臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

「知識」是現代知識經濟體系中最重要的競爭利器，且是維繫競爭優勢不可或缺的重要因子之一。如何使知識藉由人際網絡間的互動關係，進而推動一個整體、多角化的知識社會，已成為新世紀每個個體與任何組織最重要的管理議題。本研究承襲社會網絡理論的觀點，主要的研究問題是：探討在不同的人際網絡關係模式下，不同的知識分享動機所引發的知識分享行為為何?為回答上述問題，本研究採便利抽樣方式選取1,500位受測者為研究樣本，在控制性別、學歷與所屬產業別的基礎上，應用層級迴歸分析模型來進行實證，實證結果如下：
(一)人際網絡相關變項之實證結果發現：
(1) 網絡行動者間之年齡異質性程度愈高，彼此間知識分享行為的傾向愈高。
(2) 網絡行動者間之親密性的比率愈高，彼此間知識分享行為的傾向愈高。
(3) 網絡行動者間之教育異質性愈高，彼此間越不易進行知識分享行為。
(二)知識分享動機相關變項之實證結果發現：
(1) 利他主義傾向愈高者，知識分享行為的傾向愈高。
(2) 互利主義傾向愈高者，與知識分享行為無顯著關係。
(三)人際網絡與知識分享動機相關變項之交互作用，其實證結果發現：
(1) 網絡行動者間教育異質性愈高時，當其互利主義傾向愈高，其知識分享行為的傾向愈高。
(2) 網絡行動者間之網絡異質性與連帶強度皆愈高時，當其利他主義傾向愈高，對知識分享行為傾向皆無顯著關係。

Knowledge is playing an important role in intellectual economy and it’s also one of the main competitive factors. How to make knowledge become meaningful and widespread through personal networks has become an important management topic in this century. On the basis of this trend, this study follows social network theory to investigate the relationships among personal network structure, knowledge sharing motivation, and knowledge sharing behavior. To discuss this issue, this study adopts a sample of 1,500 workers from various industries and organizations by controlling their gender, education and occupation.
The empirical results showed that：(1)The higher age heterogeneity among network actors was, the higher the inclination of knowledge sharing behavior was;(2) The higher intimacy among network actors was, the higher the inclination of knowledge sharing behavior was;(3)The higher education heterogeneity among network actors was, the lower tendency of knowledge sharing behavior was;(4)The higher inclination of altruism was, the higher inclination of knowledge sharing behavior was;(5)Besides, knowledge sharing motivation will mediate the relationships between personal network structure and knowledge sharing behavior.

指導教授推薦書…………………………………………………………………....
口試委員會審定書………………………………………………………………....
明志技術學院學位論文授權書………………………………………………….... .iii
博碩士論文授權書……………………………………………………………….... iv
誌謝……………………………………………………………........…………….... v
中文摘要………………………………………………………………………….... vi
英文摘要………………………………………………………………………….... vii
目錄............................................................................................................................ viii
圖目錄........................................................................................................................ x
表目錄......................................................................................................................... xi
第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………………. 1
第一節 研究動機……………………………………………………………… 1
第二節 研究問題……………………………………………………………… 3
第三節 章節架構……………………………………………………………… 4
第二章 文獻探討…………………………………………………………………… 7
第一節 知識的基本概念……………………………………………………… 7
第二節 人際網絡與知識分享行為之關係…………………………………… 12
第三節 知識分享動機與知識分享行為之關係……………………………… 18
第四節 文獻評析……………………………………………………………… 18
第三章 研究方法………………………………………………………………… 20
第一節 研究架構…………………………………………………………… 20
第二節 研究假說…………………………………………………………… 21
第三節 變項測量…………………………………………………………… 25
第四節 問卷設計…………………………………………………………… 29
第五節 抽樣方法…………………………………………………………… 30
第四章 分析與討論……………………………………………………………… 32
第一節 信度與效度分析…………………………………………………… 32
第二節 敘述性統計分析…………………………………………………… 33
第三節 人際網絡與知識分享行為關係之分析…………………………… 35
第四節 知識分享動機與知識分享行為關係之分析……………………… 38
第五節 人際網絡與知識分享行為：知識分享動機調節效果之分析…… 39
第五章 結論與管理意涵………………………………………………………… 44
第一節 研究結論 …………………………………………………………… 44
第二節 管理意涵…………………………………………………………… 47
第三節 研究限制…………………………………………………………… 50
第四節 未來研究方向……………………………………………………… 51
參考文獻…………………………………………………………………………… 52
一、中文部分………………………………………………………………… 52
二、英文部分………………………………………………………………… 54
附 錄 …………………………………………………………………………… 63
圖目錄
圖1.1 研究流程圖…………………………………………………………… 6
圖3.1 概念性架構…………………………………………………………… 20
表目錄
表3.1 問卷回收情形…………………………………………………………… 30
表4.1 各衡量變數之信度值…………………………………………………… 33
表4.2 變項之敘述統計分析…………………………………………………… 34
表4.3 各變項的相關係數矩陣表……………………………………………… 35
表4.4 人際網絡與知識分享動機對知識分享行為影響之分析表…………… 36
表5.1 研究發現與研究假說對照表…………………………………………… 46

一、中文部分
1. 王文彥(2002)，知識分享內外在動機與知識分享行為之研究-以A公司為例，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
2. 王如哲(2001)，知識管理的理論與應用-以教育領域及其革新為例，臺北：五南出版社。
3. 司徒達賢(1994)，「台灣中小企業發展之經營策略」。輯於第一屆中小企業發展學術研討會論文集，頁235-265。
4. 吳思華(1999)，「台灣積體電路產業的動態網絡」，張笠雲所編的網絡台灣：企業的人情關係與經濟理性，頁65-127。
5. 吳盛(2000)，「台灣地區資訊人員職業生涯成就與性別差異相關性之探討」，輔仁管理評論，第7卷，第1期，頁79-102。
6. 林東清(2003)，知識管理，臺北：智勝文化。
7. 胡瑋珊(1999)，知識管理，臺北：中國生產力中心。
8. 張笠雲、譚康榮(1999)，「網絡台灣-企業人情關係與經濟理性」，收錄於形成產業網絡，張笠雲(編)，頁17-64，臺北：遠流出版社。
9. 張紹勳(2000)，研究方法，台中：滄海書局。
10. 陳心田(2003)，「人際網絡、網絡利益與事業生涯成功」，管理評論，第22卷，第4期，頁101-127。。
11. 陳心田(2003)，「關係人口與利社會組織行為：軍事後勤服務型組織的一項探索性研究」，人力資源管理學報，第三卷，第三期，頁107-125。
12. 陳介玄(1994)，協力網絡與生活結構-台灣中小企業的社會經濟分析，臺北：聯經出版社。
13. 陳介玄、高承恕(1991)，「台灣企業運作的社會秩序：人情關係與法律」，東海學報，第32期，頁219-232。
14. 許士軍(2000)，「關鍵資源與核心能力之基礎--知識管理的發展及系統觀」，中衛簡訊。
15. 湯令儀(2000)，知識分享網絡之研究，政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
16. 黃光國(1988)，人情與面子：中國人的權力遊戲，臺北：巨流圖書公司。
17. 傅仰止(1999)，「核心網絡中的聯繫與同質性」，台灣社會的個人網絡：第三次社會變遷基本調查研討會，中央研究院社會學研究所。
18. 楊國樞、文崇一(1992)，社會及行為科學研究法，臺北：東華書局。
19. 葉勇助(1999)，「網上社會網絡研究」，宣讀於第三屆資訊科技與社會轉型研討會，中央研究院社會所主辦，12月21日。
20. 鄭仁偉、黎士群(2001)，「組織公平、信任與知識分享行為之關係性研究」，人力資源管理學報，第一卷，第二期，頁069-093。
21. 劉清華(2002)，台中市國際觀光旅館業員工知識分享意願之研究，朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理系碩士論文。
22. 劉韻僖、葉匡時、王保鋅(2002)，「人際網絡在高科技產業扮演之角色-以雙灣關係為例」，淡江人文社會學刊，第11期，頁27-59。
23. 張火燦、劉淑寧(2002)，「從社會網絡理論探討員工知識分享」，人力資源管理學報，第二卷，第三期，頁101-113。
24. 魏順得(1994)，台灣中小企業創業行為之研究—台灣資訊軟體業個案研究，國立政治大學企業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
25. 譚大純(2002)，「知識環境對知識策略之決定性探討」，2002年科技管理年會暨研討會論文集。
26. 勤業管理顧問公司(Arthur Anderson)(2000)，知識管理的第一本書。臺北：商周出版；城邦發行。
二、英文部分
1. Agresti, A. and B. F. Agresti(1977). “Statistical Analysis of Quantitative Variation.” In K. F. Schuessler(Ed.), Sociological Methodology, pp.201-237. San Francisco：Jossey-Bass.
2. Alavi, M. and D. E. Leidner(1999). “Knowledge Management Systems：Emerging Views and Practices from the Field.” Communications of the AIS Vol.1, No.5.
3. Alavi, M., & D. E. Leidner(2001). “Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems：Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues.” MIS Quarterly, Vol.25, No.1, pp.107-136.
4. Beckman, T.(1997). ”Implementing the Knowledge Organization in Government.” Paper and Presentation, 10th National Conference on Federal Quality.
5. Balasubramanian, P., N. Kumar, M. Henderson, and K. Millie(1999). “Managing process knowledge for decision support.” Decision Support System, Vol.27, pp.145-162.
6. Baskett, G. D.(1973). “Interview decisions as determined by competency and attitude similarity.” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.57, pp.343-345.
7. Blau, P.(1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York：Wiley.
8. Brian, P. H.(2001). ”Value development and learning organization.” Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol.5, pp.19-32.
9. Burt, R. S.(1986). “A Note on Sociometric Order in the General Social Survey Network Data.” Social Networks, pp.149-174.
10. Burt, R. S.(1992). The social structure of competition. Cambridge：Harvard Business School Press. pp.57-91.
11. Coleman, J. S.(1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press.
12. Davenport, H. T.(1997). “Ten Principles of Knowledge Management and Four Case Studies.” Knowledge and Process Management, Vol.4, No.3, pp.187-208.
13. Davenport, T. H. and L. Prusak(1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Boston：Harvard Business School Press.
14. Dawes, P. L., D. Y. Lee, and G. R. Dowling(1999). “Informal Information Control in Complex Technological Purchase Situations.” Journal of High Technology Management Research, 10478310, Vol.10, Issue 2.
15. DE VOS H and E. P. H. Zeggelink(1994). “The emergence of reciprocal altruism and group-living: an object oriented simulation model of human social evolution.” Social Science Information, Vol.33, pp.493-517.
16. DE VOS H and E. P. H. Zeggelink(1997). “Reciprocal altruism in human social evolution: the viability of reciprocal altruism with a preference for ''old-helping-partners''.” Evolution and Human Behavior, Vol.18, pp.261-278.
17. Ducker, P. F.(1993). Post-Capitalist Society. New York：Harper Business Press.
18. Earl, M.(2001). “Knowledge management strategies：Toward a taxonomy.” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.18, pp.215-233.
19. Emerson, R. A.(1962). “Power-dependence Relations.” American Sociological Review, Vol.27, pp.31-41.
20. Emshwiller, J. R.(1991). “Suppliers struggle to improve quality as big firms slas their vendor rolls.” The Wall Street Journal,(August 16), B1,B2.
21. Fischer, C. S.(1977). Networks and Places: Social relations in the urban setting. New York：The Free Press.
22. Fischer, C. S.(1982). To Dwell Among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. Chicago：University of Chicago Press.
23. Fried, Y., and G. R. Ferris(1986). “The dimensionality of job characteristics：Some neglected issues.” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.71, No.3, pp.420-435.
24. Gina Lai and Odalia Wong (2002). “The tie effect of information dissemination：the spread of a commercial rumor in Hong Kong.” Social Networks, Vol.24, pp.49-75.
25. Granovetter, M. S.(1973). “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology, Vol.78, pp.1360-1380.
26. Granovetter, M. S.(1973). “Economic Action and Social Structure：The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology, Vol.91, No.3, pp.481-510.
27. Granovetter, M. S.(1974). Getting a Job: A study of Contacts and Careers, Cambridge, Mass.：Harvard University Press.
28. Granovetter, M. S.(1982). “The Strength of Weak Ties：A Network Theory Revisited.” In P. V. Marsden and N.Lin(Eds), Social Structure and Network Analysis, pp.105-130. Beverly Hills CA：Sage.
29. Granovetter, M. S.(1985). “Economic action and social structure：A theory of embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology, Vol.91, No.3, pp.481-510.
30. Herbert, T. T.(1976). Dimension of Organizational Behavior. New York：Collier Macmillian.
31. Hendriks P.(1999). “Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on motivation for knowledge sharing.” Knowledge and Process Management, Vol.6, No.2, pp.91-100.
32. Hidding G. J. and M. C. Shireen(1998), “Anatomy of a Learning Organization：Turning Knowledge into Capital at Anderson Consulting.” Knowledge and Process Management, Vol.5, No.1, pp.3-13.
33. Hoffman, M. L.(1975), “Altruistic Behavior and the Parent-Child Relationship.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.31, pp.937-943.
34. Holub, S. F.(2003). ”Knowledge Sharing Is A Change-Management Exercise.” Tax Practice Management, Vol.34, No.6, pp.361-363.
35. Homans, G.(1950). The Human Group. New York：Harcourt, Brace & World.
36. Huber, G. P.(1991). “Organizational learning：The contributing processes and the literature.” Organization Science, Vol.2, pp.88-115.
37. Ibarra, H.(1992). ”Homophily and differential returns：Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm.” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.37, pp.422-477.
38. Jackson, S. E., J. F. Brett, V. I. Sessa, D. M. Cooper, J. A. Julin, and K. Peyronnin(1991). “Some differences make a difference：Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover.” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.76, pp.675-689.
39. Jones, G and J. George(1998). “The Experience and Evolution of Trust：Implications for Cooperation and Teamwork.” Academy of Management Review.
40. Kelly, H. H., and J. W. Thibaut(1978). Interpersonal relations: A theoty of interdependence. New York：John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
41. Kim, W. C., and R. A. Mauborgne(1998). “Procedural Justice, Strategic Decision Making, and the Knowledge Economy.” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.19, pp.323-328.
42. Kirchmeyer, C.(1998). “Determinants of Managerial Career Success：Evidence and Explanation of Male/Female Differences.” Journal of Management, Vol.24, pp.673-692.
43. Krackhardt, D.(1992). “The Strength of Strong Ties：The Importance of Philos in Organizations.” In N. Nohria and R. G. Eccles, Networks and Organizations：Structure, Form, and Action. Boston：Harvard Business School Press. pp.216-239.
44. Larson and Andrea.(1991). “Partner Networks：Leveraging External Ties to Improve Entrepreneurial Performance.” Journal of Business Venturing, Vol.4, No.2, pp.133-147.
45. Leonard Barton D.(1995). Wellsprings of Knowledge：Building and Sustaining the Source of Innovation. Boston：Harvard Business School Press.
46. Lin, N.(1982). “Social Resources and Instrumental Action.” In P. V. Marsden and Nan Lin,(Eds), Social Structure and Network Analysis. Beverly Hills：Sage.
47. Lin, N.(1999). “Building a Network Theory of Social Capital.” Connection, Vol.22, No.1, pp.28-51.
48. Marsden, P. V.(1987). “Core discussion networks of Americans.” American Sociological Review. Vol.52, pp.122-131.
49. Mitchell, J. C.(1969). “The Concept and Use of Social Networks.” In Mitchell, J.C.(Ed.): Social Networks in Urban Settings, Manchester, U.P.
50. Morten, T. Hansen(1999). “The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits.” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.44, No.1, pp.82-111.
51. Münch, R.(1993). Sociological Theory: From the 1850s to the present. Chicago：Nelson-Hall Publosjers.
52. Nancy, M. D.(2000). Common Knowledge: How companies thrive by Sharing What They Know. Boston：Harvard Business School Press.
53. Nonaka, I.(1994). “A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation.” Organization Science, Vol.5, pp.14-37.
54. Nonaka, I., and H. Takeuchi(1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company：How Japanese Companies foster Creativity and Innovation for Competitive Advantage. New York：Oxford University Press.
55. Nunnally, J. C.(1967). Psychometric Theory. New York：McGraw-Hill.
56. Pan, S. L. and H. Scarbrough(1999). “Knowledge Management in Practice：An Exploratory Case Study.” Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, Vol.11, No.3, pp.359-374.
57. Petrash, G.(1996). Managing Knowledge Assets for Value. Boston：Knowledge-Based Leadership Conference, Linkage, Inc.
58. Polanyi, M.(1958). Personal Knowledge. Chicago：University of Chicago Press.
59. Polanyi, M.(1966). The Tacit Dimension. London：Routledge and Kegan Paul.
60. Polanyi, Karl.(1977). The livelihood of man. Edited by Harry Pearson. New York：Academic Press.
61. Provan, G.. K., and G.. J. Sebastian(1998). “Networks within Networks：Service Link Overlap Organization Cliques, and Network Effectiveness.” Academy of Management Journal, Vol.41, pp.453-467.
62. Quinn, J., P. Anderson, and S. Finkelstein(1996). “Managing Professional Intellect：Making the Most of the Best.” Harvard Business Review.
63. Rao V. S. and S. L. Jarvenpaa(1991). “Computer support of groups：Theory-based models for GDSS research.” Management Science, Vol.37, Issue 10, pp.1347-1362.
64. Ray Reagans and Ezra W. Zuckerman (2001), “Networks, Diversity and Productivity：The Social Capital of Corporate R&D Teams.” Organization Science Informs, Vol.12, No.4, July-August, pp.502-517.
65. Rhodes, S. R.(1983). ”Age-related differences in work attitudes and behavior：A review and conceptual Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin, Vol.93, pp.328-367.
66. Robbins, S. P.(1992). Essentials of Organizational Behavior. New Jersey：Prentice-Hall.
67. Senge, P.,(1997). “Sharing Knowledge”, Executive Excellence.
68. Smith, K. G., K. A. Smith, J. D. Olian, H. P. Jr, Sims, D. P. O’Bannon, and J. A. Scully(1994). “Top management team demography and process：The role of social integration and communication.” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.39, pp.412-438.
69. Stewart, T. A.(1998). “Is this job really necessary?”, Fortune, Vol.137, No.1, pp.154-155.
70. Scott, L. F.(1997). “Structural embeddedness and stability of interpersonal relations.” Louisiana State University of Network, Vol.19, pp.91-95.
71. Stott, K. and A. Walker(1995). “Teams, teamwork & Teambuilding：The manager’s complete guide to teams in organizations.” New York：Pretice Hall.
72. Sveiby, M.(2001). “A knowledge-based theory of the firm to guide in strategy formulation.” Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol.2, No.4, pp.344-359.
73. Szulanski, G.(1996). ”Exploring stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm.” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.17(winter special issue), pp.27-43.
74. Tampoe, M.(1993). “Motivation knowledge worker — the challenge for the 1990s in the Myers.” P.S.(ed.), Knowledge Management and organization Design (Boston, MA：Butterworth — Heinemann).
75. Teece, D. J.(1998). “Capturing Value from Knowledge Assets：The New Economy, Markets for Know-how and Intangible Assets.” California Management Review, Vol.40, pp.55-79.
76. Teece, D. J.(1998). “Research Directions for Knowledge Management.” California Management Review, Vol.40, pp.289-292.
77. Thomas, D. A. and K. E. Kram(1988). “Promoting Career-enhancing relationships in organizations：The Role of the Human Resource Professional.” In M. London and E. More.(Eds), The Human Resource Professional and Employee Career Development, pp.49-66. New York ：Greenwood.
78. Thomas, A. and G. R. Williams(1991). “A Strategy to Provide Retirement Benefits for International Transferees in a Global Company.” Benefits & Compensation International, pp.2-7.
79. Tsui, A. S., and C. A. O’Reilly,(1989). “Beyond simple demographical effects：The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads.” Academy of Management Journal, Vol.32, pp.402-423.
80. Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D. and K. R. Xin(1995). “Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment.” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.37, pp.549-579.
81. Von Hippel, E.(1994). ”Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation.” Management Science, Vol.40, pp.429-430.
82. von Krogh, G.(1998). “Care in knowledge creation.” California Management Review, Vol.40, No.3, pp.133-153
83. Wenpin Tsai(2001). “Knowledge Transfer In Intraorganizational Networks：Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance.” Academy of Management Journal Vol.44, No.5, pp.996-1004.
84. Wiig, K. M.(1997). “Knowledge Management: Where Did It Come from and Where Will It Go?” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.13, No.1, pp.1-14.