跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.152) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/11/01 13:24
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:賴韋如
研究生(外文):Wei-Lu Li
論文名稱:侵犯性牙周炎患者之X光齒槽骨累積喪失量及牙齒喪失率--數位牙周測微計分析
論文名稱(外文):Cumulative Alveolar Bone Loss Rate and Tooth Loss Rate in Individuals with Aggressive Periodontitis─DEC
指導教授:侯桂林
指導教授(外文):Guey-Lin Hou
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:高雄醫學大學
系所名稱:口腔衛生科學研究所
學門:醫藥衛生學門
學類:牙醫學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2003
畢業學年度:91
語文別:中文
論文頁數:109
中文關鍵詞:X光齒槽骨累積喪失量(CRABL)侵犯型牙周炎(AGP)數位測微計(DEC)年平均齒槽骨喪失量(YRABL)
外文關鍵詞:radiographic alveolar bone lossaggressive periodontitistooth loss rate
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:1
  • 點閱點閱:594
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
摘要
以往有關牙周病的文獻資料多侷限於各種牙周疾病的臨床牙周探測深度及臨床牙周附著水平的測量。關於比較國人侵犯性牙周炎患者(Aggressive periodontitis; AGP)齒槽破壞的程度,速率以及牙齒喪失率的評估,資料有限。有鑿於國人罹患牙周炎的年齡有逐年下降的趨勢,故本研究之目的在於測量評估美國牙周病學會(AAP)於1999年新分類出的侵犯性牙周炎患者(AGP)的X光齒槽骨喪失量及牙齒喪失率,並比較侵犯性牙周病(AGP)患者之X光齒槽骨累積喪失量(Cumulative alveolar bone loss rate ; CRABL),年平均齒槽骨喪失量(Yearly radiographic alveolar bone loss rate ; YRABL),與牙齒喪失率(Tooth loss rate ; TLR)與其他患者的差異。本研究之對象為在高醫牙周病科接受檢查治療的病人,從中篩選出60名AGP患者及10名健康成人做測量評估。收集研究對象全口X光片及基本資料,以牙周測微計分析(DEC),分別計算牙齒之近心側與遠心側牙秞質牙骨質交界至齒槽骨高度的距離,並計算其與牙齒行使功能時間之比例,以及牙齒喪失數。
研究結果顯示:年齡(P<0.0001),性別(P<0.0235),疾病分類(P<0.0001),及缺牙率(P<0.0001)均與X光齒槽骨累積喪失量有顯著相關。年平均齒槽骨喪失量有顯著相關的只有年齡及疾病分類兩因素(P<0.0001,P<0.0007)。年齡(P<0.0023),疾病分類(P=0.0218)亦與缺牙率有顯著相關。隨年齡上升,缺牙率隨之上升。全面型牙周炎組的缺牙率約為健康成人組的20倍,而局部型牙周炎組約為健康成人組的5倍。X光齒槽骨累積喪失量隨著年齡增加而增加,且全面型牙周炎組較LAGP組嚴重。男性亦較女性來的嚴重。年平均齒槽骨喪失量隨著年齡增加而下降,且全面型牙周炎及局部型牙周炎組的年平均齒槽骨喪失量約為健康成人組的2~3倍。缺牙率高低順序為第一大臼齒>第二大臼齒>小臼齒>門齒>犬齒。侵犯型牙周炎組之X光齒槽骨累積喪失量、年平均齒槽骨喪失量百分 及年平均齒槽骨喪失量平均值最大(59.85%;2.24%;0.34mm),局部侵犯型牙周炎組次之(41.3%;1.97%;0.3mm),健康成人組最低(9.96%;0.08%;0.176mm)。
國內有關侵犯型牙周炎的齒槽骨破壞量與缺牙率的報告資料有限。因此,本研究可提供國人有關侵犯型牙周炎的齒槽骨破壞及性別,年齡,疾病分類及缺牙數互相關係的參考資料,有助於侵犯型牙周炎長期預後之診斷。
Abstract
In the past, most of the literatures relating to periodontitis are centered n measuring clinic periodontal periodontal probing depth and clinic periodontal attachment loss of the various periodontal diseases. The researches on the level and the rate of alveolar bone fracture, as well as the tooth loss rate of the aggressive periodontitis on natives are limited. As there is a trend that the natives who suffer from peiodontitis are gradually getting younger, the purpose of this research is aimed on the measurement and estimation of the X-ray cumulative alveolar bone loss and the tooth loss rate of the aggressive periodontitis (AGP) which were newly classified from AAP in 1999. Furthermore, from this study, the differences on the cumulative radiographic alveolar bone loss (CRABL), yearly radiographic alveolar bone loss (YRABL) and tooth loss rate (TLR) between AGP and other patients can also be compared and revealed.
The samples of this research were taken from the patients who received treatments in Kaohsiung Medical University. Sixty AGE patients and ten health adult patients were taken as samples for the study. The full mouth X-ray film and basic data of the samples were collected for calculating the distance between CEJ to the top of alveolar bone from the mesial side and distal side of the tooth and TLR respectively by DEC.
The results of this research are listed below:
Age (P<0.0001), sex (P<0.0235), Disease Classification (P<0.0001), and Tooth Loss Rate (P<0.0001) have remarkable correction with CRABL %.Only the factors of Age and Disease Classification have notable links with YRABL%.Age (P<0.0023), and Disease Classification (P=0.0218) also have distinguished correlations with tooth loss rate. As the age increases, the tooth loss rate increases. The tooth loss rate of the AGP group is twenty times more than the healthy adult group is about five times more than the health adult group.CRABL % increases along with the age. The CRABL % of the AGP group is more critical than LAGP group and the male group is also more serious than the female group.YRABL % decreases along with the age. The YRABL % of AGP group and LAGP group is about 2~3 times than the healthy adult group.The highest tooth loss rate is the molar, followed by the second molar, premolar, incisor and then the canine.The highest average of CRABL % and YRABL % is the Aggressive Periodontitis Group (59.85%;2.24%), followed by the Localized Aggressive Periodontitis Group (41.3%;1.97%), and finally the Healthy Adult Group (9.96%;0.08%).
目錄
第一章 緒論 1
研究背景 1
研究目的 3
第二章 文獻探討 5
慢性牙周炎與侵犯性牙周炎之分類比較 5
齒槽骨破壞機制 8
牙周評估方式 9
侵犯型牙周炎齒槽骨破壞及牙齒喪失之相關研究 14
第一節 侵犯型牙周炎患者之X光齒槽骨破壞 14
第二節 侵犯型牙周炎與慢性牙周炎及牙周健康者之牙齒喪失比較 17
第三章 材料與方法 23
樣本收集(Sample collection) 23
研究材料與方法(Materials and mechods) 23
研究步驟 24
第一節 X光齒槽喪失(radiographic alveolar bone loss ; RABL)測量 25
第二節 X光齒槽喪失的年平均量(YRABL)的計算 25
第三節 測量值可靠性及再現性檢定 26
資料處理與分析 27
研究限制 28
第四章 研究結果 29
精準度及再現性檢驗 29
齒槽骨破壞量(CRABL%)的評估 30
第一節 侵犯型牙周患者累積齒槽骨破壞量及平均齒槽骨破壞量與年齡、性別、分類、及缺牙率的關係 30
第二節 近心、遠心及累積齒槽骨破壞率及平均齒槽骨破壞量與年齡、性別、分類、及缺牙率的關係 31
第三節 侵犯型牙周炎患者近心,遠心及年平均齒槽骨破壞率與年齡,性別分類,及缺牙數的關係 32
缺牙數的評估 33
第一節 缺牙與年齡,性別及疾病分組的關係 33
累積齒槽骨破壞率量與年齡、疾病分類、缺牙數之間的相互關係(Table 16,17,18,19,20,21) 34
年平均齒槽骨破壞率量與年齡、疾病分類、缺牙數之間 36
的關係(表 22,23,24,25,26,27) 36
牙齒總類分析 37
第五章 討論 39
數位牙周測微計分析法 39
影響齒槽骨破壞率的因素 41
影響缺牙數的因素 44
第六章 結論 47
參考文獻 48
圖目錄
FIG 1:SCHEMATIC DRAWING OF THE REFERENCE POINTS OF MOLAR TEETH CORRELATED WITH THE MEASUREMENT OF RADIOGRAPHIC ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS(RABL) 52
FIG 2:RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN YRABL(%) AND AGE OF SUBJECTS. 88
FIG 3: :RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN YRABL(%) AND SEX OF SUBJECTS. 89
FIG 4:RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN YRABL(%) AND DIFFERENT DISEASE OF SUBJECTS. 91
FIG 5: :RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MISSING TEETH(%) AND AGE OF SUBJECTS. 92
FIG 6:RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MISSING TEETH(%) AND SEX OF SUBJECTS. 93
FIG 7:RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MISSING TEETH(%) AND THE DIFFERENT DISEASE GROUP. 94
表格目錄
TABLE 1:CHRONOLOGY OF HUMAN DENTITION FOR ROOT COMPLETED 53
Table 2 : 精準度檢驗 ………………………………………………………..54
TABLE 3-1: DESCRIPTION OF THE TOTAL SAMPLES(N=70) 55
TABLE 3-2: DESCRIPTION OF THE AGGRESSIVE PERIODONTITIS (N=60) 56
TABLE 3-3: PREVALENCE OF AGGRESSIVE PERIODONTITIS FOR DISTAL, MESIAL AND CUMULATIVE RADIOGRAPHIC ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS IN EVERY ITEM. 57
TABLE 3-4: PREVALENCE OF AGGRESSIVE PERIODONTITIS FOR DISTAL, MESIAL AND YEARLY RADIOGRAPHIC ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS IN EVERY ITEM. 58
TABLE 3-5: PREVALENCE OF MISSING TEETH FOR TOTAL SAMPLES IN EVERY ITEM. 59
TABLE 4-1: MULTI-WAY ANOVA FOR DISTAL CRABL, MESIAL CRABL AND CRABL LOSS. 60
TABLE 4-2: MULTI-WAY ANOVA FOR DISTAL YRABL, MESIAL YRABL AND YRABL (YEARLY RADIOGRAPHIC ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS). 61
TABLE 4-3: MULTI-WAY ANOVA FOR MISSING TEETH. 62
TABLE 5:COMPARISON OF THE MEAN NUMBER OF DISTAL CRABL , MESIAL CRABL AND CRABL IN THE AGE GROUPS 63
TABLE 6:COMPARISON OF THE MEAN NUMBER OF DISTAL CRABL , MESIAL CRABL AND CRABL IN THE SEX GROUPS 64
TABLE 7:COMPARISON OF THE MEAN NUMBER OF DISTAL CRABL , MESIAL CRABL AND CRABL IN THE PERIODONTAL DISEASE GROUPS 65
TABLE 8:COMPARISON OF THE MEAN NUMBER OF DISTAL CRABL , MESIAL CRABL AND CRABL IN THE MISSING TEETH GROUPS 66
TABLE 9:COMPARISON OF THE MEAN NUMBER OF DISTAL YRABL , MESIAL YRABL AND YRABL IN THE AGE GROUPS 67
TABLE 10:COMPARISON OF THE MEAN NUMBER OF DISTAL YRABL , MESIAL YRABL AND YRABL IN THE SEX GROUPS 68
TABLE 11COMPARISON OF THE MEAN NUMBER OF DISTAL YRABL , MESIAL YRABL AND YRABL IN THE PERIODONTAL DISEASE GROUPS 69
TABLE 12: COMPARISON OF THE MEAN NUMBER OF DISTAL YRABL , MESIAL YRABL AND YRABL IN THE MISSING TEETH GROUPS 70
TABLE 13: COMPARISON OF THE MEAN NUMBER OF MISSING TEETH IN THE AGE GROUPS 71
TABLE 14: COMPARISON OF THE MEAN NUMBER OF MISSING TEETH IN THE SEX GROUPS 72
TABLE 15:COMPARISON OF THE MEAN NUMBER OF MISSING TEETH IN THE PERIODONTAL DISEASE GROUPS 73
TABLE 16:COMPARISON OF THE MEAN NUMBER OF CRABL BETWEEN FEMALE AND MALE IN THE AGE GROUPS 74
TABLE 17:COMPARISON OF THE MEAN NUMBER OF CRABL BETWEEN FEMALE AND MALE IN THE DISEASE GROUPS 75
TABLE 18:COMPARISON OF THE MEAN NUMBER OF CRABL BETWEEN FEMALE AND MALE IN THE MISSING TEETH GROUPS 76
TABLE 19:COMPARISON OF THE MEAN NUMBER OF CRABL BETWEEN AGP AND LAGP IN THE AGE GROUPS 77
TABLE 20: COMPARISON OF THE MEAN NUMBER OF CRABL BETWEEN AGP AND LAGP IN THE MISSING TEETH GROUPS 78
TABLE 21:COMPARISON OF THE MEAN NUMBER OF CRABL IN THE AGE GROUP BY MISSING TEETH GROUPS 79
TABLE 22: COMPARISON OF THE MEAN NUMBER OF YRABL BETWEEN FEMALE AND MALE IN THE AGE GROUPS 80
TABLE 23:COMPARISON OF THE MEAN NUMBER OF YRABL BETWEEN FEMALE AND MALE IN THE DISEASE GROUPS 81
TABLE 24:COMPARISON OF THE MEAN NUMBER OF YRABL BETWEEN FEMALE AND MALE IN THE MISSING TEETH GROUPS 82
TABLE 25:COMPARISON OF THE MEAN NUMBER OF YRABL BETWEEN AGP AND LAGP IN THE AGE GROUPS 83
TABLE 26: COMPARISON OF THE MEAN NUMBER OF YRABL BETWEEN AGP AND LAGP IN THE MISSING TEETH GROUPS 84
TABLE 27:COMPARISON OF THE MEAN NUMBER OF YRABL IN THE AGE GROUP BY MISSING TEETH GROUPS 85
TABLE 28: MISS TEETH RATIO IN ALL TEETH 86
TABLE 29: YRABL% IN ALL TEETH 87
參考文獻
1. Loe H, Anerud A, Boysen H, Smith M. The natural history of periodontal disease in man. Study design and baseline data. J Periodont Res 1978; 13:550-62
2. Loe H, Anerud A, Boysen H, Smith M. The natural history of periodontal disease in man. Tooth mortality rates before 40 years of age. J Periodont Res 1978; 13:563-72
3. Lindhe J, Haffajee AD , Socransky SS. Progression of periodontal disease in adult subjects in the absence of periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol 1977; 4:240-9
4. Becker W, Berg L, Becker B. Untreated periodontal disease: A longitudinal study. J Periodontal 1979; 50:234-44
5. Listagrten MA ,Mao A, Robinson PJ. Periodontal probing and the relationship of the probe tip to periodontal tissue. J Periodontal 1976; 47:511-513
6. Hou GL, Lin CH, Hung CC ,Yang YS, Shieh TY ,Lin IC ,Tsai CC. The consistency and reliability of periodontal bone level measurements using digital scanning radiographic image analysis —a pilot study. J Med Sciences 2000 ;16:566-73
7. World Workshop in clinical Periodontics. Report of section on Periodontal diagnosis and dignaostic aids. Princenton, NJ ,1989
8. Armitage GC. International Workshop for a Classification of Periodontal disease and conditions, Annals of Periodontology. Vol 4.1999:1-112
9. Hausmann E. Potential pathways for bone resorption in human periodontal disease. J Periodontol 1974; 45:338
10. Nair SP, Meghji S, Willson M, Reddi K, White P, Henderson B. Bacterialy induced bone destruction: mechanism and miscomceptions. Infect Immun 1996; 64:2371-80
11. Udagawa N, Takahashi N, Akatsu T,. Sasski T, Yamaguchi A. Kodama H. Martin TJ. Suda T. The bone marrow-derived stromal cell lines MC3T3-G2/PA6 and ST2 support osteoclast-like cell differentiation in cocultures with mouse spleen cells. Endocrinology, 1989; 125(4):1805-13
12. Kimble RB. Matayoshi AB. Vannice JL. Simultaneous block ofinterleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor is required to completely prevent bone loss in the early
13. Thomson SM, Mundy GR, Chambers TJ. Tumor necrosis factors α and β induce osteoblastic cells to stimulate osteoclastic bone resorption. J Immunol 1989, 138:775-9
14. Jeffcoat MK, Reddy MS. A comparison of probing and radiographic methods for detection of periodortal disease progression. Curr Opin Dent 1991; 1:45-51
15. Hausmann E, Allen K, Carpio L, Christersson LA, et al. Computerized methodology for detection of alveolar crest bone loss from serial intra-oral radiographs. J periodontal 1992; 63:657-62
16. Coolidge ED. The thickness of the human periodontal membrane. J Am Dent Assoc 1937; 24:1260-5
17. Fermin AC, Michael GN: Radiographic and other aids in the diagnosis of periodontal diseased. In: Clin Periodontol, W. B. Saunder, Philadelphia, 8th ed 1996; 362-74
18. Listgarten MA, Mao A, Robinson PJ, Periodontal Probing and the relationship of the probe tip to Periodontal tissue. J Periodontol 1976; 47:511-3
19. Haffajee AD, Socransky SS. Goodson JM. Comparison of different data analysis for detecting changes in attachment level. J Clin Periodontol 1983; 10:298-10
20. Schei O, Wauhauug J, Lovdal A, Arno A. Alveolar bone loss as related to oral hygiene and age. J Penodontol 1959; 30:7-1
21. Jeffcoat MK, Jeffcoat R, Williams RC. A New method of the comparsion of bone loss measurement on non-standardized radiogaphs. J Periodont Res 1984; 19:434-40
22. Rudolph DJ, White SC. Film-holding instruments for intraoral subtraction radiography. Oral Surg. Oral Med Pathol 1988; 65:767-72
23. Rutimann UE, Webber RL, Schmidt E. A robust digital method for film contrast correction in subtraction radiography. J Periodont Res 1986; 21:486-95
24. Hormand J, Frandsen A. Juveuile periodontitis. localized of bone loss in relation to age, sex and teeth. J Clin Periodontol. 1979; 6:407-16
25. Bial JJ, Mellonig JT. Radiographic evaluation of juvenile periodontitis (periodontosis) . J periodontal 1987; 58:321-6
26. Yusof ZA. Early-onset periodontitis: radiographic patterns of alveolar bone loss in 55 cases from a selected Malaysian population. J Periodontol. 1990; 61(12):751-4
27. Papapanou Pn, Wennstrom JL, Grondahl K. Periodontal status in relation to age and tooth type. A cross-sectional radiographic study. J Clin periodontal 1988;15:469-78
28. Pelton W, Pennell E, Druziana A. Tooth morbidity experience of adults. J Am Dent Assoc 1954; 49:438-45
29. Ong G. Periodontal reasons for tooth loss in an Asian population. J Clin Periodontol 1996; 23:307-9
30. Nyman S, Lindhe J, Rosling B. Periodontal surgery in plaque-infected dentitions. J Clin Periodontol 1977;4:240-9
31. McFall W: Tooth loss in 100 treated patients with periodontal disease. A long-term study. J Periodontal 1982; 53:539-49
32. McLeod D. The predictability of periodontal treatment as measured by tooth loss: A retrospective study. Quintessence Int 1998; 29:631-5
34. Hirschfeld L, Wasserman B. A long-term survery of tooth loss in 600 treated periodontal patients. J Periodontal 1978; 49:225-37
35. Goodson JM, Haffajee AD, Socransky SS : The relationship between attachment level loss and alveolar bone loss. J Clin Periodontology 1984; 11:348-59
36. Albandar JM : Validity and reliability of alveolar bon level measurements made on dry skulls. J Clin Periodontology 1989; 16:575-9
37. Michael SR : Radiographic methods in the evaluation of periodontal therapy. J Periodontology 1992; 63:1078-84
38. Lavstedt S : A methodological-roentgenologic investigation on alveolar bone loss. Acta Odontologica Scandinavia 33 1973; 67(suppl.):3-25
39. Okamoto H, Yoneyama T, Lindhe J, Haffajee A. Socransky. S. Method evaluating periodontal disease data in epidemiological research .J Clin Periodontol 1988; 15:430-9
40. Leo H, Anerud A, Boysen H, Smoth M. The Natural History of periodontal Disease in Man, The rate of periodontal destruction before 40 years of age, J periodontal 1978; 49:607-20
41. Mullally BH, Breen B, Linden GJ. Smoking and patterns of bone loss in early-onset periodontitis. J Periodontol 1999; 70:394-401
42. Brown LJ, Albander JM, Brunelle JA, Loe H, Early-onset periodontitis: Progression of attachment loss during 6 years. J Periodontol 1996; 67 : 968-675
43.Kaimenyi JT, Ashley FP. Assessment of bone loss in periodontitis from panoramic radiographs J Clin Periodontol 1988; 15:170-4
44.Pepelassi EA, Diamanti-Kipioti A. Selection of the most accurate method of conventional radiography for the assessment of periodontal osseous destruction J. Clin Periodontol 1997; 24:557-67
45.Hou, -G-L; Lin, -C-H. The study of cumulative and yearly alveolar bone loss rate in individuals with early-onset periodontitis and adult periodontitis-digital scanning radiographic image analysis 2001
46.Bhaskar SN. Orban’s Oral Histology and Embryology 11th ed. St. Louis Mosby-Year Book Inc 1991; 382
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top