跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.106) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/04/04 22:01
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:林晏慈
研究生(外文):Lin, Yen-Tzu
論文名稱:轉型領導與共享領導對大學運動員團隊效能之影響
論文名稱(外文):Effects of Transformational and Shared Leadership Styles on College Athletes’ Perception of Team Effectiveness
指導教授:黃崇儒黃崇儒引用關係
指導教授(外文):Huang, Chung-Ju
口試日期:2019-04-25
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:臺北市立大學
系所名稱:運動教育研究所
學門:教育學門
學類:專業科目教育學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2019
畢業學年度:107
語文別:中文
論文頁數:66
中文關鍵詞:團隊效能共享領導教練領導
外文關鍵詞:team effectivenessshared leadershipcoach leadership
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:434
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:145
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
目的:探討教練轉型領導和共享領導對大學運動員團隊效能之影響。方法:本研究對象擬以大學甲組競技運動團隊之運動員為對象,共329名 (男182人,女147人;平均年齡20.12歲),發放隊伍包括:足球、籃球、手球、橄欖球、曲棍球、棒球、壘球、排球。以問卷調查方式收集資料,使用問卷涵蓋內容為:轉型領導、共享領導、團隊效能測量工具。所得資料以皮爾遜相關與迴歸分析等統計方法進行處理。結果:轉型領導與情感承諾、團隊績效呈正相關,與工具承諾呈負相關;共享領導與情感承諾、團隊績效呈正相關,與工具承諾呈負相關;共享領導比轉型領導對情感承諾具有較高預測力。結論:當教練使用轉型領導或共享領導行為時,對團隊情感承諾、團隊績效會增加,工具承諾會降低。整體而言,當教練要提升團隊情感承諾時,使用共享領導會比轉型領導效果佳。
Purpose: This study examined the effects of transformational and shared leadership styles on college athletes’ perception of team effectiveness. Method: The participants were 329 athletes (182 males, 147 females; 20.12 years old) recruited from different college team sports including football, basketball, handball, rugby, hockey, baseball, softball, volleyball at the highest level. Data were collected by administering a battery of questionnaires under a practice condition. Results: Transformation leadership and shared leadership were positively related to affective commitment and team performance, whereas transformation leadership and shared leadership were negatively related to instrumental commitment. Shared leadership demonstrated a larger influence on affective commitment than transformational leadership. Conclusion: When coaches use transformational leadership or shared leadership, they are able to enhance team effectiveness and performance of their teams. On the whole, shared leadership is more influential than transformational leadership, when coaches expect to increase affective commitment of their teams.
學位考試審定書 ii
中文摘要 iii
英文摘要 iv
謝誌 v
目錄 vi
表目錄 ix
圖目錄 xi

第壹章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的與問題 4
第三節 研究假設 4
第四節 名詞解釋 5
第貳章 文獻探討 8
第一節 轉型領導定義與相關研究 8
第二節 共享領導定義與相關研究 15
第三節 團隊效能定義與相關研究 18
第四節 轉型領導與共享領導對團隊效能之關係 22
第五節 文獻總結 23
第參章 研究方法 25
第一節 研究架構 25
第二節 研究程序 26
第三節 研究對象 27
第四節 研究工具 27
第五節 施測程序 29
第六節 資料處理分析 30
第肆章 研究結果與討論 31
第一節 轉型領導、共享領導與團隊效能之相關 31
第二節 轉型領導對團隊效能之預測 34
第三節 共享領導對團隊效能之預測 36
第四節 轉型領導與共享領導對團隊效能之預測力比較 39
第五節 綜合討論 45
第伍章 結論與建議 49
第一節 結論 49
第二節 建議 50
參考文獻 52
一、中文部分 52
二、英文部分 55
附錄 61
附錄一 個人基本資料 61
附錄二 轉型領導量表 62
附錄三 共享領導量表 64
附錄四 團隊校能量表 65

表目錄
表2-1領導理論發展時期 9
表2-2國內、外學者對轉型領導之定義 10
表2-3國內、外有關轉型領導的各個向度對照表 11
表2-4國內外研究者在運動情境中轉型領導之相關研究歸納表 14
表2-5國內、外學者對共享領導之相關研究 17
表2-6國外學者對團隊效能之定義歸納表 19
表2-7國內、外學者對團隊效能之各向度歸納表 20
表2-8國內學者對團隊效能在運動領域之相關研究 21
表4-1轉型領導、共享領導與團隊效能之描述性統計 32
表4-2轉型領導、共享領導與團隊效能之相關矩陣 33
表4-3轉型領導對情感承諾之預測分析表 34
表4-4轉型領導行為對工具承諾之預測分析表 35
表4-5轉型領導行為對團隊績效之預測分析表 36
表4-6共享領導對情感承諾之預測分析表 37
表4-7共享領導對工具承諾之預測分析表 38
表4-8共享領導對團隊績效之預測分析表 38
表4-9轉型領導與共享領導對情感承諾之預測力比較 40
表4-10轉型領導與共享領導對工具承諾之預測力比較 42
表4-11轉型領導與共享領導對團隊績效之預測力比較 44

圖目錄
圖3-1研究架構圖 25
圖3-2研究流程圖 26
一、中文部分
王曉如 (2013)。團隊教練、團隊績效流程、團隊效能、團隊設計、組織限制之關聯性探討 (未出版碩士論文)。國立中央大學,桃園市。
朱世明 (2013)。大學生的情緒智慧對團隊效能與學習成就之影響 (未出版碩士論文)。明新科技大學,新竹縣。
何品融 (2015)。創新文化與分享式領導對員工創新行為影響之研究-以正向心理資本為中介變數 (未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
吳秀玲 (2018)。大專運動員知覺轉型領導行為與團隊承諾的關係:基本心理需求滿足感的中介 (未出版碩士論文)。臺北市立大學,臺北市。
杜茂生 (2012)。教練轉型領導與領導信任對團隊效能之研究 (未出版碩士論文)。國立體育大學,桃園市。
汪在莒、賴文璇 (2010)。教練轉型領導行為對拔河運動員成就目標、運動參與動機與組織承諾之結構模式。大專體育學術專刊,452-459。
周怡欣 (2014)。合球運動員同儕領導、性別刻板印象與團隊效能的關係 (未出版碩士論文)。臺北市立大學,臺北市。
姜定宇、李威德 (2013)。團隊關係信念與團隊效能的關聯:團隊互依之調節效果。中華心理學刊,55(2),159-179。
洪瑋璘 (2014)。轉換型領導於組織變革過程中變革團隊效能之關聯性研究 - 以資訊科技業為例 (未出版碩士論文)。朝陽科技大學,臺中市。
洪慶懷、邱奕文 (2013)。大專校院足球運動代表隊教練轉型領導、選手組織承諾與選手滿意度之研究。輔仁大學體育學刊,12,27-47。
胡漢良 (2011)。國小籃球教練家長式領導行為、球員參與動機對團隊效能之影響 (未出版碩士論文)。大葉大學,彰化縣。
徐煒茹 (2018)。中等學校籃球選手知覺教練轉型領導與團隊效能之研究 (未出版碩士論文)。臺北市立大學,臺北市。
高三福 (2001)。團隊文化與教練領導:質化與量化兩種研究途徑 (未出版博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
張奕華、顏弘欽 (2013)。學校分散式領導:概念發展與證據成效。Do Education:當代教育創新與實踐,27-44。國立屏東教育大學,屏東縣。
陳昭伶 (2016)。新北市國小田徑校隊選手知覺教練轉型領導行為與團隊凝聚力之研究 (未出版碩士論文)。臺北市立大學,臺北市。
陳昱侃 (2017)。雙北市國小田徑選手知覺教練轉型領導與組織承諾之研究 (未出版碩士論文)。臺北市立大學,臺北市。
劉書瑋 (2015)。倫理領導與團隊效能對團隊創新影響之研究 (未出版碩士論文)。銘傳大學,臺北市。
盧柏安 (2010)。校長分享式領導、教師專業社群對組織信任影響之研究 (未出版碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
魏永瀠 (2010)。團隊分享式領導行為對空服團隊的影響之研究 (未出版碩士論文)。銘傳大學,臺北市。

二、英文部分
Alyson J Crozier, Todd M Loughead, & Krista J Munroe-Chandler (2017). Top-Down or shared leadership? Examining differences in athlete leadership behaviours based on leadership status in sport. Physical Culture, 71(2), 86-98.
Arthur, C. A., Woodman, T., Ong, C. W., Hardy, L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2011). The role of athlete narcissism in moderating the relationship between coaches’ transformational leader behaviours and athlete motivation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 33, 3–19.
Aryee, S., Walumbwa, F. O., Zhou, Q., & Hartnell, C. A. (2012). Transformational leadership, innovative behavior, and task performance: Test of mediation and moderation processes. Human Performance, 25, 1–25. http://doi.org/fzwzst
Bass, B. A. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: The Free Press.
Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industrial, military, and educational impact. Mahwah. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). The implications of transactional and transformational leadership for individual, team, and organizational development. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 4, 231-272.
Boies, K., Lvina, E., & Martens, M.L. (2010). Shared leadership and team performance in a business strategy simulation. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9, 195–202.doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000021
Bryman, A. (1992). Charisma and leadership in organizations. London:Sage Publications.
Callow, N., Smith, M. J., Hardy, L., Arthur, C. A., & Hardy, J. (2009). Measurement of transformational leadership and its relationship with team cohesion and performance level. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 21, 395–412. doi:10.1080/10413200903204754
Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E., & Marrone, J. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1217-1234.
Charbonneau, D., Barling, J., & Kelloway, E. K. (2001). Transformational leadership and sports performance: The mediating role of intrinsic motivation1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 1521–1534. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02686.x
Chelladurai, P. (1984). Discrepancy between preferences and preferred leadership behavior and satisfaction of athletes in varying sports. Journal of Sport Psychology, 6, 27-41.
Chelladurai, P. (1999). Human resource management in sport and recreation. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes team work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suit. Journal of Management, 23, 239- 290.
Drescher, G., & Garbers, Y. (2016). Shared leadership and commonality: A policy-capturing study. The Leadership Quarterly, 27, 200–217. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.02.002
Elder, J. O. (2000). Support for the shared leadership of collaboration action teams through training of teams, local facilitators and development of resources materials. Presented at 2000 annual AERA meeting, New Orleans, LA (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED442206)
Ensley, M.D., Hmieleski, K.M., & Pearce, C.L. (2006). The importance of vertical and shared leadership within new venture top management teams: Implications for the performance of startups. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 217–231. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.002
Erkutlu, H. (2012). The impact of organizational culture on the relationship between shared leadership and team proactivity. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 18, 102–119. http://doi.org/bfsc
Gladstein, D. L. (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), 499-517.
Grégoire Bosselut, Julie Boiché, Bastien Salamé, Evelyne Fouquereau, Laure Guilbert, Oscar C Serrano (2018). Transformational leadership and group cohesion in sport: Examining the mediating role of interactional justice using a within- and between-team approach. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 13(6), 912-928.
Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. Handbook of Organizational Behavior, 315-342.
Hiller, N.J., Day, D.V., & Vance, R.J. (2006). Collective enactment of leadership roles and team effectiveness: A field study. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 387–397. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.04.004
Hoch, J. E. (2013). Shared leadership and innovation: The role of vertical leadership and employee integrity. Journal of Business and Psychology, 28, 159–174. http://doi.org/bfsd
Hoch, J.E., & Kozlowski, S.W. (2012). Leading virtual teams: Hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(3), 390–403. PubMed doi:10.1037/a0030264
Jaros, S. J., Jermier, J. M., Koehler, J. W., & Sincich, T. (1993). Effects of continuance, affective, and moral commitment on the withdrawal process: An evaluation of eight structural equation models. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 951-995.
Jordan, M. H., Field, H. S., & Armenakis, A. A. (2002). The relationship of group process variables and team performance: A team-level analysis in a field setting. Small Group Research, 33, 121-150.
Kai C. Bormann, Jens Rowold (2106). Transformational Leadership and Followers’ Objective Performance Over Time: Insights From German Basketball. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology ,28(3), 367-373.
Kang, H. R., Yang, H. D., & Rowley, C. (2006). Factors in team effectiveness: Cognitive and demographic similarities of software development team members. Human Relations, 59, 1681-1710.
Locke, E. A. (2003). Leadership: Starting at the top. In C. L. Pearce & J. A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership (pp. 271-284). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171-194.

Moday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee-organization linkages. New York: Academic Press.

O'Reilly, C., & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 429-499.
Parker, G. M. (1990). Team players and teamwork: The new competitive business strategy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Pearce, C. L., & Conger, J. A. (2003). Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The leadership quarterly, 1(2), 107-142.
Rowold, J., & Rohmann, A. (2009). Transformational and transactional leadership styles, followers’ positive and negative emotions, and performance in German nonprofit orchestras. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 20, 41–59.
Salas, E., Rosen, M. A., Burke, C. S., & Goodwin, G. F. (2009). The wisdom of collectives in organizations: An update of the teamwork competencies. In Salas, E., Goodwin, G. F., & Burke, C. S. (Eds.) Team effectiveness in complex organizations. cross-disciplinary perspectives and approaches (pp. 39-79), NY: Taylor & Francis.
Seers, A. (1989). Team-member exchange quality: A new construct for role making research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 118-135.
Seers, A., Petty, M. M., & Cashman, J. F. (1995). Team-member exchange under team and traditional management: A naturally occurring quasi-experiment. Group and Organization Management, 20, 18-38.
Sergiovanni T. J. (1995). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Stewart, G. L., & Barrick, M. R. (2000). Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 135-148.
Wageman, R., Hackman, J. R., & Lehman, E. V. (2005)3. Team Diagnostic Survey, Development of an Instrument. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 41(4), 1-25.
Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 258-205.
Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in organizations (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
連結至畢業學校之論文網頁點我開啟連結
註: 此連結為研究生畢業學校所提供,不一定有電子全文可供下載,若連結有誤,請點選上方之〝勘誤回報〞功能,我們會盡快修正,謝謝!
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊