跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.221) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/06/07 11:49
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:林美莉
研究生(外文):Mei-Li Lin
論文名稱:鳳梨新品種繁殖方法之研究
論文名稱(外文):Study on the Propagation Methods of New Pineapple Cultivars
指導教授:呂明雄林芳存
指導教授(外文):Ming-Hsiung LuFan-Tswen Lin
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立嘉義大學
系所名稱:農學研究所
學門:農業科學學門
學類:一般農業學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2005
畢業學年度:93
語文別:中文
論文頁數:57
中文關鍵詞:鳳梨
外文關鍵詞:pineapple
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:952
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:1
本研究目的在探討不同催花期、冠芽切片葉芽插、塊莖切片扦插及倒株、割葉處理對新品種鳳梨吸芽苗、塊莖芽苗及葉芽苗產苗量之影響,以供業界參考應用。
試驗結果顯示,不同催花期處理,吸芽苗產量以‘TN17’明顯較其他品種多;而塊莖芽苗產量以‘TN18’、‘TN19’明顯較其他品種多。冠芽切片葉芽插,‘正常開英’、‘TN13’和‘TN17’每一冠芽分別可採收11.3、13.7和13.2株芽苗,由扦插至長苗日數約42-55天。塊莖切片扦插除‘TN18’差異不顯著外,其餘各品種間均以塊莖切片扦插所獲得產苗量較未切片扦插為多,且達顯著差異。
‘TN17’倒株配合割葉處理其吸芽苗產苗量較塊莖芽苗多。倒株配合割1/4葉、割1/2葉及全割葉處理之單株吸芽苗產量分別為4.2、5.0和4.4株;立株配合割葉各處理單株吸芽苗產量則差異不顯著。倒株配合割1/2葉、全割葉處理單株塊莖芽苗產量2.5、2.2株;立株配合割1/2葉及全割葉處理單株塊莖芽苗產量2.3、1.9株。於割葉處理中,以倒株之吸芽苗及塊莖芽苗產量較立株多。顯示‘TN17’倒株配合割1/2葉及全割葉處理可獲得較多吸芽苗。
The study purpose was emphasized on discussing the effects of different flower regulation times, crown leaf bud cutting, stem section cutting, and slant, leaf cut treatments on the production of suckers, rations and cutting plantlets of different new pineapple cultivars. We hoped that the results could be useful for nurseries and pineapple growers.
Experimental data revealed that, during the flower regulation times,‘TN17’ produced more suckers than other cultivars; but‘TN18’and ‘TN19’produced more ratoons than other cultivars.. It took 42-55 days for crown leaf bud cuttings of‘Smooth Cayenne’、‘TN13’and‘TN17’to sprout and harvested separately 11.3、13.7 and 13.2 plantlets per crown at the end of investigation. In the stem section cuttings, most cultivars produced significantly more plantlets by sectioning than non-sectioning, except for‘TN18’.
Slant plants combined with leaf-cut treatments of‘TN17’plants produced more suckers than ratoons. Slant combined with 1/4 leaf-cut、1/2 leaf-cut and whole leaf cut produced separately 4.2、5.0 and 4.4 plantlets per mother plant. There was no significant different of suckers production among the erect plants combined with all leaf cut treatment. There were 2.5 and 2.2 ratoons per mother plant harvested from the slant plants combined with 1/2 leaf cut and whole leaf cut treatments. Erect plant combined with 1/2 leaf cut and whole leaf cut produced separately 2.3 and 1.9 ratoons per mother plant. Slant plants produced more suckers and ratoons that erect plants in the leaf cut treatments. The above results revealed that slant plant combined with 1/2 leaf cut and whole leaf cut of‘TN17’pineapple could produced more suckers.
壹、前言…………………………………………………………………1
貳、前人研究……………………………………………………………5
一、台灣鳳梨生產概況……………………………………………5
二、鳳梨繁殖方法…………………………………………………7
三、鳳梨植株栽培方式對芽苗數量的影響 ……………………12
參、材料與方法…………………………………………………………14
一、供試材料………………………………………………………14
二、試驗方法………………………………………………………14
肆、結果………………………………………………………………21
一、催花期對鳳梨吸芽苗及塊莖芽苗產量之影響………………21
二、鳳梨冠芽切片葉芽插對產苗量之影響………………………26
三、鳳梨塊莖切片扦插對產苗量之影響…………………………27
四、倒株、割葉處理對‘TN17’鳳梨吸芽苗和塊莖芽苗產量之影響 …………………………………………………………28
伍、討論 ………………………………………………………………39
一、催花期對鳳梨吸芽苗及塊莖芽苗產量之影響……………..40
二、鳳梨冠芽切片葉芽插對產苗量之影響………………………43
三、鳳梨塊莖切片扦插對產苗量之影響…………………………44
四、不同繁殖材料對鳳梨芽苗產量之比較………………………44
五、倒株、割葉處理對‘TN17’鳳梨吸芽苗和塊莖芽苗產量之影響 ……………………………………………………………46
陸、參考文獻 …………………………………………………………50
王炘。1975。鳳梨。p.113-115.徐氏基金會出版。台北。
行政院農業委員會統計室。2003。92年版農產貿易統計要覽。p132.行政院農業委員會統計室編印。
行政院農業委員會農糧暑。2003。92年版農業統計年報。p90.行政院農業委員會農糧署編印。
行政院農業委員會農糧暑。2003。92年版臺灣地區農產品批發市場年報。P232-233.行政院農業委員會農糧署編印。
朱建庸、吳婉苓。1995。偃枝整枝與栽培密度對玫瑰花切花產量和品質之影響。中國園藝41(4):297-308。
呂明雄。1991。種苗與果樹生產。台灣果樹之生產及研究發展研討會專刊。p.189-205。
呂明雄、林芳存、范國慶、官青杉、徐信次。2001。台灣鳳梨產業差異化競爭力─產區、品種、季節之果實品質研究。台灣鳳梨品種改良與病蟲害管理研討會專刊。p.59-67。
李傑妮、朱建庸。1997。偃枝枝數及其更新週期對玫瑰花切花生產之影響。興大園藝22(2):87-99。
林榮貴、楊耀祥。2004。鳳梨遺傳性狀標誌因子之探討。台灣鳳梨研究與發展研討會專刊。國立嘉義大學編印.p.13-28。
施昭彰、向為民。1993。不同時期的乾旱處理及除葉對梨樹碳水化合物含量及枝梢形成之影響。中華農業研究42(1):37-45.
馬溯軒。1968。鳳梨之切頂加速繁殖。中國園藝14(1,2):30-34。
馬溯軒、王淑娥。1977。鳳梨之組織培養繁殖。中國園藝23(3):107-113。
康有德。1997。園藝概論(初版)。p.402-454。啟英文化事業有限公司發行。台北。
許玉妹、朱建庸。2000。屏東地區利用偃枝栽培生產高品質冬季玫瑰可行性探討。高雄區農業專訊32:14-15。
陳唐平、楊世華、潘德芳。2001。台灣鳳梨農場技術效率之研究。中華農業研究50(3):88-97。
植物保護手冊。2002。鳳梨粉介殼蟲。p.397-398。行政院農業委員會農業藥物毒物試驗所編印。
張明聰、廖松淵。1994。番木瓜扦插繁殖及生長結實特性之研究。中國園藝40(1):11-28。
張清勤。1978。鳳梨省工栽培之示範與推廣。台灣農業季刊14(3):99-105。
張清勤。1983。果樹育種p.59-68。行政院農業發展委員會補助。台灣省山地農牧局印行。台北。
張清勤。1991。鳳梨產期調節。果樹產期研討會專集p.147-153。
張清勤。1995。「台農13號」鳳梨。中華農業研究44(3):287-296。
張清勤。1996。台灣鳳梨經營管理與展望。台灣熱帶地區果園經營管理研討會專刊。
張清勤。1997。台農四號鳳梨不同種苗對產量與果形之影響。提昇果樹產業競爭力研討會專輯p.275-279。
張清勤。1999。鳳梨產業概要─調查台灣常綠果樹生產,流通、加工及輸出入p.124-148。科學農業編印。台北。
黃新州。1986。香蕉組織培養植株之變異。中國園藝 32(2):117-125。
黃碧海。2004。台灣鳳梨產銷現況與發展。台灣鳳梨研究與發展研討會專刊。國立嘉義大學編印p.1-12。
蔡精強、黃碧海。2001。鳳梨產銷改進與發展。台灣鳳梨品種改良與病蟲害管理研討會專刊(嘉義試驗所特刊第97號)p.21-30。
園藝作物新品種申請登記命名審查資料。1998。鳳梨新品系C69-4-381育成經過及試驗成績(擬申請命名台農17號)p.1和p.7.台灣省農業試驗所嘉義分所。
園藝作物新品種申請登記命名審查資料.2001。鳳梨新品系C66-4-744育成經過及試驗成績(擬申請命名台農19號)p.7。台灣省農業試驗所嘉義分所。
Adaniya, S., K. Minemoto, Z. Moromizato and K. Molomura. 2004. The use of CPPU for efficient propagation of pineapple. Scientia Hort. 100:7-14.
Aung, L. H. and J. M. Byrne. 1978. Hormones and young leaves control development of cotyledonary buds in tomato seedlings. Plant Physiol.62:276-279.
Aung, L. H. and W. C. Kelly. 1966. Influence of defoliation on vegetative, floral and fruit development in tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.89:563-570.
Balakrishnan, S., M. Aravindakshan, N,. Sreedharan, I. P. Ambiar and K. K. R. Anair. 1978. Growth and yield of pineapple varity “Kew” (Ananas comosus Merr.) as influenced by planting densities. S. Indian Hort.26:98-102.
Benega, R., M. Isidron, E. Arias, A. Cisneros, J. Martinez, I. Torres, M. Hidalog and C. G. Borroto. 1997. In vitro germination and callus formation in pineapple hybrid seeds (Ananas comosus (L.) Merr.). Acta Hort.425:243-246.
Cabot, C. 1987. Amelioration genetique de l’Ananaus. 1. Considerations prealables aux recherches conduits en Cote d’Ivoire. Fruits42(10): 567-577.
Claude, P. Y., J. J. Lacocuilhe and C. Tisson. 1987. The pineapple cultivation and uses. p.55-70. Translated from the French by Daphne and Jack Goodfellow. G. –P. Maisonneuve et Larose.
Daie, J. 1996. Metabolic adjustments, assimilate partitioning and alterations in source-sink relations in drought-stressed plants. p.407-420. In: E. Zamski and A. A. Schaffer (eds.) Photoassimilate distribution in plants and crops: Source-sink relationships. Department of Vegetable Crops Volcani Center, Agricultural Research Organization Ministry of Agricultural, State of Israel. Bet Dagan, Israel.
Dalldorf, E. R. 1993. The effect of plant population and nitrogen fertilizer on growth, yield and fruit quality of smooth cyenne pineapple. Acta Hort.334:221-226.
d’Almeida, W. A. B., A. P. de Matos and A. da S. Souza. 1997. Effects of benzylaminopurine (BAP) on in vitro proliferation of pineapple (Ananas comosus (L.) MERR.). Acta Hort. 425:235-242.
Decoteau, D. R. 199. Tomato leaf development and distribution as influenced by leaf removal and decapitation. HortScience.25(6): 681-684.
Dewald, M. G., G. A. Moore, W.B. Sherman and M. H. Evans. 1988. Production of pineapple plants in vitro. Plant Cell Rep.7(7):535-537.
Drew, R. A. 1980. Pineapple tissue culture unequalled for rapid multiplication. Queensland Agri. J.106(5):447-451.
Epeda, C. and Y. Sagawa. 1981. In vitro propagation of pineapple. Pineapple.16(4):495.
Faber, W. R. and J. W. White. 1977. The effect of pruning and growth regulator treatments on rose plant renewal. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.102:223-225.
Fitchet, M. 1984. Tissue culture of pineapple. Citrus and Subtropical Fruit Research Institute. Information Bulletin.149:1-2.
Fitchet, M. 1989. Tissue culture speeds up evaluation of new cultivars. Citrus and Subtropical Fruit Research Institute. Information Bulletin. 197:1-2.
Fitchet, M. 1990. Clonal propagation of Queen and Smooth Cayenne pineapples. Acta Hort.275:261-266.
Gadelha, R. D., F. E. Gama and H. Vasconcellos. 1980. Planting spacing for the pineapple. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras.15(3):301-304.
Heenkenda H. M. S. 1993. Effect of plant size on sucker promotion in “MAURITIUS” pineapple by mechanical decapitation. Acta Hort.334: 331-336.
Jones, J. B. and T. Murashige. 1974. Tissue culture propagation of Aechmea fasciata Baker and other bromeliads. Proc. Inter. Plant Prop. Soc.24:117-126.
Kasperbauer, M. J. 1996. Light quantity and quality effects on source-sink relationships during plant growth and development. p. 421-440. In: E. Zamski and A. A. Schaffer (eds.) Photoassimilate distribution in plants and crops: Source-sink relationships. Department of Vegetable Crops Volcani Center, Agricultural Research Organization Ministry of Agricultural, State of Israel. Bet Dagan, Israel.
Khayat, E. and N. Zieslin. 1982. Environmental factors involved in the regulation of sprouting of basal buds in rose plant. J. Exp. Bot.33:1286-1292.
Kitto, S. L. 1997. Commercial micropropagation. HortScience.32: 1012-1014.
Leopold, A. C., K. M. Brown and F. H. Emerson. 1972. Ethylene in the wood of stressed tree. HortScience. 7(2):175.
Maerere, A. P. 1997. Axillary-bud development as it determines suckering in “Queen Victoria” and “Smooth Cayenne” pineapples. Acta Hort.425: 309-320.
Mathews, R. A. and T. S. Rangan. 1981. Growth and regeneration of plantlets in callus cultures of pineapple. Scientia Hort.14(3):227-234.
Morris, D. A. 1996. Hormonal regulation of source-sink relationships: An overview of potential control mechanism. p.441-465. In: E. Zamski and A. A. Schaffer (eds.) Photoassimilate distribution in plants and crops: Source-sink relationships. Department of Vegetable Crops Volcani Center, Agricultural Research Organization Ministry of Agricultural, State of Israel. Bet Dagan, Israel.
Nakasone, H. Y. and R. E. Paull. 1998. Pineapple. Tropical Fruit. p.308.
Norman, J. C. 1978. Responses of “Sugarloaf” pineapple, Ananas comosus (L.) Merr. to plant population densities. Gartenbauwiss43(5): 237-240.
Noyer, J. L., C. Landaud, G. Coppens d’Eeckenbrugge and M. F. Duval. 1997. RFLP study on rDNA variability in Ananas genus. Acta Hort.425:153-160.
Py, C., J. J. Lacoeuilhe and C. Teisson. 1987. The pineapple, cultivation and uses. p.568. Thecniques Agricoles et Productions Tropicales. Maisonneuve et Larose, Paris.
Ramirez, A. L. 1987. Study of in vitro growth of pineapple (Ananas comosus (L.) Merr) cv. Smooth Cayenne buds. Cultivars Tropicales.9(2):32-35.
Salvi, M. j. and J. C. Rajput. 1995. Pineapple. p.174. In: D. K. Salunkhe and S. S. Kadam (eds.) Fruit Science and Technology: Production, Composition, Storage and Processing.
Tucker, D. J. 1977. The effects of far-red light on lateral bud outgrowth in decapitated tomato plants and the associated changes in the levels of auxin and abscisic acid. Plant Sci. Lett.8:339-344.
Zhang, J. and D. P. Bartholomew. 1997. Effect of plant population density on growth and dry matter partitioning of pineapple. Acta Hort.425: 363-376.
Zieslin, N. and A. H. Halevy. 1976. Components of aillary bud inhibition in rose plants. I. The effect of different plant parts (correlative inhibition). Bot. Gaz.13:291-296.
Zieslin, N. and Y. Mor. 1981a. Plant management of greenhouse roses. Scientia Hort.14:285-293.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關論文