臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

液態黏滯性阻尼器是現代建築常使用的結構消能元件，能藉由幫助結構吸收、消散受震能量來提升結構的抗震能力，一般普遍認為 裝設液態黏滯性阻尼器可以提升耐震能力，但許多案例是按照一般傳統設計流程，對於耐震能力的提升沒有一定的要求，故本研究將以一傳統設計結構，逐量裝設液態黏滯性阻尼器，進行非線性靜力分析評估此建築物裝設後對於結構維持在線彈性之能力的提升與抗崩塌能力的提升程度。
傳統耐震設計要求結構物在30年回歸週期地震作用下維持在線彈性，475年回歸週期地震作用下可以修復，本研究將探討傳統耐震設計之建築結構裝設液態黏滯性阻尼器後，是否能在475年回歸週期地震作用下維持在線彈性，並以475年回歸週期地震作用下維持在線彈性為設計目標，考慮結構裝設黏滯性阻尼器所提昇之耐震能力，重新設計整體結構，並以非線性靜力分析評估其耐震能力。

It was generally agreed the building structure installation of fluid viscous dampers can enhance the seismic capacity, but after the installation the amount of enhancement is unclear. Therefore, this study investigates the effects of the fluid viscous damper on a building structure. And perform pushover analysis to assess the seismic capacity.
And this study will use that building structure can not yield under the 475 years Return period of the earthquake as the design conditions to design building structure. And perform pushover analysis to assess the seismic capacity.

摘要 I
ABSTRACT II
第一章 緒論 1
1.1研究動機與目的 1
1.2文獻回顧 2
1.3研究內容與論文架構 6
第二章 含黏滯性阻尼器結構耐震能力分析方法 7
2.1非線性靜力分析 7
2.2 梁柱構材行為之模擬 8
2.3液態黏滯性阻尼器介紹 21
2.4含液態黏滯性阻尼器結構等效阻尼比 24
2.5由側推分析求含黏滯性阻尼器建築之耐震能力 31
2.6 含FVD構架之分析流程 33
第三章 建築物裝設FVD 效能探討 35
3.1分析模型簡介 35
3.2 傳統設計結構物裝設FVD之性能評估 36
3.3 結構物裝設FVD之耐震設計 38
第四章 結論 41
參考文獻 43

1.Yao, J.T.P., “Concept of Structural Control”, Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol.98, No.ST7, pp.1567-1574, 1972.
2.Soong,T.T. and Dargush, G.F., “Passive Energy Dissipation Systems in Structural Engineering”, John Wiley&Sons, 1997.
3.內政部，「建築物耐震設計規範及解說」，台北，2011 年。
4.Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation for the seismic rehabilitation of building-FEMA 356, Federal Emergency Managency Agency, Washington, D.C, November 2000.
5.Constantinou, M.C., Tsopelas, P., and Hammel, W., Testing and Modeling of an Improved Damper Configuration for Stiff Structural Systems, Center for Industrial Effectiveness, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY., 1997.
6.Freeman,S.A. , Nicoletti ,J.P. ,and Tyrell, J.V., ”Evaluations of Existiong Buildings for Seismic Risk －A Case Study of Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Bremerton, Washington”, National Earthquake Conference,pp.113-122,1975.
7.內政部營建署，「結構混凝土設計規範」，1992年。
8.Applied Technology Council (ATC), Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings,Vol.1, ATC-40,Redwood City,CA,1996.
9.Mayhaney,J.A., Freeman, S.A., Paret, T.F., and Kehoe,B.E.,”The Capacity Spectrum Method of Evaluating Structural Response During the Loma Prieta Earthquake”,National Earthquake Conference,Memphis,pp.501-510,1993.
10.FEMA-273 and 274, NEHRP Guidelines for the seismic Rehailitation for Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C., 1997.
11.Sezen, H. and Moehle, J.P.,”Shear strength model for lightly reinforced concrete columns”, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol.130, No.11, 1692-1703, 2004.
12.國家地震中心，「雲林縣口湖國小校舍現地試驗之材料取樣檢測與結構配筋圖重建」，國立雲林科技大學營建材料檢測中心，報告編號：E05-00362，2005年。
13.葉勇凱、蕭輔沛、林金祿，「耐震詳評之ETABS推垮分析」，校舍之耐震評估與補強講習會，台北，2005年。
14.葉勇凱、蕭輔沛，「建築結構耐震能力詳細評估法－以消防廳舍為例」，鋼筋混凝土建築耐震能力評估研討會論文集，台北，2006年。
15.蕭輔沛、葉勇凱、林金祿，「校舍建築之耐震能力詳細評估與試驗驗證」，中華民國第八屆結構工程研討會論文集，南投，2006年。
16.蕭輔沛、葉勇凱、曾至堅，「建築物耐震詳細評估發法之研究(一)」，國家地震工程研究中心報告，編號NCREE-07-049，台北，2007年。
17.FEMA-351,Recommended Seismic Evaluation and Upgrade Criteria for Existing Welded Steel Moment-Frame Buildings,Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C., 1997.
18.Taylor, D. P., “ Fluid Dampers for Application of Seismic Energy Dissipation and Seismic Isolation”, Eleventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, No.798,1996 .
19.Constantionu, M. C. and Symans, M.D., “ Experimental and analytical Investigation of seismic of structures with supplemental fluid viscous dampers.” Report No.NCEER-92-0032, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, SUNY at Buffalo, New York.1992.
20.Reinhorn, A. M., Li,C. and Constantinou, M. C., “Experimental and Analytical Investigation of Seismic Retrofit of structure with Supplemental Damping, Part 1-Fluid Viscous Damping Devices”, Published as Report NCEER-95-0001, by the National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, State University of New York at Buffalo,1995.
21.黃震興、黃尹男，“使用線性黏性阻尼器建築結構之耐震試驗與分析”，國家地震工程研究中心報告NCREE-01-022，2001。
22.黃震興、黃尹男、洪雅惠，“含非線性黏性阻尼器結構之減震試驗與分析”，國家地震工程研究中心報告NCREE-02-020，2002。
23.黃震興、黃尹男、李昭逸，“含黏性阻尼器減震結構之非線性地震反應試驗與分析”，國家地震工程研究中心報告NCREE-03-011，2003。
24.黃震興、易序良，“使用黏性阻尼器減震結構設計公式修正(I)”，國家地震工程研究中心報告NCREE-03-012，2003。
25.黃靖夫”含液態黏滯性阻尼器建築之耐震評估” 2012。
26.FEMA-440,Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures,Federal Emergency Management Agency,Washington, D.C.,2004.
27.Elwood, K. J., and Moehle, J. P., “Axial capacity model for shear damaged columns,” ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 102, No. 4, 578-587, 2005.
28.Elwood, K. J., and Moehle, J. P., “Drift capacity of reinforced concrete columns with light transverse reinforcement,” Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 21,No. 1, 71-89, 2005.
29.ACI Committee 318, Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI318-05) and commentary (ACI 318R-05). American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2005.
30.ASCE 41-06, Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings by American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE, 2006.
31.NEHRP Recommended Previous for Seismic Regulation for New Buildings and Other Structure, Part 1: Previous (FEMA368), Building Seismic Safety Council, National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, D.C.2000.
32.NEHRP Recommended Previous for Seismic Regulation for New Buildings and Other Structure, Part 2: Previous (FEMA369), Building Seismic Safety Council, National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, D.C.2000.
33.Raggett, J. D., “Estimating Damping of Real Structure,” Journal of the structural division, Sept., 1975.
34.Chopra, Anil K., Dynamic of Structures, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey,1995.