臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

罪惡感與羞恥感都是複雜的道德情緒概念，過去研究探討犯錯情境中罪惡感與羞恥感的產生，往往認為這兩種情緒的差異在於批判對象的不同。本研究從訊息處理的取向，以兩個準實驗設計研究探討引發這兩種情緒的主要情境條件，並採取性格與情境交互決定個體情緒的觀點，驗證外在情境條件與內在特質傾向對兩種情緒是否具有交互作用效果；另外在這些條件下延伸討論罪惡感與羞恥感所可能引發的後續行為。研究一探討犯錯情境中的評價來源與注意力焦點差異是否為引發罪惡感與羞恥感的重要條件，並於研究二提出假設:罪惡感與羞恥感會採取不同的後續行為反應(即:逃避、否認、補償，以及自我提升)，來因應兩種情緒所帶來的負面感受。研究一結果顯示:當個體對過失事件有較多的自我評價並將注意力焦點放在他人的損失上，較能引發罪惡感受。反之，當個體對於過失感受聚焦於他人的評價並將注意力焦點放在自己的窘態上，較易引發羞恥感受，但後一主張在統計上並未獲得顯著水準。研究二納入特質自責傾向作為探討個別差異的性格變項，進一步討論個體本身的傾向與情境特徵如何共同影響罪惡感與羞恥感的產生。結果顯示:特質自責傾向確實能有效預測個體於犯錯情境中的罪惡感受與羞恥感受，情境特徵與特質自責傾向間對於罪惡感與羞恥感的產生，亦存在著交互作用效果。此外，在罪惡感與羞恥感的後續行為探究上，結果顯示:當個體經驗到罪惡感受時，較易引發補償行為及抑制否認行為；而當個體經驗到羞恥感受時，較易引發自我提升、逃避及否認等行為。本研究的結果有助於從產生條件及後續反應行為兩個面向來了解罪惡感與羞恥感的區別。

Both guilt and shame are complicated moral emotion. Past researches mainly focused on the disposition that an individual holds when they discussed the differences between the two emotions. The current research would like to put emphasis on the situation factors (target of focus and evaluation source) and behavioral tendencies of guilt and shame from the information-processing perspective. In Study one, we suggested that when an individual made a mistake, the target of focus and the perceived source of evaluation will influence the following emotion of guilt and shame. If an individual focuses on the well-being of others and perceive self-blaming, he or she will more likely having guilt feelings. On the other hands, if an individual focuses on the loss of him/herself, and perceiving negative evaluation from others, the shame feelings will be induced. The result showed that guilt feeling can be induced by other focus and self-blaming. However, self-focus and blamed-by-others didn’t induce more shame feelings. The hypotheses are partly supported. Study two added the characterlogical self-blame as the individual dispositions to discuss the interaction effects of situation factors and individual disposition on inducing guilt and shame. We suggested that the situation factors (target of focus and evaluation source) will interact with characterlogical self-blame to induce guilt and shame feeling. Also, we suggest that the two emotions will lead to different behavioral tendencies. Two positive and two negative behaviors are tested, including compensation, self-enhancement, escape, and denial. We suggested that both guilt and shame can lead to positive and negative behaviors. Guilt is thought to be induced by focusing others, and lead to other-oriented positive behaviors, such as compensation, while shame is induced by self-focusing, and lead to self-oriented positive behavior, such as self-enhancement. The result showed that guilt feeling can force individuals to compensate others and reduce the tendency of denial; while shame feeling can lead to both self-enhancing behavior and situation-escaping tendency.

目次


第一章 緒論 1
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 罪惡感與羞恥感的相同：道德情緒 5
第二節 罪惡感與羞恥感的差異:訊息處理的觀點 6
壹、 評價來源 6
貳、 注意力焦點 7
參、 特質自責歸因（特質）傾向 8
第三節 罪惡感與羞恥感引發的不同行為反應及其功能 10
第三章 研究一 15
第一節 研究方法與程序 15
壹、 研究對象與程序 15
貳、 研究工具 16
第二節 研究一結果 18
第三節 研究一討論 20
第四章 研究二 23
第一節 研究方法與程序 23
壹、 研究對象與程序 23
貳、 研究工具 24
參、 分析策略 28
第二節 研究結果 29
壹、 產生罪惡感與羞恥感的條件：情境操弄與特質自責 29
貳、 罪惡感與羞恥感引發之行為 41
第三節 研究二討論 49
第五章 綜合討論 57
第一節 罪惡感與羞恥感產生的前因：注意力焦點、評價來源與特質自責 58
第二節 罪惡感與羞恥感產生的行為反應 59
第三節 研究貢獻與限制 60
第六章 參考文獻 63
附錄一：情緒操弄作業 69
附錄二：罪惡感與羞恥感情緒量表 73
附錄三：性格傾向量表 75
附錄四：行為傾向量表 77

黃堅厚. (1981). 國人時間觀念和生活步調的初步研究. 教育心理學報, (14), 1-14.
馮涵棣, & 陳倩慧. (2002). 情緒, 文化與道德社教化: 以羞恥感為例的探討. 情感, 情緒與文化: 台灣社會的文化心理研究》(頁 17-48). 台北: 中央研究院民族學研究所
韓貴香. (2012). 沒面子與情緒: 事件歸咎對象與相對權力的影響效果之探討. 應用心理研究, (53), 131-152.
Ausubel, D. P. (1955). Relationships between shame and guilt in the socializing process. Psychological review, 62(5), 378.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action (pp. 5-107). Prentice Hall.: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Bedford, O. (1990). Guilt, shame and religious orientation. Unpublished master’s thesis. University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado..
Bedford, O. A. (2004). The individual experience of guilt and shame in Chinese culture. Culture & Psychology, 10(1), 29-52.
Bedford, O., & Hwang, K. K. (2003). Guilt and Shame in Chinese Culture: A Cross‐cultural Framework from the Perspective of Morality and Identity. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 33(2), 127-144.
Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). Guilt: an interpersonal approach. Psychological bulletin, 115(2), 243
Bear, G. G., Uribe-Zarain, X., Manning, M. A., & Shiomi, K. (2009). Shame, guilt, blaming, and anger: Differences between children in Japan and the US.Motivation and Emotion, 33(3), 229-238.
Covert, M. V., Tangney, J. P., Maddux, J. E., & Heleno, N. M. (2003). Shame-proneness, guilt-proneness, and interpersonal problem solving: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 22(1), 1-12.
Cohen, T. R., Wolf, S. T., Panter, A. T., & Insko, C. A. (2011). Introducing the GASP scale: a new measure of guilt and shame proneness. Journal of personality and social psychology, 100(5), 947.
De Hooge, I. E., Breugelmans, S. M., & Zeelenberg, M. (2008). Not so ugly after all: when shame acts as a commitment device. Journal of personality and social psychology, 95(4), 933.
De Hooge, I. E., Zeelenberg, M., & Breugelmans, S. M. (2010). Restore and protect motivations following shame. Cognition and Emotion, 24(1), 111-127.
Feather, N. T. (1992). An attributional and value analysis of deservingness in success and failure situations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31(2), 125-145.
Fung, H. (2006). Affect and early moral socialization: Some insights and contributions from indigenous psychological studies in Taiwan. In Indigenous and Cultural Psychology (pp. 175-196). Springer US.
Gausel, N. (2012). Facing in-group immorality: Differentiating expressed shame from expressed guilt. Review of European Studies, 4(4), p1.
Gausel, N., & Brown, R. (2012). Shame and guilt—Do they really differ in their focus of evaluation? Wanting to change the self and behavior in response to ingroup immorality. The Journal of social psychology, 152(5), 547-567
Graham, S., & Juvonen, J. (1998). Self-blame and peer victimization in middle school: an attributional analysis. Developmental psychology, 34(3), 587.
Gausel, N., & Leach, C. W. (2011). Concern for self‐image and social image in the management of moral failure: Rethinking shame. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(4), 468-478.
Ghorbani, M., Liao, Y., Caykoylu, S., & Chand, M. (2013). Guilt, shame, and reparative behavior: The effect of psychological proximity. Journal of business ethics, 114(2), 311-323.
Harder, D. W. (1995). Shame and guilt assessment, and relationships of shame-and guilt-proneness to psychopathology.
Harder, D. W., Cutler, L., & Rockart, L. (1992). Assessment of shame and guilt and their relationships to psychopathology. Journal of personality assessment,59(3), 584-604.
Harder, D. H., & Zalma, A. (1990). Two promising shame and guilt scales: A construct validity comparison. Journal of personality assessment, 55(3-4), 729-745.
Hoffman, M. L. (1982). Development of prosocial motivation: Empathy and guilt.The development of prosocial behavior, 281, 313.
Iyer, A., Leach, C. W., & Pedersen, A. (2004). Racial wrongs and restitutions: The role of guilt and other group-based emotions. Off White: Readings on power, privilege, and resistance, 345-361.
Janoff-Bulman, R. (1979). Characterological versus behavioral self-blame: inquiries into depression and rape. Journal of personality and social psychology, 37(10), 1798.
Keltner, D. (1996). Evidence for the distinctness of embarrassment, shame, and guilt: A study of recalled antecedents and facial expressions of emotion.Cognition & Emotion, 10(2), 155-172.
Ketelaar, T., & Tung Au, W. (2003). The effects of feelings of guilt on the behaviour of uncooperative individuals in repeated social bargaining games: An affect-as-information interpretation of the role of emotion in social interaction.Cognition & Emotion, 17(3), 429-453.
Lewis, H. B. (1971). Shame and guilt in neurosis. Psychoanalytic review.
Lindsay-Hartz, J. (1984). Contrasting experiences of shame and guilt. American Behavioral Scientist.
Leach, C. W., Iyer, A., & Pedersen, A. (2006). Anger and guilt about ingroup advantage explain the willingness for political action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(9), 1232-1245
Leith, K. P., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Empathy, Shame, Guilt, and Narratives of Interpersonal Conflicts: Guilt‐Prone People Are Better at Perspective Taking.Journal of Personality, 66(1), 1-37
Lutwak, N., Panish, J., & Ferrari, J. (2003). Shame and guilt: characterological vs. behavioral self-blame and their relationship to fear of intimacy. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(4), 909-916.
Mead, M. (1937). Competition and cooperation among primitive peoples.London–New York.
Miller, R. S. (1995). On the Nature of Embarrassabllity: Shyness, Social Evaluation, and Social Skill. Journal of personality, 63(2), 315-339.
Orth, U., Berking, M., & Burkhardt, S. (2006). Self-conscious emotions and depression: Rumination explains why shame but not guilt is maladaptive.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(12), 1608-1619.
Schneider, C. D. (1977). Shame, exposure, and privacy. WW Norton & Co.
Shaver, K. G. (1985). The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Sanftner, J. L., Barlow, D. H., Marschall, D. E., & Tangney, J. P. (1995). The relation of shame and guilt to eating disorder symptomatology. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 14(4), 315-324.
Smith, R. H., Webster, J. M., Parrott, W. G., & Eyre, H. L. (2002). The role of public exposure in moral and nonmoral shame and guilt. Journal of personality and social psychology, 83(1), 138.
Tangney, J. P. (1991). Moral affect: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of personality and social psychology, 61(4), 598.
Tangney, J. P. (1996). Conceptual and methodological issues in the assessment of shame and guilt. Behaviour research and therapy, 34(9), 741-754.
Tilghman-Osborne, C., Cole, D. A., Felton, J. W., & Ciesla, J. A. (2008). Relation of guilt, shame, behavioral and characterological self-blame to depressive symptoms in adolescents over time. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27(8), 809-842.
Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. (2002). Shame and guilt. New York, NY: Guilford.
Tangney, J. P., Miller, R. S., Flicker, L., & Barlow, D. H. (1996). Are shame, guilt, and embarrassment distinct emotions?. Journal of personality and social psychology, 70(6), 1256
Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Hafez, L. (2011). Shame, guilt, and remorse: implications for offender populations. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 22(5), 706-723..
Tangney, J. P., Wagner, P., & Gramzow, R. (1992). Proneness to shame, proneness to guilt, and psychopathology. Journal of abnormal psychology,101(3), 469.
Wolf, S. T., Cohen, T. R., Panter, A. T., & Insko, C. A. (2010). Shame proneness and guilt proneness: Toward the further understanding of reactions to public and private transgressions. Self and Identity, 9(4), 337-362