跳到主要內容

臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

(216.73.216.221) 您好!臺灣時間:2026/10/04 11:49
字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  
回查詢結果 :::

詳目顯示

: 
twitterline
研究生:張越翔
研究生(外文):Chang Yueh Hsiang
論文名稱:人格特質、復原力、霸凌經驗對霸凌因應之研究
論文名稱(外文):A Study on the Influence of Personality Traits, Resilience and Bullying Experience on Life Adaptation Ability
指導教授:戴伸峰戴伸峰引用關係
指導教授(外文):Tai Shen-feng
口試委員:高旭繁、陳姚真
口試委員(外文):Kao Shu-fang、Chen, Yau-Jane
口試日期:2013-11-08
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:國立中正大學
系所名稱:犯罪防治研究所
學門:社會及行為科學學門
學類:綜合社會及行為科學學類
論文種類:學術論文
論文出版年:2013
畢業學年度:102
語文別:中文
論文頁數:123
中文關鍵詞:復原力、霸凌、人格特質
外文關鍵詞:resilience、bully、personality traits
相關次數:
  • 被引用被引用:12
  • 點閱點閱:3602
  • 評分評分:
  • 下載下載:888
  • 收藏至我的研究室書目清單書目收藏:2
本研究為探討不同人格特質的大學生其復原力有何差異性,並探討與過去曾經歷過霸凌事件,對其現在生活適應上是否有所影響。研究工具為改編量表,共分為四個分量表,包括「個人基本資料」、「霸凌因應量表」、「復原力量表」與「人格特質量表」回收後有效問卷共923份。
研究工具透過探索式與驗證式因素分析,各分量表抽取之因素建構效度均獲得確認;接著進行多變量變異數分析,結果發現:整體樣本(n=923)男性比女性之復原力抗壓自信顯著較高;人格特質外向性、友善性、開放性、嚴謹性皆對復原力具顯著正向影響,而人格特質神經質則對復原力顯著負向影響。另外,有過霸凌經驗之學生(n=325)其復原力與霸凌因應的正向因子能力成長與自我瞭解有顯著正相關影響,而對霸凌因應的負向因子之消極態度與自我防衛有顯著負相關影響;人格特質對霸凌因應影響方面,人格特質愈開放其能力成長與自我瞭解之認知得分愈高,而消極態度、自我防衛之認知得分愈低;人格愈外向其能力成長與自我瞭解之認知得分愈高;人格愈神經質其消極態度、自我防衛之認知得分愈高。過去霸凌經驗中,關係霸凌對自我防衛有顯著影響。
最後進行架構圖之驗證,經適配度之檢驗,整體樣本的人格特質影響復原力達到顯著水準;有過霸凌經驗之樣本人格特質影響復原力達到顯著水準,且復原力影響霸凌因應亦達顯著水準,表示因果關係結構模型圖成立,故本研究人格特質會影響復原力獲得驗證,人格特質與復原力會影響霸凌因應亦獲得驗證。
本研究最後整理研究結果,與Moons 和Schaefer(1993)之壓力因應理論進行討論,並結合犯罪預防理念之三級預防觀念,針對霸凌事件之實務輔導以及處理提出相關建議。

This study aimed to explore the differences among university students with distinct personality traits in their resilience & impact, if any, of their prior experience as bullying victims on their life adaptation ability. The research tool was a modified scale that consisted of four sub-scales on “Personal profile,” “Bullying response", “Resilience”, & “Personality traits”. A total of 923 valid copies of the questionnaire were recovered.
By means of exploratory & confirmatory factor analyses, the construct validity of each factor collected for each sub-scale of the research tool was confirmed. The multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was subsequently performed; the results showed that, with the overall sample size (n=923), men obviously appeared to be more resilient than women in terms of their confidence in resisting against stress; personality traits such as extraversion, friendliness, openness, & rigidity, all had a positive influence on their resilience. The personality trait of anxiety, on the other hand, impacted negatively on resilience. In addition, students that fell victim to bullying in the past (n=325) showed a positive correlation between their resilience & positive factors in response to bullying events such as ability development & self awareness & a negative correlation between their resilience & negative factors in response to bullying events such as passive attitude & self defense. In terms of the influence of personality traits on the response to bullying events, higher openness rendered higher cognitive scores in ability development & self awareness & lower cognitive scores in negative attitude & self defense. More extraversion resulted in higher cognitive scores in ability development & self awareness & more anxiety also brought about higher cognitive scores in negative attitude & self defense. Among prior bullying experiences, relational bullying had a significant influence on self defense.
Finally, the framework was verified. The suitability test showed that, with the overall sample size, the influence of personality traits on resilience was significant; the influence of personality traits among the portion of the sample with prior bullying experiences on resilience was significant; & the influence of resilience on the response to bullying events was also significant. All supported the cause & effect structural model. In other words, the assumption that personality traits would have an influence on resilience was verified in this study & so was the influence of personality traits & resilience on the response to bullying events.
Research findings were summarized in the end of the study & compared with Moons & Schaefer’s (1993) Transactional Theory of Stress (TTS)to come up with suggestions concerning practical counseling & management of bullying events combining the tertiary preventive ideas in the prevention against crimes.

摘要 I
Abstract III
目錄 V
表次 VII
圖次 IX
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 名詞釋義 3
第二章 文獻探討 6
第一節人格特質與復原力及生活適應 6
第二節霸凌經驗對於復原力與生活適應影響之文獻探討 12
第三章 研究方法 17
第一節研究架構 17
第二節 研究問題與研究假設 18
第三節研究樣本與抽樣 20
第四節研究工具 21
第四章研究結果 43
第一節樣本背景與過去霸凌經驗描述性統計分析 43
第二節性別與人格對個人復原力影響之差異比較 45
第三節人格與復原力對霸凌因應影響之差異比較 56
第四節霸凌經驗對霸凌因應影響之差異比較 73
第五節研究架構圖路徑分析 76
第五章結論與建議 83
第一節研究結果整理與說明 83
第二節綜合討論 91
第三節研究建議 96
【中文】
丁牧群、曹競元(2011年6月1日)。陳銳強盜案證據不足獲輕判1年7月【蘋果動新聞】。
毛湘茹(2012)。霸凌與充權:大學女性敘說少女時期遭遇言語或關係霸凌、霸凌他人及其充權之歷程(未出版之博士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
王俊忠(2013年10月13日)。扒光虐打少女找到供片少年【自由時報】。
王慧豐(2009)。國小高年級不同背景學童抗逆能力、因應策略與其學習適應表現關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義縣。
王濬楷(2013)。國中生人格特質、網路成癮和復原力之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立雲林科技大學,雲林縣。
朱俊彥(2009年12月9日)。國一女遭脫褲霸凌【蘋果動新聞】。
吳明隆、涂金堂(2010)。SPSS與統計應用分析。台北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
吳紋如(2006)。國小高年級學童人格特質、親子關係與受霸凌知覺及反應之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。
吳英璋、許文耀(2004)。災難心理反應及其影響因子之文獻探討。臨床心理學刊,2(1),85-96。
吳慧菁、唐宜楨(2008)。人為性創傷壓力的因應歷程探討。臺灣醫學人文學刊,9(2),65-87。
宋麗玉、曾華源、施教裕、鄭麗珍(2006)。社會工作理論—處遇模式與案例分析。台北市:洪葉文化事業有限公司。
兒童福利聯盟文教基金會(2011)。2011年校園霸凌調查報告。兒童福利聯盟文教基金會。
洪光遠(譯)(2005)普通心理學(上)(原作者:Edward E., Susan Nolen-Hoeksema, Daryl J. Ben, Barbara L. Fredrickson, Geoffrey Loftus,& Stephen Maren)台北市:桂冠圖書股份有限公司。(原著出版年:2003)
胡欣男、羅浚濱(2013年8月16日)。黑幫滲透國中大樹林搞霸凌【中時電子報】。
高淑芳、陸洛(2001)。父母管教態度與國中生升學考試壓力感受之關係。應用心理研究,10,221-250。
修慧蘭譯(2005)。諮商與心理治療理論與實務(原作者:Gerald Corey)。台北市:雙葉書廊有限公司。(原著出版年:2001)。
張信務(2007)。營造友善校園-從去霸凌開始。北縣教育,61,31-35。
陳慈幸(2005)。組織犯罪與被害者學。嘉義市:濤石文化。
陳淑娥(2005)。少年重複被害因素之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
黃振賢。(2006)。國小學生班級同儕關係與霸凌行為相關之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學,屏東市。
黃貴貞。(2010)。大學生回溯被霸凌經驗之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。
黃富源、張平吾。(2008)。被害者學新論。台北市:銘傳大學。
楊士隆。(2012)。校園犯罪與安全維護。台北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
楊士隆、曾淑萍。(2007)。校園暴力犯罪與防治對策。教育研究月刊,154,60-76。
楊士隆、蔡德輝。(2004)。犯罪學。台北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
楊曙銘、劉俊良(2011年10月)。學生重大偏差行為與父母管教之相關性。「教育部防制校園霸凌個案及處理專業知能研討會」,國立中正大學。
蔡松瑜(2003)。國中生父母教養知覺、家庭生活適應與偏差行為之關係研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
劉淑惠 (2006)。國中學生復原力與生活適應關係之研究-以桃園縣為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
賴保禎(1972)父母管教態度測驗指導手冊。台北:中國行為科學社。
蕭頌恩 (2010)。國中生之衝動性格對父趺管教方式認知及其偏差行為發生之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
羅文苑(2004)。一位綜合高中學生反敗為勝的求學歷程之研究 : 探討期間的復原力。(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
羅婉麗(2001)。國中小學生生活適應之訪談、評量與調查研究。(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,台南市。
蘇建文等譯(2003)。發展心理學(原作者:David R. Shaffer)。台北市:學富文化事業有限公司。(原著出版年:1999)

【英文】
Bollmer, J. M., Harris, M. J., & Milich, R. (2006). Reactions to bullying & peer victimization: Narratives, physiological arousal, & personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 803-828. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.09.003
Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, & human resilience. American Psychologist, 59, 20–28.
Bowers, L., Smith, P. K., & Binney, V.. (1994). Perceived family relationships of bullies, victims & bully/victims in middle childhood. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships,11, 215–232.
Braithwaite, J. (2003). Restorative Justice: Theorise & Worries. Resource Material Series, 63, 47-56.
Campbell-Sills, L., Cohan, S. L., & Stein, M. B. (2006). Relationship of resilience to personality, coping, & psychiatric symptoms in young adults. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 44(4), 585-599. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2005.05.001
Champion, K., Vernberg, E., & Shipman, K. (2003). Nonbullying victims of bullies: Aggression, social skills, & friendship characteristics. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24(5), 535-551. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2003.08.003
Cohn, L.,& Felson, M. (1979). Social Change & Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608.
Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A. & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of socialstatus: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18(4), 557-570.
Connor, K.M., Davidson, J.R.T., 2003. Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD- RISC). Depression & Anxiety 18, 76–82.
Connolly, I., & O'Moore, M. (2003). Personality & family relations of children who bully. Personality & Individual Differences, 35(3), 559-567. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00218-0
Duncan, R. (2004). The impact of family relationship at school bullies & victims. In: L. Espelage & M. Swearer (Ed), Bullying in American schools: A social ecological perspective on prevention & intervention.(pp. 227-244). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Erdle, S., & Aghababaei, N. (2012). Evidence for the general factor of personality (GFP) in the Big Five from 600 Iranians. Personality & Individual Differences, 53(3), 359-361. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.03.024
Estévez López, E., Pérez, S. M., Ochoa, G. M., & Ruiz, D. M. (2008). Adolescent aggression: Effects of gender & family & school environments. Journal of Adolescence, 31(4), 433-450. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.09.007
Fagan, A. A., Mazerolle P..(2011). Repeat Offending & Repeat Victimization: Assessing Similarities & Differences in Psychosocial Risk Factors. Journal of Crime & Delinquency,57(5), 732-755.
Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (2003). The structure of personality attributes. In M. Barrick & A. M. Ryan (Eds.), Personality & work (pp. 1-29). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass-Pfeiffer.
Saucier,G., & Goldberg,L.R. (2002). Assessing the Big five: Applications of 10 psychometric criteria to the development of marker scales. In B. de Raad & M. Perugini (Eds.), Big Five assessment (pp. 30-54). Ashl&, OH, US: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
Gifford-Smith, M. E., & Brownell, C. A. (2003). Childhood peer relationships: social acceptance, friendships, & peer networks. Journal of School Psychology, 41(4), 235-284. doi: 10.1016/s0022-4405(03)00048-7
Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., & Hauser, M. (2011). Bullies have enhanced moral competence to judge relative to victims, but lack moral compassion. Personality & Individual Differences, 50(5), 603-608. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.002
Gottfredson, Michael R. (2006). The empirical status of control theory in criminology. In F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wright, & K. R. Blevins (eds), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory (pp.77-100). New Brunswick: NJ: Transaction.
Hansen, T. B., Steenberg, L. M., Palic, S., & Elklit, A. (2012). A review of psychological factors related to bullying victimization in schools. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 17(4), 383-387. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.03.008
Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. (1993). Commentary: Testing the general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 30, 47-54.
Janosz, M., Archambault, I., Pagani, L. S., Pascal, S., Morin, A. J. S., & Bowen, F. (2008). Are There Detrimental Effects of Witnessing School Violence in Early Adolescence? Journal of Adolescent Health, 43(6), 600-608. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.04.011
Johnson, J., Wood, A. M., Gooding, P., Taylor, P. J., & Tarrier, N. (2011). Resilience to suicidality: The buffering hypothesis. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(4), 563-591. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.12.007
Kamlesh Singh & Xiao-nan Yu. (2010). Psychometric Evaluation of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) in a Sample of Indian Students, 1(1), 23-30.
Klimstra, T. A., Crocetti, E., Hale Iii, W. W., Fermani, A., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2011). Big Five personality dimensions in Italian & Dutch adolescents: A cross-cultural comparison of mean-levels, sex differences, & associations with internalizing symptoms. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(3), 285-296. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.03.002
Legault, L., Anawati, M., & Flynn, R. (2006). Factors favoring psychological resilience among fostered young people. Children & Youth Services Review, 28(9), 1024-1038. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2005.10.006
Liu, Y., Wang, Z.-H., & Li, Z.-G. (2012). Affective mediators of the influence of neuroticism & resilience on life satisfaction. Personality & Individual Differences, 52(7), 833-838. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.017
Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In P. H. Mussen, & M. E. Heatherington (ed.), H&book of Child Psychology, 4, 1-101, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Mccrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1999). A five-facctor threry of personality. H&book of Personality: Theory & Research. New York: Guilford.
Moos, R. H. & Schaefer, J. A. (1993). Coping resources & process:Current concepts & measure. In Leo Goldberger, & Shlomo Brezitz (Eds.), H&book of stress:Theoretical & clinical aspects (2nd Eds.).
Musek, J. (2007). A general factor of personality: Evidence for the Big One in the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(6), 1213-1233. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.02.003
Ngan-pun Ngai, Chau-kiu Cheung, &Steven Sek-yum Ngai, (2007). Cognitive & Social Influences on Gang Involvement among Delinquents in Three Chinese Cities.Journal of Adolescence, 42(166), 381-403
Noftle, E. E., & Shaver, P. R. (2006). Attachment dimensions & the Big five personality traits: Associations & comparative ability to predict relationship quality. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(2), 179-208. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2004.11.003
Patton, D. U., Woolley, M. E., & Hong, J. S. (2012). Exposure to violence, student fear, & low academic achievement: African American males in the critical transition to high school. Children & Youth Services Review, 34(2), 388-395. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.11.009
Peng, Li Zhang, Jiajia Li, Min Li, Peipei Zhang, Yu Zuo, Xin Miao, Yi Xu, Ying (2012). Negative life events & mental health of Chinese medical students: The effect of resilience, personality & social support. Psychiatry Research, 196(1), 138-141. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2011.12.006
Richard G.Tedeschi & Lawrence G. Calhoun (1996).The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: Measuring the Positive Legacy of Trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9(3),455-471.
Robin L. ToblinaDavid Schwartza, &rea Hopmeyer Gormanb,Tania Abou-ezzeddineaT,. (2005). Social–cognitive & behavioral attributes of aggressive. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 26(3), 329-346.
Rueger, S. Y., Malecki, C. K., & Demaray, M. K. (2011). Stability of peer victimization in early adolescence: Effects of timing & duration. Journal of School Psychology, 49(4), 443-464. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.04.005
Slee, P. T., & Rigby, K. (1993). The relationship of Eysenck's personality factors & self-esteem to bully-victim behaviour in Australian schoolboys. Personality & Individual Differences, 14(2), 371-373. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(93)90136-Q
Smith, P. K. (2004). Bullying: Recent developments. Child & Adolescent Mental Health,9, 98–103.
Spriggs, A. L., Iannotti, R. J., Nansel, T. R., & Haynie, D. L. (2007). Adolescent Bullying Involvement & Perceived Family, Peer & School Relations: Commonalities & Differences Across Race/Ethnicity. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(3), 283-293. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.04.009
Vaishnavi, S., Connor, K., & Davidson, J. R. T. (2007). An abbreviated version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), the CD-RISC2: Psychometric properties & applications in psychopharmacological trials. Psychiatry Research, 152(2–3), 293-297. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2007.01.006
Waugh, C. E., Fredrickson, B. L., & Taylor, S. F. (2008). Adapting to life's slings & arrows: Individual differences in resilience when recovering from an anticipated threat. J Res Pers, 42(4), 1031-1046. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2008.02.005
Zolkoski, S. M., & Bullock, L. M. (2012). Resilience in children & youth: A review. Children & Youth Services Review, 34(12), 2295-2303. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.08.009


QRCODE
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top