臺灣博碩士論文加值系統

研究目的
醫療科技的進步，造就了微創手術的興起，目前更是以達文西機械手臂手術為趨勢，相較以往，諸多與達文西機械手臂手術的相關研究，都傾向於探討術後成效、生活品質，或者比較其他手術的優劣，較少去探討病患為何會願意使用達文西機械手臂手術。本研究主要探討病患使用達文西機械手臂手術的行為意願，以科技接受模式（TAM）為主要架構，並加入信任構面深入探討。

研究方法
本研究為回溯性研究，採用結構式問卷進行調查，以台灣南部醫學中心已使用達文西機器手臂術之單一病症病患為研究樣本，排除個案條件為非單一病症之患者。使用SPSS 22.0與Smart PLS2.0軟體進行統計分析，以描述性統計分析各項背景基本資料；以偏最小平方法（Partial Least Squares,PLS）進行研究模型之契合度分析，並驗證各個假設是否成立。由於本研究樣本數不多，因此使用PLS進行分析，可不受樣本數的限制與變項分配型態影響，具有良好預測與解釋能力。

研究結果
本研究共計收案136位，平均年齡標準差為67.40±11.043；男性114位(83.8%)、女性22位(16.2%)；教育程度以國中程度居多；職業為工商服務業比例較高；月收入多數以3至6萬為主。
研究驗證：信任分別會正向影響知覺有用性(β=0.550，T=4.527，即P<0.001)與知覺易用性(β=0.300，T=4.579，即P<0.001)；知覺易用性會正向影響知覺有用性(β=0.188，T=2.242，即P<0.05)；知覺有用性會正向影響使用態度(β=0.589，T=4.835，即P<0.001)；使用態度會正向影響使用意願(β=0.446，T=2.416，即P<0.05)；知覺易用性與使用態度未達統計上顯著差異；知覺有用性與使用意願未達統計上顯著差異。

結論與建議
在研究結果中，我們發現，病患多處於中高年齡層，且病患本身若覺得達文西機械手臂手術對他的病症幫助極大，其選擇意向的強度就會很高，相形之下，容易取得或已清楚知道達文西機械手臂手術的相關訊息，其並不會直接影響選擇意向。
從年齡的層面上也能推斷，多數採用達文西機器手臂手術是基於安全與風險考量，再者是達文西機器手臂手術對於患者本身的助益，但此手術也是眾多微創手術中需自費較高金額的手術，因此對於某些族群是為一種限制，建議政府能開放健保給付項目，讓更多有需要的患者能予以使用。

Purposes
The emergent of medical science and technology has risen the minimally invasive surgery. Da Vinci Surgery is the trend at present. Compared with the past surgical methods, many studies related to Da Vinci Surgery tend to explore postoperative outcomes and quality of life or compare the advantages and disadvantages than the other surgery. The fewer studies to understand the patients'' willings who use Da Vinci Surgery. This study mainly explores the patients'' willingness to use Da Vinci Surgery, adopts the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) as the theoretical foundation, and appended the trust concept to discuss.

Methods
This study was a retrospective study, which used a structured questionnaire to survey. The sample included the patients with single-disease who had used Da Vinci Surgery in a Medical Center of Southern Taiwan but excluded the patients with multiple disorder. This study conducted SPSS 22.0 and Smart PLS 2.0 software for statistical analysis, which included descriptive statistical analysis and applied Partial Least Squares (PLS) analysis for small sample size to test the fit of the research model and to test the established hypotheses.

Results
A total of 136 cases were collected in this study, The results have shown the average age is 67.40±11.043 that include 114 males (83.8%) and 22 females (16.2%). The educational level was mostly at the middle school level. Moreover, occupation was higher in the business service. Most of the income is mainly from 30,000 to 60,000.
Study Validation was tested. Trust positively affects Perceived Usefulness (β=0.550，T=4.527，P<0.001) and Perceived Ease of Use (β=0.300，T=4.579，P<0.001). Perceived Ease of Use positively affects Perceived Usefulness (β=0.188，T=2.242，P<0.05).Perceived Usefulness positively affects Attitude Toward Using(β=0.589，T=4.835，P<0.001). Attitude Toward Using positively affects Behavioral Intention (β=0.446，T=2.416，P<0.05). The relationship between perceived Ease of Use and Attitude toward Using was insignificant. Additionally, the relationship between Perceived Usefulness and Behavioral Intention was insignificant.

Discussions
In the research results, we found that patients are mostly in the middle and high age groups, and if the patient himself feels that Da Vinci Surgery is extremely helpful to his illness, the intensity of his choice of intention will be high. In comparison, the information related to Da Vinci Surgery has been clearly known, it does not directly affect the selection intention. According to age, most of the choices of Da Vinci Surgery is based on safety and risk considerations, and that Da Vinci Surgery is beneficial to the patient himself, but this surgery is also more costly in many minimally invasive surgeries. We recommended that the government can consider reimbursing this procedure (e.g. Da Vinci Surgery) the health insurance programs for more patients'' needs.

目錄 V
表目錄 VI
圖目錄 VII
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 4
第三節 研究步驟與流程 5
第四節 名詞解釋 7
第二章 文獻探討 8
第一節 達文西機械手臂手術系統(Da Vinci Surgical System) 8
第二節 科技接受模式（Technology Acceptance Model） 14
第三節 外部變數信任 23
第三章 研究方法 25
第一節 研究架構及研究假說 25
第二節 研究設計與樣本 27
第三節 研究工具 28
第四節 統計分析方法 35
第四章 研究結果 38
第一節 描述性統計分析 38
第二節 各項構面之平均數標準差 40
第三節 信度與效度分析 43
第四節 研究驗證 46
第五章 討論與建議 50
第一節 討論 50
第二節 研究限制 52
第三節 結論與建議 53
第四節 研究貢獻 54
第五節 未來研究方向與建議 55
參考文獻 56
中文文獻 56
英文文獻 58
附錄一 人體試驗研究同意證明書 62
附錄二 人體試驗受試者同意書 63
附錄三 研究問卷 69

陳秀敏、李尹暘、林麗娟 (2013)。糖尿病患血糖控制的假期效應－醫病關係之影響。[Glycemic Control during the Holiday Time in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: The Impact of the Patient-Physician Relationship]。醫務管理期刊，14(1)，1-17。doi:10.6174/jhm2013.14(1).1。
許維中 (2013) 。肝癌病人求醫行為與醫病關係之初探。 [A Preliminary Study of Medical-care Seeking Behavior and the Patient-physician Relationship in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma] 。澄清醫護管理雜誌，9(2)，11-17。
蔡宗宏、洪陵鎧 (2008)。病人知覺醫師行爲與組織因素對其醫病關係滿意之影響。[The Influence of Patient Perceived Physician Behaviors and Organizational Factors on Patient Satisfaction and Physician-Patient Relationships。醫務管理期刊，9(3)，222-242。
吳俞朋 (2013)。以科技接受模式探討影響國中教師運用互動式電子白板融入教學接受度之因素。臺灣師範大學，Available from Airiti AiritiLibrary database。
李怡叡 (2015) 。一手掌握天下事：以媒體豐富度、科技接受模式探討新聞App。 中山大學，Available from Airiti AiritiLibrary database。
科技新報 (2016)。手術室裡的機器人達文西報到，引爆醫療新革命。取自 https://technews.tw/2016/10/16/da-vinci-surgical-system/
振興醫院 (2018) 。達文西手術系統。取自http://www.chgh.org.tw/surgical/davinsi.html
張紀萍 (2015) 。科技接受模式與應用－以慢性病長者遠距照護使用為例。 [The Technology Acceptance Model and Its Application in a Telehealth Program for the Elderly with Chronic Illnesses]。護理雜誌，62(3)，11-16。doi:10.6224/jn.62.3.11。
梁金銅 (2017) 。機械手臂輔助手術在台灣施行的現況。[Current Status of Robotic Surgery in Taiwan] 。台灣醫學，21(2)，168-172。doi:10.6320/fjm.2017.21(2).5。
郭裕元 (2013) 。以科技接受模式探討影響消費者使用智慧電動車意圖之要素。 成功大學， Available from Airiti AiritiLibrary database。
陳佩宜 (2016) 。應用整合科技接受模式探討數位閱讀之研究－以桃園地區民眾為例。[Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Digital Reading in Taoyuan County]。蘭陽學報(15) ，12-22。doi:10.6665/jlyit.2016.15.12。
楊心怡 (2017)。達文西手術擬部分健保給付哪種手術適用？取自http://www.commonhealth.com.tw/article/article.action?nid=74134&page=
維基百科 (2018) 。微創手術。取自https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%BE%AE%E5%89%B5%E6%89%8B%E8%A1%93
馬政仁、王照元 (2017)。機械手臂手術之適應症。[The Indications of Robotic Surgery]。台灣醫學，21(2) ，178-183。doi:10.6320/fjm.2017.21(2).7。
黃郁茜、郝宗瑜 (2014)。數位教學網路平台品質、科技接受模式與認知有趣性對大學生使用意願之研究－以世新大學為研究對象。[A Study of Relationship among University Students'' Intention to Use and Network Platform Quality of E-learning, Technology Acceptance Model and Perceived Playfulness-As Example of Shih Hsin University]。中華印刷科技年報(2014)，285-306。
高潔純、吳定興 (2015)。護理人員對行動護理站的接受度與資訊素養之相關性研究. [A Study of the Relationship between Nursing Staff''s Acceptance of a Mobile Nursing Station and Information Literacy] 。醫務管理期刊，16(1) ，59-77。doi:10.6174/jhm2015.16(1).59。
鄭慧萍、李亭亭、劉介宇、侯宜菁 (2016)。護理人員對條碼科技之創新接受度探討. [Nurses'' Innovation Acceptance of Barcode Technology]。護理雜誌，63(2) ，69-79。doi:10.6224/jn.63.2.69。
葉姜辰、林清壽 (2016)。運用計畫行為理論與科技接受模式探討獨居老人使用緊急救援系統之行為意向研究。福祉科技與服務管理學刊，4(2)，297-298。doi:10.6283/jocsg.2016.4.2.297。
蔡慈儀、蔡憶文、郭耿南 (2010) 。醫療照顧體系中的健康溝通. [Health Communication in Healthcare Delivery System]。台灣醫學，14(6)，607-615。doi:10.6320/fjm.2010.14(6).02。
周君倚、陸洛(2014) 。以科技接受模式探討數位學習系統使用態度－以成長需求為調節變項。[Exploring the Attitude Differentiation on E-Learning Systems Based on TAM: The Strength of Growth Need as a Moderator]。資訊管理學報，21(1)，83-105。
吳智鴻、蔡依錞 (2014)。以科技接受模式來探討社群網站Facebook的使用意圖。[Using Technology Acceptance Model for Investigating the Social Network Website (Facebook) Usage Intenton]。國立臺灣科技大學人文社會學報，10(1)，29-44。
何是勳、林明宏、黃美華 (2017)。以能力集合與科技接受模式探討健身APP開發之研究。 [A Study of Fitness Applications by Competence Set and Technology Acceptance Model]。習慣領域期刊，8(1)，89-119. doi:10.3966/199891212017030801005。
 
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action Control (pp. 11-39): Springer.
Alemzadeh, H., Raman, J., Leveson, N., Kalbarczyk, Z., & Iyer, R. K. (2016). Adverse events in robotic surgery: a retrospective study of 14 years of FDA data. PLoS One, 11(4), e0151470.
Allan, C., & Ilic, D. (2016). Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer: a systematic review. Urologia internationalis, 96(4), 373-378.
Ba, S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2002). Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Quarterly, 243-268.
Bagante, F., Spolverato, G., Strasberg, S. M., Gani, F., Thompson, V., Hall, B. L., . . . Pawlik, T. M. (2016). Minimally invasive vs. open hepatectomy: a comparative analysis of the national surgical quality improvement program database. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 20(9), 1608-1617.
Ball, M. W., Hemal, A. K., & Allaf, M. E. (2017). International Consultation on Urological Diseases and European Association of Urology International Consultation on Minimally Invasive Surgery in Urology: laparoscopic and robotic adrenalectomy. BJU international, 119(1), 13-21.
Bencini, L., Annecchiarico, M., Di Marino, M., Moraldi, L., Perna, F., & Coratti, A. (2015). Gastrointestinal robotic surgery: challenges and developments. Robot Surg Res Rev, 2, 11-27.
Berrios‐rivera, J. P., Street, R. L., Garcia Popa‐lisseanu, M. G., Kallen, M. A., Richardson, M. N., Janssen, N. M., . . . Suarez‐almazor, M. E. (2006). Trust in physicians and elements of the medical interaction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Care & Research, 55(3), 385-393.
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, 295(2), 295-336.
Chin, W. W., & Dibbern, J. (2006). A permutation based procedure for multi-group PLS analysis: results of tests of differences on simulated data and cross-cultural analysis of the sourcing of information system services between Germany and the USA. Paper presented at the Modelización con estructuras de covarianzas en ciencias sociales: temas esenciales, avanzados y aportaciones especiales.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319-340.
Deutsch, M. (1962). Cooperation and trust: Some theoretical notes.
Diana, M., & Marescaux, J. (2015). Robotic surgery. British Journal of Surgery, 102(2).
Dobson, M., Geisler, D., Fazio, V., Remzi, F., Hull, T., & Vogel, J. (2011). Minimally invasive surgical wound infections: laparoscopic surgery decreases morbidity of surgical site infections and decreases the cost of wound care. Colorectal Disease, 13(7), 811-815.
Dunn, J. (2000). Trust and political agency. Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, electronic edition, Department of Sociology, University of Oxford, 73-93.
Efron, B. (1992). Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. In Breakthroughs in statistics (pp. 569-593): Springer.
Fan, G., Zhou, Z., Zhang, H., Gu, X., Gu, G., Guan, X., . . . He, S. (2016). Global scientific production of robotic surgery in medicine: A 20-year survey of research activities. International Journal of Surgery, 30, 126-131.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
Gagnon, M. P., Orruño, E., Asua, J., Abdeljelil, A. B., & Emparanza, J. (2012). Using a modified technology acceptance model to evaluate healthcare professionals'' adoption of a new telemonitoring system. Telemedicine and e-Health, 18(1), 54-59.
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51-90.
Ha, S., & Stoel, L. (2009). Consumer e-shopping acceptance: Antecedents in a technology acceptance model. Journal of Business Research, 62(5), 565-571.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 40(3), 414-433.
Kim, H.-I., Han, S.-U., Yang, H.-K., Kim, Y.-W., Lee, H.-J., Ryu, K. W., . . . Park, S. (2016). Multicenter prospective comparative study of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. Annals of Surgery, 263(1), 103-109.
Kim, Y. S., Kim, M. J., Park, S. C., Sohn, D. K., Kim, D. Y., Chang, H. J., . . . Oh, J. H. (2016). Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy: case-matched study of short-term outcomes. Cancer research and treatment: official journal of Korean Cancer Association, 48(1), 225.
Koufaris, M., & Hampton-Sosa, W. (2004). The development of initial trust in an online company by new customers. Information & management, 41(3), 377-397.
Lewicki, R. J., McAllister, D. J., & Bies, R. J. (1998). Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 438-458.
McCarter, M. W., & Northcraft, G. B. (2007). Happy together?: Insights and implications of viewing managed supply chains as a social dilemma. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 498-511.
Mechanic, D., & Meyer, S. (2000). Concepts of trust among patients with serious illness. Social science & medicine, 51(5), 657-668.
Numally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. NY: McGraw-Hill.
Panteleimonitis, S., Ahmed, J., Ramachandra, M., Farooq, M., Harper, M., & Parvaiz, A. (2017). Urogenital function in robotic vs laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a comparative study. International journal of colorectal disease, 32(2), 241-248.
Park, E. J., Cho, M. S., Baek, S. J., Hur, H., Min, B. S., Baik, S. H., . . . Kim, N. K. (2015). Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery. Annals of Surgery, 261(1), 129-137.
Parra-Davila, E., & Ramamoorthy, S. (2013). Lap colectomy and robotics for colon cancer. Surgical oncology clinics of North America, 22(1), 143-151, vii.
Pearson, S. D., & Raeke, L. H. (2000). Patients'' trust in physicians: many theories, few measures, and little data. Journal of general internal medicine, 15(7), 509-513.
Randell, R., Alvarado, N., Honey, S., Greenhalgh, J., Gardner, P., Gill, A., . . . Dowding, D. (2015). Impact of robotic surgery on decision making: perspectives of surgical teams. Paper presented at the AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings.
Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M., & Straub, D. (2012). A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS quarterly. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q, 36.
Suh, I. H., LaGrange, C. A., Oleynikov, D., & Siu, K.-C. (2016). Evaluating robotic surgical skills performance under distractive environment using objective and subjective measures. Surgical Innovation, 23(1), 78-89.
Tam, M. S., Kaoutzanis, C., Mullard, A. J., Regenbogen, S. E., Franz, M. G., Hendren, S., . . . Cleary, R. K. (2016). A population-based study comparing laparoscopic and robotic outcomes in colorectal surgery. Surgical endoscopy, 30(2), 455-463.
Trachtenberg, F., Dugan, E., & Hall, M. A. (2005). How patients'' trust relates to their involvement in medical care. The Journal of Family Practice, 54(4), 344-352.
Tria, A. J., & Scuderi, G. R. (2015). Minimally invasive knee arthroplasty: An overview. World journal of orthopedics, 6(10), 804.
van Dijk, J. D., van den Ende, R. P., Stramigioli, S., Köchling, M., & Höss, N. (2015). Clinical pedicle screw accuracy and deviation from planning in robot-guided spine surgery: robot-guided pedicle screw accuracy. Spine, 40(17), E986-E991.
Wang, W.-H., Kuo, K.-K., Wang, S.-N., & Lee, K.-T. (2018). Oncological and surgical result of hepatoma after robot surgery. Surgical endoscopy, 1-7.
Wixom, B. H., & Watson, H. J. (2001). An empirical investigation of the factors affecting data warehousing success. MIS Quarterly, 17-41.
Wu, L., & Chen, J.-L. (2005). An extension of trust and TAM model with TPB in the initial adoption of on-line tax: an empirical study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62(6), 784-808.
Zhang, J., Pantula, S. G., & Boos, D. D. (1991). Robust methods for testing the pattern of a single covariance matrix. Biometrika, 78(4), 787-795.
Zhou, J.-Y., Xin, C., Mou, Y.-P., Xu, X.-W., Zhang, M.-Z., Zhou, Y.-C., . . . Chen, R.-G. (2016). Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis of short-term outcomes. PLoS One, 11(3), e0151189.