臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

資料包絡分析法(Data Envelopment Analysis, DEA)是效率評估方法中很重要的一種，而權重是資料包絡分析法的主要議題之一。近來發展出DEA-R這種以比率為概念的新模式以解決多餘權重限制所造的無法表達特定投入產出關係之問題。可是關於這種新模式的相關議題並沒有被深入的探討，因此本文首先發展了投入導向DEA-R，接著以效率前緣的概念證明了DEA-R模式的正確性。除此之外，本文藉由CCR與DEA-R的比較，發現多餘權重限制除了無法表達特定投入產出關係，還會造成低估效率值甚至更嚴重的假低效問題。最後，本文將權重作轉換以評估多餘權重限制造成低估的程度，評估的結果顯示，多餘的權重限制是造成效率值低估的原因之一，且高效DMU低估的幅度較大。因為投入導向DEA-R是一個受驗證模式且不包含多餘權重限制，所以可以安穩地採用投入導向DEA-R代替投入導向CCR以避免多餘權重限制造成的問題。

DEA is one of the most representative methods of efficiency evaluation and weight is a popular issue in DEA field. A new DEA model, DEA-R, had been developed for avoiding needless weight restriction, which causes the expression problem of specific input-output relationship. But some issue about DEA-R need to be discussed. So this article developed the input-oriented DEA-R and proved the validity of DEA-R through new defined efficient frontier. In addition, this article found that needless weight restriction causes not only the expression problem but also underestimation of efficiency and pseudo-inefficiency. Finally, this article converts the optimal weight to analyze the influences of needless weight restrictions. The result showed that the underestimations of efficient DMUs are bigger than in-efficient DMUs and the needless weight restriction really causes underestimation. Because input-oriented DEA-R is a valid model and excludes needless weight restriction, input-oriented DEA-R is a good substitued model for input-oriented CCR.

摘 要 i
Abstract ii
致 謝 ii
目 錄 iii
表 目 錄 v
圖 目 錄 vi

第一章 緒論 1
1.1研究背景 1
1.2研究動機與目的 1
1.3研究架構 3

第二章 文獻回顧 4
2.1 DEA的發展史 4
2.2 與比率有關的資料包絡分析法文獻 7
2.3 與權重有關的資料包絡分析法文獻 8
2.4 資料包絡分析法在醫療產業的應用 10
2.5 資料包絡分析法模式簡介 10
2.5.1 CCR模式 11
2.5.2 DEA-R模式 14
2.5.3 Super CCR簡介 14

第三章 研究方法 16
3.1 DEA-R模式 16
3.2 效率前緣 17
3.2.1 比率為軸的投入導向效率前緣 18
3.2.2 以比率為軸的產出導向效率前緣 21
3.3 超高效模式 23
3.4 權重轉換 24

第四章 研究成果 27
4.1 DEA-R模式正確性之驗證 27
4.2 CCR與DEA-R模式之比較 29
4.2.1 實例之比較 29
4.2.2 數學模式之比較 32

4.3 多餘權重限制的影響程度 36
4.3.1 效率值沒有差距的DMU之最佳權重的比較 38
4.3.2 效率值有差距的DMU之最佳權重的比較 39

第五章 結論與建議 44
5.1 結論 44
5.2 後續研究 47

參考文獻 48
Reference 49

參考文獻
1. 王媛慧、李文福，「我國地區醫院技術效率之研究－DEA方法的應用」，經濟研究，第四十卷，61-95頁，2004。
2. 石淦生、羅紀琼、陳國樑，「公私立綜合醫院服務層面效率差異之探討」，中華公共衛生雜誌，第十五卷，469-482頁，1996。
3. 洪維河、江東亮、張睿詒，「市場結構與組織特性對醫院營運效率之影響」，管理學報，第二十二卷，191-203頁，2005。
4. 高強、黃旭男及Toshiyuki Sueyoshi，「管理績效評估-資料包絡分析法」，華泰文化事業公式，2003。
5. 孫遜，「台北市立綜合醫院營運績效評估之研究」，管理學報，第二十卷，993-1022頁，2003。
6. 張秀雲、陳天惠，「利用統計訪法建立資料包絡分析模式之變數權數上下界限」，工業工程學刊，第二十四卷第二期，120-127頁，2007。
7. 張東生、曾國強，「利用融入價值判斷之資料包絡分析模式衡量台灣地區公共安全品質」，管理與系統，第七卷第三期，283-304頁，2000。
8. 張睿詒、侯穎蕙，「省立醫院最佳經營典範探討－技術效率、分配效率與整體效率之評估」，管理評論，第二十卷，1-27頁，2001。
9. 郭振雄、何怡澄，「非營利醫院的負債融資與營運效率及資本投資效率之關聯性」，經濟研究，第46卷第1期，141-170頁，2010。
10. 黃月桂、張保隆、李延春，「台北市立綜合醫院經營績效之評估」，中華公共衛生雜誌，第十五卷，382-390頁，1996。
11. 黃旭男，「資料包絡分析法使用程序之研究及其在非營利組織效率評估上之應用」，交通大學，博士論文，1993。
12. 游濬遠、邱健泰、耿慶瑞、黃馨瑩、邱志洲，「從效率性分析觀點探討醫療服務品質之提升－以台灣地區大型醫院為例」，品質學報，第十四卷，197-206頁，2009。
13. 劉春初，「公共部門效率衡量-DEA與AHP之應用」，中華管理評論，第一卷第二期，1998。
14. 劉春初，「資料包絡分析法權重設限之研究」，中華管理學報，第五卷第二期93-104頁，2004，。
15. 蕭基淵，「以DEA方法探討台灣林業效率之衡量」，交通大學，碩士論文，1989。

Reference
1. Allen, R., Athanassopoulos, A., Dyson, R.G., and Thanassoulis, E. "Weights Restrictions and Value Judgments in Data Envelopment Analysis: Evolution, Development and Future Directions", Annals of Operations Research, 73, pp. 13-34, 1997.
2. Anderson, p. and Peterson, N.C. "A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Unit in Data Envelopment Analysis", Management Science, 39, pp. 1261-1264, 1993.
3. Athanassopoulos, A., and Gounaris, C. “Assessing the technical and allocative efficiency of hospital operations in Greece and its resource allocation implications”, European Journal of Operational Research, 133(2) pp. 416-431, 2001.
4. Ballestero, E., and Maldonado, J.A. "Objective Measurement of Efficiency: Applying Single Price model to Rank Hospital Activities", Computers & Operations Research, 31, pp. 515-532, 2004.
5. Banker, R. D., Chanes, A., and Cooper, W. W. "Some Models for Estimating Technacal and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis", Management Science, 30, pp. 1078-1092, 1984.
6. Chang, H. H., "Determinants of hospital efficiency: the case of central government-owned hospitals in Taiwan," Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 26, pp. 307-317, 1998.
7. Chang, H. H., Cheng, M. A., & Das, S., "Hospital ownership and operating efficiency: Evidence from Taiwan," European Journal of Operational Research, 159, pp. 513-527, 2004.
8. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. "Measuring The Efficiency of Decision Making Units", European Journal of Operational Research, 2, pp. 429-44, 1978.
9. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., and Rhodes, E. "Short Communication: Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units", European Journal of Operational Research, 4, pp. 339, 1979.
10. Charnes, A., Clark, C. T., Cooper, W. W. and Golany, B. "A Developmental Study of Data Envelopment Analysis in Measuring the Efficiency of Maintence Units in the U.S. Air Force", Anuals of Operations Research, 2, pp. 95-112, 1985.
11. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Wei, Q. L., and Huang, Z. M. "Cone-Ratio Data Envelopment Analysis and Multi-objective Programming", International Journal of Systems Sciences, 20, pp. 1099–1118, 1989.
12. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Huang, Z. M., and Sun, D. B. "Polyhedral Cone-Ratio DEA Models with an Illustrative Application to Large Commercial Banks", Journal of Econometrics, 40, pp. 73–91, 1990.
13. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Lewin, A. Y. and Seiford, L. M., Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Application, Kluwer Academic, Boston, 1994.
14. Chen, Andrew, Hwang, Y., and Shao, B. "Measurement and Sources of Overall and Input Inefficiencies: Evidences and Implications in Hospital Services", European Journal of Operational Research, 161, pp.447-468, 2005.
15. Chen, Wen-Chih, and McGinnis, Leon F. "Reconciling Ratio Analysis and DEA as Performance Assessment Tools", European Journal of Operational Research, 178, pp. 277–291, 2007.
16. Chen, Yao, and Ali, Agha Iqbal, "Output–Input Ratio Analysis and DEA Frontier", European Journal of Operational Research, 142, pp. 476–479, 2002.
17. Chu, H. L. Liu, S. Z., & Romeis, J. C., "Does the implementation of responsibility centers, total quality management, and physician fee programs improve hospital efficiency? Evidence from Taiwan hospitals," Medical Care, 40, pp. 1223-1237, 2002.
18. Cook, W.D., and Seiford, L.M. "Data envelopment analysis (DEA) - Thirty years on ", European Journal of Operational Research, 192, pp. 1-17, 2009.
19. Despic´, O., Despic´, M., and Paradi, J.C. " DEA-R: Ratio-Based Comparative Efficiency Model, Its Mathematical Relation to DEA and Its Use in Applications ", Journal of Productivity Analysis, 28, pp.33-44, 2007.
20. Dyson, R. G., and Thanassoulis, E. "Reducing Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis ", Journal of the Operational Research Society, 39, pp. 563-576, 1988.
21. Ersoy, K., Kavuncubasi, S., Ozcan, Y. A., & Harris, J. M., "Technical efficiencies of Turkish hospitals: DEA approach," Journal of Medical Systems, 21, pp. 67-74, 1997.
22. Farrell M.J. "The Measurement of Productive Efficiency", Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120, pp.253-281, 1957.
23. Giokas, D. I., "Greek hospitals: how well their resources are used," Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 29, pp. 73-83, 2001.
24. Gonzalez-Bravo, MI. "Prior-Ratio-Analysis Procedure to Improve Data Envelopment Analysis for Performance Measurement", Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58, 1214-1222, 2007.
25. Hillier, F., and Lieberman, G., Introduction to Operations Research, McGraw Hill, Boston, 2001.
26. Katharaki M. "Approaching the Management of Hospital Units with an Operation Research Technique: The Case of 32 Greek Obstetric and Gynaecology Public Units", Health Policy, 85, pp. 19-31, 2008.
27. Kirigia, J. M., Emrouznejad, A., Cassoma, B., Asbu, E. Z., & Barry, S. "A Performance Assessment Method for Hospitals: The Case of Municipal Hospitals in Angola," Journal of Medical Systems, 32, pp. 509-519, 2008.
28. Liu, S.T., and Chuang, M. "Fuzzy Efficiency Measures in Fuzzy DEA/AR with Application to University Libraries", Expert Systems with Applications, 36, pp.1105-1113, 2009.
29. Morita, Hiroshi, Hirokawa, Koichiro, and Zhu, Joe "A Slack-Based Measure of Efficiency in Context-Dependent Data Envelopment Analysis" Omega-The International Journal of Management Science, 33, pp. 357 – 362, 2005.
30. Nayar, P., and Ozcan, Y. A. "Data Envelopment Analysis Comparison of Hospital Efficiency and Quality" Journal of Medical Systems, 32, pp. 193-199, 2008.
31. Pareto, V., Manuel d’Economic Polotique, Girard, Paris, 1927.
32. Podinovski, V.V. "Computation of Efficient Targets in DEA Models with Production Trade-offs and Weight Restrictions" European Journal of Operational Research, 181, pp. 586-591, 2007.
33. Renner, A., Kirigia, J. M., Zere, E. A., Barry, S. P., Kirigia, D. G., Kamara, C., & Muthuri, L. HK., "Technical efficiency of peripheral health units in Pujehun district of Sierra Leone: a DEA application," Bmc Health Services Research, 5, 2005.
34. Roll, Y., Cook, W., and Golany, B. "Controlling Factor Weights in Data Envelopment Analysis", IIE Transactions, 23, pp. 2–9, 1991.
35. Roll, Y., and Golany, B. "Alternate Methods of Treating Factor Weights in DEA ", Omega-The International Journal of Management Science, 21, pp. 99–109, 1993.
36. Seiford L.M. and Zhu, J. "Context-Dependent Data Envelopment Analysis—Measuring Attractiveness and Progress", Omega-The International Journal of Management Science, 31, 397-408, 2003.
37. Thanassoulis, E., Boussofiane, A., and Dyson, R.G. "A Comparison of Data Envelopment Analysis and Ratio Analysis as Tools for Performance Assessment" Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 24, pp. 229-244, 1996.
38. Thompson, R. G., Singleton, F. D., Jr., Thrall, R. M., and Smith, B. A. "Comparative Site Evaluations for Lacating a High-Energy Physics Lab in Texas", Interfaces, 16, pp.35-49, 1986.
39. Thompson, R. G., Langemeier, L. N., Lee, C. T., Lee, E., and Thrall, R. M. "The Role of Multiplier Bonds in Efficiency Analysis with Application to Kansas Farming", Journal of Econometrics, 46, pp. 93–108, 1990.
40. Tone, Kaoru "A Slack-Based Measure of Efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis", European Journal of Operational Research, 130, pp. 498-509, 2001.
41. Tone, Kaoru "A Slacks-Based Measure of Super-Efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis", European Journal of Operational Research, 143, pp. 32–41, 2002.
42. Tracy, D.L., and Chen, B.A. "Generalized Model for Weight Restrictions in Data Envelopment Analysis", Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56, pp. 390-396, 2005.
43. Valdmanis, V. G., Rosko, M. D., and Mutter, R. L. "Hospital Quality, Efficiency, and Input Slack Differentials", Health Services Research, 43, pp.1830-1848, 2008,.
44. Wong, Y. B., and Beasley, J. E. "Restricting Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis", Journal of the Operational Research Society, 41, pp. 829-835, 1990.
45. Wu, Desheng, and Liang, Liang "Aggregated Ratio Analysis in DEA" International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 4, pp. 369–384, 2005.