跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.214) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/06/21 10:49
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:陳昱仁
研究生(外文):CHEN, YU-REN
論文名稱:常溫合成緩釋保坍型聚羧酸強塑劑特性探討
論文名稱(外文):Study of Polycarboxylate Superplasticizer Featured as Extended-Release and Slump-Retaintion under Room Temperature Synthesis
指導教授:許鎧麟許鎧麟引用關係
指導教授(外文):HSU, KAI-LIN
口試委員:許鎧麟劉玉雯陳君弢林彥宇
口試委員(外文):HSU, KAI-LINLIU, YU-WENCHEN, CHUN-TAOLIN, YEN-YU
口試日期:2018-07-30
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立高雄第一科技大學
系所名稱:營建工程系碩士班
學門:工程學門
學類:土木工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2018
畢業學年度:106
語文別:中文
論文頁數:110
中文關鍵詞:常溫合成一次性投料聚羧酸強塑劑緩釋保坍
外文關鍵詞:room temperature synthesisdisposal-input methodpoly-carboxylate superplasticizerextended-release and slump-retaining
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:556
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:63
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:0
強塑劑被普遍用來改善混凝土的性能,也因添加不同性質的強塑劑,而得不同的工作特性,合適的添加也能增加施作的品質及效率。目前市售強塑劑大多為聚羧酸系,其製程上也多以高溫聚合,其次常溫合成也需加溫,不僅可能造成能源的耗用,也可能造成環境的影響,合成方法也多以滴加方法進行,程序複雜且合成時間需嚴密控管,於建廠時可能需投入更多精密設備;聚羧酸系強塑劑在使用上雖比傳統萘磺酸系強塑劑效果佳,但其對水及水泥之敏感度高,可能造成混凝土新拌階段工作性不良,或在未運送到工地時就失去了工作性。
本研究自行研發助劑形式強塑劑,製備以常溫不加溫方式合成,以分子設計方法為基礎,配置緩釋型及保坍型聚羧酸強塑劑配方,並利用原料作用機制控制其製備方法,分為滴加法及一次性投料法。在強塑劑分別合成後參照規範標準進行基礎性質試驗及測試其水泥基漿體坍流度、坍流度保持性、檢核反應溫度曲線之變化。試驗以7種不同水泥2種不同強塑劑(緩釋型及保坍型)進行強塑劑之飽和添加量測試,並以飽和添加量測試結果進行水泥基漿體之坍流度及坍流度保持性;再藉緩釋型強塑劑及保坍型強塑劑之混用並添加緩凝劑,以單格子點法進行最佳組合之試驗,且試驗其對效果較好及效果較差之水泥進行水泥基砂漿之用水比率、強度比率、坍流度及坍流度保持性試驗,確保其之效益;最後與效果較差之市售強塑劑進行相容性驗證試驗,找出本研究所開發之緩釋保坍型聚羧酸強塑劑與市售強塑劑之最佳組合改善方案。
試驗結果經由分析得出,本研究使用常溫不加溫方式,並以滴加法及一次投料法成功合成緩釋型及保坍型聚羧酸強塑劑;以7種水泥試驗緩釋型強塑劑60分鐘飽和添加量在0.66~1.05%間,保坍型強塑劑飽和添加量在0.56~1.33%間;緩釋型及保坍型強塑劑雖然效果沒有非常優異,但確實能對少數水泥基漿體達到緩慢釋放及保持坍流度之效果;複合型強塑劑為緩釋型強塑劑及保坍型強塑劑兩者混合使用,並加入緩凝劑調配,最佳比例為SR:ER:SG=0.8:0.2:0.1=SEG;複合型強塑劑水泥砂漿抗壓強度比3天在122~166%間,7天在106~149%間,28天在90.7~147%間,複合型強塑劑水泥基砂漿坍流度測試結果效果不顯著,但120分鐘時皆還有坍流度;相容性應用驗證試驗之水泥漿坍流度試驗,添加複合型強塑劑改善了市售性能較差兩種水泥之工作性。本研究所開發之複合添加式聚羧酸強塑劑,確實能增加性能較差強塑劑之坍流度及坍流度保持性,改善性能較差之強塑劑。
Superplasticizers are commonly used to improve the performance of concrete. They also have different working characteristics due to the addition of different superplasticizers. Appropriate addition can also increase the quality and efficiency of application. At present, most of the commercially available superplasticizers are poly-carboxylate systems, and the process is also high temperature synthesis, secondly, the room temperature synthesis needs to be heated, which may not only cause energy consumption, but also may cause environmental impact. The titration method is carried out, the procedure is complicated and the synthesis time needs to be strictly controlled, and more precision equipment may need to be invested in the construction of the plant. The poly-carboxylate superplasticizer is better than the traditional naphthalene-sulfonic acid superplasticizer in use. However, its high sensitivity to water and cement may result in poor workability in the concrete mixing stage or loss of workability when not delivered to the construction site.
In this study, the self-developed auxiliary form of superplasticizer was prepared, and the preparation was carried out at room temperature without heating. Based on the molecular design method, the formula of extended-release and slump-retaining poly-carboxylate superplasticizer was formulated, and the mechanism of raw material was used to control it. The preparation method is divided into titration method and disposal-input method. After the synthetic superplasticizers were separately synthesized, the basic properties were tested with reference to the normative standards and the changes of the cement slump flow and slump flow retention, and check reaction temperature curves were tested. The test carried out the saturation addition test of the superplasticizers with 7 different cements and 2 different kinds of superplasticizers (extended-release and slump-retaining), and the slump flow and slump flow retention of the cement-based slurry were tested by the saturated addition test results. Further by the combination of extended-release and slump-retaining superplasticizer and adding retarder, the best combination test is carried out by simplex-lattice design, and the test is better and the effect is poor. The cement is used to test the water ratio, strength ratio, slump flow and slump flow retention of the cement-based mortar to ensure its benefits. Finally, the compatibility verification test is carried out with the commercially available superplasticizer with poor effect to find out the research. The best combination improvement scheme for the development of the extended-release and slump-retaining poly-carboxylate superplasticizer and the commercially available superplasticizer.
The test results were obtained through analysis, the study used the room temperature and no heating method, and successfully synthesized the extended-release and slump-retaining poly-carboxylate superplasticizer by the divided into titration method and disposal-input method, the extended-release superplasticizer was tested with 7 kinds of cement, the saturated addition amount of the agent in 60 minutes is between 0.66 and 1.05%, and the saturated addition amount of the slump-retaining superplasticizer is between 0.56 and 1.33%. Although the effect of the extended-release and slump-retaining superplasticizers is not excellent, it can indeed be used for a few. The cement-based slurry achieves the effects of extended-release and slump-retaining. The SEG superplasticizer is a mixture of extended-release and slump-retaining superplasticizer, and is added with a retarder, and the optimum ratio is SR: ER: SG=0.8:0.2:0.1=SEG. The compressive strength of composite type plasticizer cement mortar is between 122~166% in 3 days, 106~149% in 7 days, and 90.7~147% in 28 days. The results of the slump flow test of the SEG superplasticizer cement-based mortar are not significant, but there are slump flow at 120 minutes. The grouting test of the cement slump flow for the compatibility application verification test, adding the SEG Improved the workability of the two types of cement with poor commercial performance. The compound-added poly-carboxylate superplasticizer developed by the research institute can increase the slump flow and slump flow retention of the poorer superplasticizers and improve the poor performance of the superplasticizers.
摘要 I
Abstract III
致謝 VI
目錄 VII
表目錄 X
圖目錄 XII
第一章 緒論 1
1-1 前言 1
1-2 研究動機與目的 2
1-2.1研究動機 2
1-2.2研究目的 2
1-3 研究方法與流程 3
1-4 用語及定義 6
第二章 文獻回顧 7
2-1 水泥 7
2-1.1 水泥製程與組成特性 7
2-1.2 水泥水化反應機制 8
2-2 強塑劑 12
2-2.1 強塑劑之種類與特性 12
2-2.2 強塑劑作用機制 16
2-3 聚羧酸強塑劑之製備 19
2-3.1 自由基聚合物 19
2-3.2 自由基聚合反應機制 20
2-3.2 聚羧酸強塑劑的製備近年研究 21
2-4 水泥與強塑劑相容性 22
2-5 文獻回顧小結 22
第三章 實驗設計與方法 23
3-1 實驗變數與實驗規劃 23
3-1.1 實驗變數 23
3-1.2 實驗規劃 23
3-2 試驗材料與配比 24
3-2.1 組成材料與基礎性質 24
3-2.2 強塑劑合成程序 30
3-3 試驗儀器與設備 31
3-3.1 合成反應設備 31
3-3.2 電子秤 32
3-3.3 溫度數據擷取器 33
3-3.4 pH酸鹼度計 34
3-3.5 循環烘箱 34
3-3.6 水泥砂漿攪拌機 35
3-3.7 水泥漿坍流度試驗模具 36
3-3.8 水泥砂漿坍流度試驗模具 36
3-3.9 水硬性水泥試驗用之流動性台 37
3-3.10抗壓試驗機 37
3-3.11比重計 38
3-4 試驗方法與步驟 38
3-4.1 強塑劑pH值量測 38
3-4.2 強塑劑固成份含量測定 39
3-4.3 水泥漿坍流度試驗 39
3-4.4 水泥砂漿坍流度試驗 40
3-4.5 水泥砂漿抗壓強度試驗 41
3-4.6 強塑劑比重試驗 42
第四章 結果分析與討論 43
4-1 聚羧酸強塑劑合成結果 43
4-1.1 合成反應溫度 43
4-1.2 水泥漿坍流度試驗 46
4-1.3 基本性質試驗 48
4-2 強塑劑對水泥基漿體之影響 48
4-2.1 飽和添加量試驗 48
4-2.2 水泥漿坍流度試驗 56
4-2.3 水泥漿膠結材坍流度試驗 59
4-2.4 複合型強塑劑最佳組合 64
4-3 複合型強塑劑對水泥基砂漿之影響 67
4-3.1 抗壓強度 67
4-3.2 坍流度 71
4-4 相容性應用驗證試驗 75
4-4.1 市售強塑劑對坍流度之影響 75
4-4.2 市售強塑劑對相容性影響之改善對策 77
第五章 結論與建議 79
5-1 結論 79
5-2 建議 80
參考文獻 81
照片附錄 85
附錄一、口試委員審查意見與說明對照表 109
附錄二、作者簡介 110
[1]Mindess, S., J.F.Young, 1981, Concrete, Prentice- Hall, Englewood Cliff, New Jersy.
[2]黃兆龍,2002,混凝土性質與行為,詹氏書局,台北。
[3]廖國裕,2004,混凝土中骨材與水泥漿界面處過渡區性質與耐久性之研究,國立交通大學,博士論文。
[4]F.M.Lea, 1971, The Chemistry of Cement and Concrete, Chemical Publishing Company, Inc., New York.
[5]楊志強,1990,混凝土中水泥漿和顆粒骨材界面特性之研究,國立交通大學,碩士論文。
[6]楊柏蒼,1993,規則顆粒混凝土性質之研究,國立台灣工業技術學院,碩士論文。
[7]Cottin, B.,1992, “The First Reaction in Cement Hydratio”, Hydration and Setting of Cements, pp.89-100 .
[8]Taylor, H. F. W.,1990, Cement Chemistry, Academic Press, London.
[9]Mehta, P. K.,1986, Concrete Structure, Properties and Materials,Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersy.
[10]Dacker,E.A., and Fleming, J.p., 1978, “Admixture for Flowing Concrete,” Chemical Admixture for Concrete, E.& FN. Spon, New York.
[11]CSN12283,混凝土化學用摻料。
[12]許貫中,1999,材料因素對強塑劑最佳用量之影響,強塑劑於混凝土應用研討會論文集,pp.27-43。
[13]黃兆龍,1999,強塑劑的質與量對混凝土性質的影響,強塑劑於混凝土應用研討會論文集,pp129-155。
[14]王子明、王亞麗,2011,混凝土高效減水劑,化學工業出版社,北京。
[15]Ramachandran, V. S., and Feldman, R. F., 1984, Superplasticizers, Concrete Admixture Handbook, New Jersey.
[16]胡翔皓,2010,水泥質材料中混合化學掺料不相容原因的探討,國立台灣師範大學,碩士論文。
[17]M. Pei, D. Wang, X. Hu, D. Xu, 2000, “Synthesis of sodium sulfanilate phenol formaldehyde condensate and its application as a superplasticizer in concrtet”, Cem. Concr. Res., Vol.30, pp.1841.
[18]M. Collepardi, 1998, “Admixtures used to enhance placing characteristics of concrete”, Cem. Concr. Comp., Vol.20, pp.103.
[19]Etsuo, S., and Daimon, M.,1995, Mechanisms of superplastification, Materials Science of Concrete IV, Tokyo.
[20]K. C. Hsu, J. J. Chiu, S. D. Chen, Y. C. Tseng, 1999, “Effect of addition time of a superplasticizer on cement adsorption and on concrete workability”, Cem. Concr. Comp., Vol.21, pp. 425.
[21]B. G. Kim, S. Jiang, C. Jolicoeur and P. C. Aïtcin, 2000, “The adsorption behavior of PNS superplasticizer and its relation to fluidity of cement paste”, Cem. Concr. Res., Vol.30, pp.887.
[22]H. Uchikawa, S. Hanehara, and D. Sawaki, 1997, “The role of steric repulsive force in the dispersion of cement particles in fresh paste paste prepared with organic admixture”, Cem. Concr. Res.,Vol.27, pp.37.
[23]黃甄玲,2004,羧酸系分散劑的合成以及對水泥漿體性質的影響, 國立台灣師範大學,碩士論文。
[24]Mehta, P. K., Monteiro, P. J. M., 1993,“Concrete Structure, Properties , and Materials”, (2nd ed.), Prentice Hall International Series.
[25]Jolicoeur, C., Simard, M. A., 1998, “Chemical admixture-cement interactions: phenomenology and physico-chemical concepts”, Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol.20, p87-101.
[26]王子明,2013,聚羧酸系高性能減水劑-製備.性能與應用,中國建築工業出版社,北京。
[27]蔡信行、楊靜儀、葉德惠、陳進隆,2002,聚合物化學,新文京開發出版有限公司,台北。
[28]趙德仁、張慰盛,2015,高聚物合成工藝學,化學工業出版社,北京。
[29]王平寧,2013,合成不同分子量聚羧酸系減水劑對混凝土坍流度保持性之研究,萬能科技大學,碩士論文。
[30]黃彥傑,2015,常溫合成泛用型高保塑羧酸強塑劑之開發研究,國立高雄第一科技大學,碩士論文。
[31]陳昱仁,2017,聚羧酸系保坍劑製備與應用之研究,混凝土工程研討會,台灣混凝土學會,嘉義。
[32]Aitcin,P.c, 1997 ,“Cement/Superplasticizers Compatibility”,高性能混凝土新近研發與應用研討會論文集,台北,p79-105。
[33]Byung-Gi Kim, 1999, “Dispersing Mechanism of PNS Superplasticizer in high-performance concrete ”,強塑劑於混凝土應用研討會論文集,p101-119。
[34]Robert J.Flatt, Yves f. Houst,“A Simplifued view on chemical effects perturbing the actuon of superplasticizer ”, Cement and Concrete Research,Vol, 2001, p1169-1176.
[35]楊華,2012,“調整外加劑在混凝土中的相容性方法探究”,商品混凝土,第十期。
[36]張博堯,2003,水泥中鹼當量對含強塑劑水泥漿流變行為之影響,國立高雄應用科技大學,碩士論文。
[37]GB T8077-2012,混凝土外加劑均勻性試驗。
[38]CNS1010,水硬性水泥墁料抗壓強度試驗法。
[39]CNS1012,水硬性水泥試驗用之流動性台。
[40]GB50119-2013,混凝土外加劑應用技術規範。
[41]公共工程施工綱要規範第03050章2.1.6節。
[42]張慶文,2014,複合型防水劑研發與性能研究,國立高雄第一科技大學,碩士論文。
[43]Fubing Zou, Hongbo Tan, Yulin Guo, Baoguo Ma, Xingyang He, and Yang Zhou, 2017,“Effect of sodium gluconate on dispersion of polycarboxylate superplasticizer with different grafting density in side chain”, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol. 55, pp91-100.
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊