臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

面臨國內營建市場逐漸萎縮及因應全球化競爭時代來臨，許多營建業者有意拓展國際市場，尋求寬廣的發展空間。據統計，國際每年營建市場規模約四兆美元，全球225大營造公司總營收約5,628億美元，海外市場的營收約1,894億美元 佔33.7％，整體市場競爭日趨激烈，故營建業者如何爭取進入國際市場的空間為重要課題。當前有關國際化的文獻大都以製造業為主，國內營建產業國際化的論述則偏重企業組織策略及公司治理方面，甚少由國際化策略及模式的角度切入，故本研究希望藉由營建產業國際化的研究，瞭解其進入策略及模式。
首先，本研究回顧國際化的相關理論及文獻，包括國際化策略及進入模式等相關理論，並以折衷理論為基礎，參考 Hill et al.(1990)延伸折衷理論所提影響市場進入的因素及Chen(2005)研究營建產業國際化策略及模式，建構研究架構及命題；藉由個案研究方式，探討中鼎工程、大陸工程及亞新工程顧問公司等國內主要營建產業國際化的策略（包含國際市場進入時機、市場選擇、進入障礙及網絡關係等）及進入國際市場模式，並探討本研究之研究命題。
研究結果發現，營建業者通常採取設立分公司或子公司的方式進入國際市場，除資源變數中的知識價值因素無明顯關連外，策略變數、環境變數及資源變數均對國際市場進入模式選擇產生影響。研究顯示大致符合命題，惟發現採多國策略之營建業者，傾向採取高度控制的進入模式；在高度競爭市場，營建產業反而傾向於採取高資源投入的進入模式。
本研究最後歸納營建產業進入國際市場的策略，提出結論與建議，俾供營建產業進入國際市場決策之參考。

In face of gradual market shrinkage and global competitions, many domestic construction firms are planning to expand their business to the international market, in pursuit of a broader room for development. Statistics show the market scale of the international construction market each year is about US$4 trillion. The 225 top international contractors generate about US$562.8 billion revenue in total, and of which US$189.4 billion (about 33.7%) is from the overseas market. The competition in the entire market is becoming more intense, so how construction firms can enter the international market has become an important issue. The existing studies on internationalization have mostly concentrated on the manufacturing industry, and domestic studies on internationalization of the construction industry are more focused on corporate strategy and corporate governance. Such issue is seldom discussed from the perspective of internationalization strategies and models. Therefore, this study was aimed to explore the entry strategies and entry models of the construction firms into the international market.
First of all, theories and literature about internationalization strategies and entry models were reviewed. Based on the eclectic theory, factors of market entry proposed by Hill et al. (1990) and the internationalization strategies and models introduced by Chen (2005) were employed to construct the research framework and propositions. Through a case study, the internationalization strategies (including entry timing, market selection, entry barriers, cooperative network, and entry model) adopted by CTCI Corporation, Continental Engineering Corp., MAA Group Consulting Engineers, and other leading construction firms in Taiwan were investigated to establish propositions.
The research results revealed that the case firms entered the international market mainly by adopting the strategy of “setting up branches or subsidiaries”. Among the proposed propositions, except that knowledge value of the resource variables and the entry model was not significantly correlated, all the other variables including strategic variables, environmental variables, and resource were influential to the selection of entry model. The results generally supported the propositions. However, construction firms taking multi-domestic strategy were more inclined to adopt the high-control entry model. Besides, in the highly competitive market, construction firms would rather adopt the entry model of high resource commitments.
Finally, this study concluded by inducing the major entry strategies of the construction industry and providing suggestions as a reference for the construction industry on decision of entry into the international market.

目錄
口試委員會審定書 Ⅰ
誌謝 Ⅱ
中文摘要 III
英文摘要 IV
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景及動機 1
第二節 研究目的 4
第三節 研究範圍及對象 5
第四節 研究內容及流程 6
第二章 文獻回顧 9
第一節 國際化及相關理論 9
第二節 國際市場進入策略及模式 20
第三章 研究設計 44
第一節 研究架構 44
第二節 個案研究法 52
第三節 資料蒐集方法 55
第四節 資料分析方法 59
第四章 個案研究分析 61
第一節 中鼎工程股份有限公司 61
第二節 大陸工程股份有限公司 74
第三節 亞新工程顧問集團 84
第四節 研究命題探討 93
第五章 結論與建議 100
第一節 結論 100
第二節 建議 103
參考文獻 106
中文文獻. 106
英文文獻. 109
作者簡歷 115

中文文獻
1.大陸工程全球資訊網，檢索日期：2008年3月2日，檢索自：http://www.cec.com.tw/index.php。
2.大陸工程股份有限公司（2006），大陸工程股份有限公司2006年年報，檢索日期：2008年3月2日，檢索自http://www.cec.com.tw/page.php?cat_id=111&art_id=580。
3.中鼎工程股份有限公司，檢索日期：2008年3月2日，檢索自：http://www.ctci.com.tw/WWW/ctci/index.aspx。
4.中鼎工程股份有限公司（2006），中鼎工程股份有限公司2006年年報，檢索日期：2007年5月20日，檢索自：http://www.ctci.com.tw/WWW/2003/內容/投資關係/會計報表/96年報.pdf。
5.中鼎泰國公司（CTCI；Thailand），檢索日期：2008年3月20日，檢索自：http://www.ctci.co.th/aboutus.php。
6.公開資訊觀測站，瀏覽日期：2008年3月20日，檢索自：http://newmops.tse.com.tw/。
7.亞新工程顧問集團，檢索日期：2008年3月2日，檢索自：http://www.maa.com.tw/tc/index.asp。
8.京鼎工程建設有限公司網站，檢索日期：2008年3月29日，檢索自：http://www.jdec.com.cn/。
9.財團法人中技社，檢索日期：2008年3月29日，檢索自：http://www.ctci.org.tw/ct.asp?xItem=15&CtNode=3。
10.王文科、王智弘（2005），教育研究法，台北：五南。
11.王德頻（2005），台灣營造業國際化之研究，台灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文。
12.行政院經濟建設委員會（2007），我國營建業進軍海外市場拓展業務之利基及可行方向研究，台北。
13.吳思華（2000），策略九說— 策略思考的本質（三版），台北市：臉譜出版社。
14.吳錦波、蔡崇盛（1997），資管領域研究方法之研究比較，第八屆國際資訊管理學術研討會論文集，頁405-412。
15.吳讚庭（2003），交易成本、制度環境、國際化經驗對進入模式與經營績效之影響，元智大學管理研究所碩士論文。
16.李文瑞（2000），廠商海外投資股權模式關鍵影響因素之研究-台商赴東南亞投資之實證分析，亞太管理評論，5:2，頁 221-236。
17.李健民（2001），台灣廠商國際化之策略、營運組織與協調機制之研究－以台達電子和宏�砦q腦為例，台灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文
18.李蘭甫(1994)，國際企業論，台北：三民書局。
19.柯秋霜（2002），多國籍企業經營大陸市場對台灣子公司知識資源依賴程度之探討，中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
20.唐招貴（2005），南部旅遊業利基型市場關鍵成功因素之研究—以M公司為例，中山大學國際高階經營管理碩士學程碩士在職專班碩士論文。
21.莊婷媜（2007），教師教學信念與教學行為關係之個案研究，高雄師範大學物理學研究所碩士論文。
22.莊雅惠（2004），知識型企業發展階段研究-以兒童學習相關企業為例，政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
23.黃品翔等（2006），家庭成員對購屋決策影響之研究-著重核心與主幹家庭探討，逢甲大學土地管理學系學士論文。
24.廖文忠（2003），跨國工程公司之組織策略與公司治理－中鼎工程公司個案研究，台灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文
25.趙家鴻（2002），事業網絡關係、國際化程度與經營績效之研究--以核心廠商觀點，國立東華大學國際企業研究所碩士論文
26.潘淑滿（2003），質性研究：理論與應用（第一版），台北：心理。
27.鄭家韻（2008），探討運動觀光之發展－2007年太魯閣國際馬拉松為例，東華大學環境政策研究所碩士論文。
28.謝美如（2000），市場之進入障礙分析—以有線電視跨業經營電信業為例，中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文。
29.蘇張和惠（2003），國際市場進入模式的選擇—印度和台灣藥廠經驗之實證研究，成功大學企業管理學系（EMBA）專班碩士論文。



英文文獻
1.Agarwal, S., and Ramaswami, S. N. (1992), Choice of Foreign Market Entry Mode: Impact of Ownership, Location and International Factors, Journal of International Business Studies, 23(1), 1-28.
2.Ahmed, Z. U., Mohaman, B., Tan, B., and Johnson, J. P. (2002), International risk perceptions and mode of entry: A case study of Malaysian multinational firms, Journal of Business Research, 55(10), 805-816.
3.Anderson, E., and Gatignon, H. (1986), Modes of Foreign Entry: A Transaction Cost Analysis and Propositions, Journal of International Business Studies, 17(Fall), 1-26.
4.Arora, A., and Fosfuri, A. (2000), Wholly owner subsidiary versus technology licensing in the worldwide chemical Industry, Journal of International Business Studies, 31(4), 555.
5.Bain, J. S. (1956), Barriers to New Competition: their character and consequences in manufacturing industries, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
6.Ball and Mcculloch. (1999), International Business: The Challenge of Global Competition, 7th ed.
7.Bartlett, C. A., and Ghoshal, S. (1989), Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution, Boston, M. A.: Harvard Business School Press.
8.Betts, M., and Ofori, G. (1992), Strategic planning for competitive advantage in construction, Construction Management and Economics (10), 511-532.
9.Brouthers, K. D., and Brouthers, L. E. (2000), Acquisition or Greenfield Strat-up? Institutional, Cultural and Transaction Cost Influence, Strategic Management Journal, 21(1), 89-97.
10.Brouthers, L. E., Brouthers, K. D., and Werner, S. (2000), Perceived Environmental Uncertainty, Entry Mode Choice and Satisfaction with EC-MNC Performance, British Journal of Management, 11, 183-195.
11.Buckley, P. J., and Mark, C. (1976), The Future of the Multinational Enterprise, New York: Holmes and Meier Publishers.
12.Chang, S. J. (1995), International expansion strategy of Japanese firms: Capability building through sequential entry, Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 383-407.
13.Chen, C（2005）, Entry strategies for international construction markets: A Thesis in Architectural Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Department of Architectural Engineering.
14.Czinkota, M. R., Rivoli, P., and Ronkainen, I. A. (1992), International Business, Dryden Press, 2nd.
15.Davidson, W. H. (1980), The Location of Foreign Direct Investment Activity: Country Characteristics and Experience Effect, Journal of International Business Studies: 9-22.
16.Davidson, W. H. (1982), Global Strategic Management, New York: John Wiely and Sons.
17.Dean, J., and Holmes, S. (1997), Understanding business networks: Evidence from the manufacturing and service sectors in Australia, Journal of Small Business Management, 35(1), 78-84.
18.Delios, A., and Beamish, P. W. (2001), Survival and Profitability: the roles of experience and intangibles assets in foreign subsidiary performance, Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 1028-1038.
19.Delios, A., and Beamish, P. W. (1999), Ownership Strategy of Japanese Firms: Transactional, Institutional, and Experience Influences, Strategic Management Journal, 20, 915-933.
20.Deresky, H. (1994), International Management-Managing Across Borders and Cultures, New York, HarperCollins College Publishers.
21.Douglas, S. P., and Craig, C. S. (1995), Global marketing strategy, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York.
22.Dunning, J. H. (1980), Toward an eclectic theory of international production, Journal of International Business Studies, 11(1), 9-31.
23.Dunning, J. H. (1988), The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement and Some Possible Extensions, Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1), 1-31.
24.Dunning, J. H. (1993), Multinational Enterprises and The Global Economy, New York: Addison-Wesley.
25.Erramilli, M. K., Agarwal, S., and Dev, C. S. (2002), Choice between non-equity entry modes: an organizational capability perspective, Journal of international business studies, 33(2), 223-242.
26.Erramilli, M. K., and Rao, C. P. (1993), Service firms'' international entry mode-choice: a modified transaction-cost analysis approach, Journal of Marketing, 57(July), 19-38.
27.Han, S. H., and Diekmann, J. E. (2001), Approaches for making risk-based go/no-go decision for international projects, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 127(4), 300-308.
28.Harrigan, K. R.（1985）, Strategies for intrafirm transfers and outside sourcing, Academy of Management Journal, 28（4）, 914-925.
29.Hill, C. W. L., Hwang, P., and Kim, W. C. (1990), An eclectic theory of the choice of international entry mode, Strategic Management Journal, 11(2), 117-128.
30.Hitt, M. A., Robert E. H., and Hicheon, K. (1997), International Diversification: Effects on Innovation and Firm Performance in Product-Diversified Firms, Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 767-798.
31.Johanson, H., and Vahlne, J. E. (1977), The internationalization process of firm—A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitment, Journal of Business Studies, Spring/Summer, 23-32。
32.Johanson, J., and Mattsson, L.G. (1987), Internationalization in Industrial Systems - A network approach, In N. Hood and J.E. Vahne, ed., Strategies in global competition, London: Croom Helm.
33.Johanson, J., and Wiedersheim-Paul, F.(1975), The Internationalization of the Firm-Four Swedish Cases, Journal of Management Studies, 8（3）, 305-322.
34.Kamann, Dirk-Jan F., and Strijker, D. (1992), Mechanisms of coordination in the Dutch horticultural complex, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 19, 393-416.
35.Karakaya, F., and Stahl, M. J. (1991), Entry barriers and market entry decision: a guide for marketing executives, Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc., New York.
36.Kim, W. C., and Hwang, P. (1992), Global Strategy and Multinationals’ Entry Mode Choice, Journal of International Business Studies, 23(1), 29-54.
37.Klaus, M., and Ane, S. (2002), Networks, Serendipity and SME Entry into Eastern Europe, European Management Journal, 20(2), 179-188.
38.Kogut, B., and Singh, H. (1988), The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode, Journal of International Business Studies, 19 (3), 411-432.
39.Lambkin, M. (1992), Pioneering New Markets: A Comparison of Market Share Winners and Losers, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 9, 5-22.
40.Lambkin, M.（1988）, Order of Entry and Performance in New Markets, Strategic Management Journal, 9, 127-140.
41.Levy, J. B., and Yoon, E. (1995), Modeling global market entry decision by fuzzy logic with an application to country risk assessment, European Journal of Operational Research, 82 (1), 53-78.
42.Lieberman, M. B., and Montgomery, D. B.（1988）, First-Mover Advantages, Strategic Management Journal, 9, 41-58.
43.Luo, Y. D. (2001). Determinants of entry in an emerging economy: a multilevel approach., Journal of Management Studies, 38(3), 443-472.
44.Newbould, G. D., Buckley, P. J., and Thurwell, J. C. (1978), Going International—The Experience of Small Companies Overseas, N.Y. Associated Business Press, 1-20.
45.Porter, M. E.(1980), Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: The Free Press.
46.Prahalad, C. K., and Doz, Y. L.（1987）, The Multinational Mission-Balancing Local Demands and Global Vision, The Free Press.
47.Price, A. D. F., and Newson, E. (2003), Strategic management: consideration of paradoxes, processes, and associated concepts as applied to construction, Journal of Management in Construction, 19(4), 183-192.
48.Root, F. R. (1987), Entry strategies for international markets, D.C. Health and Company, Massachusetts.
49.Scherer, F. M. and Ross, D., （1990）, Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Boston, Houghton Mifflin.
50.Schnaars, S. P. （1986）, When Entering Growth Markets, Are Pioneers Better than Poachers? Business Horizons, 29, 27-36.
51.Thorelli, H. B. (1986), Network：Between Markets and Hierarchies, Strategic Management Journal, 7, 37-51.
52.Tse, D. K., Pan, Y., and Au, K. Y. (1997), How MNCs Choose Entry Modes and Form Alliances: The China Experience, Journal of International Business Studies, 28(4), 779-805.
53.Vernon, R. (1966), International investment and international trade in the product cycle, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, 190-207.
54.Warszawski, A. (1996), Strategic planning in construction companies, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 122(2), 133-140.
55.Welch, L. S., and Loustarinen, R. (1988), Internationalization: Evolution of a Concept, Journal of General Management, 14（2）, 34-55.
56.Woodcock, C. P., Beamsih, P., and Makino, S. (1994), Ownership-based Entry Strategies and International Performance, Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2), 253-272.
57.Yip, G. S. (1989), Global Strategy-In a World of Nations, Sloan Management Review , 31（1）, 29-41.