臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

在開放政府與資料運用風潮之下，國際上先進民主國家紛紛開啟開放政府資料(Open Government Data)計畫，結合資訊公開帶來的透明化、效率化，以及產業界蓬勃的能量，開啟了新的機會大門，在實現許多創新的運用價值同時，也帶來許多新挑戰。
本研究探討我國與國外經驗之開放政府資料策略與實際作為，統整相關研究與發展現況，提出開放政府資料之價值主張，包括經濟面之政府效能、創新經濟，以及社會面之民生資訊以及民主責任。並發展價值中心策略地圖，比較我國與外國經驗落差，探討政府政策目標對策略之影響。提倡正視開放政府資料之本質，平衡發展各層面價值，並輔以適當之推行與執行規劃。
英國與美國為國際間較早發展政府開放資料、也發展得較為成熟的國家。其中英國致力達到政府透明度領先全球、並成為第一個公開豐富政府資料以提升公部門效能與推動成長的指標性國家。而美國則以開放政府計畫為其開放政府資料策略之核心，圍繞實現開放透明之精神進行規劃。不論英國或美國，都由中央高層帶領，以積極推廣開放透明之政府文化為基礎，設定具體策略方向與時程規劃，使開放政府資料內化為預設之作業流程(Open by Default)。同時亦注重廣納外界之意見與需求，統整建立全國性開放資料平台，持續推動更多的開放資料以增進政府運作透明與資訊運用價值。
相對於英美在開放政府的前提之下推動開放政府資料，著重開放資料對於增進政府運作透明、落實問責等民主責任面價值，我國之政府開放資料被視為挖掘政府資訊加值得利機會之一環。過度聚集於資訊加值，而忽略開放資料本身，以及其相應之開放精神與平衡之價值發展，因此在策略上應有借鏡檢討並修正之空間。
關鍵字:開放資料;政府推動策略

Under the worldwide trend of Open Government and Value-added data reuse, governments around the world had started their Open Government Data initiatives. The movement aims to achieve the transparency and efficiency enabled by open data, and also the innovative energy it brings to the industry. Along with all these new opportunities, there are many new challenges faced by the government as well.
The study focused on the strategic and practical perspective of open government data. Based on the international comparison and analysis, the study develop the value-centric strategy map, and identify the value proposition of open government data in four perspective, that is, government efficiency, innovation and economic growth, informed citizen life, and democracy and accountability. The study also discussed about how government strategies differ under different government policy goal, and proposed a strategy map to achieved balanced social and economic value.
Open government data in UK and USA are relatively well-developed. The UK government is trying to achieve unprecedented transparency and efficiency of the public sector through open government data. Meanwhile, the USA government also considers open government data as the core of open government. Both governments showed great leadership to set specific action plan, establish the national open data platform and gradually transform their agencies with an open by default attitude.
Instead of UK and USA, where open government data movement is part of achieving an open government, the Taiwan government see open government data as another opportunity to harvest the economic value of government information assets. As a result, the Taiwan government focused only on the value-added reuse of government data, and open data itself and other social value behind it were relatively neglected. Therefore the study made several suggestions to close the gap and better realize the value of open government data.
key words:open data;government strategy

致謝 Ⅰ
摘要 Ⅱ
Abstract Ⅲ
目錄 IV
圖目錄 VI
表目錄 VII
第1章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究目的與研究問題 2
第2章 文獻探討 4
2.1 開放政府與開放資料 4
2.2 政府資訊分類 8
2.3 政府資訊釋出機制 12
2.4 價值理論 18
2.5 政府資訊開放運用價值 21
2.6 政府策略管理 28
2.7 開放政府與資訊再利用推動 33
2.8 小結 41
第3章 研究方法與架構 43
3.1 研究方法 43
3.2 理論與研究架構 46
第4章 國外經驗 48
4.1 全球背景 48
4.2 英國 50
4.3 美國 58
4.4 英美比較與價值中心策略地圖 67
4.5 討論與小結 76
第5章 我國案例 79
5.1 台灣開放政府資料 79
5.2 台北市政府公開資料平台 83
5.3 台灣策略地圖 91
討論與小結 95
第6章 結論與建議 102
6.1 開放政府資料策略 102
6.2 我國發展開放政府資料建議 104
6.3 研究限制與後續研究方向 105
第7章 參考資料 107

Access Info Europe, t. O. K. F. (2010). Beyond Access: Open Government Data and the ‘‘Right to Reuse’’.
Allee, V. (2000). "RECONFIGURING THE VALUE NETWORK." Journal of Business Strategy 21(4): 36 - 39.
Allee, V. (2008). "Value network analysis and value conversion of tangible and intangible assets." Journal of Intellectual Capital 9(1): 5-24.
Anttiroiko, A. V. (2010). "Innovation in democratic e-governance: Benefitting from Web 2.0 applications in the public sector." International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR) 6(2): 18-36.
Banisar, D. (2006). "Freedom of information around the world 2006: A global survey of access to government information laws." Privacy International, cited in Panos (2007) At the Heart of Change: The role of Communication in Sustainable Development.
Baumgarten, J. and M. Chui (2009). "E-government 2.0." mckinseyquarterly. com, July.
Berners-Lee, T. (2006). "Linked Data." W3C.
Berners-Lee, T. (2009). "On the next Web." from http://www.ted.com/talks/tim_berners_lee_on_the_next_web.html.
Berners-Lee, T. (2010). "The year open data went worldwide." from http://www.ted.com/talks/tim_berners_lee_the_year_open_data_went_worldwide.html.
Blakemore, M. and M. Craglia (2006). "Access to Public-Sector Information in Europe: Policy, Rights, and Obligations." The Information Society 22(1): 13-24.
Blanton, T. (2002). "The World''s Right to Know." Foreign Policy(131): 50-58.
Brito, J. (2007). "Hack, mash & peer: Crowdsourcing government transparency." ExpressO.
Chapman, R. A. and M. Hunt (2006). Open government in a theoretical and practical context, Ashgate Pub Co.
Chief Secretary to the Treasury (2009). Putting the frontline first: smarter government, London: HMGovernment.
Conrad, K. P. (2012). "U.S. Open Data Status and Case Study Conference on Open Data Applications In Taiwan." 政府公開資料 Open Data 加值推動策略會議.
Controller and Auditor-General, N. Z. (2008). "Charging fees for public sector goods and services." A good practice guide published under section 21 of the Public Audit Act 2001.
Council, E.-G. a. I. O. o. t. O. o. M. a. B. F. C. I. O. (2010). "Data.gov Concept of Operations."
CSC (2011). Unchartered waters the state of open data in europe. Public Sector Study Series.
Davies, T. (2010). "Open data, democracy and public sector reform." University of Oxford.
Davies, T. (2010). "The Roles of Open Government Data in Democratic Engagement and Reform of Public Services."
Dieter, B. (1985). Chapter 3 Public sector pricing. Handbook of Public Economics. J. A. Alan and F. Martin, Elsevier. Volume 1: 129-211.
Dul, J. and T. Hak (2008). Case study methodology in business research, Butterworth-Heinemann.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). "Building theories from case study research." Academy of management review: 532-550.
European Commission. "Re-use of Public Sector Information." from http://www.egovbarriers.org/?view=subject&subject=psi.
European Commission (1998). Public Sector Information: A Key Resource for Europe. Green Paper on Public Sector Information in the Information Society. COM (98) 585 final, 20 January 1999: 30.
Feldstein, M. S. (1972). "Equity and efficiency in public sector pricing: the optimal two-part tariff." The Quarterly Journal of Economics: 176-187.
Gill, H. S. and P. Yates-Mercer (1998). "The dissemination of information by local authorities on the World Wide Web." Journal of information science 24(2): 105-112.
Grimsley, M. and A. Meehan (2007). "e-Government information systems: Evaluation-led design for public value and client trust." European Journal of Information Systems 16(2): 134-148.
HM Government (2011). "Making open data real: A public consultation." Cabinet office, HM Government.
HM Treasury (2001). "Charges for Information: When and How." UK, HM Treasury.
HM Treasury (2011). "Further Detail on Open Data Measures in the Autumn Statement."
Huijboom, N. and T. Van den Broek (2011). "Open data: an international comparison of strategies." European Journal of ePractice: 4.
Irwin, D. (2002). "Strategy mapping in the public sector." Long Range Planning 35(6): 637-647.
Janssen, M. and G. Kuk (2007). "E-government business models for public service networks." International Journal of Electronic Government Research 3(3): 54-71.
Kalampokis, E., E. Tambouris, et al. (2011). "A classification scheme for open government data: towards linking decentralised data." International Journal of Web Engineering and Technology 6(3): 266-285.
Kalampokis, E., E. Tambouris, et al. (2011). Open Government Data: A Stage Model
Electronic Government. M. Janssen, H. Scholl, M. Wimmer and Y.-h. Tan, Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. 6846: 235-246.
Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton (2001). "Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: Part 1." Accounting Horizons 15(1): 87-104.
KPMG "Achieving the potential."
Lee, D. H. D. (2005). Contextual IT Business Value and Barriers: An E-Government and E-Business Perspective. System Sciences, 2005. HICSS ''05. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on.
Lee, K. and J. H. Hong (2002). "Development of an e-government service model: a business model approach." International Review of Public Administration 7(2): 109-118.
Lee, S. M., X. Tan, et al. (2005). "Current practices of leading e-government countries." Commun. ACM 48(10): 99-104.
Mayo, E. and T. Steinberg (2007). "The Power of Information."
McAdam, R. and T. Walker (2003). "An inquiry into balanced scorecards within best value implementation in UK local government." Public Administration 81(4): 873-892.
McKinsey Global Institute (2011). "Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition and productivity." McKinsey Global Institute, May.
Meijer, A. and M. Thaens (2010). "Alignment 2.0: Strategic use of new internet technologies in government." Government Information Quarterly 27(2): 113-121.
MEPSIR (2006). "Measuring European Public Sector Information Resources, Final Report of Study on Exploitation of public sector information-benchmarking of EU framework conditions." prepared for the European Commission.
Mintzberg, H. (1979). "An emerging strategy of" direct" research." Administrative Science Quarterly 24(4): 582-589.
MOGDy "Ready2Open."
Montagna, J. M. (2005). "A framework for the assessment and analysis of electronic government proposals." Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 4(3): 204-219.
Mooko, N. P. and L. O. Aina (1998). "The use of government publications: The case of social scientists at the university of botswana." Journal of Government Information 25(4): 359-365.
Newbery, D., L. Bently, et al. (2008). "Models of public sector information provision via trading funds." Cambridge University 26.
O''Reilly, T. (2010). Government as a Platform. Open Government, O''Reilly media: 11-39.
OECD (2006). "DIGITAL BROADBAND CONTENT: PUBLIC SECTOR INFORMATION AND CONTENT."
OECD (2008). "OECD RECOMMENDATION OF THE COUNCIL FOR ENHANCED ACCESS AND MORE EFFECTIVE USE OF PUBLIC SECTOR INFORMATION."
Office of Management and Budget (2009). "Open Government Directive in December 2009."
Open Government Working Group (2007). "8 Principles of Open Government Data."
Orszag, P. R. (2009). "Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies, Open Government Directive." Executive office of the president, OMB.
Osimo, D. (2008). "Web 2.0 in government: why and how." Institute for Prospectice Technological Studies (IPTS), JRC, European Commission, EUR 23358.
Osterwalder, A. and Y. Pigneur (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers, Wiley.
Parks, W. (1957). "Open Government Principle: Applying the right to know under the Constitution." Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 26: 1.
Pria International (2000). "Commercial exploitation of Europe''s Public Sector Information." Prepared for the European Commission.
Punch, K. (2000). Developing effective research proposals, Sage Publications Ltd.
Quinn, J. B., P. Anderson, et al. (1996). "Leveraging intellect." The Academy of Management Executive (1993-2005): 7-27.
Rados, D. L. (1981). Marketing for non-profit organizations, Auburn House Boston.
Research, C. f. T. P. (2010). "Open Government, Some next steps for the UK." London: Centre for Technology Policy Research.
Ritchie, J. and J. Lewis (2003). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers, Sage Publications Ltd.
Robinson, D., H. Yu, et al. (2009). "Government data and the invisible hand." Yale Journal of Law & Technology, Vol. 11, p. 160, 2009.
Robinson, D. G., H. Yu, et al. (2010). Enabling Innovation for Civic Engagement. Open Government, O''Reilly media: 83-89.
Rogers, E. M. (1983). "Diffusion of Innovations." The Free Press, New York, NY.
Stott, A. (2012). "Experience, Business Models and Case Study of Open Data in UK." 政府公開資料 Open Data 加值推動策略會議.
Taewoo, N. (2011). New Ends, New Means, but Old Attitudes: Citizens'' Views on Open Government and Government 2.0. System Sciences (HICSS), 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on.
Taylor, B. (2009). "Open Government, Data Reuse, and Semantic Publishing." Research e-Labs, from http://research.elabs.govt.nz/open-government-data-reuse-and-semantic-publishing/.
The Attorney General (2009). "The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)."
The White House (2012). "Building A 21st Century Platform To Better Serve The American People." Digital Government.
Thomas, G. (2011). How to do your case study: A guide for students and researchers, Sage Publications Ltd.
UK Office of Fair Trading (2006). Commercial use of public information.
Van Eechoud, M. and B. Van Der Wal (2007). "Creative commons licensing for public sector information Opportunities and pitfalls." Institute for Information Law, University of Amsterdam.
Vickery, G. (2011). Review of Recent PSI Re-Use Studies Published. E. Commission.
Vickery, G. (2011). Review of recent studies on PSI re-use and related market developments.
Wassenaar, A. (2000). E-governmental value chain models-E-government from a business (modelling) perspective. Database and Expert Systems Applications, 2000. Proceedings. 11th International Workshop on.
Watson, R. T. and B. Mundy (2001). "A strategic perspective of electronic democracy." Communications of the ACM 44(1): 27-30.
Web Content Managers Advisory Council. "Requirements and Best Practices Checklist." Retrieved 2/23, 2012, from http://www.howto.gov/web-content/requirements-and-best-practices/checklists/long.
Weiss, P. (2004). Borders in Cyberspace: Conflicting Public Sector Information Policies and their Economic Impacts. Global Spatial Data Infrastructure.
Wikipedia. (2011). "Creative Commons." Retrieved 12/11, 2011.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods, Sage publications, INC.
Yu, C.-C. (2007). A value-based strategic management process for e-government strategy planning and performance control. Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Theory and practice of electronic governance. Macao, China, ACM: 169-178.
Yu, C.-C. (2008). "Building a value-centric e-government service framework based on a business model perspective." Electronic Government: 160-171.
于馨媛, 林嘉鴻, et al. (2009). "我國政府資訊再利用之法制化研究." 行政院研究發展考核委員會.
行政院研究發展考核委員會 (2011). 從電子資料流通到加值運用.
行政院研究發展考核委員會 (2012). "政府部門資料加值推動策略與挑戰." 政府公開資料 Open Data 加值推動策略會議.
吳思華 (2000). "策略九說: 策略思考的本質, 台北: 臉譜."
林巧敏 (2005). "檔案應用與加值服務." 檔案與微縮(78): 1-8.
陳相如 (2005). "網路時代社會科學研究者使用政府資訊之探討."
陳美伶 (2005). "現行政府資訊公開法制及其落實." 研考雙月刊 29(3): 20-29.
湯德宗 (2006). "政府資訊公開法比較評析." 臺大法學論叢 35(6): 37-115.
黃彥棻 (2012). 政府6月底完成9類公開資料盤點. iThome online.
葉俊榮 (1996). "政府資訊公開制度之研究." 行政院研究發展考核委員會.
葉俊榮 (1998). "邁向電子化政府:資訊公開與行政程序的挑戰." 經社法制論叢.
廖淑君 (2007). "政府資訊加值利用與管理法制研究-以美國及英國為例." 科技法律透析.
管倖生 (2008). 設計研究方法, 全華圖書.
劉得正 (2010). "我國政府資訊再利用法制建構之研究." 世新大學法學院碩士論文.
劉靜怡 (2004). "政府數位資訊及其授權架構初探." 研考雙月刊 28(3): 61-70.
潘競恒, 李長晏, et al. (2009). "我國政府資訊再利用之法制化研究." 行政院研究發展考核委員會委託研究報告.
聯合報系民意調查中心 (2009). "民眾網路使用行為及需求變化趨勢分析."
謝銘洋, 趙義隆, et al. (2008). "數位典藏之保護與授權加值應用相關法律問題探討." 藝術教育研究(16): 77-106.
簡錫堦 (2008). "解構金權 鞏固民主." 臺灣民主季刊 5(3): 185-192.
行政院研究發展考核委員會 (2011). "第四階段電子化政府計畫."