臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

本論文旨在探討，彼得辛格「動物解放」的倫理觀點。動物解放運動是為了對抗，制度性剝削動物的情形，辛格則為此一激進的主張，提出嚴謹的哲學性辯護。
辛格指出部分動物像人一樣，具有「避免痛苦」的基本利益，並且不同物種的痛苦程度，可以粗略作比較。他認為「利益平等考量」是平等的基本要求，也是道德推理得到的終極原則；依據此原則，不應該排除或貶低動物的利益。因此，集約飼養以及多數的動物實驗，犯了嚴重的道德錯誤。
關於生命價值的高低，辛格採取偏好效益主義的立場，分成三類來處理。殺害具自我意識的個體所造成的損失，不能藉由製造新的個體而獲得彌補，因此人或動物的生存偏好，都應該受到保障。但是依效益主義理論，有條件地殺害缺乏自我意識、但是能感受痛苦的個體，是被允許的；不過符合條件的情形，實際上幾乎不存在。至於完全不能感受痛苦的個體，沒有道德地位可言。
對辛格的批評，可歸類為幾個方向。（1）道德界線的問題：包括語言能力、道德自主性、互惠關係。（2）平等考量的問題：包括賦予某些經驗較高的價值，將導致道德地位的不平等，以及積極責任的內容如何。（3）效益主義的問題：包括簡化道德、預設所有利益可量化、對生命的保障並非絕對的。（4）倫理觀的根本問題：包括忽略情感與社會關係的道德重要性，以及只重視個體、以人的能力為典範，而與生態倫理產生衝突。
最後，研究者建議了五個例子，將辛格的主張，適度轉化為教學的內容，既符合教育的目標和原則，也協助學生更瞭解動物的處境，思索尊重生命的意涵。

The purpose of this thesis is to introduce and discuss Peter Singer’s theory about animal liberation. Peter Singer is probably the most influential theorist in animal liberation movement, which is aimed at opposing the deprivation of animals. Singer’s theory is a philosophical defense for the radical animal liberation movement. He believes that some animals, like people, can suffer, and the avoidance of sufferings is a fundamental interest for a being. He uses the “equal consideration of interests” as a basic requirement for equality and the ultimate principle of ethics.
He claims that neither the exclusion nor degrading of animal’s interests can be justified. In ethical considerations, the same degree of suffering (of different species) should be taken equally. Intensive animal farming and most animal experiments cause strong pains for the animals only to fulfill minor and trivial interests for human beings. Therefore, intensive animal farming and animal experiments violate an ethical principle, which is the equal consideration of interests.
Regarding the value of lives, Singer takes a preference utilitarian approach. He claims that only the self-conscious beings have preferences and only those beings’ lives should be protected by the ethical principle. Those who are not self-conscious but can feel pains can be morally killed and replaced, providing the killing process is painless. (However, such painless meat production hardly exists.) Those who cannot feel pains have no moral standings.
I also discussed the criticism to Singer’s theory, which can be classified into four types: (1) questions about the moral boundary, (2) questions about the equal consideration of interests, (3) questions about utilitarianism, and (4) fundamental questions about ethics. Hopefully, my introduction and discussion of Singer’s theory would provide some clarification in Taiwan’s environmental education regarding animal right.
I also propose 5 examples where Singer''s ideas are used in education. Hopefully, these examples would show students the immorality of animal''s current situation and teach them to respect lives.

內容目次
誌謝 I
摘要 II
ABSTRACT III
內容目次 V
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的與範圍 4
第三節 研究對象 4
第四節 名詞解釋 7
第五節 各章介紹 9
第二章 動物解放思想的背景 10
第一節 傳統思想中動物的地位 10
第二節 近代的動物保護主張與運動 15
第三節 對動物道德地位的學術探討 23
第三章 彼得辛格之「動物解放」倫理 26
第一節 「動物解放」倫理的基礎 26
第二節 「動物解放」倫理的主張 42
第四章 對「動物解放」倫理的批判 76
第一節 動物解放與動物權利的差別 76
第二節 道德界線的劃分標準 82
第三節 關於平等考量的問題 90
第四節 效益主義與生命的可替代性 98
第五節 情感與關係的重要性 104
第六節 動物解放與生態保護 106
第七節 研究者的看法 108
第五章 教學應用 111
教案一：狗的來歷 113
教案二：大象哪裡去了─象牙 117
教案三：大象哪裡去了─馬戲團 120
教案四：神聖的騾子 122
教案五：千禧的希望 126
第六章 結論與建議 128
第一節 結論 128
第二節 建議 132
參考文獻 133

辛格（Singer, P.）（1990／1996）：《動物解放》。孟祥森、錢永祥譯。台北：關懷生命協會。
李奧波(Leopold, A.)（1949 / 1988）：《砂地郡曆誌》。費張心漪譯。台北：十竹書屋。
李澤厚（1990）：《批判哲學的批判》。台北：風雲時代。
林火旺（1997）：《倫理學》。台北：空中大學。
波依曼編(Pojman, L. P.) （？/1997）：《為動物說話：動物權利的爭議》。張忠宏等譯。台北：桂冠。
萬俊人（1990）：《現代西方倫理學史》。北京：北京大學出版社。
葉力森（1995）：《動物與法律》。台北：中華民國保護動物協會。
《簡明大英百科全書》（1988）。台北：台灣中華書局。
羅竹民（1997）：〈馬戲是馬的遊戲嗎？〉。《人本教育札記》，第101期，85-98頁。
羅傑‧卡拉斯（1998）：《完美的和諧：動物與人的親密關係》。陳慧雯譯。台北：天下遠見。
Bekoff, M. & Meaney, C. A. (Eds.) (1998). Encyclopedia of animal rights and animal welfare. CT: Greenwood Press.
Benton, T. (1993). Natural relations: Ecology, animal rights, and social justice. NY: Verso.
Callicott, J. Baird (1980). Animal Liberation: A Triangular Affair, Environmental Ethics, 2, 311-328.
Callicott, J. Baird (1998). ''Back Together Again'' Again, Environmental Values, 7, 461-475.
Caplan, M. W. (1993). Compassion, creation, and community: A case for humane education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Union Institute.
Clark, S. R. L. (1977). The moral status of animals. NY: Oxford University Press.
DeGrazia, D. (1993). Equal consideration and unequal moral status. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 31(1), 17-31.
DeGrazia, D. (1996). Taking animals seriously: Mental life and moral status. NY: Oxford University Press.
Fox, M. W. & Mickley, L. D. (Eds.) (1987). Advance in animal welfare science 1986/1987. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
Frey, R. G. (1979). Rights, interests, desires and beliefs. American Philosophical Quarterly, 16(3), 233-239.
Jamieson, Dale (1998). Animal Liberation is an Environmental Ethic. Environmental Values , 7, 41-57.
Leopold, Aldo (1949). A Sand County Almanac. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nash, R. F. (1989). The rights of nature: A history of environmental ethics. London: the University of Wisconsin Press.
Nelson, J. A. (1985). Recent studies in animal ethics. American Philosophical Quarterly, 22(1), 13-24.
Paterson, D. & Ryder, R. D. (Eds.) (1979). Animals’ Rights: A symposium. London: Centaur Press.
Regan, T. & Singer, P. (Eds.) (1976). Animal rights and human obligations. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (1998). NY: Routledge.
Ryder, R. D. (1989). Animal revolution: Changing attitudes towards speciesism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Sapontzis, S. F. (1987). Morals, reason, and animals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Singer, P. (1974). Democracy and disobedience. NY: Oxford University Press.
Singer, P. (1979). Killing humans and killing animals. Inquiry, 22(2), 145-156.
Singer, P. (1980). Animals and the value of life. In Regan, T. (Ed.) Matters of life and death. PA: Temple University Press.
Singer, P. (1980). Marx. NY: Oxford University Press.
Singer, P. (Ed.) (1981). The expanding circle: Ethics and sociobiology. Oxford : Clarendon Press.
Singer, P. (1983). Hegel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Singer, P. (1985). In defence of animals. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Singer, P. & Wells, D. (1985). Making babies : the new science and ethics of conception. NY: C. Scribner''s Sons.
Singer, P. (Ed.) (1986). Applied ethics. NY: Oxford University Press.
Singer, P. (1987). Life’s uncertain voyage. In Pettit, P., Sylvan, R. & Norman, J. (Eds.) Metaphysics and morality: Essays in honour of F. F. C. Smart. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Singer, P. (1987). Animal liberation or animal rights. The Monist, 70(1), 3-14.
Singer, P. (Ed.) (1990). Embryo experimentation. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Singer, P. (Ed.) (1991). A Companion to ethics. Oxford: Blackwell Reference.
Singer, P. (1993). Practical ethics. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Singer, P. (Ed.) (1994). Ethics. NY: Oxford University Press.
Singer, P. & Kuhse, H. (1994). Should the baby live? : The problem of handicapped infants. Aldershot : Gregg Revivals.
Singer, P. (1995). Rethinking life & death : the collapse of our traditional ethics. NY: St. Martin''s Press.
Singer, P. (1996). Ethics and the limits of scientific freedom. The Monist, 79(2), 218-229.
Singer, P. (1997). The Great Ape Project. Bridging the GAP, March 1997.
Singer, P. (1997). How are we to live? : ethics in an age of self-interest. NY: Oxford University Press.
Singer, P. (1998). Ethics into action: Henry Spira and the animal rights movement. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Singer, P. (Ed.) (1998). A Companion to bioethics. Oxford: Blackwell Reference.
Westerlund, S. R. (Ed.) (1982). Humane education and realms of humaneness. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.