臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

近年國軍迷彩野戰服逢汰換階段，研改至現今數位迷彩。一套迷彩服，除了戰場上的隱蔽性，更代表軍隊氣勢凜然的剛直形象。綜合了各種因素考量，與嚴苛的環境下，軍服穿著的舒適度更顯重要。本研究目的為探討穿著不同布料，在一定運動強度下，迷彩衣著之衣內微氣候與舒適度評估，人體皮膚和衣服之間的空氣層稱為衣內微氣候。26 位現役軍人參與試驗；年齡分佈 21-40 佔最大比例(90%)；BMI 平均24.81。受試者隨機穿著兩款(後稱A與B)不同規格(透氣性差異)布料進行運動實驗，紀錄每分鐘衣內微氣候，包括: 皮膚溫度、衣內溫度、衣內濕度等三項指標數據，並於運動實驗前、後填寫主觀衣著舒適度評比。設備儀器使用膚溫感測儀(Thought technology)量測皮膚表面溫度變化；使用溫溼度感測儀(TK 550，Dickson)量測衣服內層溫度與濕度變化，所有感應器黏貼身上 7 個部位(胸口、腋窩、上背、下背、臀部、大腿內側、小腿外側)皮膚表層及迷彩服內層。初步成對 T 檢定結果發現，A 布料與 B 布料相比，B 布料透氣度較低，較低透氣度使皮膚表面溫度、衣內溫度變化量皆大於 A 布料。衣內濕度在高強度運動後皆無顯著，表示布料透氣度調整對衣內濕度上影響並不大。在運動前後衣著舒適度，B 布料有較低出汗感受、保暖程度、皮膚濕潤、內層濕潤，表示受試者對 A 布料穿著感受較溼熱。整體舒適度 B 布料皆高於A 布料，表示 B 布料接受度較高。綜合以上，B 布料有較高溫度變化量，衣著舒適度卻較 A 布料來的高。主要研究結果發現，紡織品的物理屬性與主觀穿著舒適感並不完全相關，個人主觀穿著舒適感應該是衣著布料使用考慮的重要因素之一。

The functional requirements for military textiles are manifold and complex. It should be simultaneously concerted about the physical, environmental, camouflage, specific battlefield threats, flames, heat and flash, and the economic considerations. This study aims to discuss how the textile of air-vapor permeability influences the clothing micro-climate and subjective clothing comfort. Twenty-eight subjects were recruited to participate in this experiment. Two textiles (A and B) made by 50% cotton and 50% nylon with different weave and air-permeability of 35cm3/cm2/s (A) and from 28 to 32 cm3/cm2/s (B) separately were used in this study. Subjects were asked to wear two camouflages, A and B, randomly and running on the treadmill to complete a 3km jogging within 15 minutes. The measurements include the variances of skin temperature, cloth inside temperature, cloth inside humidity and subjective comfort feelings. Sensors were attached on the seven body parts including chest, axillary, upper back, and lower back, hip, inner thigh, and lateral calf and between clothe-inside layers. Subjective comfort rating was assessed by visual analog scales (VAS) before and after exercise. The results of this study indicated that varied air-permeability of textile cause significant differences in skin temperatures, cloth-inside temperature and cloth-inside humidity during running exercise (p<.05). In general, wearing A-textile has remarkably lower skin temperature and lower cloth-inside temperature than B-textile during exercise. It’s reasonable because sweat evaporation would lose heat and decrease skin temperature. A-textile has higher air-permeability than B-textile which leads to lower skin and cloth-inside temperature. For cloth-inside humidity, it didn’t have significant differences between two textiles (p>.05). Moreover, subjective comfort ratings revealed that wearing B textile have higher satisfactions than A (p<.05). The primary findings present that textile physical attributes don’t really relate with subjective wearing comfort feeling. Individuals comfort feeling should be an issue for textile consideration.

摘要 i
Abstract ii
致謝 iii
目錄 iv
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vii
第一章 緒論 1
1.1研究背景與動機 1
1.2研究目的 2
1.3研究架構 2
第二章 文獻探討 4
2.1 軍裝設計考量 4
2.1.1衣物材質選擇 5
2.2 國軍野戰服沿革 6
2.3 衣著舒適度 6
2.3.1熱生理舒適性 6
2.4 衣內微氣候 9
第三章 研究方法 10
3.1 問題定義與描述 10
3.2 實驗設計 10
3.2.1實驗流程 11
3.2.2實驗對象 13
3.2.3實驗布料 14
3.2.4黏貼部位 15
3.2.5 運動試驗 16
3.3 實驗設備 17
3.3.1硬體設備 17
3.3.2軟體設備 20
第四章 研究結果 22
4.1受試者人體計測值 22
4.2受試者衣內微氣候基準值 23
4.2.1受試者皮膚溫度基準平均值標準差 23
4.2.2受試者衣內溫度基準平均值與標準差 24
4.2.3受試者衣濕度度基準平均值與標準差 25
4.3布料與運動階段對身體各部位變化量 26
4.3.1布料於不同階段對身體各部位皮膚溫度變化量 26
4.3.2布料於不同階段對身體各部位衣內溫度變化量 29
4.3.3布料於不同階段對身體各部位衣內濕度變化量 32
4.4布料對各部位之變化量 35
4.4.1布料對各部位皮膚溫度之平均變化量 35
4.4.2布料對各部位衣內溫度之平均變化量 36
4.4.3布料對各部位衣內濕度之平均變化量 37
4.5衣著舒適度主觀感受 38
第五章 討論 45
5.1布料因子對衣內微氣候影響 45
5.2布料因子對皮膚溫度影響 46
5.3布料因子對主觀舒適度影響 46
第六章 結論與建議 47
6.1結論 47
6.2建議 48
參考文獻 49
附錄一 衣著舒適度主觀評比問卷 52

1.張昌. (2005). 服裝熱舒適性與衣內微氣候. 武漢科技學院學報, 18(1), 4-7
2.蔡倩. (2014). 追求功能與外形的完美结合—美國軍裝面料現狀與未來發展趨勢. 紡織服裝周刊, (28), 44-44
3.陳德鴻. (2014)。無塵服之吸濕、透濕與透氣特性對人員生理與主觀舒適性之影響. 清華大學工業工程與工程管理學系學位論文, 1-64.
4.陳宏宇. (2018). 台灣氣候過去與未來. 國家災害防救科技中心
5.機能性暨產業用紡織品認證與驗證評議委員會. (2013). 慢跑服驗證規範FTTS-GA-025. 台灣機能性紡織品
6.ASHRAE, A. (2013). Standard 55, thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy, atlanta: american society of heating, refrigerating, and air-conditioning engineers. Inc., USA
7.Barker, R. L. (2002). From fabric hand to thermal comfort: the evolving role of objective measurements in explaining human comfort response to textiles. International journal of clothing science and technology,181-200.
8.Bartels, V. T. (2011). Improving comfort in sports and leisure wear. In improving comfort in clothing , 385-411.
9.Cardello, A. V. (2008). The sensory properties and comfort of military fabrics and clothing. In Military textiles ,71-106.
10.Choudhury, A. R., Majumdar, P. K., & Datta, C. (2011). Factors affecting comfort: human physiology and the role of clothing. In Improving comfort in clothing . Woodhead Publishing
11.De Sousa, J., Cheatham, C., & Wittbrodt, M. (2014). The effects of a moisture-wicking fabric shirt on the physiological and perceptual responses during acute exercise in the heat. Applied ergonomics, 45(6), 1447-1453.
12.Fournet, D., Redortier, B., & Havenith, G. (2012). A method for whole-body skin temperature mapping in humans. Thermology International, 22(4), 157-159.
13.Gavin, T. P., Babington, J. P., Harms, C. A., Ardelt, M. E., Tanner, D. A., & Stager, J. M. (2001). Clothing fabric does not affect thermoregulation during exercise in moderate heat. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 33(12), 2124-2130.
14.Gwosdow, A. R., Stevens, J. C., Berglund, L. G., & Stolwijk, J. A. J. (1986). Skin friction and fabric sensations in neutral and warm environments. Textile Research Journal, 56(9), 574-580.
15.Havenith, G. (1999). Heat balance when wearing protective clothing. Annals of occupational Hygiene,43(5), 289-296.
16.Havenith, G., Fogarty, A., Bartlett, R., Smith, C. J., & Ventenat, V. (2008). Male and female upper body sweat distribution during running measured with technical absorbents. European journal of applied physiology, 104(2), 245-255.
17.Hollies, N. R., Custer, A. G., Morin, C. J., & Howard, M. E. (1979). A human perception analysis approach to clothing comfort. Textile Research Journal, 49(10), 557-564.
18.Holmer, I. (2006). Protective clothing in hot environments. Industrial health, 44(3), 404-413.
19.Kamalha, E., Zeng, Y., Mwasiagi, J. I., & Kyatuheire, S. (2013). The comfort dimension; a review of perception in clothing. Journal of Sensory Studies, 28(6), 423-444.
20.Machado-Moreira, C. A. (2011). The regional distribution of human sudomotor function and its neuropharmacological control. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
21.Mandal, S., Annaheim, S., Camenzind, M., & Rossi, R. M. (2017). Evaluation of thermo-physiological comfort of clothing using manikins. In Manikins for textile evaluation (pp. 115-140). Woodhead Publishing.
22.Mecheels, J. (1998). Körper-Klima-Kleidung: wie funktioniert unsere Kleidung?. Fachverlag Schiele & Schoen.
23.Raccuglia, M., Sales, B., Heyde, C., Havenith, G., & Hodder, S. (2018). Clothing comfort during physical exercise–determining the critical factors.Applied ergonomics,73, 33-41.
24.Risteski, S., Srebrenkoska, V., & Zhezhova, S. (2017). Applying of Different Fabrics For Design of the Protective Military Clothes. Quality of Life, 15(1-2)
25.Ruckman, J. E., Murray, R., & Choi, H. S. (1999). Engineering of clothing systems for improved thermophysiological comfort: the effect of openings.International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology,11(1), 37-52.
26.Scott, R. A. (2000). Textiles in defence. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, UK. 425-460
27.Smith, C. J., & Havenith, G. (2011). Body mapping of sweating patterns in male athletes in mild exercise-induced hyperthermia. European journal of applied physiology, 111(7), 1391-1404.
28.Ueda, H., & Havenith, G. (2005). The effect of fabric air permeability on clothing ventilation. Elsevier Ergonomics Book, 343-346. Elsevier.
29.Varadaraju, R., & Srinivasan, J. (2019). Design of sports clothing for hot environments. Applied ergonomics, 80, 248-255.
30.Wang, Z., de Dear, R., Luo, M., Lin, B., He, Y., Ghahramani, A., & Zhu, Y. (2018). Individual difference in thermal comfort: A literature review. Building and Environment, 138, 181-193.