27(4):351-3.
59. Poirel L, Nordmann P. Genetic structures at the origin of acquisition and expression of the carbapenem-hydrolyzing oxacillinase gene blaOXA-58 in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50(4):1442-8.
60. Chen TL, Wu RC, Shaio MF, Fung CP, Cho WL. Acquisition of a plasmid-borne blaOXA-58 gene with an upstream IS1008 insertion conferring a high level of carbapenem resistance to Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52(7):2573-80.
61. Turton JF, Ward ME, Woodford N, Kaufmann ME, Pike R, Livermore DM, et al. The role of ISAba1 in expression of OXA carbapenemase genes in Acinetobacter baumannii. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2006;258(1):72-7.
62. Lee YT, Huang LY, Chiang DH, Chen CP, Chen TL, Wang FD, et al. Differences in phenotypic and genotypic characteristics among imipenem-non-susceptible Acinetobacter isolates belonging to different genomic species in Taiwan. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009;34(6):580-4.
63. Castanheira M, Toleman MA, Jones RN, Schmidt FJ, Walsh TR. Molecular characterization of a beta-lactamase gene, blaGIM-1, encoding a new subclass of metallo-beta-lactamase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48(12):4654-61.
64. Lee K, Yum JH, Yong D, Lee HM, Kim HD, Docquier JD, et al. Novel acquired metallo-beta-lactamase gene, blaSIM-1, in a class 1 integron from Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates from Korea. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49(11):4485-91.
65. Lu PL, Huang LY, Lian ST, Chang K, Lin CL, Hwang IJ, et al. How carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp. established in a newly constructed hospital. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008;31(5):463-6.
66. Pasteran F, Rapoport M, Petroni A, Faccone D, Corso A, Galas M, et al. Emergence of PER-2 and VEB-1a in Acinetobacter baumannii strains in the Americas. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50(9):3222-4.
67. Huang LY, Chen TL, Lu PL, Tsai CA, Cho WL, Chang FY, et al. Dissemination of multidrug-resistant, class 1 integron-carrying Acinetobacter baumannii isolates in Taiwan. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008;14(11):1010-9.
68. Whelan JA, Russell NB, Whelan MA. A method for the absolute quantification of cDNA using real-time PCR. J Immunol Methods. 2003;278(1-2):261-9.
69. Lee CL, Ow DS, Oh SK. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction for determination of plasmid copy number in bacteria. J Microbiol Methods. 2006;65(2):258-67.
70. Smajs D, Strouhal M, Matejkova P, Cejkova D, Cursino L, Chartone-Souza E, et al. Complete sequence of low-copy-number plasmid MccC7-H22 of probiotic Escherichia coli H22 and the prevalence of mcc genes among human E. coli. Plasmid. 2008;59(1):1-10.
71. Lee C, Kim J, Shin SG, Hwang S. Absolute and relative QPCR quantification of plasmid copy number in Escherichia coli. J Biotechnol. 2006;123(3):273-80.
72. Valenzuela JK, Thomas L, Partridge SR, van der Reijden T, Dijkshoorn L, Iredell J. Horizontal gene transfer in a polyclonal outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(2):453-60.
73. Segal H, Garny S, Elisha BG. Is IS(ABA-1) customized for Acinetobacter? FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005;243(2):425-9.
74. Chen TL, Lee YT, Kuo SC, Hsueh PR, Chang FY, Siu LK, et al. Emergence and distribution of plasmids bearing the blaOXA-51-like gene with an upstream ISAba1 in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates in Taiwan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(11):4575-81.
75. Lee YT, Kuo SC, Chiang MC, Yang SP, Chen CP, Chen TL, et al. Emergence of carbapenem-resistant non-baumannii species of Acinetobacter harboring a blaOXA-51-like gene that is intrinsic to A. baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(2):1124-7.
76. Lee NY, Chang TC, Wu CJ, Chang CM, Lee HC, Chen PL, et al. Clinical manifestations, antimicrobial therapy, and prognostic factors of monomicrobial Acinetobacter baumannii complex bacteremia. J Infect. 2010;61(3):219-27.
77. Chuang YC, Sheng WH, Li SY, Lin YC, Wang JT, Chen YC, et al. Influence of genospecies of Acinetobacter baumannii complex on clinical outcomes of patients with acinetobacter bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(3):352-60.
78. Harbarth S, Nobre V, Pittet D. Does antibiotic selection impact patient outcome? Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44(1):87-93.
79. Metan G, Sariguzel F, Sumerkan B. Factors influencing survival in patients with multi-drug-resistant Acinetobacter bacteraemia. Eur J Intern Med. 2009;20(5):540-4.
80. Cisneros JM, Rodriguez-Bano J, Fernandez-Cuenca F, Ribera A, Vila J, Pascual A, et al. Risk-factors for the acquisition of imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in Spain: a nationwide study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005;11(11):874-9.
81. Lee SO, Kim NJ, Choi SH, Hyong Kim T, Chung JW, Woo JH, et al. Risk factors for acquisition of imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: a case-control study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48(1):224-8.
82. Higgins PG, Wisplinghoff H, Krut O, Seifert H. A PCR-based method to differentiate between Acinetobacter baumannii and Acinetobacter genomic species 13TU. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007;13(12):1199-201.
83. Tsakris A, Ikonomidis A, Poulou A, Spanakis N, Vrizas D, Diomidous M, et al. Clusters of imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clones producing different carbapenemases in an intensive care unit. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008;14(6):588-94.
84. Zielenkiewicz U, Ceglowski P. Mechanisms of plasmid stable maintenance with special focus on plasmid addiction systems. Acta Biochim Pol. 2001;48(4):1003-23.
85. Figueiredo S, Poirel L, Croize J, Recule C, Nordmann P. In vivo selection of reduced susceptibility to carbapenems in Acinetobacter baumannii related to ISAba1-mediated overexpression of the natural bla(OXA-66) oxacillinase gene. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53(6):2657-9.
86. Superti SV, Martins Dde S, Caierao J, Soares Fda S, Prochnow T, Zavascki AP. Indications of carbapenem resistance evolution through heteroresistance as an intermediate stage in Acinetobacter baumannii after carbapenem administration. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2009;51(2):111-3.
87. Coyne S, Guigon G, Courvalin P, Perichon B. Screening and quantification of the expression of antibiotic resistance genes in Acinetobacter baumannii with a microarray. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2010;54(1):333-40.

連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
1. 73. 林惠彥,陸洛,吳珮瑀,吳婉瑜(2012),快樂的員工更有生產力嗎?組織支持與工作態度之雙重影響,中華心理學刊第54卷第4期。P451-469
2. 82. 王精文、徐碧慧、李珍玫(2007)創造力人格、領導型態與績效關係之探討,臺大管理論叢第17卷第2期。
3. 71. 蔡進雄(2013),「真誠領導在教育領導的應用與評析」,教育人力與專業發展第30卷第2期。
4. 69. 李新民,朱芷萱(2012),真誠領導的測量與相關後果變項初探,樹德科技大學學報第十四卷第一期民國 101年1月。
5. 66. 李鴻文,吳佩璇(2010),領導風格與組織承諾之關聯性研究,經營管理論叢第6卷第1期。P87-95
6. 64. 陳正專、劉佳鎮、王志全(2010),「教師理想行為-以學校行政者的觀點」,經營管理學刊第二/三期。
7. 19. 許道然(2003),公部門組織信任與組織公民行為關係之研究,空大行政學報第十三期。
8. 56. 李新民(2009),「幼兒教師的心理資本及其與工作表現的潛在關聯」,幼兒保育學刊第7 期。P1-24
9. 18. 許道然(2002),組織公民行為之研究,空大行政學報第十二期。P113-146
10. 35. 林鉦棽,蕭淑月,何慧清(2005),社會交換理論觀點下組織支持、組織知識分享行為與組織公民行為相關因素之研究:以信任與關係為分析切入點,人力資源管理學報春季號第五卷第一期。P77- 110
11. 33. 林鉦棽(2003),以組織承諾及工作滿足為實徵切入分析組織公民行為與員工工作考績之結構模式比較,人力資源管理學報夏季號第三卷第二期。P93-113
12. 14. 池進通、李鴻文、陳芬儀(2008),「五大人格特質與工作績效關係之研究」,經營管理論叢第四卷第二期。P1-9
13. 13. 沈進成、王銘傑(2007),工作士氣對工作績效影響關係之研究-以工作壓力為干擾變項,經營管理論叢第三卷第一期。P81-98
14. 9. 李雯智(2008),組織公民行為研究之評析,學校行政雙月刊 56。
15. 8. 陳儀蓉、黃芳銘(2006),組織公民行為量表在男女員工群體上之測驗恆等性檢定,測驗學刊第五十三輯第二期。P297-326