臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

宿舍環境對住宿學生的影響既深又廣，高密度居住的情況，引發許多環境心理學家以擁擠、隱私為主題的田野研究。本研究以19位男女受訪者為主角，探討他/她們在多人共處一室生活的寢室空間中所遭遇的困境，及如何以短、長期的調節行動、機制來加以因應。
寢室場所中的衝突來自於室友間相互的干擾，干擾則源自於他人與自我間的差異，而高度鄰近、通透、狹小的空間特性，則扮演催化的背景條件。當個人需要寢室作為確保獨處、孤立的後臺空間時，卻常因為其他室友的在場，而面臨感官刺激、資訊失控及行為上的不自由、不確定、不安全感等干擾。因應干擾的方式則相當多元異質，短期而言，習慣、忍耐、出走，是反求諸己的內斂方式。而暗示、請求、表態、邀約，則是訴諸於人際溝通互動。還可能訴諸於團體公約的制定，或是藉由空間擺設上的隔離/聯盟來面對問題。諸多策略各有其適用的事件、對象及必須付出的代價、風險。
就長期而言，室友間關係親疏的變化是影響共處一室感受的關鍵機制。當室友關係愈親密時，互惠互動的增加、差異的融合消解，及互動彈性化三個向度的發展，使全體室友們能同時向最舒適、穩定的平衡點趨近。最後，則針對使用者個人、空間設施、管理機制這三方面提出亡羊補牢的建議。

第一章 緒論
第一節 研究動機．目的
第二節 文獻回顧
第三節 研究發問
第四節 研究方法
第二章 同處一室的干擾與衝突
第一節 感知的—感官的過度刺激
第二節 認知的—資訊的失控傳播
第三節 行為的—生活作息及互動氛圍的差異
第三章 衝突的心理．社會調節
第一節 訴諸自我調整
第二節 訴諸人際互動
第三節 訴諸公共約束力
第四章 人與空間的交互影響
第一節 缺乏封閉性的空間條件
第二節 個人領域的空間劃定
第三節 領域內的個人經營
第四節 空間的互動性
第五節 公共空間
第五章 關係親疏程度的影響
第一節 零與壹之間—關係的有無
第二節 由淺入深—關係的發展
第三節 關係發展的影響
第六章 結論與建議

01. 費孝通 (1948)：《鄉土中國》。香港：鳳凰出版社。
02. 駱明慶 (2002)：〈誰是台大學生？—性別、省籍與城鄉差異〉《經濟論文叢刊》，30期，頁113-147。
03. Aiello, J. R., & Thompson, D. E. (1980). Personal space, crowding and spatial behavior in a cultural context. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Environment and culture. New York: Plenum Press.
04. Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior-privacy, personal space, territory, crowding (3 ed.). Monterey: Brooks/Cole.
05. Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: the development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart &Winston.
06. Bale, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: a Method for the study of small groups. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.
07. Baron, R. M., & Rodin, J. (1978). Personal control as a mediator of crowding. In J. E. Baum & Singer & S. Valins (Eds.), Advances in environmental psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 145-181). NJ: Erlbaum.
08. Baum, Calesnick, Davis, & Gatchel. (1982). Individual differences in coping with crowding: stimulus screening and social overload. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 821-830.
09. Baum, A., & Gatchel, R. J. (1981). Cognitive determinants of response to uncontrollable events: Development of reactance and learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 1078-1089.
10. Baum, A., Harpin, R. E., & Valins, S. (1975). The role of group phenomena in the experience of crowding. Environment and Behavior, 7, 185-198.
11. Baum, A., Shapiro, A., Murray, D., & Wideman, M. (1979). Interpersonal mediation of perceived crowding and control in residential dyads and triads. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 9, 491-507.
12. Baum, A., & Valins, S. (1977). Architecture and social behavior: psychological studies of social density. NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M. (1997). Rethinking communication in personal relationships from a dialectic perspective. In S. W. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (2 ed., pp. 325-349). New York: Wiley.
14. Berg, J. H. (1984). Development of friendship between roommates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 346-356.
15. Braiker, H. B., & Kelley, H. H. (1979). Conflict in the development of close relationships. In R. L. Burgess & T. L. Huston (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships (pp. 135-168). New York: Academic Press.
16. Calhoun, J. B. (1970). Space and the strategy of life. Ekistics, 29, 425-437.
17. Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 12-24.
18. Cone, J. D., & Hayes, S. C. (1980). Environmental problems / behavioral solutions. Monterey, California: Brooks/Cole.
19. Duck, S. (1994). Steady as (s)he goes: Relational maintenance as a shared meaning system. In D. J. Canary & L. Stafford (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 45-60). New York: Academic Press.
20. Ellis, D. G., & Fisher, B. A. (1994). Small group decision making: communication and the group process (4 ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
21. Epstein, Y. M. (1981). Crowding stress and human behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 126-144.
22. Evans, G. W. (1978). Human spatial behavior: the arousal model. In Baum & Y. M. Epstein (Eds.), Human response to crowding. Hillsdale,NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Freedman, J. (1975). Crowding and behavior. San Francisco: Freeman.
24. Goffman, E. (1992). 日常生活中的自我表演。台北市：桂冠中譯.
25. Gove, W. R., & Hughes, M. (1983). Overcrowding on the household. New York: Academic Press.
26. Hall, E. T. (1959). The silent language. NY: Doubleday.
27. Hays, R. B. (1985). A longitudinal study of friendship development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 909-924.
28. Karlin, R. A., Epstein, Y. M., & Aiello, J. R. (1978). Strategies for the investigation of crowding. In A. Esser & B. Greenbie (Eds.), Design for communality and privacy (pp. 71-88). New York: Plenum.
29. Kaya, N., & Erkip, F. (2001). Satisfaction in a dormitory building: The effect of floor height on the perception of room size and crowding. Environment and Behavior, 33, 35-53.
30. Levinger, G. (1980). Toward the analysis of close relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 510-544.
31. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper.
32. MacDonald, W. S., & Oden, C. W. (1973). Effects of extreme crowding on the performance of five married couples during twelve weeks of intensive training.
33. McCallum, Rusbalt, Hong, Walden, & Schopler. (1979). Effects of resource availability and importance of behavior on the experience of crowding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1304-1313.
34. McCarthy, D. P., & Saegert, S. (1979). Residential density, social overload and social withdrawal. In J. R. Aiello & A. Baum (Eds.), Residential crowding and design. New York: Plenum Press.
35. Miller, Rossbach, & Munson. (1981). Social density and affiliative tendency as determinants of dormitory residential outcomes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11, 356-365.
36. Nasar, J. L., & Min. (1984). Modifiers of perceived spaciousness and crowding: across-cultural study. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 15, 79.
37. Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. R. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In S. W. Duck & D. F. Hay & S. E. Hobfoll & W. Ickes & B. M. Montgomery (Eds.), Handbook of personal relationship: theory, research and interventions (pp. 367-390). New York: John Wiley.
38. Schaeffer, G. H., & Patterson, M. L. (1980). Intimacy, arousal and small group crowding. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 38, 283-290.
39. Schiffenbauer, A. I. (1979). Designing for high-density living. In J. R. Aiello & A. Baum (Eds.), Residential crowding and design. New York: Plenum Press.
40. Schmidt, D., & Keating, J. (1979). Human crowding and personal control: an integration of the research. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 680-700.
41. Schopler, & Stockdale. (1977). An interference analysis of crowding. Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior, 1, 81-88.
42. Sinha, S. P. (1996). The effect of perceived cooperation on personal space requirements. Journal of Social Psychology, 136(5), 655-657.
43. Sommer, R. (1969). Personal space: the behavioral basis of design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
44. Stokols, D. (1972). On the distinction between density and crowding: some implications for further research. Psychological Review, 79, 275-277.
45. Stokols, D. (1976). The experience of crowding in primary and secondary environments. Environment and Behavior, 8, 49-86.
46. Taylor, R. B., Clinton, B., Soto, D., & Lieb, R. (1979). Sharing secrets: disclosure and discretion in dyads and triads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1196-1203.
47. Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmenntal sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399.
48. Vinsel, A., Brown, B. B., Altman, I., & Foss, C. (1980). Privacy regulation, territorial displays, and effectiveness of individual functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1104-1115.
49. Westin, A. (1970). Privacy and freedom. New York: Atheneum.