跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.19) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/09/05 02:56
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:賴冠名
研究生(外文):Ming-kuan Lai
論文名稱:使用者資訊隱私顧慮和網站隱私機制對信任的影響 ─ 以Facebook台灣使用者為例
論文名稱(外文):The Influence of User’s Privacy Concern and Websites Privacy Mechanism on Trust ─ An Example of Facebook Users in Taiwan
指導教授:何靖遠何靖遠引用關係
指導教授(外文):Chin-Yuan Ho
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中央大學
系所名稱:資訊管理研究所
學門:電算機學門
學類:電算機一般學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2010
畢業學年度:98
語文別:中文
論文頁數:77
中文關鍵詞:資訊隱私顧慮隱私機制信任行為意圖
外文關鍵詞:Information privacy concernbehavioral intentiontrustprivacy mechanism
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:95
  • 點閱點閱:5044
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:1484
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
近年來Facebook使用者人數逐漸增加,各項資料都顯示Facebook已成了世界上最熱門的社群網路帄台。因為眾多的使用者在Facebook上分享他們的個人資訊,關於資訊隱私的顧慮也隨著不斷升高。過去研究中,關於Facebook之研究僅只有初步之使用行為調查,缺乏對於其使用者隱私顧慮的影響之研究文獻。另一方面,Facebook提供之隱私機制是否可以影響使用者對於Facebook的信任,過去也無相關之文獻探討。因此本研究之主要目的在於瞭解使用者的資訊隱私顧慮、網站隱私機制以及其他信任之前置因素,對於使用者信任和風險的影響,以及是否影響後續分享資訊之意圖。
研究中採用問卷調查法,透過Facebook應用程式上設計問卷,並蒐集了428份Facebook使用者的有效樣本,進行變異數及結構方程模型分析。研究結果發現以下四點:一、不同的使用者族群的資訊隱私顧慮程度皆不同,例如性別、教育程度、使用網路經驗及過去曾使用過不真實資訊。二、使用者資訊隱私顧慮會顯著影響使用者對Facebook的信任及感受的風險,進而影響使用意圖。三、Facebook隱私機制會顯著影響使用者對Facebook的信任。四、其他信任前置因素對Facebook使用者的信任和過去文獻不完全一致。
In recent year, there are increasing numbers of Facebook users, and many reports showed that Facebook has become the most popular social network platform. When Facebook users share their personal information on Facebook, it makes information privacy concerns rising. In the past studies, what researchers finds in users’ behavior are only some preliminary investigation, but lacks of studies about Facebook users’ privacy concerns . On the other hand, there is no relevant past literature of the privacy mechanism which Facebook provides can affect the users’ trust on the platform. The main purpose of this study is to understand which factors, including user''s information privacy concerns, the website’s privacy mechanisms, and other antecedents of trust, will impact the trust and risk of users on Facebook, and whether it will affect the intention of information of sharing,.
The study surveyed 428 valid samples through the Facebook application, and conducted variance analysis and structural equation modeling. The results showed that the following four conclusions: First, the different user groups will have different levels of information privacy concerns, such as gender, education level, experience in using the Internet and in the past had used false information. Second, the user information privacy concerns will significantly affect the users’ trust and risk, and the intention of sharing information. Third, Facebook’s privacy mechanism will significantly affect the users’ trust. Finally, other Facebook users’ antecedents of trust are not consistent with past literature.
第一章 緒論 ................................................................................................................. 1
第一節 研究背景與動機...................................................................................... 1
第三節 研究目的與問題...................................................................................... 5
第三節 論文章節.................................................................................................. 6
第二章 文獻探討 ......................................................................................................... 7
第一節 Facebook簡介 ......................................................................................... 7
第二節 隱私........................................................................................................ 14
第三節 信任及風險............................................................................................ 21
第三章 研究方法 ....................................................................................................... 31
第一節 研究架構................................................................................................ 31
第二節 研究假說................................................................................................ 32
第三節 變數定義與衡量.................................................................................... 40
第四節 研究設計................................................................................................ 46
第五節 資料分析方法........................................................................................ 48
第四章 資料分析與結果 ........................................................................................... 49
第一節 樣本結構分析........................................................................................ 49
第二節 衡量模型................................................................................................ 53
第三節 結構方程模型分析................................................................................ 57
第五章 結論與建議 ................................................................................................... 64
第一節 研究結論................................................................................................ 64
第二節 管理意涵................................................................................................ 68
第三節 研究限制及未來研究方向.................................................................... 70
參考文獻...................................................................................................................... 72
國外文獻.............................................................................................................. 72
國內文獻.............................................................................................................. 76
參考網站.............................................................................................................. 77
國外文獻
[1]. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
[2]. Anderson, E., & Weitz, B. (1989). Determinants of continuity in conventional industrial channel dyads. Marketing Science, 8(4), 310-323.
[3]. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.
[4]. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
[5]. Campbell, A. J. (1999). Relationship marketing in consumer markets: A comparison of managerial and consumer attitudes about information privacy. Journal of Direct Marketing, 11(3), 44-57.
[6]. Chin, W. W., Gopal, A., & Salisbury, W. D. (1997). Advancing the theory of adaptive structuration: The development of a scale to measure faithfulness of appropriation. Information Systems Research, 8(4), 342.
[7]. Dwyer, C., Hiltz, S., & Passerini, K. (2007). Trust and privacy concern within social networking sites: A comparison of Facebook and MySpace.
[8]. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
[9]. Federal Trade Commission. (2000). Privacy Online: Fair Information Practices in the Electronic Marketplace. A Report to Congress’, Washington DC, online at: http://www.ftc.gov/reports/privacy2000/privacy2000.pdf
[10]. Ganesan, S. (1994). Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. The Journal of Marketing, 58(2), 1-19.
[11]. Gefen, D. (2000). E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust. Omega, 28(6), 725-737.
[12]. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS quarterly, 51-90.
[13]. Govani, T., & Pashley, H. (2007). Student awareness of the privacy implications when using Facebook. Unpublished manuscript retrieved September.
[14]. Hair, J. F. J., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis: with readings: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
[15]. Hayduk, L. A. (1987). Structural equation modeling with LISREL: Essentials and advances: Johns Hopkins Univ Pr.
[16]. Hoffman, D. L., Novak, T. P., & Peralta, M. (1999). Building consumer trust online. Communications of the ACM, 42(4), 80-85.
[17]. Hosmer, L. T. (1995). Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 379-403.
[18]. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
[19]. Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N., Saarinen, L., & Vitale, M. (1999). Consumer trust in an Internet store: A cross-cultural validation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5(2), 1-35.
[20]. Koller, M. (1988). Risk as a determinant of trust. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 9(4), 265-276.
[21]. Kumar, N., Scheer, L. K., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. M. (1995). The effects of perceived interdependence on dealer attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(3), 348-356.
[22]. Lauer, T. W., & Deng, X. (2007). Building online trust through privacy practices. International Journal of Information Security, 6(5), 323-331.
[23]. Law, C. PRIVACY IN CYBERSPACE.
[24]. Lipford, H. R., Besmer, A., & Watson, J. (2008). Understanding privacy settings in facebook with an audience view. Usability, Psychology, and Security.
[25]. Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S., & Agarwal, J. (2004). Internet Users'' Information Privacy Concerns(IUIPC): The Construct, the Scale, and a Causal Model. Information Systems Research, 15(4), 336-355.
[26]. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.
[27]. McKnight, D. H., & Chervany, N. L. (2001). What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: an interdisciplinary conceptual typology. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(2), 35-59.
[28]. McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). The impact of initial consumer trust on intentions to transact with a web site: a trust building model. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(3-4), 297-323.
[29]. McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2003). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334-359.
[30]. McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., & Chervany, N. L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 473-490.
[31]. Nunnally, J. C., Bernstein, I. H., & Berge, J. M. F. (1994). Psychometric theory: McGraw-Hill New York.
[32]. Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101-134.
[33]. Pavlou, P. A., & Gefen, D. (2004). Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Information Systems Research, 15(1), 37-59.
[34]. Phelps, J., Nowak, G., & Ferrell, E. (2000). Privacy concerns and consumer willingness to provide personal information. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 27-41.
[35]. Regan, K. (2003). Online Privacy Is Dead –What Now? E-Commerce Times, 2.
[36]. Reichheld, F. F., & Schefter, P. (2000). E-loyalty. Harvard business review, 78(4), 105-113.
[37]. Sharma, S., Durand, R. M., & Gur-Arie, O. (1981). Identification and analysis of moderator variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 291-300.
[38]. Sheehan, K. B., & Hoy, M. G. (2000). Dimensions of privacy concern among online consumers. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 19(1), 62-73.
[39]. Smith, H. J., Milberg, S. J., & Burke, S. J. (1996). Information privacy: measuring individuals'' concerns about organizational practices. MIS quarterly, 20(2), 167-196.
[40]. Stone, E. F., Gueutal, H. G., Gardner, D. G., & McClure, S. (1983). A field experiment comparing information-privacy values, beliefs, and attitudes across several types of organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(3), 459-468.
[41]. Van Dyke, T. P., Midha, V., & Nemati, H. (2007). The effect of consumer privacy empowerment on trust and privacy concerns in e-commerce. Electronic Markets, 17(1), 68-81.
[42]. Van Slyke, C., Shim, J. T., Johnson, R., & Jiang, J. (2006). Concern for information privacy and online consumer purchasing. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7(6), 415-444.
[43]. Wang, P., & Petrison, L. A. (2006). Direct marketing activities and personal privacy. A consumer survey. Journal of Direct Marketing, 7(1), 7-19.
[44]. Warren, S. D., & Brandeis, L. D. (1890). Right to Privacy. Harv. L. Rev., 4, 193.
[45]. Westin, A. F. (1967). Privacy and freedom: London.
[46]. Whelan, B. (2005). Facebook, a fun resource or invasion of privacy. Athensnews. com, 8.
[47]. Wulf, K. D., Odekerken-Schroder, G., & Iacobucci, D. (2001). Investments in consumer relationships: a cross-country and cross-industry exploration. The Journal of Marketing, 65(4), 33-50.
[48]. Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840-1920. Research in organizational behavior, 8, 53-111.
國內文獻
[1]. 吳亞馨、朱素玥、方文昌,2008,網路購物信任與科技接受模式之實證研究,資訊管理學報,15卷1期:123 - 152。
[2]. 孫思源、詹淑敏、趙佩如,2009,顧客對行動商務購物意願之影響因素—由安全及風險觀點探討,顧客滿意學刊,5卷2期:127 - 154。
參考網站
[1]. Facebook 統計資料. from http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics
[2]. Facebook 隱私設定. from http://www.facebook.com
[3]. Facebook 隱私導覽與說明. from http://www.facebook.com/privacy/explanation.php
[4]. Facebook 隱私權政策. from http://www.facebook.com/policy.php
[5]. Wikipedia: Facebook 簡介. from http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top