臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

若電子代工廠商想在成熟的市場維持競爭優勢，勢必要增強其技術能力。在過去的研究中，多以單一部門或單一事業群呈現營運績效，未觀察企業整體營運績效之變化。有鑑於此，本研究利用系統動態學，透過「跨部門、跨事業群」的方式來建構企業之(i)資金配置決策模型、(ii)技術鑑價模型以及(iii)技術合盟模型。系統動態學具備高階複雜、因果回饋、非線性、環環相扣、滯延等特性，本研究之三大模型可以反應各部門資金配置決策對於企業績效的真實回饋，並有效模擬五大元件之技術鑑價，以及分析複雜動態之技術合盟系統所產生的效益。此個案公司是全球委托設計與製造之主要廠商，本研究針對企業之資金配置決策及技術交換之效益議題進行探討，同時利用田口方法分析單一事業群及兩個事業群的營運模式之參數設計對於技術授權金的影響，以尋找最佳的技術鑑價之參數組合。

In a competitive original design manufacturing (ODM) business, firms continue to strengthen their technology capability to retain competitiveness in the market. Previous studies examined business operation performance from the perspective of a single department or a single business unit (BU). Instead, this research takes cross-department and cross-BU perspective by using system dynamics simulation in which (i) strategic capital allocation, (ii) technology valuation, and (iii) technical cooperation are investigated. The proposed model using system dynamics has the characteristics of business causal loop multiplicity, nonlinear, dealing uncertainty and events with time delay to reflect capital investment decisions for each BU on the basis of real-time feedback from business performances. A case study is conducted for a worldwide leading ODM firm. The proposed model effectively accesses the technology valuation of five key components of the firm, and examines the profit changes from a complex dynamics of a technical cooperation protocol. This research solves the performance issue regarding capital allocation and technology cooperation. Meanwhile, the experiments conducted using Taguchi experiment design examine the impact of key parameters to technology transfer revenues from two levels of business operations: a single-BU system and a two-BU system. Our study facilitates to determine the optimal settings for technology valuation in these two business operating systems.

摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
CONTENTS III
FIGURE LISTS V
TABLE LISTS VI
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Research Background 1
1.2 Motivation 1
1.3 Research Purpose and Scope 3
1.4 Research Framework and Procedures 3
Chapter 2 Literature Review 6
2.1 System Dynamics 6
2.2 Investment Planning 7
2.2.1 Capacity Investment 7
2.2.2 Technology Investment 8
2.3 Technology Valuation 8
2.3.1 Cost Method 8
2.3.2 Discounted Cash Flow Approach 9
2.4 Case Firm Profile 9
Chapter 3 Modeling of a Single BU System 11
3.1 Causal Loop of a Single BU Model 11
3.2 Process Flow Design and Mathematical Model 12
3.2.1 Order Demand Sub-Model 14
3.2.2 Project Management Sub-Model 14
3.2.3 Production Control Sub-Model 15
3.2.4 Research and Development Sub-Model 16
3.2.5 Financial Planning Sub-Model 17
3.3 Dashboard System 17
3.4 Model Validation 19
3.5 Experiment and Analysis 21
3.5.1 What-If Analysis 22
3.5.2 Impact Analysis 24
3.6 Sensitivity Analysis 28
Chapter 4 Modeling of a Two-BU system 31
4.1 BU A and BU B as Isolated Models 31
4.2 Modeling of Technology Valuation 32
4.2.1 Classification of Technology 32
4.2.2 Technology Valuation Process 32
4.2.3 Technology Valuation Result 34
4.3 Technology Exchange between BUs 37
4.4 Technology Exchange Policy Analysis 42
4.5 Optimal Parameter Design by Taguchi Approach 45
Chapter 5 Conclusion 52
5.1 Summary 52
5.2 Suggestion and Future Research 53
REFERENCES 54
APPENDIXS 57

Barlas, Y. (1989). "Multiple tests for validation of system dynamics type of simulation models." European Journal of Operational Research 42(1): 59-87.
Barlas, Y. (1996). "Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics." System dynamics review 12(3): 183-210.
Brealey, R. M. (2003). "Principles of Corporate Finance." New York.
Chen W.M. (2008). "A Review and Study on the Patent Valuation Theses in Taiwan." Vanung University, Taoyuan.
Chen. Y.J. (2003). "An analysis of patent data on LCD industry in Taiwan." Feng Chia University, Taichung.
Chou, L.T. (2005) "Using System Thinking Approach To Find Out The Reason Why OEM Firms’ Profits Squeeze Continuously." National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung.
Drury, C. (2006). "Cost and management accounting." Thomson Learning.
Ford, D. (1988). "Develop your technology strategy." Long range planning 21(5): 85-95.
Forrester, J. W. (1961). "Industrial Dynamics, Cambridge." MIT Press.
Forrester, J. W. (1968). "Market growth as influenced by capital investment." Industrial Management Review.
GUO, YC. (2001). "Strait competing analysis of Notebook components." IEK Press.
Hansen, J. E. and P. Bie (1987). "Distribution of body fluids, plasma protein, and sodium in dogs: a system dynamics model." System dynamics review 3(2): 116-135.
Hasset, K. A. (2008). Investment. The Concise Encylopedia of Economics. http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Investment.html
Huang, Z.Z. (2001). "Patents, R &; D expenditures and vendor market value - An Empirical Study of the semiconductor industry." National Taiwan University, Taipei.
Jan, C.G, (2000) "Policy Analysis for Major Weapon Systems Development in Taiwan." National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu.
Kamath, N. B. and R. Roy (2007). "Capacity augmentation of a supply chain for a short lifecycle product: A system dynamics framework." European Journal of Operational Research 179(2): 334-351.
Karabuk, S. and S. D. Wu (2003). "Coordinating strategic capacity planning in the semiconductor industry." Operations Research 51(6): 839-849.
Kleijnen, J. P. (1995). "Verification and validation of simulation models." European Journal of Operational Research 82(1): 145-162.
Ko, D. C., Kim, D. H., and Kim, B. M. (1999). "Application of artificial neural network and Taguchi method to preform design in metal forming considering workability." International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 39(5): 771-785.
Koller, T., et al. (2010). "Valuation: measuring and managing the value of companies." John Wiley and Sons.
Lewis, E. (1981). "Control of body segment differentiation in Drosophila by the bithorax gene complex." Progress in clinical and biological research 85: 269-288.
Liang, S.K. (2002). "Taiwan notebook market development market trend analysis." Institute for Information Industry Press.
Liu, C.T. (2009). "Study of Capital and Technology Investment Strategy-Applying System Dynamics and a Case Study of Wafer Fabrication Factory." Tunghai University, Taichung.
Phadke, M. S. (1989). "Quality Engineering Using Robust Design." Prentice Hall. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Qudrat-Ullah, H. and B. S. Seong (2010). "How to do structural validity of a system dynamics type simulation model: the case of an energy policy model." Energy Policy 38(5): 2216-2224.
Rivera, K. G. (2000). "Discovering new value in intellectual property." Harvard business review 55.
Science &; Technology Policy Research and Information Center. (2005) "Foxconn patent strategy layout with the left side of the smile curve theory." http://cdnet.stpi.narl.org.tw/techroom/analysis/pat002.htm
Senge, P. M. (1990). "The art and practice of the learning organization." The new paradigm in business: Emerging strategies for leadership and organizational change: 126-138.
Shin, Z.R. (2004). "Acer century of change." Taipei.
Stan, S. (2010). "The Smiling Curve: Stan Shih." http://chaitravi.wordpress.com/2010/02/10/the-smiling-curve-stan-shih/
Stave, K. A. (2002). "Using system dynamics to improve public participation in environmental decisions." System dynamics review 18(2): 139-167.
Sterman, J. D. (2002). "System dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world." Proceedings of the ESD Internal Symposium.
Taguchi, G. (1986). "Introduction to quality engineering: designing quality into products and processes."
Tidd, J. and M. J. Trewhella (1997). "Organizational and technological antecedents for knowledge acquisition and learning." R&;D Management 27(4): 359-375.
Wang, N.H, (2005). "A System Dynamics Model for Technology Development Behavior of TFT-LCD Industry in Taiwan." National Dong Hwa University, Hualien.
Wen, H.C, (2004). "The Impact of Intangible Asset and Research Expense on the Performance of Flat Display Panel Industry." National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu.
Wu, C.Y. (2001). "R&;D Expenses and Corporate Performance: The Case of Information Technology Firms in Taiwan." National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu.
Wu, X.L. (2003). "Study on R&;D, Performance and Firm Size: The Evidence of Top 600 R&;D-oriented Businesses." Economic situation comment 9(1):218-251.
Zahra, S. A., Sisodia, R. S., &; Das, S. R. (1994). "Technological choices within competitive strategy types: a conceptual integration." International Journal of Technology Management 9(2): 172-195.