跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.60) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/06/24 12:46
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:陳柏翔
研究生(外文):CHEN,PO-HSIANG
論文名稱:價值共創如何影響服務創新-以服務主導邏輯觀點
論文名稱(外文):How Value Co-creation Affects Service Innovation-A Service Dominant Perspective
指導教授:鄭啟均
指導教授(外文):CHENG, CHI-JYUN
口試委員:趙琪許嘉文鄭啟均
口試委員(外文):JAW, CHYIHSU, CHIA-WENCHENG, CHI-JYUN
口試日期:2019-05-27
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立臺北大學
系所名稱:企業管理學系
學門:商業及管理學門
學類:企業管理學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2019
畢業學年度:107
語文別:中文
論文頁數:54
中文關鍵詞:價值共創服務創新自我效能服務主導邏輯雙元性創新
外文關鍵詞:value co-creationservice innovationservice dominant logicself-efficacyservice innovation ambidexterity
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:940
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:108
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
在現今的知識型社會中,服務為最主要的經濟來源,且重視科技與創新。而企業為了要保持長期的競爭優勢,勢必要同時兼顧雙元創新。所謂的雙元創新包含探索及盡用,探索式創新帶給公司及社會革命性的轉變,而盡用式創新則為公司帶來穩定的收益。本研究以服務主導邏輯的觀點,來探討顧客與企業間的價值共創對於服務創新之影響,且加入過去常應用於教育及人力資源領域的自我效能理論,來觀察價值共創對於服務創新的強化作用。本研究針對過去曾經使用過金融理財服務的消費者進行問卷發放,實證結果顯示,價值共創對於探索式服務創新以及盡用式服務創新皆產生了正向影響,但顧客的自我效能並沒有對上述變數關係造成調節。
In today’s knowledge-based society, services are the most important source of economic, and technology and innovation are valued. In order to maintain a long-term competitive advantage, it is necessary for enterprises to balance innovation ambidexterity. This study focus on the impact of customer-enterprise value creation on service innovation from the perspective of service dominant logic, and joins the self-efficacy theory that was often used in education and human resources to observe the moderation between value co-creation and service innovation. This study is based on the questionnaires issued by people who have used financial services in the past. The empirical results show that value co-creation has a positive impact on exploratory service innovation and exploitative service innovation, but the customers self-efficacy does not causes moderation effect on the above variable relationship.
中文摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
目 錄 III
圖次 V
表次 VI
第ㄧ章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 研究流程 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 服務主導邏輯 5
第二節 價值共創 10
第三節 服務創新 13
第四節 自我效能 15
第三章 研究設計 19
第一節 研究架構 1
第二節 研究假說發展與推論 20
第三節 變數定義與衡量 23
第四節 問卷設計 25
第五節 統計分析方法 25
第四章 資料分析 29
第一節 敘述性統計 29
第二節 模式驗證與信效度分析 31
第五章 結論與建議 41
參考文獻 45
附錄一 研究調查問卷 51
著作權聲明 54

一、中文參考文獻
吳明隆(2007)。SPSS 操作與應用:問卷統計分析實務。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
吳統雄(1985)。態度與行為研究的信度與效度:理論,應用,反省。 民意學術專刊,夏季號,29-53。
俞洪亮、蔡義清、莊懿妃(2010)。商管研究資料分析SPSS的應用二版。華泰文化事業股份有限公司。
二、英文參考文獻
Baer, M., Oldham, G. R., Jacobsohn, G. C., & Hollingshead, A. B. (2008). The personality composition of teams and creativity: The moderating role of team creative confidence. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(4), 255-282.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191.
Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of social and clinical psychology, 4(3), 359-373.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control: Macmillan.
Bandura, A. (2010). Self‐efficacy. The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology, 1-3.
Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 447-457.
Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of management review, 28(2), 238-256.
Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments.
Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational research methods, 4(1), 62-83.
Constantin, J. A., & Lusch, R. F. (1994). Understanding resource management: How to deploy your people, products, and processes for maximum productivity: Irwin Professional Pub.
Coombs, R., & Miles, I. (2000). Innovation, measurement and services: the new problematique. In Innovation systems in the service economy (pp. 85-103): Springer.
Duncan, T., & Estabrook, G. F. (1976). An operational method for evaluating classifications. Systematic Botany, 373-382.
Edgett, S. (1994). The traits of successful new service development. Journal of Services Marketing, 8(3), 40-49.
Edvardsson, B., & Olsson, J. (1996). Key concepts for new service development. Service Industries Journal, 16(2), 140-164.
Fisk, R. P., Brown, S. W., & Bitner, M. J. (1993). Tracking the evolution of the services marketing literature. Journal of retailing, 69(1), 61-103.
Gadrey, J., Gallouj, F., & Weinstein, O. (1995). New modes of innovation: how services benefit industry. International journal of service industry management, 6(3), 4-16.
Gallouj, F., & Weinstein, O. (1997). Innovation in services. Research policy, 26(4-5), 537-556.
Galvagno, M., & Dalli, D. (2014). Theory of value co-creation: a systematic literature review. Managing Service Quality, 24(6), 643-683.
Gibcus, J. H., Menkema, L., Mastik, M. F., Hermsen, M. A., de Bock, G. H., van Velthuysen, M. L. F., ... & van den Brekel, M. W. (2007). Amplicon mapping and expression profiling identify the Fas-associated death domain gene as a new driver in the 11q13. 3 amplicon in laryngeal/pharyngeal cancer. Clinical Cancer Research, 13(21), 6257-6266.
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of management Journal, 47(2), 209-226.
Gist, M. E., Schwoerer, C., & Rosen, B. (1989). Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training. Journal of applied psychology, 74(6), 884.
Gong, Y., Huang, J. C., & Farh, J. L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of management Journal, 52(4), 765-778.
Grönroos, C., & Voima, P. (2012). Making sense of value and value co-creation in service logic.
He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization science, 15(4), 481-494.
Holmqvist, M. (2004). Experiential learning processes of exploitation and exploration within and between organizations: An empirical study of product development. Organization science, 15(1), 70-81.
IfM, I. B. M. (2008). Succeeding through service innovation: a service perspective for education, research, business and government. University of Cambridge Institute for Manufacturing, Cambridge.
Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2006). Service-dominant logic: reactions, reflections and refinements. Marketing theory, 6(3), 281-288.
Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2009). Service-dominant logic—a guiding framework for inbound marketing. Marketing Review St. Gallen, 26(6), 6-10.
Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2014). The service-dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate, and directions: Routledge.
Madhavaram, S., & Hunt, S. D. (2008). The service-dominant logic and a hierarchy of operant resources: developing masterful operant resources and implications for marketing strategy. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 67-82.
Maglio, P. P., & Spohrer, J. (2008). Fundamentals of service science. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 36(1), 18-20.
Magnusson, P. R., Matthing, J., & Kristensson, P. (2003). Managing user involvement in service innovation: Experiments with innovating end users. Journal of Service Research, 6(2), 111-124.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization science, 2(1), 71-87.
McDermott, C. M., & Prajogo, D. I. (2012). Service innovation and performance in SMEs. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(2), 216-237.
Nambisan, S., & Sawhney, M. (2008). The global brain. Creare innovazione nel mercato aperto. Pearson.
Nijssen, E. J., Hillebrand, B., Vermeulen, P. A., & Kemp, R. G. (2006). Exploring product and service innovation similarities and differences. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23(3), 241-251.
Normann, R. (2001). Reframing business: When the map changes the landscape: John Wiley & Sons.
Nysveen, H., & Pedersen, P. E. (2014). Influences of cocreation on brand experience. International Journal of Market Research, 56(6), 807-832.
O’Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovators dilemma. Research in organizational behavior, 28, 185-206.
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of interactive marketing, 18(3), 5-14.
Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of management, 34(3), 375-409.
Rathmell, J. M. (1966). What is meant by services?. Journal of marketing, 30(4), 32-36.
Ritter, T., & Gemünden, H. G. (2003). Network competence: Its impact on innovation success and its antecedents. Journal of business research, 56(9), 745-755.
Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Positive psychology: An introduction. In Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (pp. 279-298): Springer.
Sequist, L. V., Waltman, B. A., Dias-Santagata, D., Digumarthy, S., Turke, A. B., Fidias, P., ... & Akhavanfard, S. (2011). Genotypic and histological evolution of lung cancers acquiring resistance to EGFR inhibitors. Science translational medicine, 3(75), 75ra26-75ra26.
Sicotte, H., & Bourgault, M. (2008). Dimensions of uncertainty and their moderating effect on new product development project performance. R&d Management, 38(5), 468-479.
Spohrer, J., Maglio, P. P., Bailey, J., & Gruhl, D. (2007). Steps toward a science of service systems. Computer, 40(1), 71-77.
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 277.
Tushman, M. L., & Reilly, C. A. O. (1996). The Ambidextrous Organization: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8.
Vargo, & Lusch. (2004). Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1-17.
Vargo, & Lusch. (2011). Its all B2B… and beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market. Industrial marketing management, 40(2), 181-187.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). The four service marketing myths: remnants of a goods-based, manufacturing model. Journal of service research, 6(4), 324-335.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). From goods to service (s): Divergences and convergences of logics. Industrial marketing management, 37(3), 254-259.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 36(1), 1-10.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 44(1), 5-23.
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. J. J. o. t. A. o. m. S. (2016). Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 44(1), 5-23.
Vargo, S. L., Maglio, P. P., & Akaka, M. A. (2008). On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. European management journal, 26(3), 145-152.
Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of management Review, 14(3), 361-384.

QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊