臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

研究背景：隨著人口老化及家庭結構的改變，入住長期照護機構的老人逐漸增加，機構也成為許多老人生命末期的照護地點，機構如何推行安寧療護也應獲得重視。在台灣安寧療護政策雖發展快速，但對於長照機構的安寧療護，目前除了針對機構中末期住民提供「安寧居家護理」或「社區安寧療護」，尚未見到具體的方向與做法。
研究目的：本研究以台北市至善老人安養護中心為個案，進行長期照護機構實施安寧療護之成效評估探討，並期望至善經驗能提供後續長照機構推行安寧療護之參考。
研究方法：本研究以「台北市至善老人安養護中心」為個案，以SWOT分析法制定長照機構推行安寧療護策略，並以Donabedian’s model為基礎制定長照機構安寧療護模式之成效評估架構，進行長照機構推行安寧療護之成效評估，針對結構面、過程面及結果面進行評估。在結構面，以末期照護組織、機構特性及人力資源作評估；在過程面，以人員之間的溝通及機構人員的照護技術作評估；在結果面，則分析「照護程序結果」中機構安寧療護介入前後住民「安寧緩和醫療暨維生醫療抉擇意願書」簽署率、死亡個案於機構在地臨終比率、末期住民於機構在地臨終比率、反覆出入院的頻率及住院天數的比較，並分析死亡個案接受安寧療護的比率及「家屬感受結果」。
研究結果：至善老人安養護中心為了推行安寧療護，經過結構面(如成立機構內安寧照護團隊、進行安寧教育訓練、設置獨立的臨終關懷室、建置末期照護標準作業流程、建立與社區醫院的轉介流程等)、過程面(如舉行安寧個案討論會以強化機構人員間的溝通整合、透過家庭會議及牧靈關懷活動強化與住民及家屬間的溝通、利用教育訓練及個案實務學習強化機構人員的照護技術)及結果面(如以「照護程序結果」及「家屬感受結果」作成效評估)的變革，克服最初SWOT分析中所面臨的劣勢(機構員工訓練及接受度不足、住民與家屬的接受度不足、末期住民在地臨終的困難)與威脅(機構安寧缺乏具體完整政策及專家指引故各機構作法不一而成效未知、擔心與社區醫院聯結有變)，至善安寧模式執行2年後在結果面的分析上發現能增加住民「安寧緩和醫療暨維生醫療抉擇意願書」簽署率及於機構在地臨終比率；而「安寧居家護理」或「社區安寧療護」服務在統計上呈現顯著減少末期住民反覆出入院的頻率及住院天數，並增加其於機構在地臨終的比率。但死亡住民接受安寧居家照護比率為30.6%，未達半數，需強化與住民討論預立醫療照護計劃能力並進一步評估是否增加其他末期住民篩檢方式。而在家屬感受分析結果中，可看到住民及家屬們對於至善安寧模式的感受皆是滿意的。
結論：至善經驗中發現，結構面的變革是機構推行安寧療護初期最基本且重要的，唯有完善結構面，才能促成良好的照護過程面，進而達到預期的結果面。在結構面中最重要的部分包括：需完備機構人員的照護能力，能建立機構內的安寧照護團隊更佳、設置臨終關懷室、重視靈性關懷及強化與社區醫院之間的聯結；在過程面，可利用個案討論會強化機構人員間的溝通整合、利用家庭會議及牧靈關懷活動促進機構人員與住民及家屬間的溝通及加強人員末期照護的技術；在結果面，可採用「臨床照護結果」(包括末期住民的住院頻率、住院天數、死亡地點、DNR簽署率、安寧療護轉介率等)及「家屬的感受結果」作評估，未來則可考慮增加「照護程序結果」(包括末期住民症狀控制程度、疼痛評估頻率、情緒障礙比率、人工營養的使用率、不必要的藥物使用率及被約束率等)及「機構員工的感受結果」。而可再精益求精的部分是強化人員與住民討論預立醫療照護計劃的能力及評估是否需增加其他末期住民篩檢方式，以成為更完善的機構安寧模式。

Background: As the population ages, the number of elderly living in long-term care facilities has gradually increased. Most residents will remain in a long-term care facility until their deaths. Thus, promoting hospice care in long-term care facilities should be a priority. However, the hospice care policy in long-term care facilities has not yet seen a practical model in Taiwan other than providing Home/Community-Based Hospice Care for residents with terminal diseases in long-term care facilities.

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Hospice-care Model in Zhi-Shan Long-Term Care Facility. We expect that the experience of hospice care in Zhi-Shan Long-Term Care Facility will provide a practical example for other long-term care facilities to implement hospice care in the future.

Methods: This study used a SWOT analysis to identify core strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of hospice care in Zhi-Shan Long-Term Care Facility and developed strategic plans for providing hospice care in Zhi-Shan Long-Term Care Facility based on the results of the SWOT analysis. Then we developed a model to measure the effectiveness of Hospice-care Model in Zhi-Shan Long-Term Care Facility. The model was based on the Donabedian’s model, and we assess the effectiveness through three perspectives: “structure,” “process,” and “outcome.” In our study, structural performance was measured by (1) the special team for end-of-life care, (2) facility’s characteristics, (3) facility’s resources and staffing. Process performance was measured by (1) status of communication and coordination among providers, (2) status of communication with residents and families, (3) assessment of end-of-life symptoms, (4) delivery of appropriate medications or treatments. Outcome performance was measured by (1) comparing the signing rate of Do Not Resuscitate(DNR) directives among all residents before and after providing hospice care in the facility, (2) comparing the percentage of in-facility deaths before and after providing hospice care in the facility, (3) comparing the number and days of hospitalization among residents with terminal diseases 3 months before and after receiving Home/Community-Based Hospice Care, (4) the percentage of in-facility deaths among residents with terminal diseases received Home/Community-Based Hospice Care ,(5) the percentage of the dead who ever received Home/Community-Based Hospice Care, (6) family perceptions of hospice care.

Results: After implementing the structure, process and outcome reform since the end of 2015, Zhi-Shan Long-Term Care Facility has overcome the weaknesses (lack of training and acceptance of the staff, lack of acceptance of the residents and families, and difficulties in dying in the facility for the residents) and threats (lack of definite policies and expert guidelines of hospice care in facilities, and worry about changes of the support from the community hospital) of the SWOT analysis initially. Structure reform consisted of setting up a hospice-care team in the facility, staff education in hospice care, setting up a private room for dying residents and their families, publishing end-of-life care protocols for residents with terminal diseases, and creating referral protocols with the community hospitals. Process reform consisted of holding terminal-case meetings to promote communication and coordination among providers, holding family meetings and spiritual care activities to promote communication with residents and families, and strengthening staff’s end-of-life care skills through education and case practice. Outcome reform consisted using processes of care outcomes and family perceptions of care to measure the effectiveness of hospice care. The results showed that the provision of hospice care in Zhi-Shan Long-Term Care Facility has increased the singing rate of DNR and increased the percentage of in-facility deaths among residents. A pre-post comparison also showed that after providing Home/Community-Based Hospice Care to residents with terminal diseases, the number and length of hospitalizations significantly decreased. And the family members were satisfied with the hospice-care services in Zhi-Shan Long-Term Care Facility. However, the proportion of the dead who ever received Home/Community-Based Hospice Care was not more than half.

Conclusion: According to the results of the study, the hospice care model in Zhi-Shan Long-Term Care Facility can be considered a successful experience. The structural change is the most basic and important in the early stage of implementing hospice care in long-term care facilities. Only by perfecting structure domains can improve process domains, and then achieve the expected outcome domains. This experience illustrates the most important projects on structural reform included (1) improving the hospice care skills of staff, setting up hospice teams within the facility is better,(2) offering a private room for dying residents and their families, (3) arranging spiritual care, (4) linking to the community hospitals. The process reform included (1) holding terminal-case meetings to promote communication and coordination among providers, (2) holding family meetings and spiritual care activities to promote communication with residents and families, (3) strengthening staff’s end-of-life care skills through education and case practice. The outcome reform included using processes of care outcomes (e.g., DNR orders, site of death, proportion of residents with hospice care prior to death, hospitalizations) and family perceptions of care to measure the effectiveness of hospice care. Furthermore, residents’ clinical care outcomes (e.g., pain and other symptoms management, spiritual and emotional distress, receiving intravenous or tube feedings, physical restraints) and staff’s perceptions are recommended to be included as measures for assessing the effectiveness of hospice care. In order to become a competent hospice-care model, Zhi-Shan Long-Term Care Facility shall further educate staff in documenting advance care plans for residents on admission and find a better screening tool to identify terminal patients in the future.

致謝………………………………………………………………………………………i
目錄………………………………………………………………………………...……ii
圖目錄…………………………………………………………………………………..iv
表目錄……………………………………………………………………………….. vi
中文摘要 vii
Abstract ix
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究重要性 12
第三節 研究目的 12
第二章 文獻探討 13
第一節 文獻回顧 13
第二節 知識缺口與研究重要性 27
第三章 研究方法 29
第四章 個案介紹 32
第一節 至善老人安養護中心簡介 32
第二節 至善老人安養護中心實施安寧療護之推展沿革 40
第三節 至善老人安養護中心實施安寧療護之初的SWOT分析 42
第五章 個案分析方法與結果 45
第一節 依SWOT分析結果以Donabedian’s model架構制訂至善執行安寧療護之要項 45
第二節 個案結果分析 49
第六章 討論 76
第一節 由Donabedian’s model分析結果來看至善安寧模式是否已突破最初SWOT分析之劣勢與威脅 76
第二節 至善經驗分享—可學習的部分 78
第三節 至善經驗分享—可改善的部分 80
第四節 研究限制 82
第七章 結論與建議 84
第一節 結論 84
第二節 建議 85
參考文獻 87
附錄一、安寧緩和照會需求評估表 93
附錄二、安寧居家療護健保收案條件 94

1.中華民國內政部統計處：最新統計指標. Available from: https://www.moi.gov.tw/chi/chi_site/stat/chart.aspx?ChartID=S0401.
2.行政院性別平等會：重要性別統計資料庫. Available from: https://www.gender.ey.gov.tw/gecdb/Stat_Statistics_Query.aspx?sn=MwEtyBleRxJh%2flZApHWboQ%3d%3d&statsn=iGJRpsNX45yniGDj%2bw1ueQ%3d%3d.
3.衛生福利部統計處：衛生福利統計專區. Available from: https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/lp-4226-113.html.
4.Reynolds, K., et al., Needs of the dying in nursing homes. J Palliat Med, 2002. 5(6): p. 895-901.
5.Hanson, L.C., et al., Symptom experience of dying long-term care residents. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2008. 56(1): p. 91-8.
6.李欣慈等, 長期照護機構之老年緩和照護需求. 長期照護雜誌, 2013. 17(3): p. 331-343.
7.Intrator, O., J. Zinn, and V. Mor, Nursing home characteristics and potentially preventable hospitalizations of long-stay residents. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2004. 52(10): p. 1730-6.
8.林昭卿等, 長期照護機構住民功能性評估之研究. 弘光學報, 2008(52): p. 67-79.
9.冼鴻曦、李英俊、馬震中、盧玉強, 護理之家住民轉住院率的整體分析. 台灣老年醫學暨老年學雜誌 2012；7(1)：27-40, 2012.
10.王英偉, 醫院評鑑－安寧療護的整合與發展. 醫療品質雜誌, 2013. 7(3): p. 59-69.
11.Ouslander, J.G., et al., Potentially avoidable hospitalizations of nursing home residents: frequency, causes, and costs: [see editorial comments by Drs. Jean F. Wyman and William R. Hazzard, pp 760-761]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2010. 58(4): p. 627-35.
12.Givens, J.L., et al., Hospital transfers of nursing home residents with advanced dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2012. 60(5): p. 905-9.
13.WHO Definition of Palliative Care. Available from: https://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/definition/en/.
14.全國法規資料庫：安寧緩和醫療條例. Available from: https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=L0020066.
15.王思雅, 長期照顧體系下的安寧居家療護. 社區發展季刊 2016. 153: p. 170-181.
16.陳榮基, 我國安寧緩和照護之相關政策的過去發展與未來展望. 護理雜誌, 2015. 62(2): p. 13-17.
17.呂欣怡, 林碧珠, 社區安寧照護之未來發展. 新臺北護理期刊, 2017. 19(2): p. 1-5.
18.台灣安寧照顧基金會. 病人自主權利法專區. Available from: https://www.hospice.org.tw/care/law.
19.全國法規資料庫. 病人自主權利法. Available from: https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=L0020189.
20.李閏華, 長期照護機構住民安寧療護的社會心理照護. 長期照護雜誌, 2014. 18(2): p. 193-202.
21.張嘉秀, 葉淑惠, 讓逝者適得其所－臺灣長期照護機構推行安寧療護之現況與展望. 長期照護雜誌, 2014. 18(2): p. 175-192.
22.侯春梅等, 醫院與長照機構推動社區安寧整合性服務. 北市醫學雜誌, 2015. 12: p. 130-148.
23.劉依薰, 黃淑鶴, 施行安寧緩和照顧協助機構長者在機構善終之實務經驗－以台中市某私立養護機構執行現況為例. 安寧療護雜誌, 2017. 22(3): p. 310-324.
24.龍紀萱, 李依臻, 護理之家實施安寧療護服務措施之研究. 台灣公共衛生雜誌, 2018. 37(6): p. 638-650.
25.洪一文等, 長照機構執行安寧緩和照護介入之成效初探. 安寧療護雜誌, 2016. 21(3): p. 245-257.
26.Tyler, D.A., et al., Effect of increased nursing home hospice use on nursing assistant staffing. Journal of palliative medicine, 2011. 14(11): p. 1236-1239.
27.Kelly, A., et al., Length of stay for older adults residing in nursing homes at the end of life. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2010. 58(9): p. 1701-6.
28.Hatano, Y., et al., The relationship between cancer patients'' place of death and bereaved caregivers'' mental health status. Psychooncology, 2017. 26(11): p. 1959-1964.
29.Booth, M., et al., Three approaches to delivering end-of-life education to care homes in a region of south east England. Int J Palliat Nurs, 2014. 20(1): p. 27-35.
30.Stevenson, D.G. and J.S. Bramson, Hospice care in the nursing home setting: a review of the literature. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2009. 38(3): p. 440-51.
31.Kovach, C., S. A. Wilson, and P. Noonan, The effects of hospice interventions on behaviors, discomfort, and physical complications of end stage dementia nursing home residents. Vol. 11. 1996. 7-15.
32.SUSAN C. MILLER, P.G.A.V.M. OUTCOMES AND UTILIZATION FOR HOSPICE AND NON-HOSPICE NURSING FACILITY DECEDENTS. 2000/03/01; Available from: https://aspe.hhs.gov/basic-report/outcomes-and-utilization-hospice-and-non-hospice-nursing-facility-decedents.
33.Obermeyer, Z., et al., Association between the Medicare hospice benefit and health care utilization and costs for patients with poor-prognosis cancer. JAMA, 2014. 312(18): p. 1888-1896.
34.Li, Q., N.T. Zheng, and H. Temkin-Greener, Quality of end-of-life care of long-term nursing home residents with and without dementia. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2013. 61(7): p. 1066-1073.
35.Levy, C., M. Morris, and A. Kramer, Improving end-of-life outcomes in nursing homes by targeting residents at high-risk of mortality for palliative care: program description and evaluation. J Palliat Med, 2008. 11(2): p. 217-25.
36.Volicer, L., et al., Impact of special care unit for patients with advanced Alzheimer''s disease on patients'' discomfort and costs. J Am Geriatr Soc, 1994. 42(6): p. 597-603.
37.胡文郁, 楊嘉玲, 生命末期之病情告知與預立照護計畫. 護理雜誌, 2009. 56(1): p. 23-28.
38.林佳瑩等, 預立醫療自主計畫對提升長期照護機構老人安寧療護、預立醫療指示知識及態度的成效初探. 長庚護理, 2014. 25(4): p. 389-403.
39.Mukamel, D.B., H. Ladd, and H. Temkin-Greener, Stability of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and do-not-resuscitate orders among long-term nursing home residents. Med Care, 2013. 51(8): p. 666-72.
40.Shanley, C., et al., Decisions about transferring nursing home residents to hospital: highlighting the roles of advance care planning and support from local hospital and community health services. J Clin Nurs, 2011. 20(19-20): p. 2897-906.
41.Frank, C., et al., Determining resuscitation preferences of elderly inpatients: a review of the literature. Cmaj, 2003. 169(8): p. 795-9.
42.張淑真, 董和銳, 中部某榮家住民對使用維生治療之態度及其相關因素探討. 臺灣老人保健學刊, 2010. 6(1): p. 77-94.
43.NHS. End of life care. Available from: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/end-of-life-care/what-it-involves-and-when-it-starts/.
44.朱育增, 吳肖琪, 國際安寧緩和療護發展及其對我國政策之啟示. 長期照護雜誌, 2009. 13(1): p. 95-107.
45.The gold standards framework. Available from: http://www.goldstandardsframework.org.uk/about-us.
46.The GSF Care Homes Training Programme. 2012; Available from: http://www.goldstandardsframework.org.uk/cd-content/uploads/files/GSFCH%20Training%20Programme%20Flyer%20v5%20Final%2026.11.pdf.
47.Kinley, J., K. Froggatt, and M.I. Bennett, The effect of policy on end-of-life care practice within nursing care homes: a systematic review. Palliat Med, 2013. 27(3): p. 209-20.
48.Hospice action network. 2017; Available from: http://hospiceactionnetwork.org/linked_documents/get_informed/policy_resources/Medicare_Hospice_Benefit_print.pdf.
49.Miller, S.C. and V. Mor, The opportunity for collaborative care provision: the presence of nursing home/hospice collaborations in the U.S. states. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2004. 28(6): p. 537-47.
50.衛生福利部中央健保署安寧療護專區. Available from: https://www.nhi.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=504E7671B98A9930&topn=0B69A546F5DF84DC.
51.宋宜盉等, 護理之家護理人員對安寧療護知識及態度的探討. 安寧療護雜誌, 2016. 21(1): p. 30-45.
52.陳銘渼等, 長期照護機構提供緩和照護之護理經驗－讓在地善終成為可行的事實. 護理雜誌, 2017. 64(2): p. 130-135.
53.張宏哲, 長期照顧服務品質確保機制的建立─品質資訊的蒐集和公開 社區發展季刊 2013. 141: p. 161-172.
54.A., D., The Definition of Quality and Approaches to Its Assessment. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press;, 1980.
55.曾慧姬等, 台灣長期照顧管理中心運作現況探討. 長期照護雜誌, 2010. 14(2): p. 161-176.
56.E. Lighter, D., How (and why) do quality improvement professionals measure performance? Vol. 1. 2015.
57.Capitman, J., et al., Long-Term Care Quality: Historical Overview and Current Initiatives. 2005.
58.Temkin-Greener, H., et al., Measuring end-of-life care processes in nursing homes. The Gerontologist, 2009. 49(6): p. 803-815.
59.Cimino, N.M. and M.L. McPherson, Evaluating the impact of palliative or hospice care provided in nursing homes. J Gerontol Nurs, 2014. 40(10): p. 10-4.
60.Evans, C.J., et al., The selection and use of outcome measures in palliative and end-of-life care research: the MORECare International Consensus Workshop. Journal of pain and symptom management, 2013. 46(6): p. 925-937.
61.Comart, J., et al., Palliative Care for Long-Term Care Residents: Effect on Clinical Outcomes. The Gerontologist, 2012. 53(5): p. 874-880.
62.Castle, N.G. and J.C. Ferguson, What is nursing home quality and how is it measured? The Gerontologist, 2010. 50(4): p. 426-442.
63.Donabedian, A., The quality of care. How can it be assessed? Jama, 1988. 260(12): p. 1743-8.
64.Helms, M. and J. Nixon, Exploring SWOT analysis – where are we now? : A review of academic research from the last decade. Vol. 3. 2010. 215-251.
65.台北市至善老人安養護中心網頁. Available from: http://zhishan01.myweb.hinet.net/.
66.蔡芳文, 多層級連續性的長期照顧服務體系經驗分享. 社區發展季刊 2013. 141: p. 223-229.
67.彭仁奎 and 洪壽宏, 社區末期醫療體系的建立：以雲林為例. 台灣醫學, 2011. 15(1): p. 48-55.
68.衛生福利部中央健康保險署. 安寧居家療護. Available from: https://www.nhi.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=56BA5E522F215808&topn=D39E2B72B0BDFA15.
69.Miller, S.C., J.M. Teno, and V. Mor, Hospice and palliative care in nursing homes. Clin Geriatr Med, 2004. 20(4): p. 717-34, vii.
70.老人福利法. 老人福利機構設立標準. 民國101年12月03日修正; Available from: https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=D0050039.
71.台北市政府社會局. 107 年度臺北市老人安養暨長期照顧機構評鑑指標. 2018; Available from: https://dosw.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=43A90D45AB7831E2&sms=DD6BF477E6083269&s=DB779D692022F996.
72.老人福利法. 老人福利服務專業人員資格及訓練辦法. 民國106年4月11日修正; Available from: https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=D0050151.
73.Miller, S.C. and B. Han, End-of-life care in U.S. nursing homes: nursing homes with special programs and trained staff for hospice or palliative/end-of-life care. J Palliat Med, 2008. 11(6): p. 866-77.
74.大悲學苑. Available from: https://dabei.eoffering.org.tw/.
75.財團法人基督教史懷哲宣道會. Available from: http://godhope.org/.
76.Lo, Y.T., et al., Prevalence and related factors of do-not-resuscitate directives among nursing home residents in Taiwan. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 2010. 11(6): p. 436-42.
77.Flacker, J.M. and D.K. Kiely, Mortality-related factors and 1-year survival in nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2003. 51(2): p. 213-21.
78.衛生福利部中央健康保險署. 安寧居家支付標準. Available from: https://www.nhi.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=BC4B6B42238D5D7A&topn=D39E2B72B0BDFA15&upn=AE1C197963C84A2C.