跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.167) 您好!臺灣時間:2025/11/01 04:27
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

我願授權國圖
: 
twitterline
研究生:翁千惠
研究生(外文):Chien-Hui Weng
論文名稱:虛擬空間之空間感與存在感探討
論文名稱(外文):A Study on Sense of Space and Presence in Virtual Space
指導教授:劉育東劉育東引用關係
指導教授(外文):Yu-Tong Liu
學位類別:博士
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:土木工程系所
學門:工程學門
學類:土木工程學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2007
畢業學年度:95
語文別:中文
論文頁數:237
中文關鍵詞:網際空間虛擬實境空間感存在感
外文關鍵詞:cyberspacevirtual realitysense of spacepresence
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:29
  • 點閱點閱:1700
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:0
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:3
電腦與網路的興起帶領我們進入數位化時代,同時也帶來了對「空間」另一種詮釋的可能性。相對於我們生活於其中的實體空間,電腦與網路等新媒材創造了全新的虛擬空間,全然不同於以往的空間概念,也打破了既有的空間形式。本研究將這些虛擬空間分成兩大類:一是電腦所模擬建構的空間,透過螢幕或虛擬實境等設備而呈現出來;另一是網際網路所形成的空間,我們在其中與世界各地的人進行交流。而欲探討的研究問題在於:這些虛擬空間的參與者或使用者,他們如何感知沒有形體的虛擬空間,透過哪些因子來認定空間,形成空間感,又是否能感受自己身處於虛擬空間之中,產生存在感?因此本研究目的是希望有系統地從使用者的角度來探討,他們所認定的虛擬空間定義;且透過虛擬空間中的哪些因子去建構自己的空間概念,形成對空間的感知;更進一步希望探討,他們如何在虛擬空間中產生身處其中的存在感受。
基於上述研究問題,本研究以兩類虛擬空間為對象,分成三個步驟來進行。第一個步驟採用社會科學之參與式觀察法進行,以最典型的網際空間―全球資訊網(WWW)為探討對象;希望從使用者角度得到虛擬空間中的場所╱空間╱空間感╱存在感之定義與關係,並獲得初步的空間感與存在感之決定因子。第二個步驟是進行空間感認知實驗,以全球資訊網之視覺化網站為主,採用認知實驗之口語分析法,分析使用者在虛擬空間中如何感知空間,形成空間感。最後一個步驟則是存在感認知實驗,同樣以口語分析法,而以沉浸式虛擬實境為對象,探討虛擬空間之存在感現象。
研究結果得到使用者對虛擬空間的感知現象,以及空間感與存在感的因子類別,進一步將其歸納成四個範疇:空間元素、介面操控、內在感知以及虛實切換,依據四個範疇之關係來解釋空間感與存在感認知過程。近年來,對數位科技與網路等研究大多著重於技術發展,以及內容的開發,缺乏從使用者的角度去探討,因此本研究的研究成果提供虛擬空間認知現象的進一步了解,同時所提出的空間感與存在感因子,可作為日後相關研究的評估參考。而後續研究可分成幾個面向,包括其他虛擬空間形式之探討、研究方法之改進,以及受測者之差異等,使研究結果更為完備。
The invention of computer and internet has led us into the digital era, and brought a new possibility of space representation in the meanwhile. Relative to the physical space that we live in, these new media has been creating a so-called “virtual space” that differs from the former space conception and breaks the existing formation of space. This study sorts these virtual spaces into two categories: one is simulation space that is generated by computer and represented through devices like computer monitor, head-mounted display, VR cave, and so on; the other is cyberspace where we communicate with others from all over the world. The research problems of this study are to investigate how the user or participant perceives the virtual space, through which factors they can recognize space and establish the sense of space, and whether they can feel live-in perception to generate presence. Therefore, the objectives are to systematically explore the definitions of virtual space from user’s aspects, to probe through which factors the users construct the sense of space, and to examine how they can further evoke the sense of presence.
There were three methodological steps in this study. The first step was to investigate the typical cyberspace― World Wide Web via participant observation method of social science. The purpose was to get the definitions and relationships of virtual space from user’s points of view, as well as to gather the determinants of sense of space and presence. The second one was the cognitive experiment of sense of space in visual websites. Using protocol analysis to examine how the subjects perceive virtual space and construct sense of space. Final step was another cognitive experiment of sense of presence in fully-immersive VR to explore presence phenomena through, again, protocol analysis method.
As a result, this study indicated four categories of the determinants of sense of space and presence. They were spatial elements, interface controlling, inner perceiving, and interchange between real and virtual. The relationships of four categories could be arranged to interpret the cognitive process in perceiving virtual space. The findings are significant to the evaluation of factors of sense of space and presence, and the understanding of user’s cognitive phenomena in virtual space. Future study will focus on the investigation of other virtual space formations, the improvement of research method, and the differentiation of subject background.
1.緒 論 1
1.1研究背景 1
1.2研究問題 3
1.3研究目的 5
1.4研究方法與步驟 5
1.5研究架構 7
2.先前研究 8
2.1網際空間 8
2.2虛擬實境 14
2.3空間感 17
2.4存在感 20
3.虛擬空間之參與式觀察研究 26
3.1虛擬空間形式 26
3.2研究說明 27
3.3觀察結果 32
3.4地方╱空間╱空間感╱存在感之交互關係 39
3.5空間感與存在感因子 46
4.空間感認知實驗 55
4.1實驗說明 55
4.2編碼系統建立 63
4.3討論與分析 68
5.存在感認知實驗 75
5.1實驗說明 75
5.2正式實驗 80
5.3編碼系統建立 83
5.4 討論與分析 88
6.結論 94
6.1虛擬空間概念 94
6.2空間感與存在感 95
6.3研究限制 96
6.4 後續研究 97
6.5 研究貢獻 97

參考文獻 99
個人簡歷 104
附錄A__參與式觀察問答資料
附錄B__空間認知實驗編碼
附錄C__虛擬實境體驗
附錄D__存在感認知實驗編碼
Adams, P. C. 1997. Cyberspace and Virtual Places. Geographical Review. 87(2): 155-172.
Agnew, J. A. 1993. Representating Space: Space, Scale and Culture in Social Science. Place/Culture/Representation. J. Duncan and D. Ley (eds). Routledge.
Anders, P. 1998. Envisioning Cyberspace: the Designing 3D Electronic Spaces. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.
Anders, P. 2000. Places of Mind: Implications of Narrative Space for the Architecture of Information Environments, Eternity, Infinity and Virtuality in Architecture. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Design in Architecture. Washington D.C. pp. 85-89.
Angeles, P. A. 1992. The HarperCollins Dictionary of Philosophy: HarperResource.
Barfield, M., Zeltzer, D., et al. 1995. Presence and Performance within Virtual Environments. Virtual environments and advanced interface design. M. Barfield and I. T. A. Furness (eds). New york. Oxford University Press: 473 - 513.
Batty, M. 1997. Virtual Geography. Future. 29: 337-357.
Bell, P. A., Greene, T., et al. 1996. Environmental Psychology: Wadsworth.
Benedikt, M. (ed). 1991. Cyberspace: First Steps. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Benedikt, M. 1995. On Cyberspace and Virtual Reality. Man and Information TechnologyStockholm. IVA: 42.
Bloomer, K. C. and Moore, C. W. 1993. Body, Memory and Architecture.
Castells, M. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society. Cambridge: Blackwells.
Champion, E. and Dave, B. 2002. Where is This Place? ACADIA?002. California State Polytechnic University,Pomona,. pp. 87-97.
Chan, C. S., Hill, L., et al. 1999. Can Design be Done in Full-scale Representation? Proceedings of the 4th Design Thinking Research Symposium - Design Representation. MIT, Boston. pp. 139-148.
Chang, Y. Y. 1999. 'It's so Crowded Here!' Creating a Sense of Telepresence in a Virtual Chatroom. the 12th World Congress of Applied Linguistics (AILA, 1999). Japan, Tokyo. pp.
Cheng, N. Y.-W. 1998. Wayfinding In Cyberspace - Negotiating Connections between Sites. Proceedings of The Third Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia. Osaka (Japan). pp. 83-92.
Cicognani, A. and Maher, M. L. 1997. Design Speech Acts. How to Do Things With Words in Virtual Communities. CAAD Future97. pp.
Cicognani, A. and Maher, M. L. 1999. Two Approaches to Designing in Virtual Worlds. International Journal of Design Computing. 11.
Darken, R. P. and Peterson, B. 2001. Spatial Orientation, Wayfinding, and Representation. Handbook of Virtual Environment Technology. K. Stanney (ed).
Darken, R. P. and Sibert, J. L. 1993. A Toolset for Navigation in Virtual Environments. Proceedings of ACM User Interface Software and Technology. pp. 157-165.
Davies, C. 2003. Rethinking VR: Key Concepts and Concerns. Hybrid Reality: Art, Technology and Human Factor(9th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia). Montreal, Canada. pp. 253-262.
Dodge, M. and Kitchin, R. 1999. Mapping Cyberspace: Routledge.
Downs, R. M. and Stea, D. 1973. Theory. Image and Environment. R. M. Downs and D. Stea (eds). Chicago. Aldine: 1-7.
Ericsson, K. A. and Simon, H. A. 1980. Verbal Reports as Data. Psychological Review. 87: 215-250.
Eysenck, M. W. and Keane, M. 2000. Cognitive psychology: A Student's Handbook: Psychology Press.
Ferrar, S. 2001. The Nature of Non-Physical Space - Or How I Learned to Love Cyberspace Wherever it may Be. Architectural Information Management. 19th eCAADe Conference Proceedings. Helsinki (Finland). pp. 208-213.
Foy, G. 1997. Comtraband. New York: Batham Books.
Gero, J. S. and McNeill, T. 1998. An approach to the analysis of design protocols. Design Studies. 19(2): 21-26.
Gibson, J. J. 1966. The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
Gibson, W. 1984. Neuromancer. New York.: Ace Books.
Goldschmidt, G. 1991. The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal. 4(2): 123-143.
Gulli and Signorini. 2005. The Indexable Web is more than 11.5 billion pages. available at http://www.cs.uiowa.edu/~asignori/web-size/.
Harvey, D. 1989. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Heeter, C. 1992. Being There:The Subjective Experience of Presence. Presence.
Heeter, C. 2003. Reflections on Real Presence by a Virtual Person. Presence. 12(4): 335-345.
Heim, M. 1993. The Metaphysics of Virtual Reality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Heim, M. 1998. Virtual Realism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hillis, K. 1999. Digital Sensations: Space, Identity, and Embodiment in Virtual Reality. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Hogue, A., Robinson M., et al. 2003. A Vision-Based Head Tracking System for Fully Immersive Displays. International Immersive Projection Technologies Workshop. Eurographics Workshop on Virtual Environments. pp. 179-187.
IJsselstenijn, W. A. 2002. Elements of a Multi-level theory of Presence: Phenomenology, Mental Processing and Neural Correlates. Proceedings of Presence 2002. Universidade Fernando Pessoa, Porto, Portugal. pp. 245-259.
IJsselstenijn, W. A. 2003. Presence in the Past: What Can We Learn from Media History? Being There: Concepts, Effects and Measurement of User Presence in Synthetic Environments. G. Riva, F. Davide and W. A. IJsselsteijn (eds). Amesterdam. Ios Press: 17-40.
IJsselstenijn, W. A. and Riva, G. 2003. Being There: The Experience of Presence in Mediated Environments. Being There: Concepts, Effects and Measurement of User Presence in Synthetic Environments. G. Riva, F. Davide and W. A. IJsselsteijn (eds). Amesterdam. Ios Press: 3-16.
Insko, B. E. 2003. Measuring Presence: Subjective, Behavioral, and Physiological Methods. Being There: Concepts, effects and measurement of user presence in synthetic environments. G. Riva, F. Davide and W. A. IJsselsteijn (eds). Amesterdam. Ios Press: 109-119.
Iovine, J. 1995. Step into Virtual Reality: Windcrest/McGraw-Hill.
Johnston, R. J., Gregory, D., et al. (eds). 2000. The Dictionary of Human Geography. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kalawsky, R. S. 1993. The Science of Virtual Reality and Virtual Environments: Addison-Wesley.
Kalay, Y. and Marx, J. 2003. Changing the Metaphor: Cyberspace as a Place. Digital Design - Research and Practice, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp.
Kalay, Y. E. and Marx, J. 2001. Architecture and the Internet: Designing Places in Cyberspace, Reinventing the Discourse - How Digital Tools Help Bridge and Transform Research, Education and Practice in Architecture. Proceedings of the Twenty First Annual Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Design in Architecture. Buffalo (New York). pp. 230-241.
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1980. The Metaphor We Live By. Chicago and Landon: The University of Chicago Press.
Lefebvre, H. 1991. The Production of Space. Malden: Blackwell.
Liu, Y. T. 2001. Spatial Representation of Design Thinking in Virtual Space. the proceedings of 2001 Conference of Visual and Spatial Reasoning in Design. Sydney. pp. 25-40.
Liu, Y. T. 2002. Being Digital: New Media, New Space and New Architecture. Definition Digital Architecture. Y. T. Liu (ed). Switzerland. Birkhouser.
Liu, Y. T. and Tang, S. K. 2003. Space, Place and Digital Media: Towards a better simulation for a disappeared city. International Journal of Architectural Computing.
Lofland, J. and Lofland, L. H. 1984. Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative observation and Analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Compang.
Lombard, M. and Ditton, T. 1997. At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 3(2).
Lynch, K. 1960. The Image of the City. Combridge: The MIT Press.
Maher, M. L. 1999. Designing the Virtual Campus as a Virtual World. Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning. University, Palo Alto, California. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Mahwah,NJ. pp.
McLuhan, M. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York,NY: McGraw Hill.
Milroy, L. 1987. Observing and Analyzing Natural Language. New York: Basil Backwell.
Mirabelli, P. 2001. Public Cyberspace Planning and Design. Architect's role in the construction of the virtual city, Architectural Information Management. 19th eCAADe Conference Proceedings. Helsinki (Finland). pp. 42-46.
Mitchell, W. J. 1995. City of Bits:Space, Place and the Infobahn. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Mitchell, W. J. 1999a. E-topia: "Urban life, Jim-but not as we know it". Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Mitchell, W. J. 1999b. Replacing Place. The Digital Dialect: New Essays on New Media. P. Lunenfeld (ed). Cambridge. The MIT press: 112-128.
Newcombe, N. S. and Huttenlocher, J. 2000. Making Space: The Development of Spatial Representation and Reasoning. Cambridge: MIT Press, Massachusetts.
Novak, M. 1991. Liquid Architecture in Cyberspace. Cyberspace First Steps. M. Benedikt (ed). Cambridge. The MIT Press.
Nunez, D. and E.Blake. 2001. Cognitive Presence as a Unified Concept of Virtual Reality Effectiveness. Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Computer graphics, virtual reality and visualization. ACM press,New York. pp. 115-118.
Passini, R. 1992. Wayfinding in Architecture. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Pimental, K. and Teixeira, K. 1995. Virtual Reality:Through the new looking glass: McGraw-Hill.
Rheingold, H. 1991. Virtual Reality: Exploring the Brave NewTechnologies. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Sack, R. D. 1980. Conceptions of Space in Social Thoughts: A Geographic Perspective. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Sas, C. and O'Hare, G. M. P. 2003. Presence Equation: An Investigation into Cognitive Factors Underlying Presence. Presence. 12(5): 523-537.
Sheridan, T. B. 2000. Interaction, Imagination and Immersion: Some Research Needs. Proceedings of Virtual Reality Software and Technology VRST'00. Seoul, Korea. ACM Press. pp. 1-7.
Slater, M. 1999. Measuring Presence: A Response to the Witmer and Singer Presence Questionnaire. Presence. 8(5): 560-565.
Slater, M. 2003. A Note on Presence Terminology. Presence-Connect. 3(3).
Slater, M. 2004. How Colorful Was Your Day? Why Questionnaires Cannot Assess Presence in Virtual Environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments. 13(4): 484-493.
Slater, M. and Steed, A. 2000. A Virtual Presence Counter. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. 9(5): 413-434.
Slater, M. and Usoh, M. 1994. Body Centred Interaction in Immersive Virtual Environments. Artificial life and virtual reality. N. M. Thalmonn and D. Thalmann (eds). England. John Wiley & Sons: 125-147.
Solso, R. L. 1979. Cognitive Psychology.
Stanney, K. M. 2003. Virtual Environments. The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving technologies, and Emerging Applications. Julie A. Jacko and A. Sears (eds). 621-634.
Stanney, K. M. and Zyda, M. 2002. Virtual Environments in the 21st Century. Handbook of virtual environments: Design, implementation, and applications. K. M. Stanney (ed). Mahwah, N.J., Lawrence Erlbaum Associations: 1-14.
Stenger, N. 1991. Mind is a Leaking Rainbow. Cyberspace First Steps. M. Benedikt (ed). Cambridge. The MIT Press.
Steuer, J. 1992. Defining Virtual Reality: Dimensions Determining Telepresence. Journal of Communication. 42(4): 73-93.
Steuer, J. 1995. Defining Virtual Reality: Dimensions Determining Telepresence. Communication in the Age of Virtual Reality. F. Biocca and M. R. Levy (eds). New Jersy: 35-56.
Strate, L. 1999. The Varieties of Cyberspace: Problems in Definition and Delimitation. Western Journal of Communication. 63: 382-413.
Suler, J. 1999. The Psychology Of Cyberspace. Dept of psychology: Rider University.
Sutherland, I. E. 1965. The Ultimate Display. Proceedings of the IFIP Congress. pp. 506-508.
Sutherland, I. E. 1968. Head-Mounted Three-Dimentional Display. Proceedings of the Fall Joint Computer Conference. pp. 757-764.
Taylor, H. A. and Tversky, B. 1996. Perspective in Spatial Descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language. 35: 371-391.
Thalmann, N. M. and Thalmann, D. 1994a. Introduction: Creating Artificial Life in Virtual Reality. Artificial Life and Virtual Reality. N. M. Thalmonn and D. Thalmann (eds). England. John Wiley & Sons: 1-9.
Thalmann, N. M. and Thalmann, D. (eds). 1994b. Articial Life and Virtual Reality. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Turkle, S. 1996. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Waterworth, J. A. and Waterworth, E. L. 2003. Being and Time: Judged Presence and Duration as a Function of Media Form. Presence. 12(5): 495-511.
Wertheim, M. 1999. The Pearly Gates of Cyberspace: A History of Space from Dante to the Internet. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
Witmer, B. G. and Singer, M. J. 1998. Measuring Presence in Virtual Environment: A Presence Questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. 7(3): 225-240.
Zevi, B. 1973. Architecture as Space. New York: Horizon Press.

參考網站
VR related
http://vresources.jump-gate.com/home.html
http://vehand.engr.ucf.edu/revised2.htm
http://www.vrac.iastate.edu/
http://www.vrclassroom.org/


Presence related
http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/M.Slater/Papers/Chess/index.html
http://lombardresearch.temple.edu/ispr/
http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=4&tid=37
http://www.presence-research.org/
http://www.andrewpatrick.ca/virtual-presence/presence-ideas.html
QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
無相關期刊